Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T08:05:26.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sediment and water geochemistry record of water-rock interactions in King George Island, Antarctic Peninsula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2022

Yagmur Gunes*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Engineering, Geomicrobiology and Biogeochemistry Laboratory, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey ITU Faculty of Mines, Department of Geological Engineering, Ayazaga Campus, 34469 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey
Nurgul Balci
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Engineering, Geomicrobiology and Biogeochemistry Laboratory, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey ITU Faculty of Mines, Department of Geological Engineering, Ayazaga Campus, 34469 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We used a multidisciplinary approach integrating major, trace and rare earth element geochemistry, mineralogy of rocks and sediments along with the ionic composition of water reservoirs of Admiralty Bay, King George Island, to evaluate the record of water-rock interactions under Maritime Antarctic conditions. Our results showed that the ionic compositions of the streams and meltwaters predominantly reflect the atmospheric inputs, while lake waters have higher Na/Cl, Ca/Mg and HCO3/Cl ratios related to chemical weathering in lake sediments, but this did not allow for distinguishing purely silicate sources. Consistent with the trace and rare earth element data, various alteration indices and Index of Compositional Variability values denote the low degree of chemical weathering in the lake sediments. The records from the previously unexplored Mud Lake and Upper Lake suggest that the lakes of Admiralty Bay are better places to trace the impacts of a succession of environmental changes that have occurred in the watershed, while the stream channel sediments, when accompanied by water chemistry data, may provide a more representative composition of the source rocks than the lake sediments. These findings may help revealing the intensity of contemporary weathering in a colder climate with relatively few mineralogical changes accompanied by a lesser degree of elemental loss.

Information

Type
Earth Sciences
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antarctic Science Ltd
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location map of Admiralty Bay, King George Island, South Shetland Island Group, Antarctica.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Field sampling points of the studied areas. Each circle indicates water and the associated sediment, and the triangles and crosses indicate mineralogically and elementally characterized rocks, respectively. EG = Ecology Glacier Creek; IV = Italian Valley Creek; MC = Mud Creek; ML = Mud Lake; PFC = Petrified Forest Creek; TC = Tower Creek; UC = Upper Creek; UL = Upper Lake; VC = Vanishing Creek.

Figure 2

Table I. Physicochemical, major anion and cation compositions of waters.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Piper diagram showing the relative abundances of the major ion concentrations of the water samples. EG = Ecology Glacier Creek; IV = Italian Valley Creek; MC = Mud Creek; ML = Mud Lake; PFC = Petrified Forest Creek; TC = Tower Creek; UC = Upper Creek; UL = Upper Lake; VC = Vanishing Creek.

Figure 4

Table II. Major oxide, total organic carbon (TOC), loss on ignition (LOI), Index of Compositional Variability (ICV), Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA), Plagioclase Index of Alteration (PIA) and Mafic Index of Alteration (MIA) values of sediment and rock samples (in %).

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Bivariate plots of the oxides of CaO. a. & b. K2O vs Al2O3 and c.–f. Al2O3. TiO2. Fe2O3. CaO vs SiO2 in the sediment and bedrock from the western part of Admiralty Bay. EG = Ecology Glacier Creek; IV = Italian Valley Creek; MC = Mud Creek; ML = Mud Lake; PFC = Petrified Forest Creek; TC = Tower Creek; UC = Upper Creek; UL = Upper Lake; VC = Vanishing Creek.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Comparison of the sediment samples with the bedrocks in the total alkali-silica diagram (Le Bas et al.1986). EG = Ecology Glacier Creek; IV = Italian Valley Creek; MC = Mud Creek; ML = Mud Lake; ol = olivine; PFC = Petrified Forest Creek; q = quartz; TC = Tower Creek; UC = Upper Creek; UL = Upper Lake; VC = Vanishing Creek.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Correlation plots of the trace elements (ppm) against SiO2 (wt%).

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Ocean island basalt-normalized rare earth element distribution patterns of sediments and bedrocks of the western part of Admiralty Bay (Sun & McDonough 1989). EG = Ecology Glacier Creek; IV = Italian Valley Creek; MC = Mud Creek; ML = Mud Lake; PFC = Petrified Forest Creek; TC = Tower Creek; UC = Upper Creek; UL = Upper Lake; VC = Vanishing Creek.

Figure 9

Table III. Average trace element and rare earth element (REE) concentrations (ppm) of the bedrocks and sediments of the western part of Admiralty Bay.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Grain size distribution of selected sediments. Results of sieve analysis; weight in percentages. MC = Mud Creek; ML = Mud Lake; PFC = Petrified Forest Creek; UC = Upper Creek; UL = Upper Lake.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Gibbs plots of stream meltwater and lake water of the western part of Admiralty Bay. EG = Ecology Glacier Creek; IV = Italian Valley Creek; MC = Mud Creek; ML = Mud Lake; PFC = Petrified Forest Creek; TC = Tower Creek; TDS = total dissolved solids; UC = Upper Creek; UL = Upper Lake; VC = Vanishing Creek.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Plots of a. Clvs Na+, b. (HCO3 + SO42−) vs (Ca2+ + Mg2+), c. HCO3vs (Ca2+ + Mg2+) and d. HCO3vs (Na + K)Si. EG = Ecology Glacier Creek; IV = Italian Valley Creek; MC = Mud Creek; ML = Mud Lake; PFC = Petrified Forest Creek; TC = Tower Creek; UC = Upper Creek; UL = Upper Lake; VC = Vanishing Creek.

Figure 13

Table IV. Ratios of selected major elements used as source indicators for water samples.

Figure 14

Fig. 11. Spider plot of average Al-normalized major element contents of each sediment unit normalized against the bedrocks. EF = enrichment factor; EG = Ecology Glacier Creek; IV = Italian Valley Creek; MC = Mud Creek; ML = Mud Lake; PFC = Petrified Forest Creek; TC = Tower Creek; UC = Upper Creek; UL = Upper Lake; VC = Vanishing Creek.

Figure 15

Fig. 12. A-CN-K ternary diagram of sediment and rock samples showing the degree of silicate weathering through the Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) (Nesbitt & Young 1984). EG = Ecology Glacier Creek; IV = Italian Valley Creek; MC = Mud Creek; ML = Mud Lake; PFC = Petrified Forest Creek; TC = Tower Creek; UC = Upper Creek; UL = Upper Lake; VC = Vanishing Creek.

Supplementary material: PDF

Gunes and Balci supplementary material

Gunes and Balci supplementary material

Download Gunes and Balci supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.6 MB