Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-x2lbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T08:19:38.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2025

Weijian Tao
Affiliation:
ISIS & icFRC, University of Strasbourg & CNRS, Strasbourg, France
Fatma Mihoubi
Affiliation:
ISIS & icFRC, University of Strasbourg & CNRS, Strasbourg, France Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Bianca Patrahau
Affiliation:
ISIS & icFRC, University of Strasbourg & CNRS, Strasbourg, France
Claudia Bonfio
Affiliation:
ISIS & icFRC, University of Strasbourg & CNRS, Strasbourg, France Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Bengt Nordén
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Thomas W. Ebbesen*
Affiliation:
ISIS & icFRC, University of Strasbourg & CNRS, Strasbourg, France
*
Corresponding author: Thomas W. Ebbesen; Email: ebbesen@unistra.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Manipulating matter by strong coupling to the vacuum field has attracted intensive interests over the last decade. In particular, vibrational strong coupling (VSC) has shown great potential for modifying ground state properties in solution chemistry and biochemical processes. In this work, the effect of VSC of water on the melting behaviour of ds-DNA, an important biophysical process, is explored. Several experimental conditions, including the concentration of ds-DNA, cavity profile, solution environment, as well as thermal annealing treatment, were tested. No significant effect of VSC was observed for the melting behaviour of the ds-DNA sequence used. This demonstrates yet again the robustness of ds-DNA to outside perturbations. Our work also provides a general protocol to probe the effects of VSC on biological systems inside microfluid Fabry–Perot cavities and should be beneficial to better understand and harness this phenomenon.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Principle and protocol for probing melting behaviour of ds-DNA inside the microfluidic cavity. (a) Schematic illustration of the principle of measurement based on the FRET process (yellow cavity field, green melting curve as a function of temperature). (b) Measured fluorescence spectra at different temperatures of ds-DNA at 1 μM in the reference structure (R0). (c) Extracted melting curves from four independent measurements in R0, with their corresponding first derivatives shown in (d).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Melting behaviour of ds-DNA at 1 μM inside microfluid cavities. (a) FTIR spectra of cavity S1 filled with ds-DNA solution, also shown in black line is the IR band of OH stretching mode of water. The cavity mode position is indicated in a grey-dashed line. (b) The melting curves of ds-DNA in cavity S1 and reference structure R0.

Figure 2

Table 1. Melting temperatures of ds-DNA under various experimental conditions and determined by first-derivative analysis

Figure 3

Figure 3. Melting behaviour of ds-DNA under other conditions. (a) FTIR spectrum of D2O/H2O (90%/10%) solution. (b) the melting curves of ds-DNA in reference structure R0 and cavity S1. (c) the melting curve after annealing in reference structure R0 and cavity S1. Also shown is the melting curve of ds-DNA without annealing in cavity S1.

Supplementary material: File

Tao et al. supplementary material

Tao et al. supplementary material
Download Tao et al. supplementary material(File)
File 987.6 KB

Author comment: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Editor,

Please find uploaded our ms entitled “Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling”. I have suggested two groups of referees one from the DNA physical chemistry community and one from the vibrational strong coupling community since this is a very pluridisciplinary topic. In regards to strong coupling referees, we do not want to have our ms refereed by scientists in the US as there are real conflicts of interest.

Thank you in advance for your consideration of our manuscript.

Best regards, Thomas Ebbesen

Review: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

there are no competing interests.

Comments

Authors reported about the DNA melting behavior by vibrational strong coupling of water. I would like to suggest the minor revision of this manuscript.

1. Stability of the cavity upon temperature range.

Authors used the fused silica cell for the temperature control.

FT-IR spectrum for all the cavities with empty or DNA-filled aqueous solution should be reported. There might be the possibility for evaporation of water during experiment or detuning of the cavity from the fixed thickness. This might cause the different conclusion from these experiments.

2. Melting behavior

Author used the 1st derivative to calculate about the melting temperature of DNA. When looking into the data such as Fig. S4, there is a step around 20°C. What is the reason for that? The fluorescent probe is sensitive so that if author can modify the possition of the dye molecule in DNA, it can be informative for the melting behavior.

3. H2O/D2O concentration dependence

This is confusing. Author should show the data with H2O/D2O 1:1 ratio. In this condition, water show the vibrational strong coupling, not ultrastrong coupling regime.

Minor comment

Figure 1a is confusing. Author should show cavity structure and cavity electric field in Figure 1a, then show the schematic structure of the DNA upon the temperature increase.

Review: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interest

Comments

The authors investigated the effect of vibrational strong coupling (VSC) of the OH stretch on the melting temperature of double-stranded DNA. They examined a wide variety of factors that could influence the results. While the findings presented here do not align with those reported in another work (ACS Photonics 2024, 11, 1303), the authors discuss their results by considering the differences between the two studies. I recommend the acceptance of this paper after the following points are addressed.

1)

The lower part of Figure 2b is obscured by the figure legend, making the horizontal axis difficult to see. This misalignment should be corrected. This problem may have occurred due to an error during the conversion from the Word file to the PDF file.

2)

Although the authors mention the stability of the optical cavity in the introduction, providing supporting data to show the stability of the cavity mode during temperature variations would make the experimental data more convincing.

3)

I wonder about the influence of VSC on fluorescence intensity. If VSC affects the fluorescence intensity by either suppressing or enhancing the decay pathways of vibrational relaxation, the fluorescence intensity under VSC would need to be corrected. If VSC has no effect on the fluorescence intensity, it would be useful to mention this as well.

Review: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R0/PR4

Conflict of interest statement

N/A

Comments

Reviewer report

Title: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling

Authors: Tao,W., Mihoubi,F., Patrahau,B., Bonfio, C., Norden, B., and Ebbesen, T.W.

The fascinating phenomenon of vibrational strong coupling (VSC) has intrigued and has been studied by chemical physicists/physical chemists, material scientists, for quite some time. Ebbeson, one of the authors of this submission, has published a wonderful perspective piece in JACS that presents a valuable overview of this phenomenon and its rich information content (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 41, 16877–16889 https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c07420).

More recently, the biophysical community is beginning to recognize the unique insights that can be derived from this technique when applied to biological systems. This submission provides an exciting application of this phenomenon to an oligonucleotide model of the iconic DNA double helix.

In this manuscript the authors use the technique of vibrational strong coupling (VSC) between the vacuum field of a Fabry-Perot cavity and the ground state vibrational modes of solvent molecules (here water) to modulate the melting of a short model oligonucleotide. Strong coupling to solvent in VSC is aided by the generally large number of solvent molecules involved. This reality allows for indirect cooperative coupling between solute and solvent vibrations in dilute solutions which are not generally amenable to direct vibrational strong coupling to the solute. In particular, water as a solvent that is intimately involved in stabilizing biological macromolecules, also gives rise to ultrastrong VSC coupling at vibrational frequencies that, at least, partially overlap vibrations found in biomolecules. By monitoring the impact of VSC coupling to water, while manipulating and recording solute properties (here the melting of a dilute oligonucleotide duplex) the authors are able to gain insights into solute-solvent interactions.

In this pioneering study, the authors observe that the melting behavior of their oligonucleotide duplex is not significantly altered by VSC to solvent (water) compared to its absence. This observation leads the authors to conclude that base pairing and stacking interactions along the helical axis dominate over interactions between the oligonucleotide chains and solvent in dictating oligonucleotide stability. This conclusion is entirely consistent with current thinking about the forces that stabilize DNA double helices.

In short, this study represents an innovative application of an exciting technique to probe nucleic acids, in particular, and biological molecules in general. While the results are essentially “negative” in appearance, the reader should recognize the importance of the authors’ clear and consequential observation of no change in melting behavior with or without VSC. As such, this study represents an essential and valuable baseline study for the application of this technique to more complex nucleic acid constructs, where VSC may well exhibit a modulating, regulatory impact. Because of its pioneering nature, and careful data collection and analysis, I strongly support publication of this intriguing work in QRB Discovery.

While not essential, the authors may wish to add a brief comment or two that acknowledges their recognition of the few minor issues listed below in no particular order.

1. Might the observed lack of response to VSC potentially also be due to unrecognized compensating processes?

2. The authors may wish to clarify the different meanings of the terms oligonucleotide and polynucleotide. In the introduction they refer to oligonucleotides when they probably meant polynucleotides, whereas their study involves a short oligonucleotide duplex.

3. The maximum in the first derivative melting curves of short duplexes, that are not monomolecular constructs, represent a Tmax value rather than a Tm value. Noting this has not consequent to their interpretation.

Review: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R0/PR5

Conflict of interest statement

I have no competing interests.

Comments

The manuscript investigates the effect of vibrational strong coupling (VSC) states of water on the melting behavior of double-stranded (ds) DNA. It reports no significant influence under VSC conditions. Temperature-dependent fluorescence spectroscopy based on Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and FT-IR spectroscopy reveal that the melting point, or dissociation temperature, of dsDNA into single-stranded (ss) DNA remains unchanged under VSC. This was demonstrated using a Fabry-Pérot cavity with two parallel gold (Au) mirrors (cavity lengths: 6.0, 12.0, 12.5, and 13.0 µm) and a control structure without Au mirrors (12.0 µm). VSC of both H₂O and D₂O did not modulate the melting point, irrespective of dsDNA concentration. While the manuscript consistently shows that VSC does not affect the melting behavior of dsDNA, the authors provide discussions on possible reasons for the lack of significant effects compared to prior studies. These discussions offer valuable insights for future research. Therefore, the manuscript is potentially suitable for publication in QRB Discovery. I recommend its publication after addressing the following points:

Figure 1a: The authors illustrate the study’s concept effectively. However, I found certain elements confusing. The dark yellow objects likely represent the Au mirrors in the cavity, while the bright yellow curve shows the standing wave of the cavity mode. In contrast, the green curve indicates fluorescence variation via FRET with temperature (black arrow), depicted within the cavity illustration. The former conveys spatial information, whereas the latter provides temperature-dependent details, which might imply that ssDNA and dsDNA form at the cavity mode’s nodes and antinodes, with a temperature gradient in the cavity. To avoid confusion, consider redesigning Figure 1a to clarify these points.

Cavity Stability: Is the cavity stable across the temperature range used in the experiments? Specifically, are there any effects due to the thermal expansion of the cell material or temperature-induced changes in the refractive index of H₂O? I recommend including IR spectra at different temperatures to verify the cavity length’s stability under varying thermal conditions.

Page 3, Figure 1c: The authors state, “The emission intensities were further averaged over a large spectral range (from 510 nm to 550 nm), yielding the melting curves shown in Fig. 1c.” Please clarify why this large range was chosen to calculate average fluorescence intensity. Additionally, the fluorescence spectra in Figure 1b show a shoulder-like peak around 570 nm. Could you explain the assignments of the peaks at 520 and 570 nm? If the second peak relates to another structural state of DNA, please provide temperature-dependent fluorescence intensity data similar to Figure 1c.

Figure S3 Reference: On page 3 (end of the left column), the text states, “The melting temperature is as shown in Figure S3.” However, Figure S3 in the supplementary material currently shows the FT-IR spectrum of an empty cavity. It seems “Figure S3” should be replaced with “Figure 1d” in the main text.

Page 4, Figure 2: Please check the configuration of Figure 2. Currently, the lower part of Figure 2b overlaps with the figure caption. Ensure that all figures are displayed correctly in the document. Furthermore, the polariton peaks (UP and LP) in Figure 2a are weak, with a potential shoulder around 3000 cm⁻¹. To clarify the polariton contributions, I recommend investigating the incident angle dependence of these peaks to confirm the VSC condition.

Page 4, Right Column: The authors write, “D₂O has stronger hydrogen bonding than H₂O, thus different solvent properties.” Please provide evidence supporting this statement.

Page 4, Right Column & Figure 3: The authors present intriguing results regarding the effects of sample aging. Could you elaborate on the aging process? In Figure 3, dsDNA in a 90% D₂O/10% H₂O mixture shows a constant melting temperature (~42°C), regardless of annealing. However, in Figure S8, the fresh sample shows a higher melting point compared to the aged sample under similar conditions. Please check dataset consistency and explain any discrepancies between Figures 3 and S8.

Page 5, Right Column: The authors discuss NH stretching vibrational modes overlapping with the cavity mode. Is it possible to quantify these contributions based on the shape or intensity of the transmittance/absorption peaks? Additionally, consider including a discussion on the oscillator strength of all potential vibrational modes contributing to VSC in the study.

Recommendation: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R0/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R0/PR7

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R1/PR8

Comments

Dear Editor,

Please find uploaded the revised version of our manuscript. The comments of the 4 referees were very useful, even if minor ones, and believe the paper is improved. Thank you for your consideration of the manuscript. Best regards, Thomas Ebbesen

Review: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R1/PR9

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

My concerns are fulfilled.

Review: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R1/PR10

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The manuscript correctly according to our request.

Recommendation: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R1/PR11

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Probing DNA melting behaviour under vibrational strong coupling — R1/PR12

Comments

No accompanying comment.