Hostname: page-component-74d7c59bfc-6sd86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-31T21:30:32.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

N3 nodal disease as a dominant prognostic determinant in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2026

Jiayi Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Stomatology, Suzhou Wujiang District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, PR China
*
Corresponding author: Jiayi Chen; Email: cjy13912736738@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information

Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Dear Editors,

I read with great interest the article by Smee et al. entitled “The significance of nodal disease in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma.”Reference Smee, Williams and Vangelov1The authors are to be commended for presenting a large, long-term, single-institution cohort that rigorously examines the prognostic implications of nodal burden, particularly N3 disease, in mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

This study provides compelling evidence that N3 nodal disease represents a dominant adverse prognostic factor, independent of primary tumour T-stage. Notably, despite nearly half of the N3 cohort presenting with T1–T2 disease, these patients experienced significantly worse local control, regional control, cancer-specific survival and overall survival compared with those with N0 or N1–N2 disease. The finding that time to both local and regional failure was markedly shortened in N3 patients underscores the aggressive biological behaviour associated with bulky nodal metastasis and suggests that nodal burden may reflect tumour biology rather than merely disease extent.

An important contribution of this work is the demonstration that poor regional control in N3 disease appears closely linked to compromised local control, highlighting the interdependence of primary and nodal disease management. This observation has practical clinical relevance, as it challenges the traditional view that nodal failure is predominantly a regional issue and reinforces the need for optimised locoregional strategies in this high-risk population.

Furthermore, the authors’ findings align with emerging evidence that routine neck dissection following chemoradiotherapy may not confer additional survival benefit in N3 disease, emphasising instead the importance of effective non-surgical multimodality treatment. In the contemporary era, further stratification by biological factors such as human papillomavirus (HPV) status, treatment intensification and systemic therapy optimisation may help refine outcomes for these patients.

Overall, this study makes a valuable contribution to the literature by clearly demonstrating the prognostic dominance of N3 nodal disease in HNSCC and provides a strong rationale for continued research into tailored therapeutic approaches for this challenging subgroup.

  • What is already known

  • Cervical nodal status is a key prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

  • Advanced nodal disease is associated with poorer locoregional control and survival

  • What this paper adds

  • N3 nodal disease is an independent, dominant adverse prognostic factor, regardless of T-stage

  • Even early T-stage (T1–T2) tumours with N3 disease have markedly worse outcomes

  • N3 disease is associated with earlier local and regional failure, suggesting aggressive tumour biology

Footnotes

Jiayi Chen takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Smee, R, Williams, J, Vangelov, B. The significance of nodal disease in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol 2025;31:16Google Scholar