Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-x2lbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T00:31:36.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular characterization and identification of digenean larval stages in Aylacostoma chloroticum (Prosobranchia: Thiaridae) from a neotropical floodplain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2019

F.M.T. Onaca ,
R.J. da Graça ,
T.M.C. Fabrin Open the ORCID record for T.M.C. Fabrin [Opens in a new window] ,
R.M. Takemoto  and
A.V. de Oliveira
F.M.T. Onaca
Affiliation:
Curso de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
R.J. da Graça
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
T.M.C. Fabrin*
Affiliation:
Programa de pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
R.M. Takemoto
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ictioparasitologia, Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
A.V. de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biotecnologia, Genética e Biologia Celular, Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: T.M.C. Fabrin, E-mail: fabrintmc@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Digeneans (Trematoda: Digenea) are endoparasites that present a complex life cycle, generally involving an intermediate invertebrate host and a vertebrate host. There is limited information about which species of molluscs may act as intermediate hosts in the upper Paraná River floodplain (UPRF), where Aylacostoma chloroticum can be considered a potential candidate. The study of digeneans in this region is important because some of these parasites are potentially zoonotic, and, therefore, are relevant to public health. However, the correct identification of these organisms during the larval stages is difficult because of the lack of morphologically diagnostic characteristics. The objective of this study was to identify and molecularly characterize the larval stages of digeneans found in A. chloroticum in the UPRF, using the mitochondrial marker of subunit I of cytochrome c oxidase and the 28S nuclear marker. The molluscs were examined in the laboratory and three morphotypes of cercariae were found. DNA was extracted from the specimens obtained and was then amplified and sequenced. The morphotypes exhibited high genetic similarities with Pseudosellacotyla, Paralecithodendrium and Philophthalmus, indicating that these organisms belong to these genera. This is the first record of larval stages of these genera in molluscs collected in the UPRF.

Keywords

COIDigeneaParalecithodendriumparasitesPhilophthalmusupper Paraná River floodplainPseudosellacotyla28S

Information

Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 94 , 2020 , e73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Introduction

Digeneans have a complex life cycle, involving a definitive vertebrate host and at least one first intermediate host (usually an invertebrate), in which the larval stages are found. Sometimes, digeneans may present a second intermediate host (Combes et al., Reference Combes, Bartoli, Théron, Lewis, Campbell and Sukhdeo2002; Rosser et al., Reference Rosser, Alberson, Khoo, Woodyard, Pote and Griffin2016). Although the life cycle of digeneans has been commonly studied, the larval stages of numerous taxa are still unknown and their identification remains difficult due to the small number of morphologically diagnostic characteristics (Scholz et al., Reference Scholz, Aguirre-Macedo, de León, Ditrich, Salgado-Maldonato and Vidal-Matínez2000).

Digeneans are among the most common parasites identified in fish in the upper Paraná River floodplain (UPRF) (Chapell, Reference Chapell1995; Takemoto et al., Reference Takemoto, Pavanelli, Lizama, Lacerda, Yamada, Moreira, Ceschini and Bellay2009), a region important to biodiversity conservation because it maintains highly heterogeneous habitats and species richness (Filho & Ibarras, Reference Filho, Ibarras, Agostinho, Thomas, Júlio, Hahn and Rodrigues2005), consequently enabling an interesting diversity of parasites (Souza et al., Reference Souza, Machado, Dias, Yamada, Pagotto and Pavanelli2008; Takemoto et al., Reference Takemoto, Pavanelli, Lizama, Lacerda, Yamada, Moreira, Ceschini and Bellay2009). Currently, only Biomphalaria peregrina (Orbiny, 1835) has been identified as a potential invertebrate host for digeneans in the UPRF (Souza et al., Reference Souza, Machado, Dias, Yamada, Pagotto and Pavanelli2008), however, the low prevalence of parasitism indicates that other mollusc species could be acting as intermediate hosts for these organisms.

Because other mollusc species inhabit the UPRF, Aylacostoma chloroticum (Scott, 1954) is an interesting potential host candidate for digeneans because it has been registered as an intermediate host of Pseudosellacotyla lutzi (Freitas, 1941), Neocladocystis intestinalis (Vaz, 1932), Stephanoprora aylacostoma and the Echinostoma group (Quintana & Núñez, Reference Quintana and Núñez2008, Reference Quintana and Núñez2014, Reference Quintana and Núñez2016; Pinto & Melo, Reference Pinto and Melo2013a) and it is native to this environment. This mollusc is currently considered an endangered species according to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Mansur, Reference Mansur2000), and in South America it is part of a conservation breeding programme called the Aylacostoma Project (Vogler et al., Reference Vogler, Beltramino, Peso and Rumi2014). In addition, it is the only species of this genus in the UPRF, a region impacted by the construction of dams in the Paraná River basin and by the introduction of species, including molluscs (Takeda et al., Reference Takeda, Fujita, Fontes Júnior, Agostinho, Rodrigues, Gomes, Thomaz and Miranda2004).

According to Abdul-Salam & Al-Khedery (Reference Abdul-Salam and Al-Khedery1992), the populations of molluscs can determine the species of digeneans present in birds and fish in a certain region and changes in the malacological community may alter the life cycle of these parasites; therefore, infections caused by trematode larvae can be used as bioindicators of environmental quality (Souza et al., Reference Souza, Machado, Dias, Yamada, Pagotto and Pavanelli2008). However, the identification of larval stages is difficult, so the use of molecular techniques is important for the correct identification of Platyhelminthes (Locke et al., Reference Locke, Al-Nasiri and Caffara2015). Therefore, molecular markers are commonly used and the fragment of the mitochondrial gene of subunit I of cytochrome c oxidase (COI) and the 28S nuclear ribosomal gene are both helpful for identification at a specific level because they represent conserved regions present in interesting variations among species of this group (Vilas et al., Reference Vilas, Criscione and Blouin2005; Moszczynska et al., Reference Moszczynska, Locke, McLaughlin, Marcogliese and Crease2009; Steenkiste et al., Reference Steenkiste, Locke, Castelin, Marcogliese and Abbott2015).

The identification of digenean species and their respective intermediate hosts in the UPRF are important considerations for public health policies. Some species are zoonotic (Fried et al., Reference Fried, Graczyk and Tamang2004; Pinto & Melo, Reference Pinto and Melo2013b), which is a concern for the riverside population and tourists. In addition, some species use fish as a second intermediate host, which causes damage to fish farming, making them susceptible to predation or increasing their mortality rate (Eiras et al., Reference Eiras, Takemoto, Pavanelli and Adriano2011). Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize and identify digeneans parasitizing A. chloroticum using molecular tools.

Materials and methods

Sampling was performed during July 2017 and May 2018, in the upper Paraná River floodplain (Garças lagoon, 22°43′30.7″S, 53°13′11.6″W) in Batayporã city (Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil). The specimens were maintained alive in aquariums in the Laboratório de Ictioparasitologia of the NUPÉLIA (Núcleo de Pesquisa em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura) and analysed during the study.

To identify the gastropods, the individuals were examined and identified morphologically with the support of researchers from the Laboratório de Zoobentos (NUPÉLIA) and identification was confirmed using the COI mitochondrial gene. Parasite specimens were obtained from the gastropods collected. Subsequently, the body of the gastropod was carefully removed from its shell to avoid damaging the specimen and was examined under a stereomicroscope. The digestive gland was specifically examined because this organ is generally an infection site. The digeneans obtained were identified by their morphology (Gibson et al., Reference Gibson, Jones and Bray2002; Pinto & Melo, Reference Pinto and Melo2013b) and isolated in 1.5 ml tubes containing Milli-Q water, according to morphotype.

Two specimens of parasites of each morphotype were used for DNA extraction, which was carried out using the ReliaPrep™ gDNA Tissue Miniprep System kit, following the manufacturer's instructions. The 28S gene was partially amplified using the U178 primer: 5′-GCACCCGCTGAAYTTAAG-3′ and the L1642 primer: 5′-CCAGCGCCATCCATTTTCA-3′ (Lockyer et al., Reference Lockyer, Olson and Littlewood2003). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions comprised an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min and a final elongation cycle at 72°C for 5 min. The COI gene also was partially amplified using the Trem CoI: F 5′-TTTCGTTGGATCATAAGCG-3′ and e Trem CoI: R 5′-GCAGCACTAAATTTACGATCAAA-3′ primers (Bonett et al., Reference Bonett, Steffen, Trujano-Alvarez, Martin, Bursey and McAllister2011). The PCR conditions for the COI gene amplification comprised an initial denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, followed by ten cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 42°C for 40 s and 72°C for 1 min, then 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 50°C for 40 s, 72°C for 1 min and a final elongation step at 72°C for 7 min. The amplicons were verified on 1% agarose gel and purified using polyethylene glycol. The sequencing reactions were prepared using BigDye™ Terminator 3.1. Cycle sequencing was performed following the manufacturer's instructions and the products were sent to the Complexo de Centrais de Apoio à Pesquisa (COMCAP) of the Universidade Estadual de Maringá for automated sequencing using an ABI3500 Applied Biosystems sequencer.

The sequences obtained were edited and aligned using BioEdit (Hall, Reference Hall1999) and MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al., Reference Kumar1999) software, respectively. Species identification of the parasites was performed by comparing the results with previous data available in GenBank using the BLAST tool implemented in MEGA 7.0. Therefore, the sequences with high similarity were selected for further analysis (tables 1 and 2). The Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) distance among the analysed species were also calculated using MEGA 7.0. The best nucleotide substitution model was selected using jModelTest 2 (Darriba et al., Reference Darriba, Taboada, Daollo and Posada2012) and maximum-likelihood gene trees were constructed using the RAxML Black Box (Kozlov et al., Reference Kozlov, Darriba, Flouri, Morel and Stamatakis2019). Schistosoma japonicum was used as an outgroup in both analyses because this species belongs to a family distant from those of the digeneans obtained in this study – Faustulidae, Lecithodendriidae and Philophthalmidae. The novel sequences were deposited in GenBank (MK629695–MK629702).

Table 1.

28S sequences used in this study.

Table 2.

COI sequences used in this study.

Results

Partial sequences of the COI gene obtained from the mollusc specimens used in this study showed 98% similarity with A. chloroticum sequences available in GenBank and a 0.7% genetic distance. A total of 26 specimens of A. chloroticum were analysed, of which 19 (73.08%) were parasitized. Three distinct digenean morphotypes were recorded in these molluscs, morphotype 1, 2 and 3. Each morphotype showed the following prevalence: morphotype 1 (31%), morphotype 2 (50%) and morphotype 3 (34%). The mean measurements of the morphotypes are presented in table 3.

Table 3.

Mean measurements (min–max) (in μm) of cercariae obtained from Aylacostoma chloroticum.

For the 28S gene, morphotype 1 shared high (95–96%) genetic similarity with Paralecithodendrium parvouterus (Bhaleraeo, 1926); morphotype 2 was most similar to Pseudosellacotyla lutzi, with 99–100% similarity; and morphotype 3 was most similar to Philophthalmus gralii (Mathis and Leger, 1910), with 98% similarity. The sequences used in the analyses are shown in table 1. The mean genetic distance between the different species of Paralecithodendrium was 6.6% and ranged from 3.9% to 8.2%, with 7.1% genetic distance between these sequences and morphotype 1. The sequence obtained for morphotype 2 was identical to Pseudosellacotyla lutzi obtained from GenBank. In Philophthalmus, the mean distance between species was 1.8% and ranged from 1.7% to 2.4%, and 2.1% when Philophthalmus spp. are compared with morphotype 3. The genetic distance values between all sequences are shown in table 4. A maximum-likelihood tree was constructed from this data (fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Maximum-likelihood gene tree constructed using the 28S gene sequences analysed in this study. Schistosoma japonicum was used as an outgroup. Support values above 85 are represented by circles. (a) Cercaria morphotype 3 obtained in this study; (b) cercaria morphotype 2 obtained in this study; (c) cercaria morphotype 1 obtained in this study. Scale bars indicates the mean number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Table 4.

Genetic distances resulting from the comparison of 28S gene sequences obtained from GenBank and morphotype 1, 2 and 3 cercariae of Aylacostoma chloroticum.

The COI region of morphotypes 1 and 2 were 77% and 78% similar, respectively. However, molecular identification using this gene was not conclusive when compared with previously published data, so the results were not used for maximum-likelihood tree construction. For morphotype 3, the sequences were 88% similar to Philophthalmus gralli and P. lucipetus (Rudolphi, 1819). The sequences were aligned with the sequences of different Philophthalmus species obtained from GenBank (table 2), with a mean distance of 15.4% between the species of this genus and 14.5% divergence from morphotype 3. The genetic distance values are shown in table 5. A maximum-likelihood tree was constructed using this data (fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Maximum-likelihood gene tree constructed using the COI gene sequences of Philophthalmus species used in this study. Schistosoma japonicum was used as an outgroup. Support values above 85 are represented by circles. Scale bars indicates the mean number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Table 5.

Genetic distances resulting from the comparison of COI gene sequences obtained from GenBank and morphotype 3 cercariae of Aylacostoma chloroticum.

Discussion

This is the first molecular characterization and identification of digenean larvae obtained in an aquatic invertebrate host from the UPRF using the molecular markers 28S and cytochrome c oxidase. These results showed that A. chloroticum is an important intermediate host of digenean parasites in this region.

Based on the 28S gene partial sequence, the relationships observed in the gene tree (fig. 1) indicate that morphotypes 1 and 3 belong to Paralecithodendrium and Philophthalmus. However, morphotype 2 was identified as Pseudosellacotyla lutzi, previously recorded as parasitizing specimens of Hoplias malabaricus (Bloch, 1794) ‘traíra’ in Brazil (Pantoja et al., Reference Pantoja, Hernández-Mena, de León and Luque2018), and using A. chloroticum as an intermediate host during its life cycle (Quintana & Núñez, Reference Quintana and Núñez2014), which was validated by this study.

The COI gene provided conclusive information only for morphotype 3, indicating that this specimen belongs to Philophthalmus, a species that can use birds or mammals as definitive hosts. In Brazil, there are also records of Philophthalmus gralli parasitizing Melanoides tuberculatus (Müller, 1774), an invasive mollusc, but only under experimental conditions (Pinto & Melo, Reference Pinto and Melo2010, Reference Pinto and Melo2013a). In the UPRF, there are records of Philophthalmus lachrymosus (Braun, 1902) using Capybara, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris (Linnaeus, 1766), as a definitive host, found in its vitreous humour (Souza et al., Reference Souza, Ribeiro, Antonuci, Ueda, Carniel, Karling, Eiras, Takemoto and Pavanelli2015). However, there have been no previous studies on the definitive host of this genus in the UPRF. Paralecithodendrium was also reported to use M. tuberculatus as a first intermediate host, insects as second intermediate hosts and bats as its definitive host (Fried et al., Reference Fried, Graczyk and Tamang2004; Santos & Gibson, Reference Santos and Gibson2015). These parasites are globally distributed, with human infections recorded in Asiatic countries, such as Indonesian and Thailand (Kumar, Reference Kumar, Stecher and Tamura1999).

In general, the molecular markers used in this study were useful for the identification of digenean parasites at the genus and species level, but the results also indicate that more than one molecular marker should be used, considering the difficulty in developing universal primers to these organisms (Moszczynska et al., Reference Moszczynska, Locke, McLaughlin, Marcogliese and Crease2009; Steenkiste et al., Reference Steenkiste, Locke, Castelin, Marcogliese and Abbott2015). Another difficulty is the scarcity of DNA sequences in public databases. In addition, the difficulty in morphological identification of the parasites obtained in this study may be because these specimens represent previously undescribed digenean species, thereby necessitating new molecular and morphological studies in the future.

Monitoring the life cycle of the parasites, along with the identification of their larval stages, can help in the understanding of ecosystem dynamics and environmental quality because changes in the environment are reflected in the digenean species richness and in the prevalence of infection (Souza et al., Reference Souza, Machado, Dias, Yamada, Pagotto and Pavanelli2008). Therefore, considering the high prevalence of parasitism (73.08%) in this gastropod, it is possible that this species is an important intermediate host in the life cycle of digenean and the maintenance of their populations is of great importance in terms of conservation and preservation of biodiversity. Finally, we suggest intensifying studies aimed at understanding the life cycles of digenean parasites using molecular tools because morphological identification is difficult during the initial stages of the life cycle and, perhaps more importantly, because two of the three digeneans found here present zoonotic potential.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the laboratories of Zoobentos of the NUPÉLIA (UEM), all researchers that provided support and materials to the conduct of this study, the COMCAP (UEM) and the Universidade Estadual de Maringá – the institution where this research was carried out.

Financial support

This work was supported by CNPq (446150/2014-2).

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

Abdul-Salam, J and Al-Khedery, B (1992) The occurrence of larval Digenea in some snails in Kuwait Bay. Hydrobiologia 248, 161–165.Google Scholar
Bonett, RM, Steffen, MA, Trujano-Alvarez, AL, Martin, SD, Bursey, CR and McAllister, CT (2011) Distribution, abundance, and genetic diversity of Clinostomum spp. metacercariae (Trematoda: Digenea) in a modified Ozark stream system. Journal of Parasitology 97, 177–184.Google Scholar
Chapell, LH (1995) The biology of diplostomatid eyeflukes of fishes. Journal of Helminthology 69, 97–101.Google Scholar
Church, ML, Barrett, PM, Swenson, J, Kinsella, JM and Tkach, VV (2013) Outbreak of Philophthalmus gralli in four greater rheas (Rhea americana). Veterinary Ophthalmology 16, 65–72.Google Scholar
Combes, A, Bartoli, P and Théron, A (2002) Trematode transmission strategies. pp. 1–12 in Lewis, E, Campbell, JF and Sukhdeo, MVK (Eds) The behavioral ecology of parasites. 1st edn. New York, Wallingford, UK, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Darriba, D, Taboada, GL, Daollo, R and Posada, D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and high-performance computing. Nature Methods 9, 772.Google Scholar
Eiras, JC, Takemoto, RM, Pavanelli, GC and Adriano, EA (2011) About the biodiversity of parasites of freshwater fish from Brazil. Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 31, 161–168.Google Scholar
Filho, EES and Ibarras, JAA (2005) Aspectos geológicos e geomorfológicos. pp. 28–36 in Agostinho, AA, Thomas, SM, Júlio, HF Jr, Hahn, NS and Rodrigues, L (Eds) A planície alagável do rio Paraná: estruturas e processos. Maringá, Relatório PELD.Google Scholar
Fried, B, Graczyk, TK and Tamang, L (2004) Food-borne intestinal trematodiases in humans. Parasitology Research 93, 159–170.Google Scholar
Gibson, DI, Jones, A and Bray, RA (2002) Keys to the Trematoda, vol. 1. New York, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Hall, TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41, 95–98.Google Scholar
Heneberg, P, Casero, M, Waap, H, Sitko, J, Azevedo, F, Těšínskýa, M and Literák, I (2018) An outbreak of philophthalmosis in Larus michahellis and Larus fuscus gulls in Iberian Peninsula. Parasitology International 67, 253–261.Google Scholar
Jayawardena, UA, Tkach, VV, Navaratne, AN, Amerasinghe, PH and Rajakaruna, RS (2013) Malformations and mortality in the Asian Common Toad induced by exposure to pleurolophocercous cercariae (Trematoda: Cryptogonimidae). Parasitology International 62, 246–252.Google Scholar
Kozlov, A, Darriba, D, Flouri, T, Morel, B and Stamatakis, A (2019) RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable, and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305.Google Scholar
Kumar, V (1999) Trematode infections and diseases of man and animals. Netherlands, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Stecher, G and Tamura, K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33, 1870–1874.Google Scholar
Leung, TLF, Donald, KM, Keeney, DB, Koehler, AV, Peoples, RC and Poulin, R (2010) Trematode parasites of Otago Harbour (New Zealand) soft-sediment intertidal ecosystems: Life cycles, ecological roles and DNA barcodes. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 43, 857–865.Google Scholar
Literák, I, Heneberg, P, Sitko, J, Wetzel, EJ, Callirgos, JMC, Čapek, M, Basto, DV and Papoušek, I (2013) Eye trematode infection in small passerines in Peru caused by Philophthalmus lucipetus, an agent with a zoonotic potential spread by an invasive freshwater snail. Parasitology International 62, 390–396.Google Scholar
Littlewood, DTJ and Johnston, DA (1995) Molecular phylogenetics of the four Schistosoma species groups determined with partial 28S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Parasitology 111, 167–175.Google Scholar
Locke, AS, Al-Nasiri, FS, Caffara, M, et al. (2015) Diversity, specificity and speciation in larval Diplostomidae (Platyhelminthes: Digenea) in the eyes of freshwater fish, as revealed by DNA barcodes. International Journal for Parasitology 45, 841–85.Google Scholar
Lockyer, AE, Olson, PD and Littlewood, DTJ (2003) Utility of complete large and small subunit rRNA genes in resolving the phylogeny of the Neodermata (Platyhelminthes): implications and a review of the cercomer theory. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 78, 155–171.Google Scholar
Lord, JS, Parker, S and Brooks, DR (2012) Gastrointestinal helminths of pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus/Pipistrellus pygmaeus) (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) of England. Parasitology 139, 366–374.Google Scholar
Mansur, MCD (2000), Aylacostoma chloroticum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2000: e.T29612A9504703. Retrieved May 15, 2019, from http://www.iucnredlist.org/species/29612/9504703.Google Scholar
Miller, TL and Cribb, TH (2008) Eight new species of Siphoderina Manter, 1934 (Digenea, Cryptogonimidae) infecting Lutjanidae and Haemulidae (Perciformes) off Australia. Acta Parasitologica 53, 344–364.Google Scholar
Moszczynska, A, Locke, SA, McLaughlin, JD, Marcogliese, DJ and Crease, TJ (2009) Development of primers for the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene in digenean trematodes (Platyhelminthes) illustrates the challenge of barcoding parasitic helminthes. Molecular Ecology Resources 9, 75–82.Google Scholar
Pantoja, CS, Hernández-Mena, DI, de León, GP and Luque, JL (2018) Phylogenetic position of Pseudosellacotyla lutzi (Freitas, 1941) (Digenea: Cryptogonimidae), a parasite of Hoplias malabaricus (Bloch) in South America, through 28S rDNA sequences, and new observations of the ultrastructure of their tegument. Journal of Parasitology 104, 530–538.Google Scholar
Pinto, HA and Melo, AL (2010) Melanoides tuberculata as intermediate host of Philophthalmus gralli in Brazil. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 52, 323–327.Google Scholar
Pinto, HA and Melo, AL (2013a) A checklist of cercariae (Trematoda: Digenea) in molluscs from Brazil. Zootaxa 3666, 449–475.Google Scholar
Pinto, HA and Melo, AL (2013b) Larvas de trematódeos em moluscos do Brasil: panorama e perspectivas após um século de estudos. Revista de Patologia Tropical 42, 369–386.Google Scholar
Quintana, MG and Núñez, MO (2008) The life cycle of Stephanoprora aylacostoma n.sp. (Digenea: Echinostomatidae), parasite of the threatened snail Aylacostoma chloroticum (Prosobranchia, Thiaridae), in Argentina. Parasitology Research 102, 647–655.Google Scholar
Quintana, MG and Núñez, MO (2014) The life cycle of Pseudosellacotyla lutzi (Digenea: Cryptogonimidae), in Aylacostoma chloroticum (Prosobranchia: Thiaridae), and Hoplias malabaricus (Characiformes: Erythrinidae), in Argentina. Journal of Parasitology 100, 805–811.Google Scholar
Quintana, MG and Núñez, MO (2016) The life cycle of Neocladocystis intestinalis (Vaz, 1932) (Digenea: Cryptogonimidae), in Aylacostoma chloroticum (Prosobranchia: Thiaridae), and Salminus brasiliensis (Characiformes: Characidae), in Argentina. Parasitology Research 115, 2589–2595.Google Scholar
Rosser, TG, Alberson, NR, Khoo, LH, Woodyard, ET, Pote, LM and Griffin, MJ (2016) Characterization of the life cycle of a fish eye fluke, Austrodiplostomum ostrowskiae (Digenea: Diplostomidae), with notes on two other diplostomids infecting Biomphalaria havanensis (Mollusca: Planorbidae) from catfish aquaculture ponds in Mississippi, USA. Journal of Parasitology 102, 260–274.Google Scholar
Santos, CP and Gibson, DI (2015) Checklist of the Helminth Parasites of South American Bats. Zootaxa 3937, 471–499.Google Scholar
Scholz, T, Aguirre-Macedo, ML, de León, SFD and Ditrich, O (2000) Larval stages of trematodes in Mexican freshwater mollusc: a review of present state and methodology for future research. pp. 62–89 in Salgado-Maldonato, G-A and Vidal-Matínez, VM (Eds) Metazoan parasites in the neotropics: a systematic and evolutionary perspective. Mexico, Instituto de Biología, UNAM.Google Scholar
Souza, GTR, Machado, MH, Dias, MLGG, Yamada, FH, Pagotto, JPA and Pavanelli, GC (2008) Composição e sazonalidade dos moluscos do alto rio Paraná, Brasil, e sua potencialidade como hospedeiros intermediários. Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences 30, 309–314.Google Scholar
Souza, GTR, Ribeiro, TS, Antonuci, AM, Ueda, BH, Carniel, MK, Karling, LC, Eiras, JC, Takemoto, RM and Pavanelli, GC (2015) Endoparasite fauna of wild capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) (Linnaeus, 1766) from the upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Aquatic Mammals 41, 213–221.Google Scholar
Steenkiste, NV, Locke, SA, Castelin, M, Marcogliese, DJ and Abbott, CL (2015) New primers for DNA barcoding of digeneans and cestodes (Platyhelminthes). Molecular Ecology Resources 15, 945–952.Google Scholar
Takeda, AM, Fujita, DS and Fontes Júnior, HM (2004) Perspectives on exotic bivalves proliferation in the upper Paraná river floodplain. pp. 97–100 in Agostinho, AA, Rodrigues, L, Gomes, LC, Thomaz, SM and Miranda, LE (Eds) Structure and functioning of the Paraná river and its floodplain. Maringá, Eduem.Google Scholar
Takemoto, RM, Pavanelli, GC, Lizama, MA, Lacerda, AC, Yamada, FH, Moreira, LH, Ceschini, TL and Bellay, S (2009) Diversity of parasites of fish from the Upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 69, 691–705.Google Scholar
Tkach, VV, Littlewood, DTJ, Olson, PD, Kinsella, JM and Swiderski, Z (2003) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Microphalloidea Ward, 1901 (Trematoda: Digenea). Systematic Parasitology 56, 1–15.Google Scholar
Tkach, VV, Kudlai, O and Kostadinova, A (2016) Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the Echinostomatoidea Looss, 1899 (Platyhelminthes: Digenea). International Journal for Parasitology 46, 171–185.Google Scholar
Vilas, R, Criscione, CD and Blouin, MS (2005) A comparison between mitochondrial DNA and ribosomal internal transcribed regions in prospecting for cryptic species of platyhelminth parasites. Parasitology 131, 839–846.Google Scholar
Vogler, RE, Beltramino, AA, Peso, JG and Rumi, A (2014) Threatened gastropods under the evolutionary genetic species concept: redescription and new species of the genus Aylacostoma (Gastropoda: Thiaridae) from High Paraná River (Argentina–Paraguay). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 172, 501–520.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. 28S sequences used in this study.

Figure 1

Table 2. COI sequences used in this study.

Figure 2

Table 3. Mean measurements (min–max) (in μm) of cercariae obtained from Aylacostoma chloroticum.

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Maximum-likelihood gene tree constructed using the 28S gene sequences analysed in this study. Schistosoma japonicum was used as an outgroup. Support values above 85 are represented by circles. (a) Cercaria morphotype 3 obtained in this study; (b) cercaria morphotype 2 obtained in this study; (c) cercaria morphotype 1 obtained in this study. Scale bars indicates the mean number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Figure 4

Table 4. Genetic distances resulting from the comparison of 28S gene sequences obtained from GenBank and morphotype 1, 2 and 3 cercariae of Aylacostoma chloroticum.

Figure 5

Fig. 2. Maximum-likelihood gene tree constructed using the COI gene sequences of Philophthalmus species used in this study. Schistosoma japonicum was used as an outgroup. Support values above 85 are represented by circles. Scale bars indicates the mean number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Figure 6

Table 5. Genetic distances resulting from the comparison of COI gene sequences obtained from GenBank and morphotype 3 cercariae of Aylacostoma chloroticum.