Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:36:10.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Which device - when and why? The controversial role of bone conduction hearing devices in the rehabilitation of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss

Presenting Author: David Morris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2016

David Morris
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University
Myrthe Hol
Affiliation:
ENT Surgeon - Otology, Hearing & Implants. Radboud University Medical CentreMyrthe.Hol@radboudumc.nl
Jaydip Ray
Affiliation:
ENT Consultant. Sheffield Teaching Hospitals & Sheffield Children's Hospital, England, UK.
Joe Toner
Affiliation:
ENT Consultant. Queens University, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Bill Hodgetts
Affiliation:
Program Director, Bone Conduction Amplification Institute for Reconstructive Sciences in Medicine (iRSM) Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Learning Objectives: Participants will feel able to describe the issues faced by those with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss / single sided deafness (SSD). Participants will appreciate the limitations to rehabilitation of SSD with bone conduction hearing devices. Participants will become familiar with a range of bone conduction hearing devices, described by surgeons who are experienced in their placement. Participants will understand the role of case selection and will appreciate the place for preoperative testing. Participants will appreciate that the personal choice of device selected to address SSD relies on many intertwining factors relating to the surgeon, audiologist and recipient and must also include financial and logistical considerations. Participants will realize the complexities and challenges faced when we attempt to make comparisons between the audiometric performance of such devices.

This lively, one hour round table will bring together colleagues from five experienced auditory implant programmes to share their experience with a range of bone conduction hearing devices now used to rehabilitate patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss often referred to simply as single sided deafness or SSD.

The panelists have been selected for their experience with particular devices or for their expertise in audiometric assessment. After a brief introduction, invited panelists will offer their views on a number of controversial topics. It will be interesting to see how much consensus and common ground exists between the different programmes and devices in this regard.

Specific attention will focus on a number of key areas that will guide our discussions:

Selection criteria - is there an age limit to consider at presentation, and if so, how relevant is the state of contralateral cochlea?

Pre-operative trials - short and in-office or prolonged, pre-directed home trial? Is there a place for headband testing with some other surrogate device for transcutaneous implant candidates?

Ease of surgical placement - have the panel experience any notable or avoidable complications?

Device tolerance - are the devices practical to wear day to day?

Postoperative limitations - how relevant are imaging restrictions and removability?

Money - are there any major cost differences between the devices and the resources needed to implant them?

Post-operative performance - how do we begin to determine patient benefit let alone compare the performance of different devices?

Best of breed - one vote - why?

Where will we be in 10 years?

Myrthe Hol will share her Nijmegen, NL, experience on BAHA and Ponto devices, Joe Toner from Belfast, Northern Ireland, will share his extensive experience with Bonebridge, Jaydip Ray from Sheffield, UK, will cover BAHA Attract and Sophono, and Bill Hodgetts from Edmonton,Canada will address the perils of trying to compare device performance.