Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T10:37:34.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MARINE ORGANIC CARBON AND RADIOCARBON—PRESENT AND FUTURE CHALLENGES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2022

Ellen R M Druffel*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, UC Irvine, Keck Carbon Cycle AMS, Irvine, CA, USA
Steven R Beaupré
Affiliation:
School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
Hendrik Grotheer
Affiliation:
Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Marine Geochemistry, Bremerhaven, Germany
Christian B Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, UC Irvine, Keck Carbon Cycle AMS, Irvine, CA, USA
Ann P McNichol
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Wood Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA
Gesine Mollenhauer
Affiliation:
Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Marine Geochemistry, Bremerhaven, Germany
Brett D Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: edruffel@uci.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We discuss present and developing techniques for studying radiocarbon in marine organic carbon (C). Bulk DOC (dissolved organic C) Δ14C measurements reveal information about the cycling time and sources of DOC in the ocean, yet they are time consuming and need to be streamlined. To further elucidate the cycling of DOC, various fractions have been separated from bulk DOC, through solid phase extraction of DOC, and ultrafiltration of high and low molecular weight DOC. Research using 14C of DOC and particulate organic C separated into organic fractions revealed that the acid insoluble fraction is similar in 14C signature to that of the lipid fraction. Plans for utilizing this methodology are described. Studies using compound specific radiocarbon analyses to study the origin of biomarkers in the marine environment are reviewed and plans for the future are outlined. Development of ramped pyrolysis oxidation methods are discussed and scientific questions addressed. A modified elemental analysis (EA) combustion reactor is described that allows high particulate organic C sample throughput by direct coupling with the MIniCArbonDAtingSystem.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona
Figure 0

Figure 1 Size ranges of organic matter constituents in seawater and their relationships to the operationally defined pools of DOC (gray background) and POC (white background). (After Beaupré 2019.)

Figure 1

Figure 2 Peter M. Williams on the R/V Melville with a Gerard barrel, a 270 L steel vessel used to collect large volume seawater samples. The barrel is covered to protect it from particles coming mostly from the ship’s stack. Circa 1989. (Photo by Ellen Druffel.)

Figure 2

Figure 3 DOC Δ14C values (‰) of water samples (indicated by black dots) collected from seven stations along 150°W on the P16N cruise in 2015 (Druffel et al. 2019), one station on the P06 cruise (stn 130, 32.5°S 144.7°W) in 2010 (Druffel and Griffin 2015) and one station from the Southern Ocean (SOce; 54.0°S 176.0°W) in 1995 (Druffel and Bauer 2000) using Ocean Data View (Schlitzer 2015). (After Druffel et al. 2019.)

Figure 3

Figure 4 Size-Δ14C and elemental composition (C:N) relationships of DOC in the Pacific Ocean. (A) DOC Δ14C as a function of ultrafiltration concentration factor (CF) for the surface and deep Pacific ocean. Relationships between the C:N content of size-fractionated marine organic matter (B,D) and Δ14C (C,E) in the surface and deep Pacific. (Figures adapted from Walker et al. 2011 and Walker et al. 2016b.)

Figure 4

Figure 5 Δ14C of organic compound classes (THAA, open triangles; TCHO, open circles; lipids, solid triangles; acid insoluble fraction, solid circles). The range of DIC 14C values in surface waters at Stn M ranged from about 40 to 70‰. (After Hwang and Druffel 2003.)

Figure 5

Figure 6 Schematic of the RPO reactor (left) and the results (right) from a POC sample collected from the Narayani River, Nepal (Hemingway 2017). The top half of the quartz reactor heats the sample while the gases are swept into a CO2 analyzer before passing through a cryogenic trap. The gray shaded region is the thermogram, the variation in ppm CO2 vs. temperature (units not shown), white circles show the δ13C values, and bars show the fraction modern values for each temperature interval (Hemingway 2017). The data show that the high temperature, more refractory, fractions have dramatically less 14C, i.e., are older than the lower temperature fractions.

Figure 6

Figure 7 Preliminary F14C POCsusp values of samples collected along a shelf to open ocean transect off Cape Blanc (NW Africa, ∼21°N) collected in November 2018 during research cruise MSM79 onboard the German R/V Maria S. Merian and processed according to the EA–AMS method described above (H. Grotheer unpublished data). Red dots indicate sampling depths. (The map was generated using Ocean Data View; Schlitzer 2015).