No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Outcomes and symptom-specific quality of life after microscopic parotidectomy: a prospective study
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 October 2024
Abstract
Objectives
Assess the post-operative complications of microscopic parotidectomy and its impact on quality of life.
Methods
Thirty patients were included in this prospective study. Three to six months post-surgery, patients underwent assessments for Frey’s syndrome by Minor test, aesthesiometer test, facial nerve function and Quality of Life questionnaire.
Results
Frey’s syndrome symptom positive in none, Minor test positive in 50 per cent. The preservation rate of the great auricular nerve posterior branch was 90 per cent, but it had no significant impact on the aesthesiometer test. Transient and permanent facial paresis were observed in 13.3 per cent and 3.3 per cent, and salivary fistula in 3.3 per cent. In quality of life, the rating of general health as good/better was seen in 73.3 per cent, nil/minimal pain in 93.3 per cent, bothersome change of facial contour in none, and dry mouth in 23.3 per cent.
Conclusion
Microscopic parotidectomy achieves good surgical outcomes regarding Frey’s syndrome symptoms, greater auricular nerve preservation, facial paresis, salivary fistula and quality of life.
Information
- Type
- Main Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.
References
Smith, SL, Komisar, A. Limited parotidectomy: the role of extracapsular dissection in parotid gland neoplasms. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1163–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilavuz, AE, Songu, M, Pinar, E, Ozkul, Y, Ozturkcan, S, Aladag, I. Superficial parotidectomy versus partial superficial parotidectomy: a comparison of complication rates, operative time, and hospital stay. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:2027–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, BD, Lim, S, Wood, J, Samant, S, Ver Halen, JP, Kim, JY. Predictors of adverse events after parotidectomy: a review of 2919 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2015;124:35–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stodulski, D, Świątkowska-Stodulska, R, Mikaszewski, B, Kuczkowski, J. Health-related quality of life of parotid carcinoma patients-a comparative study with parotid adenoma patients and assessment of the influence of demographic, treatment, and pathological factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;48:163–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhardwaj, A, Sood, R, Malhotra, M, Priya, M, Tyagi, AK, Kumar, A, et al. Microscopic parotidectomy: a prospective study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022;74 (Suppl2):2273–800CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, WR, Fee, WE. Long-term great auricular nerve morbidity after sacrifice during parotidectomy. Laryngoscope 2009;119:1140–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
House, JW, Brackmann, DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:146–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nitzan, D, Kronenberg, J, Horowitz, Z, Wolf, M, Bedrin, L, Chaushu, G, et al. Quality of life following parotidectomy for malignant and benign disease. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1060–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luna-Ortiz, K, Sansón-RíoFrío, JA, Mosqueda-Taylor, A. Frey syndrome. A proposal for evaluating severity. Oral Oncol 2004;40:501–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuncel, A, Karaman, M, Sheidaei, S, Tatlıpınar, A, Esen, E. A comparison of incidence of Frey’s syndrome diagnosed based on clinical signs and Minor’s test after parotis surgery. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2012;22:200–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumann, A, Rosenberger, D, Vorsprach, O, Dazert, S. The incidence of Frey syndrome following parotidectomy: results of a survey and follow-up [in German]. HNO 2011;59:173–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lafont, M, Whyte, A, Whyte, J, Saura, E, Tejedor, MT. Frey syndrome: factors influencing the time to event. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:834–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, HG, Kwon, SY, Won, JY, Yoo, SW, Lee, MG, Kim, SW, et al. Comparisons of three indicators for Frey’s syndrome: subjective symptoms, Minor’s starch iodine test, and infrared thermography. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2013;6:249–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, NR, Jacobsen, SD. Parotidectomy. Preserving the posterior branch of the great auricular nerve. J Laryngol Otol 1997;111:556–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hui, Y, Wong, DS, Wong, LY, Ho, WK, Wei, WI. A prospective controlled double-blind trial of great auricular nerve preservation at parotidectomy. Am J Surg 2003;185:574–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suen, DT, Chow, TL, Lam, CY, Wong, ES, Lam, SH. Sensation recovery improved by great auricular nerve preservation in parotidectomy: a prospective double-blind study. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:374–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, N, Har-El, G, Rosenfeld, R. Quality of life after great auricular nerve sacrifice during parotidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:884–8Google ScholarPubMed
Fiacchini, G, Cerchiai, N, Tricò, D, Sellari-Franceschini, S, Casani, AP, Dallan, I, et al. Frey syndrome, first bite syndrome, great auricular nerve morbidity, and quality of life following parotidectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275:1893–1902CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulut, OC, Hohenberger, R, Oladokun, D, Odenwald, K, Plinkert, PK, Federspil, PA. Long-term quality of life and sensory impact of great auricular nerve preservation in parotid surgery as measured with the Parotidectomy Outcome Inventory-8. Clin Otolaryngol 2019;44:743–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciuman, RR, Oels, W, Jaussi, R, Dost, P. Outcome, general, and symptom-specific quality of life after various types of parotid resection. Laryngoscope 2012;122:1254–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehle, ME, Kraus, DH, Wood, BG, Benninger, MS, Eliachar, I, Levine, HL, et al. Facial nerve morbidity following parotid surgery for benign disease: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation experience. Laryngoscope 1993;103:386–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, AH, Quraishi, SM, Bradley, PJ. Patients’ perspectives on the short- and long-term outcomes following surgery for benign parotid neoplasms. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:624–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydin, S, Erbay, MF, Kizilay, A. The effects of residual parotid volume on symptom-specific quality of life and complications in patients undergoing parotid surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021;278:5003–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manola, M, Moscillo, L, Simeon, V, De Luca, E, Mastella, A. The effectiveness of sternocleidomastoid flap versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap for the prevention of Frey syndrome and facial depressed deformity in parotid surgery for pleomorphic adenoma. Ann Plast Surg 2018;80:125–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed