Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T10:08:26.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Harnessing the promise of floating solar photovoltaics in sustainable energy revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2025

Anik Goswami*
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India
*
Corresponding author: Anik Goswami; Email: anik91_go@rediffmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Solar photovoltaic (PV) technology is one of the most widely used renewable energy sources, generating electricity without producing greenhouse gas emissions. Over the past few decades, PV technology has seen widespread adoption due to technological advancements and continuously reducing costs. Traditionally, PV panels are mounted on terrestrial installations, including rooftops, agricultural fields and utility-scale solar farms. Although terrestrial PV systems perform well and are relatively scalable, they are still facing problems with land use and environmental pollution. As a result of these constraints, floating solar photovoltaic (FPV) systems have come to the fore as a viable alternative. Aquatic systems, such as lakes, reservoirs and coastal areas, can effectively utilise their surface area for the deployment of solar energy panels. This will also help to reduce land cost and water evaporation and improve overall energy efficiency, among other advantages. FPVs also have the potential to diversify and fulfil energy requirements since they liberate property in populated regions for additional crop usage. Thus, the potential scalability of FPVs is also extremely relevant towards climate and energy security objectives. FPV is still a new concept requiring thorough feasibility and performance-degradation studies to improve its uptake.

Information

Type
Editorial
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Author comment: Harnessing the promise of floating solar photovoltaics in sustainable energy revolution — R0/PR1

Comments

Editorial regarding the penetration and T&D problems in Floating Solar PV

Review: Harnessing the promise of floating solar photovoltaics in sustainable energy revolution — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Reviewer Comments on Manuscript: “Harnessing the Promise of Floating Solar Photovoltaics in Sustainable Energy Revolution”

Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. While the topic of Floating Solar Photovoltaics (FPVs) is undoubtedly relevant and timely for the renewable energy sector, the paper in its current form lacks several critical elements necessary for academic publication. Below are my detailed comments:

1. Lack of References:

The manuscript does not contain any citations or references to existing literature. For a scholarly paper, it is essential to ground arguments in existing research, policy documents, and technical studies. I recommend conducting a comprehensive literature review to support the claims made, including studies on FPV efficiency, water conservation benefits, and case studies of successful implementations.

2. Absence of Original Contribution:

The paper reads more like a general commentary rather than a research article. It lacks a clear research question, hypothesis, or original contribution to the field. I recommend the authors define a specific research gap, formulate objectives, and present novel insights or empirical findings.

3. Insufficient Depth in Technical Discussion:

While the paper mentions key advantages of FPVs, such as energy efficiency and water conservation, these points are discussed superficially. It would strengthen the manuscript to include technical analysis, such as efficiency comparisons with land-based PVs, data on water savings, and modeling of hybrid FPV-hydropower systems.

4. Transmission and Distribution (T&D) Challenges:

The manuscript briefly notes challenges related to T&D but does not elaborate on what these challenges are or how they might be addressed. It would be valuable to explore specific issues, such as grid integration, intermittency management, or infrastructure requirements, alongside potential solutions.

5. Structure and Academic Rigor:

The manuscript lacks the standard structure of a research paper (e.g., Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion, Conclusion). I recommend restructuring the content to follow a more rigorous academic format.

6. Language and Tone:

The tone of the paper comes across as opinion-based rather than evidence-driven. While the enthusiasm for the technology is commendable, it is crucial to balance this with objective analysis and data-driven conclusions.

Recommendations:

Conduct a thorough literature review and cite relevant research.

Clarify the research objective and define the paper’s unique contribution.

Provide quantitative analysis or case studies to support key claims.

Deepen the discussion on technical and policy challenges.

Restructure the paper to align with academic publishing standards.

Conclusion:

Given the issues outlined above, the paper, in its current form, cannot be accepted for publication. I encourage the authors to address these concerns, revise the manuscript thoroughly, and consider resubmitting a more robust and research-oriented version.

I hope these comments are helpful, and I look forward to seeing a revised version of the manuscript.

Recommendation: Harnessing the promise of floating solar photovoltaics in sustainable energy revolution — R0/PR3

Comments

Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. While the topic of Floating Solar Photovoltaics (FPVs) is undoubtedly relevant and timely for the renewable energy sector, the paper in its current form lacks several critical elements necessary for academic publication. Below are my detailed comments:

1. Lack of References:

The manuscript does not contain any citations or references to existing literature. For a scholarly paper, it is essential to ground arguments in existing research, policy documents, and technical studies. I recommend conducting a literature review to support the claims made, including studies on FPV efficiency

2. The tone of the Editorial

The tone of the paper comes across as opinion-based; while the enthusiasm for the technology is commendable, it is crucial to balance this with objective analysis and data-driven conclusions.

Recommendations:

- Conduct a short literature review and cite relevant research in the editorial.

- Clarify the research objective and define the paper’s unique contribution.

I strongly encourage the author to address these concerns, revise the manuscript, and consider resubmitting it as soon as possible. I hope these comments are helpful, and I look forward to seeing a revised version of the manuscript

Decision: Harnessing the promise of floating solar photovoltaics in sustainable energy revolution — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Harnessing the promise of floating solar photovoltaics in sustainable energy revolution — R1/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Recommendation: Harnessing the promise of floating solar photovoltaics in sustainable energy revolution — R1/PR6

Comments

The paper is improved and accepted

Decision: Harnessing the promise of floating solar photovoltaics in sustainable energy revolution — R1/PR7

Comments

No accompanying comment.