Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-8p85h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T01:03:51.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of novel mechanical cervical dislocation and a modified captive bolt for on-farm killing of poultry on behavioural reflex responses and anatomical pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

JE Martin*
Affiliation:
The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK Monogastric Science Research Centre, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, SRUC Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW, UK Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow G61 1QH, UK
DEF McKeegan
Affiliation:
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow G61 1QH, UK
J Sparrey
Affiliation:
Livetec Systems Ltd, Building 52 Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford, Bedfordshire MK45 4HS, UK
V Sandilands
Affiliation:
Monogastric Science Research Centre, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, SRUC Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Jessica.Martin@ed.ac.uk

Abstract

An alternative emergency method for killing poultry on-farm is required following European legislation changes (EU 1099/2009), which heavily restricts the use of manual cervical dislocation. This study investigated the kill efficacy of two mechanical methods that conform to the new legislation: (i) a novel mechanical cervical dislocation device; and (ii) a modified captive-bolt device (Rabbit Zinger™) and manual cervical dislocation (the control). Killing treatments were applied to broilers and layers at two stages of production (broilers: 2-3 and 5 weeks of age; layers: 12-13 and 58-62 weeks), with a total of 180 birds. Latency to abolition of cranial and behavioural reflexes, as well as post mortem analysis of the physiological damage produced, were used to estimate time to unconsciousness and assess kill efficacy. The novel mechanical cervical dislocation device was reliable and a practical method for killing poutry on-farm (100% kill success), with the majority of cranial reflexes showing no significant differences between interval mean durations across killing methods (eg nictitating membrane [mean = 0.7-3.3 s], and rhythmic breathing [mean = 0.0-0.3 s]), however for jaw tone and pupillary reflex, the modified Rabbit ZingerTM had significantly shorter interval mean durations compared to the control and mechanical cervical dislocation device (mean differences: jaw tone = ~8 s; pupillary = ~38 s). The novel mechanical cervical dislocation device resulted in consistent anatomical damage to the birds (eg high dislocation of the neck and severing of the spinal cord) compared to the manual method, despite both having 100% success rate, while the modified Rabbit ZingerTM was difficult to operate and resulted in varied anatomical damage. The novel mechanical cervical dislocation device showed promise as a replacement kill method on-farm for poultry.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2016 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable