Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-hzqq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-26T23:03:56.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A permeameter for temperate ice: first results on permeability sensitivity to grain size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2022

Jacob R. Fowler
Affiliation:
Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
Neal R. Iverson*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Neal R. Iverson, E-mail: niverson@iastate.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Results of ice-stream models that treat temperate ice deformation as a two-phase flow are sensitive to the ice permeability. We have constructed and begun using a custom, falling-head permeameter for measuring the permeability of temperate, polycrystalline ice. Chilled water is passed through an ice disk that is kept at the pressure-melting temperature while the rate of head decrease indicates the permeability. Fluorescein dye in the water allows water-vein geometry to be studied using fluorescence microscopy. Water flow over durations of seconds to hours is Darcian, and for grain diameter d increasing from 1.7 to 8.9 mm, average permeability decreases from 2 × 10−12 to 4 × 10−15 m2. In tests with dye on fine (d = 2 mm) and coarse (d = 7 mm) ice, average area-weighted vein radii are nearly equal, 41 and 34 μm, respectively. These average radii, if included in a theory slightly modified from Nye and Frank (1973), yield permeability values within a factor of 2.0 of best-fit values based on regression of the data. Permeability values depend on d−3.4, rather than d−2 as predicted by models if vein radii are considered independent of d. In future experiments, the dependence of permeability on liquid water content will be measured.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Network of melt veins (like that considered by Frank (1968)) approximated by truncated semiregular octahedra (modified from Dani and others, 2012). (b) Cross-section of a water vein at a three-grain intersection, with vein radius, r, describing the size of an equilateral triangle used to model Poiseuille flow through veins.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Schematic cross-section of the permeameter. (a) Ice chamber and surrounding bath. Red dots are thermistor locations. (b) Ice chamber with standpipe (not to scale). The device resides in a walk-in freezer. The external hydraulic pump/press and heating/cooling circulator are not shown (see colors in on-line version).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a) Former water-filled vein at a three-grain intersection imaged using through-flowing water that contained fluorescein dye. Despite the need to freeze the interstitial water to make thin sections, the dye preserves the cross-sectional form of veins, allowing measurements of vein radius, r, and dihedral angle, θ. (b) Former water at three-grain intersections and grain boundaries as imaged in thin section by the dye. (c) Water-filled vein network in a fine-grained ice specimen still at its melting temperature immediately after a permeability experiment. In parts a–c, water flow was approximately normal to the plane of the photograph. (d) Flow pathways viewed in a plane parallel to water flow in a fine-grained ice specimen at its melting temperature (see colors in on-line version).

Figure 3

Table 1. Grain diameter, permeability and vein size for the seven ice specimens of Figure 7

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Grain-size distributions measured from thin sections for ice disks with geometric mean grain sizes of (a) 2.6 mm, (b) 5.2 mm, (c) 6.8 mm and (d) 8.0 mm. Grain-size distributions are log-normal, rather than Gaussian, which is typical for grain-size distributions of glacier ice (Fitzpatrick, 2013).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Head decreases with time for three ice disks for tests begun at different head values. (a) Head-drop data from eight tests on ice with a geometric mean grain diameter of 3.1 mm; two series of tests were conducted in succession at each of the four initial head values. (b) Single-test data from a different ice disk with a comparable mean grain diameter. (c) Single-test data from an ice disk with a mean grain diameter of 6.8 mm. Dashed lines indicate the decrease in head with time for the average permeability value derived for each ice specimen using Eqn (5): (a) 3.0  ± 1.5 x 10−13 m2, (b) 5.0  ± 1.2 x 10−13 m2 and (c) 6.4  ± 1.1 x 10−14 m2. All ice disks were ~50 mm thick, and the ice pressure was 500 kPa (see colors in on-line version).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Permeability as a function of average head magnitude for the test results of Figure 5. Error bars show ±1 SD calculated by considering rates of head decrease over 10 periods of equal duration during each head-drop test. Dashed colored lines indicate mean permeability values for each series of head-drop tests. Note that two of the data sets (blue circles and black diamonds) were collected from the same ice specimen and reflect a first series of tests at different initial head values (black diamonds) followed immediately by a second series of tests (blue circles) (see colors in on-line version).

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Permeability as a function of grain diameter from tests on seven ice disks. Error bars show ±1 SD based on multiple permeability tests and the distribution of grain sizes within ice disks. The black line is a best-fit regression of the data, where k = 1.75 x 10−11 (d−3.4) with d in millimeters. The dashed red line is a best fit to the data using Eqn (3) and vein radius as a fitting parameter with r = 45 μm. The blue dashed line is a best fit to the data using a model adjusted to include vein tortuosity (Eqn 8) with r = 46 μm (see colors in on-line version).

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Mean grain-boundary tortuosity as a function of grain diameter for different ice disks. Error bars show ±1 SD The dashed line is the fitted linear relationship between mean tortuosity, T, and mean grain diameter d, such that T = 1.0 +  0.048 d, with d in millimeters.