Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T18:35:27.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adherence to Personal Protective Equipment Guidelines During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Health Care Personnel in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2021

Oliver A. Darwish Open the ORCID record for Oliver A. Darwish [Opens in a new window] ,
Ayushi Aggarwal ,
Mehran Karvar ,
Chenhao Ma ,
Valentin Haug ,
Mengfan Wu ,
Dennis P. Orgill  and
Adriana C. Panayi Open the ORCID record for Adriana C. Panayi [Opens in a new window]
Oliver A. Darwish
Affiliation:
California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, USA Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Ayushi Aggarwal
Affiliation:
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Mehran Karvar
Affiliation:
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Chenhao Ma
Affiliation:
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Valentin Haug
Affiliation:
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
Mengfan Wu
Affiliation:
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P R China
Dennis P. Orgill
Affiliation:
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Adriana C. Panayi*
Affiliation:
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Adriana Panayi, Email: apanayi@bwh.harvard.edu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

Protecting frontline health care workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) is critical during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Through an online survey, we demonstrated variable adherence to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) PPE guidelines among health care personnel (HCP).

Methods:

CDC guidelines for optimal and acceptable PPE usage in common situations faced by frontline health care workers were referenced to create a short online survey. The survey was distributed to national, statewide, and local professional organizations across the United States and to HCP, using a snowball sampling technique. Responses were collected between June 15 and July 17, 2020.

Results:

Responses totaling 2245 were received from doctors, nurses, midwives, paramedics, and medical technicians in 44 states. Eight states with n > 20 (Arizona, California, Colorado, Louisiana, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, and Washington) and a total of 436 responses are included in the quantitative analysis. Adherence to CDC guidelines was observed to be highest in the scenario of patient contact when COVID-19 was not suspected (86.47%) and lowest when carrying out aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) (42.47%).

Conclusions:

Further research is urgently needed to identify the reasons underlying variability between professions and regions to pinpoint strategies for maximizing adherence and improving the safety of HCPs.

Keywords

adherencecoronavirusCOVIDCOVID-19PPEsafety

Information

Type
Brief Report
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , August 2022 , pp. 1331 - 1333
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2021

Introduction

A critical focus of the US response to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is to protect nearly 18 million health care personnel (HCP). 1 Without proven, effective treatments, use of personal protective equipment (PPE) remains key to HCP safety. To date, the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has provided PPE recommendations in the United States to facilitate a safer work environment. 2,3 Through an online, anonymous survey, we collected data on adherence to CDC PPE guidelines among HCP in different US states.

Methods

By referencing guidelines from the CDC, 2,3 we defined the standard of optimal PPE use in 5 different clinical scenarios (Table 1). Following approval from the review board at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, an online questionnaire was designed, using REDCap (Vanderbilt University, Tennessee), and distributed among statewide health care institutions and to HCP through the snowball sampling technique. Adherence was determined by calculating the proportion of respondents who met the optimum PPE standard. Data were processed and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 365 (Microsoft, WA) and RStudio 1.2.5033 (RStudio, MA).

Table 1.

Clinical scenarios and optimal personal protective equipment combinations

Note:

* To accommodate for PPE shortages, the CDC guidelines state that surgical masks are an acceptable alternative for patient contact when COVID-19 is suspected or confirmed when there is a shortage of respirator masks. We accommodate this as adherent to the guidelines.

Results

From June 15 to July 17, 2020, 2245 responses from 44 US states were collected; 436 responses from 8 states – Washington (n = 61); Texas (n = 64); South Carolina (n = 30); Oregon (n = 25); Louisiana (n = 100); Colorado (n = 41); California (n = 62); Arizona (n = 53) – are included in the quantitative analysis. Only the first 100 of 1760 responses received from Louisiana were analyzed to control for sampling bias. Respondents included nurses (57.8%), doctors (26.8%), midwives (11.5%), paramedics (1.9%), medical technicians (1.2%), and unknown/unstated (0.7%). Among different professions, doctors demonstrated greatest adherence in all scenarios except for “patient contact when COVID-19 suspected,” for which nurses demonstrated the highest adherence. The rate of adherence to optimum PPE guidelines in the 8 states included is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Percent adherence to optimum personal protective equipment (PPE) guidelines in 5 clinical scenarios in different states: WA, Washington; TX, Texas; SC, South Carolina; OR, Oregon; LA, Louisiana; CO, Colorado; CA, California; AZ, Arizona.

Discussion

HCP adherence to PPE guidelines has remained a key concern throughout the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, particularly because effective prophylaxis and treatments have yet to become available. Based on a prior global survey study conducted by Panayi et. al. Reference Panayi, Flores-Huidobro and Wu4 regarding HCP adherence to the World Health Organization PPE recommendations, we investigated nationwide adherence to CDC PPE recommendations among HCP, during a time when the COVID-19 crisis has been rapidly evolving.

Among the 8 states included in this report, the highest and lowest complete adherence to 4 of 5 clinical scenarios were seen in California and Oregon, respectively. While adherence to the PPE guidelines in different clinical scenarios varied widely, our results showed average adherence in each scenario is poor (ranging from 42.47% to 86.47%). As a general trend, HCP adherence to PPE in “Patient contact when COVID-19 is not suspected” was highest, and in “Carrying out AGPs” was lowest compared with the other clinical scenarios.

Although this study provides new insights on the use of PPE among HCP, its limitations cannot be ignored. Data were included from only 8 states, which limits the generalizability of the results. Further, individual institutional guidelines can influence HCP understanding of optimum standard PPE-use in different scenarios. PPE availability is changing rapidly as state and local decision makers adapt to their situations. These data represent only 1 time frame during the course of a longer public health crisis and should be considered in this context.

Conclusions

Factors driving low adherence rates may be PPE shortages, insufficient training, and/or a low level of awareness among HCP, as well as the inability to remain informed on rapidly evolving recommendations by the CDC or individual institutional administrations. Although our survey does not reflect possible reasons for such variability, it highlights the need to address disparities in PPE use among different HCPs and to urgently investigate the factors that may be contributing to disparities among the states. Providing effective training programs, an adequate supply of PPE, and in-training evaluation are top strategies that can be enforced by policy-makers and safety managers of health care institutions. Further research is warranted to identify which strategies may be most useful.

Acknowledgments

We thank those who helped disseminate the survey on various platforms: Karen C. Lyon, PhD, MBA, APRN-CNS, NEA; Medical Societies of Washoe County, NV, Philadelphia County, PA, Baltimore County, MD, Harford County, MD, TriCounty, TX, Pueblo County, NM, Metropolitan Portland, OR; South Carolina Medical Association; Maryland Dermatologic Society; South Carolina Nurses Association; North Dakota Nurses Association; North Dakota Center for Nursing; Virginia Midwives Alliance; VA Affiliate of the American College of Nurse-Midwives; and Wisconsin EMS Association.

Author contributions

OAD and AA contributed equally as co-first authors.

Funding Statement

This manuscript, in part, was funded by an NIH 5 T35 HL110843 fellowship position to OAD.

Conflict(s) of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this paper.

References

CDC COVID-19 Response Team. Characteristics of health care personnel with COVID-19 – United States, February 12–April 9, 2020. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(15):477–481. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e6.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use personal protective equipment (PPE) when caring for patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. Cent Dis Control Prev Guidel. 2020;epub.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Using personal protective equipment (PPE). July 15, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/using-ppe.html. Accessed August 8, 2020.Google Scholar
Panayi, AC, Flores-Huidobro, A, Wu, M, et al. Adherence to personal protective equipment guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: a worldwide survey study. Br J Surg. 2020;epub, doi: 10.1002/bjs.12001.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Clinical scenarios and optimal personal protective equipment combinations

Figure 1

Figure 1. Percent adherence to optimum personal protective equipment (PPE) guidelines in 5 clinical scenarios in different states: WA, Washington; TX, Texas; SC, South Carolina; OR, Oregon; LA, Louisiana; CO, Colorado; CA, California; AZ, Arizona.