Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-rxvq6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T10:00:50.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026

Md Salek Miah Open the ORCID record for Md Salek Miah [Opens in a new window]  and
Mohammad Shahab Uddin
Md Salek Miah*
Affiliation:
Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh
Mohammad Shahab Uddin
Affiliation:
Management, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh Management, University of Essex Faculty of Social Sciences, UK
*
Corresponding author: Md Salek Miah; Email: saleksta@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study evaluated the association between Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and mental health indicators, providing evidence to inform maternal health policy. This study used the first nationally representative cross-sectional data on mental health symptoms from the 2024 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS), including 13,951 women aged 15–49 years. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scales, with a score of ≥10 indicating the presence of symptoms. Stepwise, survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression was employed to examine the associations of mental health indicators and various dimensions of IPV, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Physical IPV was significantly associated with higher odds of Depression aOR= 3.89; 95% CI: 2.16-6.95; p < 0.001), while Emotional IPV was also associated with higher odds of Depression aOR = 3.50; 95% CI: 2.09-5.86; p < 0.001). Similarly, Any IPV was associated with substantial higher odds with Depression aOR = 2.90; 95% CI: 1.80-4.67, p < 0.001) and Anxiety aOR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.20-3.50, p = 0.008). These findings provide evidence-based, actionable insights for policymakers to integrate mental health and IPV prevention in high-burden provinces to meet the targets of SDG 3 and SDG 5.

Topics structure

Topic(s)

EtiologyInterventionsTeaching and learning

Subtopic(s)

EpidemiologyIndividual careTraining non-mental health professionals

Keywords

mental healthspatialIPVSDGsLMICs

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health , Volume 13 , 2026 , e143
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press

Impact statement

Intimate partner violence (IPV) remains a widespread but under-recognized threat to women’s mental health, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study provides nationally representative data in Zambia that indicates that women who experience IPV have significantly increased chances of developing depression and anxiety; some provinces bear a heavier burden than others. Mental health screening instruments combined with spatial analysis reveal geographic disparities that are not evident from national averages alone. The mental health screening instruments, coupled with spatial analysis, show that there are some geographic disparities evident that are not highlighted by national averages. The findings directly relate to the public health planning and realization of the Sustainable Development Goals, namely, SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 5 (Gender Equality). Identifying high-burden provinces allows policymakers to move beyond broad, mass-based interventions and focus resources on mental health and violence-prevention services where they are most needed. Recognizing high burden provinces enables policymakers to eliminate mass-based solutions and instead direct their efforts toward mental health and violence-prevention services where such needs are the greatest. By incorporating mental health screening and psychosocial support in the current maternal health, primary care and gender-based violence interventions, women at risk may be identified and assisted earlier. Integrating mental health screening and psychosocial support into maternal health and gender-based violence programs can help identify at-risk women early and provide timely support. Outside Zambia, the research provides the experiences of other nations with low- and middle-income populations experiencing the same gender norms, social inequalities and resource limitations. These findings offer insights for other LMICs facing similar challenges, supporting equity-focused interventions. On the whole, this study advocates for more specific, complicated and equity-based measures to minimize the mental impact of intimate partner violence and to promote the health and well-being of women.

Introduction

Psychological and emotional well-being are termed as mental health (WHO, 2022). Mental health disorders, notably depression and anxiety, constitute one of the most burdensome global public health challenges of the twenty-first century (WHO, 2015). These hardships are expected to affect over 1 billion people worldwide by 2025 and are primary drivers of morbidity, substantially increasing Years Lived with Disability (YLDs) (WHO, 2025). Basically, mental health represents a portion of overall well-being, and disruptions in emotional regulation, cognition or behavior can result in mental disorders that require targeted care and support. Globally, mental disorders considered the leading causes of disease burden, affecting nearly one in eight individuals (Fan et al., Reference Fan, Fan, Yang and Fan2025). In 2021, ~970 million people were living with mental disorders, including large populations across sub-Saharan Africa (Alam K and GBD 2021 Forecasting Collaborators, 2024). These status highlights substantially to disability and economic loss, with depression and anxiety alone for an estimated US$1 trillion in annual global productivity loss (Brauer et al., Reference Brauer, Roth, Aravkin, Zheng, Abate, Abate, Abbafati, Abbasgholizadeh, Abbasi and Abbasian2024).

Furthermore, the burden of common mental disorders is highly unequal. Women are disproportionately affected compared with men, a disparity heavily mediated by social and structural determinants, including pervasive gender-based violence (GBV) (“Global, Regional, and National Burden of 12 Mental Disorders in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019”, 2022; C. J. L. Murray et al., Reference Murray, Mokdad, Ballestros, Echko, Glenn, Olsen, Mullany, Lee, Khan, Ahmadi, Ferrari, Kasaeian, Werdecker, Carter, Zipkin, Sartorius, Serdar, Sykes, Troeger and Murray2018). IPV shows a fundamental violation of human rights and a major social determinant of adverse health outcomes among women, encompassing physical, sexual and emotional abuse (Antabe et al., Reference Antabe, Sano, Antabe and Saaka2025). There is a robustly established causal pathway between exposure to IPV and mental health disorders, consistently shown across varied global contexts (Ali and Zuberi, Reference Ali and Zuberi2012; Muchemwa et al., Reference Muchemwa, Phiri, Hollington and Sodi2025; Miah and Kabir, Reference Miah and Kabir2026).

One recent, large-scale meta-analysis synthesized evidence demonstrating that survivors of IPV face nearly double the odds of experiencing significant depressive symptoms (Dokkedahl et al., Reference Dokkedahl, Kirubakaran, Bech-Hansen, Kristensen and Elklit2022; Flor et al., Reference Flor, Spencer, Cagney, Gil, Aalruz, Abd ElHafeez, Abdelwahab, Abdoun, Abebe, Abebe, Abedi, Abeldaño Zuñiga, Abie, Abiodun, Aboagye, Abreu, Abu Farha, Abubakar, Abuhammad, Achore, Adams, Adebiyi, Adedokun, Adegbile, Adegoke, Adeleke, Adeniyi, Adesina, Adewuyi, Adnani, Adzigbli, Afolabi, Afolabi, Afzal, Afzal, Agyemang-Duah, Ahinkorah, Ahmad, Ahmad, Ahmad, Ahmed, Ahmed, Ahmed, Ahmed, Ahmed, Akin-Odanye, Akosile, Akpabio, Alam, al-Amer, Alansari, Alanzi, Aleidi, Alemu, Alhalaiqa, al-Iede, Alinejad Rokny, Almagharbeh, al-Mamun, Almazan, Alnaeem, Alrimawi, Alshahrani, Alyahya, Amin, Amini, Amiri, Amu, Amzat, Anderson, Anuoluwa, Anvari, Anyasodor, Aravkin, Arias de la Torre, Armocida, Arrieta, Arumuganainar, Ashraf, Aslam, Asri, Athari, Atorkey, Atre, Atsbaha, Atta, Atteraya, Azzam, B, Baghlaf, Baig, Balcha, Balmori-de-la-Miyar, Bandyopadhyay, Barik, Barker-Collo, Bashar, Bashir, Bashiri, Bastan, Beeraka, Belayneh, Belge Bilgin, Bell, Berihun, Bermudez, Bhatnagar, Bhattarai, Biswas, Bjertness, Bolarinwa, Bolourinejad, Boppana, Botero Carvajal, Bouaoud, Brugha, Buonsenso, Burns, Bustanji, Carugno, Carvalho, Carvalho, Castaldelli-Maia, Cerrai, Chandan, Chandradasa, Charalampous, Chattu, Chaudhary, Chaudhuri, Chen, Ching, Chopra, Chukwu, Chukwu, Chung, Cullen, da Silva, Dachew, Dadras, Dai, Dalal, Dandona, D’Anna, Darcho, Dayal, DeGraw, Dellie, Deuba, Dewan, Dias da Silva, Diaz, Dohare, Dowou, Dumbili, Dunne, Eboreime, Edeh, Edinur, Ekholuenetale, el Morsi, Eshun, Fagbamigbe, Fan, Farahani, Faro, Fasanmi, Feizkhah, Ferreira, Franklin, Fry, Gao, Gebregergis, Gebrehiwot, Geda, Gelchu, Getahun, Ghasemi Assl, Gholami, Gholizadeh, Ghotbi, Gilani, Girmay, Golechha, Goleij, Grivna, Guan, Gunawardane, Gupta, Halder, Halil, Hanif, Hanifi, Hareru, Haro, Has, Hasaballah, Hasani, Hay, Herbert, Hesari, Hlongwa, Hossain, Hossain, Hossain, Hossain, Hu, Huang, Huang, Iftikhar, Iqbal, Irham, Iskander, Islam, Islam, Jabbarinejad, Jena, Jha, Joseph, Joshua, Kang, Kanmodi, Karajizadeh, Karami, Kashoo, Khaing, Khajuria, Khalil, Khan, Khan, Khanmohammadi, Khasbage, Kheirallah, Khoshvaght, Khosrowjerdi, Khubchandani, Kim, Kim, Knaul, Knudsen, Koomson-Yalley, Kretchy, Krishan, Kuate Defo, Kuddus, Kuitunen, Kulimbet, Kumar, Kumar, Kumar, Kumar, Kumar, Kumar, Kusi Amponsah, Kusnali, Kuwornu, Kyei-Arthur, L C, Laflamme, Lahariya, Lajunen, Langguth, Laslett, Lassi, Latif, Lawal, Lawan, Lee, Leshargie, Li, Li, Liu, Liu, Llanaj, Loreche, Ma, Ma, Madadizadeh, Madureira-Carvalho, Mahmood, Makram, Mallick, Malta, Manjani, Maravilla, Marzouk, Matei, Mathangasinghe, Mattoo, Maulik, Mbachu, McLaughlin, McPhail, Meles, Mendoza, Menezes, Mengesha, Mestrovic, Mettananda, Mewoabi, Michelerio, Miller, Minervini, Mirghafourvand, Mittal, Mohamed, Mohamed, Mohamed Ahmed, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, Mohammadian-Hafshejani, Mohammed, Mokdad, Molavi Vardanjani, Monasta, Moradi, Moreira, Motappa, Mozahheb Yousefi, Mubarik, Mujica, Mullany, Murray, Myung, Nagarajan, Nargus, Nashwan, Nassar, Navaratna, Nayak, Nayak, Nazri-Panjaki, Ndungu, Nearchou, Nega, Negoi, Nguyen, Nguyen, Nguyen, Nguyen, Noor, Noreen, Norouzy, Nri-Ezedi, Nwakama, Nyande, O’Connell, Okonji, Okunlola, Olabisi, Olorunsaiye, Onie, Onwujekwe, Orscelik, Ortiz-Prado, Osborne, Osuagwu, Ouyahia, P A, Padubidri, Palma-Alvarez, Pantazopoulos, Parikh, Parmar, Pashaei, Pasovic, Patel, Patel, Patil, Pawar, Pawar, Peprah, Poluru, Pourtaheri, Pradhan, Prates, Puthussery, Puvvula, Qattea, Qi, Qi, Qiao, Raheem, Rahimi-Movaghar, Rahman, Rahman, Rahman, Raimondo, Rajaa, Rajpoot, Ramadan, Ramazanu, Ranabhat, Rao, Rathish, Rauniyar, Rezaeian, Rhee, Rodriguez, Roever, Ronfani, Rony, Ross, Rouzbahani, Rouzbahani, Roy, Roy, Rudolf, Sabet, Saeed, Saeed, Sagar, Sagoe, Sahoo, Sajadi, Salihu, Sameen, Samy, Santomauro, Santric-Milicevic, Sarkar, Sarode, Sarode, Satpathy, Sawhney, Selvaraj, Sethi, Shahab, Shahid, Shahwan, Shaikh, Shaikh, Shamsi, Shamsutdinova, Shan, Shanawaz, Shannawaz, Sharma, Shetty, Shetty, Shi, Shimul, Shiri, Shittu, Shiue, Shorofi, Siddig, Silva, Singh, Singh, Sousa, Stanikzai, Stein, Stein, Stubbs, Subramaniyan, Suhaib, Sullman, Sun, Swain, T Y, Tabarés-Seisdedos, Tabatabaei, Tabche, Tampa, Tareke, Taridashti, Tasnim, Temsah, Tesfu, Thapar, Thiruvengadam, Tian, Tovani-Palone, Tran, Tran, Tromans, Truppa, Tsai, Tsermpini, Twalibu, Unnikrishnan, Vally, Vasconcelos, Vieira, Villarreal-Zegarra, Vinayak, Vos, Waheed, Walia, Wang, Wang, Wang, Wickramasinghe, Wiredu Agyekum, Xie, Xu, Yahoo (Syed, Yan, Yang, Ye, Yesodharan, Yi, Yismaw, Yon, Yonemoto, Yu, Yunusa, Zadey, Zamagni, Zandam, Zeariya, Zemariam, Zhang, Zhang, Zhumagaliuly, Zinchuk, Zoromba, Zyoud and Gakidou2026). As a result, the mental health consequences extend across a scale, including generalized anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and diverted suicidal tendency (Dokkedahl et al., Reference Dokkedahl, Kirubakaran, Bech-Hansen, Kristensen and Elklit2022). Notably, the psychological and emotional dimensions of IPV are particularly corrosive and often initiate a vicious cycle of eroded self-esteem, diminished self-efficacy and impaired capacity for appropriate care-seeking or exiting an abusive relationship (Babandi et al., Reference Babandi, Habib, Umar, Taura, Gudaji, Salihu, Owolabi, Aghukwa, Baguda and Umar2024; Francis-Tan, Reference Francis-Tan2024). Addressing this IPV-mental health comorbidity is thus an imperative for global health equity (Rasch et al., Reference Rasch, Van, Nguyen, Manongi, Mushi, Meyrowitsch, Gammeltoft and Wu2018; Tesfaye et al., Reference Tesfaye, Chia, Nomhwange, Owuor, Muluh, Nosheen, Wakem, Jimoh, Saatcioglu, Touray, Hamisu, Ndoutabe, Ahmed and Kfutwah2025). The burden of both IPV and resultant mental health distress is acutely concentrated in LMICs, which bear ~75–85% of the global mental health disease burden (Semrau et al., Reference Semrau, Evans-Lacko, Alem, Ayuso-Mateos, Chisholm, Gureje, Hanlon, Jordans, Kigozi, Lempp, Lund, Petersen, Shidhaye and Thornicroft2015; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Zhang, Chen, Li, Huang, Zhao, Chen, Qu and Li2025). SSA bears a disproportionate share of this burden, with a very high prevalence of IPV coupled with systemic structural inequalities, profoundly constrained mental health services and severe stigma at the community level (Tharp et al., Reference Tharp, DeGue, Valle, Brookmeyer, Massetti and Matjasko2013). New national data from countries across the SSA region, such as Mozambique, and earlier waves of surveys in Zambia continue to demonstrate significant associations between IPV exposure and elevated mental health disorder symptoms among women (Antabe et al., Reference Antabe, Sano, Antabe and Saaka2025).

Mental health problems, especially those of depression and anxiety, are currently one of the biggest challenges worldwide, and the problem mostly affects women (Lund et al., Reference Lund, Brooke-Sumner, Baingana, Baron, Breuer, Chandra, Haushofer, Herrman, Jordans, Kieling, Medina-Mora, Morgan, Omigbodun, Tol, Patel and Saxena2018). In the case of Zambia, the large scale of IPV, combined with the shortcomings of mental health interventions and various inequalities, makes it imperative to recognize the mental health problems for effective interventions and policy formulations (Patel et al., Reference Patel, Saxena, Lund, Thornicroft, Baingana, Bolton, Chisholm, Collins, Cooper, Eaton, Herrman, Herzallah, Huang, Jordans, Kleinman, Medina-Mora, Morgan, Niaz, Omigbodun, Prince, Rahman, Saraceno, Sarkar, de Silva, Singh, Stein, Sunkel and UnÜtzer2018).

Specifically, Zambia has long reported among the highest rates of IPV for women aged 15–49 years in the region (Musaka and Musekiwa, Reference Musaka and Musekiwa2024). Such violence is usually sustained by deep-seated and pervasive gender norms that afford men authority and sometimes justify violence against women (Afifi, Reference Afifi2007). First, the older nationally representative surveys, such as the ZDHS 2013–2014, often lacked standardized and validated screening scales needed to capture common mental disorders like anxiety and depression, together with comprehensive data on IPV exposure (Winter et al., Reference Winter, Darmstadt, Lee and Davis2021; Jia et al., Reference Jia, Snider, Collishaw, McNamara and Tumusiime2025). In the absence of spatially disaggregated evidence, policy responses will fall to an inefficient one-size-fits-all national approach, overlooking critical regional differences and possibly failing to reach the most vulnerable populations with sufficient resources (AL-shahrani and Hammad, Reference AL-shahrani and Hammad2025). Besides, some South Asian countries, including Nepal and Bangladesh, conducted these types of investigations to identify the key risk factors of anxiety and depression (Pandey et al., Reference Pandey, Adhikari, Bista, Lamichhane, Joshi, Saugat Pratap, Sharma and Baral2024; Miah & Ullah, Reference Miah and Ullah2025a). Additionally, Mozambique also performed similar types of study, but there are socioeconomical, cultural and geographical gaps arising (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Augusto, Ásbjörnsdóttir, Akullian, Cumbe, Rao, Gimbel, Sherr, Wagenaar, Manuel, Hicks, Mahumane, Pfeiffer, Gloyd, Cuembelo, Nhumba, Lequechane, Covele, Napua and Michel2019).

While various research studies conducted in various countries, Nepal, Mozambique, Lesotho, and Bangladesh, for instance, had explored the connections between intimate partner violence and mental health outcomes, none of them had conducted the study on the national representative level in the case of ZDHS, which had various shortcomings when considering spatially and standardized mental health indicators (Munakampe, Reference Munakampe2020; Pandey et al., Reference Pandey, Adhikari, Bista, Lamichhane, Joshi, Saugat Pratap, Sharma and Baral2024; Rahman et al., Reference Rahman, Tohan, Zaman, Islam, Rahman, Howlader and Kundu2024; Melkam et al., Reference Melkam, Fente, Negussie, Asmare, Asebe, Seifu, Gebrehana, Tsega, Bezie and Asnake2025; Miah & Ullah, Reference Miah and Ullah2025a; Miah and Kabir, Reference Miah and Kabir2026). The 2024 ZDHS, which, for the first time, includes the validated Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) sections, makes it possible to overcome the gaps and provide the first comprehensive information regarding the situation of anxiety and depression, as well as intimate partner violence, in the case of Zambian women (Jacobs et al., Reference Jacobs, Moshabela, Maswenyeho, Lambo and Michelo2017).

Therefore, to address this evidence and geographical gap, the researchers emerged with the key insights of mental health symptoms to inform the policymakers. Therefore, this study robustly addresses this gap using necessary spatial and recent data, leveraging the update released and comprehensive 2024 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS).

The primary research question is what is the impact of intimate partner violence on the mental health of women in Zambia, and the differences in the prevalence of anxiety and depression in various regions? An additional research question is how the prevalence and associations of intimate partner violence and mental health outcomes (anxiety and depression) vary across different provinces in Zambia, highlighting spatial inequalities in mental health burden?

The robust evidence addressed by this research is strongly aligned with global and national health policies, most notably the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – specifically, SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being, target 3.4 for mental health), SDG 5 (Gender Equality, target 5.2 to eliminate violence against women) and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities).

Therefore, this study aims to:

  1. 1. Assess the associations between all dimensions of IPV (physical, sexual, emotional and any IPV) and mental health indicators (anxiety and depression) among women aged 15–49 years in Zambia using the 2024 ZDHS data.

  2. 2. Examine and map the subnational spatial variation and heterogeneity of this mental health and IPV prevalence across Zambia’s provinces, providing geographically focused evidence for policy-making.

This study provides novel, nationally representative evidence on anxiety and depression among Zambian women using the 2024 ZDHS, the first survey to include validated mental health modules (PHQ-9 and GAD-7). It offers policy-relevant spatial insights by mapping subnational inequalities in mental health and various dimensions of IPV prevalence, highlights nuanced associations across all IPV dimensions and reinforces evidence for integrated mental health and IPV interventions. The findings support improvement to SDGs 3, 5 and 10 and generate convenient information for other LMICs with limited mental health data, informing targeted policies and programs.

This study follows the subsequent order: Section 2 presents the methodology, including study design, data, variables, analyses and ethical considerations. Section 3 reports the results, summarizing participant characteristics, prevalence, associations and spatial patterns. Finally, Section 4 provides the discussion, highlighting key findings, interpretation, implications, limitations and recommendations for future research.

Methodology

Data source

This study is based on the nationally representative cross-sectional dataset of the most recent seventh round 2023–2024 ZDHS. The survey was conducted by the Zambia Statistics Agency (ZamStats) in collaboration with the Ministry of Health (MoH), the University Teaching Hospital Virology Laboratory (UTH-VL), the Tropical Diseases Research Centre (TDRC) and the University of Zambia (UNZA). ICF International, under the DHS program, provided the additional assistance, and the survey was conducted from 17 January to 7 July 2024 using computer-assisted personal interviews (CAPIs). Funding and support were provided by the Government of Zambia, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and UNICEF (Kamanga et al., Reference Kamanga, Ngosa, Aladesanmi, Zulu, McCarthy, Choba, Nyirenda, Chizuni, Mwiche, Storey, Shakwelele and Prust2022; Musaka and Musekiwa, Reference Musaka and Musekiwa2024).

Sampling design, setting and sample size

The ZDHS 2023–2024 is a nationally representative survey that used a two-stage stratified random sampling design. A complete list of enumeration areas (EA) covering the whole country was prepared by ZamStats based on the most recent population (seventh round) and housing census, and it was used as the sampling frame. The primary sampling unit (PSU) for the survey is an EA, which contains ~130–150 households on average. In total, 14,000 women aged 15–49 years were eligible for individual interviews, of whom 13,951 women completed the interviews, yielding a response rate of 99.6%. For this study, only women who completed the mental health module (assessing anxiety via GAD-7 and depression via PHQ-9) were included. Consequently, the analysis is based on a sample of 13,951 women (Supplementary Figure S1). No patients are included in this study. For further details on the sampling procedure, data collection process, quality control measures and the questionnaires developed for this survey, namely, the household questionnaire, individual women’s questionnaire and domestic violence module, the readers are referred to the ZDHS 2023–2024 report (Musaka and Musekiwa, Reference Musaka and Musekiwa2024). This study maintained all items of Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (Cuschieri, Reference Cuschieri2019).

Variables

Outcome variables

Anxiety and depression were the main outcomes of this study. The anxiety indicator was assessed using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), a self-reported questionnaire that measures the presence and severity of generalized anxiety symptoms over the past 2 weeks. Participants rated each item on a four-point Likert scale starting from 0 (never) to 3 (always), yielding total scores between 0 and 21 (Casares et al., Reference Casares, Díez-Gómez, Pérez-Albéniz, Lucas-Molina and Fonseca-Pedrero2024). The second outcome variable, the depression indicator, was measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), which assesses depressive indicators over the preceding 2 weeks. Responses were also recorded on a four-point Likert scale, yielding total scores from 0 to 27. Severity was classified as follows: 0–4 (no depression), 5–9 (mild), 10–14 (moderate), 15–19 (moderately severe) and 20–27 (severe), with scores of ≥10 indicating moderate to severe depression (Manea et al., Reference Manea, Gilbody and McMillan2012). For this study, both depression and anxiety were dichotomized (1 = yes, 0 = no) using established cutoff points (PHQ-9 ≥ 10 and GAD-7 ≥ 10), consistent with prior literature. The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 demonstrated strong internal consistency, with Cronbach’s α of 0.821 and 0.834, respectively (Steinman et al., Reference Steinman, Phal, Srou, Ung, LoGerfo, Veith and Harachi2025; Lushington et al., Reference Lushington, Washer, Wicking, Wicking and Dorrian2026; Yi et al., Reference Yi, Zheng, Bargiota, Dri, Teopiz, Wong, Han Le, Kwan, Cao, Ho, Balanag and McIntyre2026).

To address potential co-occurring symptoms, anxiety and depression were analyzed independently; however, all multivariable models were mutually adjusted, meaning depression was included as a covariate in anxiety models and vice versa. This approach reduces bias arising from overlapping symptomatology.

Additionally, respondents who reported receiving treatment (medication or counseling) but scored below the clinical thresholds were retained and classified as “0 = no symptoms,” following DHS psychometric guidelines, since the objective was to estimate current symptom burden rather than treatment history (Pengpid et al., Reference Pengpid, Peltzer and Hasan2025; Steinman et al., Reference Steinman, Phal, Srou, Ung, LoGerfo, Veith and Harachi2025; Miah & Ullah, Reference Miah and Ullah2025a.

Exposures variables

Intimate partner violence (IPV)

The primary exposure to IPV was classified as physical, emotional, sexual and any IPV, following WHO and DHS definitions (Table 1):

  • ▪ Physical IPV indicated acts such as being pushed, shaken, slapped, punched, kicked, strangled, attacked with a weapon or having the arm twisted/pulled (d105a–d105f, d105j).

  • ▪ Emotional IPV indicated humiliation, threats or insults (d103a–d103c).

  • ▪ Sexual IPV indicated forced intercourse or other unwanted sexual acts (d105h–d105k).

  • ▪ Any IPV captured exposure to at least one form.

Table 1.

Classification of IPV exposures

A classification table for I P V exposures including physical, emotional, sexual, and composite categories with their definitions, examples, D H S codes, and binary coding rules. See long description.
Table 1. Long description

The table consists of five columns and four rows of data.

* Row 1: Physical I P V. Defined as physical aggression by a partner. Examples include being pushed, shaken, slapped, punched, kicked, strangled, attacked with a weapon, or having hair pulled. D H S codes are d 1 0 5 a, d 1 0 5 b, d 1 0 5 c, d 1 0 5 d, d 1 0 5 e, d 1 0 5 f, and d 1 0 5 j. Coding is 1 if any are experienced, otherwise 0.

* Row 2: Emotional I P V. Defined as emotional harm or fear. Examples include humiliation, threats, and insults. D H S codes are d 1 0 3 a, d 1 0 3 b, and d 1 0 3 c. Coding is 1 if any are experienced, otherwise 0.

* Row 3: Sexual I P V. Defined as a sexual act forced by a partner. Examples include forced intercourse or unwanted sexual acts. D H S codes are d 1 0 5 h, d 1 0 5 i, and d 1 0 5 k. Coding is 1 if any are experienced, otherwise 0.

* Row 4: Any I P V (composite). Defined as exposure to at least one type of I P V. Examples include physical, emotional, or sexual I P V. Variables include all physical, emotional, and sexual codes listed above. Coding is 1 if any I P V is experienced, otherwise 0.

For this study, all IPV exposures were classified as a binary category (1 = yes and 0 = no).

Importantly, exposure to one form of IPV did not preclude exposure to the others. Women could experience physical, emotional and sexual IPV simultaneously, and these categories were treated as non-mutually exclusive, consistent with DHS methodology.

Covariates

In this study, socioeconomic and demographic features of women, such as their age in years,(categorized into 15–24, 24–25 and 35–49), age at first birth in years (10–17, 18–24 and ≥ 25), age at cohabitation in years (<18, 18–21 and > 21), women education level (no education, primary and secondary + higher), number of children (no children, 1–2 children and 3+ children), maternal working status (not working and currently working), household wealth status (poor, middle class and rich), place of residence (rural and urban), household religion status (Non-Protestant and Protestant), number of the household members (<5 and ≥ 5), household ownership (does not own and owns), contraception decision status (not joint and joint), household media access (no media and has media), use of internet status (no and yes), household assets (no major asset and yes) and household materials (unimproved and improved). Additional household-level variables were constructed to capture specific living conditions. Household ownership was recoded as a binary variable (owns vs. does not own). A composite household asset variable was generated, coded as “yes” if the household owned at least one major asset (refrigerator, bicycle, motorcycle/scooter or car/truck). Household materials were also categorized as improved versus unimproved based on wall, floor and roof materials, following standard DHS classifications. These variables were included alongside the DHS wealth index to distinguish overall socioeconomic status from specific material and environmental conditions (Vyas and Kumaranayake, Reference Vyas and Kumaranayake2006; Thomson et al., Reference Thomson, Thomas, Sellstrom and Petticrew2009; Howe et al., Reference Howe, Galobardes, Matijasevich, Gordon, Johnston, Onwujekwe, Patel, Webb, Lawlor and Hargreaves2012). This selection of covariates in this study was used by several factors, including their availability in the ZDHS 2023–2024 dataset, relevant studies and self-consideration (Anik et al., Reference Anik, Ghose and Rahman2021; Mahfuzur et al., Reference Mahfuzur, Billah, Liebergreen, Ghosh, Alam, Haque and Al-Maruf2022; Hasan et al., Reference Hasan, Asif, Barua, Banerjee, Kalam, Kader, Wahed, Noman and Talukder2023; Shawon et al., Reference Shawon, Hossain, Ahmed, Poly, Hasan and Rahman2024; Negash and Wubneh, Reference Negash and Wubneh2025; Pengpid et al., Reference Pengpid, Peltzer and Hasan2025; Rafi et al., Reference Rafi, Anika, Hasan and Hossain2025; Miah and Ullah, Reference Miah and Ullah2025b; Miah et al., Reference Miah, Lamia, Begum, Shied and Akhter2026).

Confounder selection

This portion provides the methods applied to detect and select potential confounders for adjustment in this study. The confounder selection was based on statistical testing and conceptual analysis to ensure the robustness and validity of the final adjusted model.

Step 1: Bivariate analysis

Initially, this study used chi-square tests to assess associations between covariates and mental health indicators. Categorical variables with p < 0.25 were retained as potential confounders for adjusting final multivariate modeling to avoid excluding potentially important determinants (Celentano and Szklo, Reference Celentano and Szklo2019).

Step 2: Forward stepwise model selection

In this stage, all potential confounders as covariates were included one by one in the model based on statistical (p < 0.25) and conceptual considerations. At each step, the inclusion of a variable was evaluated based on:

  • ▪ Statistical significance (p-value).

  • ▪ The changes in odds ratio (OR) for the main exposure variable.

  • ▪ Model fit statistics, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC).

Conceptually aligned confounders were retained even if they slightly increased AIC/BIC, preventing model misspecification. Separate models were fitted for depression and anxiety, including IPV as the main exposure. Additionally, this study used likelihood ratio tests (LRT) to compare nested logistic regression models, evaluating the effect of covariates on model performances. The statistical significance of the LR test (p-value) showed that the full model, including demographic and household variables, provided a significantly better fit than the reduced model. In addition, model fit was further evaluated using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC).

Bias and missing handling

Participants with missing information on PHQ-9 and GAD-7, or IPV exposures were excluded from the analysis (complete-case analysis). Additionally, survey weights, clustering and stratification were applied according to ZDHS guidelines to reduce bias. Weighting provides that the survey estimates are nationally representative and adjust for unequal probabilities of selection and nonresponse.

Model assumption

After developing the final adjusted model, the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was applied to assess the model’s fit; a nonsignificant p-value indicated a good fit. Additionally, for evaluating multicollinearity, variance inflation factors (VIFs) were used, and a VIF value >10 shows potential concerns with collinearity in covariates.

Set of confounders adjusted in final model

This following set of confounders are added in final adjusted stepwise survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression model, including maternal age, maternal education, household wealth status, place of residence, maternal employment, number of living children, age at cohabitation, household head sex, media access, internet status, household materials, household assets, abstaining status, menstruation status, administrative province, contraception status, religion status, household size, household ownership and health card access.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analysis

In this investigation, descriptive analysis was used to summarize and to explore the background characteristics of the study populations, which were presented with the frequency and percentage for all categorical variables. Additionally, several donut charts were visualized for showing prevalences of anxiety, depression and various dimensions of IPV prevalence.

Bivariate analysis

This study used Pearson’s χ 2-test to assess the initial significant association between study variables and mental health indicators in ever-married women aged 15–49 years, and the results were presented as cell percentages for all categorical cross-tabulations.

Multivariate analysis

Model 1: Unadjusted/crude model (IPV exposure only).

Model 2: Adjusted for demographic variables as potential confounders conceptually and statistically (age, education, religion, province, etc.).

Finally, in this process, a stepwise survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression model was applied to assess the association between mental health indicators (anxiety and depression) and IPV exposure. All results were presented as 95% confidence interval (CI) and adjusted odds ratios (aORs).

Spatial analysis

Additionally, this study used several choropleth plots to assess the spatial variation of mental health indicators and IPV prevalence across provinces. Initially, prevalence statistics for mental health indicators and IPV were calculated in Stata and exported in MS Excel format. The Excel datasets were subsequently imported into R (version 4.5.1), and the datasets were merged with Zambian administrative boundary shapefiles (https://data.humdata.org/dataset). Finally, spatial data preprocessing and geospatial visualization were applied using the sf, tidyverse, ggplot2 and tmap packages.

Analytical tools

All analyses were performed using statistical software STATA version 17 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA) and R version 4.5.1 with R Studio (Posit PBC, Boston, MA, USA).

Results

Background characteristics

Among all women, about 1.3% of individuals reported anxiety, and 1.6% reported depression (Supplementary Figure S2). Women exposed to any IPV showed a significantly higher proportion of depression (11.59% among depressed women) and anxiety (10.71% among anxious women) compared to women not exposed to IPV (p < 0.001 for both outcomes). Among IPV subtypes, physical IPV and emotional IPV were significantly associated with both depression and anxiety. Physical IPV was more common among women with depression (7.73%) and anxiety (5.36%), while emotional IPV showed stronger associations with depression (9.66%) and anxiety (7.14%), and both were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Sexual IPV showed a statistically significant association with anxiety (2.98%, p = 0.014). Among sociodemographic factors, maternal age showed a significant association with both outcomes (p ≤ 0.001), with a higher proportion of depression and anxiety observed among older women aged 35–49 years. Maternal education was significantly associated with depression (p = 0.041), while household wealth was also associated with depression (p = 0.005). Residence type showed significant associations with both depression and anxiety, with higher proportions observed in urban areas. Access to household media and internet use were significantly associated with both outcomes. Women reporting internet use had a higher proportion of depression (2.12%) and anxiety (1.70%) compared to nonusers (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Household material quality was significantly associated with both depression and anxiety (p = 0.008 and p = 0.010, respectively), indicating variation in mental health outcomes across living conditions. However, variables such as age at first birth, age at cohabitation, pregnancy status, household size and household ownership were not significantly associated with either depression or anxiety (Table 2).

Table 2.

Bivariate association between intimate partner violence, sociodemographic characteristics and maternal mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety) among women in Zambia (N = 13,951)

A complex data table showing bivariate associations between I P V, sociodemographics, and maternal mental health in Zambia. See long description.
Table 2. Long description

The table presents data for 13,951 women, categorized by Depression (P H Q 9 score greater than or equal to 10) and Anxiety (G A D 7 score greater than or equal to 10). Each outcome is split into No and Yes columns with associated p-values.

I P V exposures section:

* Physical I P V: Yes (7.73 percent depression, 5.36 percent anxiety); p-values are less than 0.001 and 0.009 respectively.

* Emotional I P V: Yes (9.66 percent depression, 7.14 percent anxiety); p-values are less than 0.001 and 0.002 respectively.

* Sexual I P V: Yes (1.93 percent depression, 2.98 percent anxiety); p-values are 0.212 and 0.014 respectively.

* Any I P V: Yes (11.59 percent depression, 10.71 percent anxiety); p-values are both less than 0.001.

Sociodemographic characteristics section (selected significant findings):

* Maternal age: Depression and anxiety rates increase with age, peaking at 2.00 percent and 1.57 percent respectively for the 35 to 49 age group (p-values 0.001 and less than 0.001).

* Maternal education: Secondary or higher education shows higher depression rates (1.74 percent) compared to no education (1.25 percent), with a p-value of 0.041.

* Number of unions: More than once (2.40 percent depression) vs once (1.39 percent), p-value 0.004.

* Residence type: Urban areas show higher rates (1.76 percent depression, 1.48 percent anxiety) than rural areas (1.27 percent depression, 0.98 percent anxiety), with p-values of 0.016 and 0.007.

* Internet use: Users have higher rates (2.12 percent depression, 1.70 percent anxiety) than non-users (1.27 percent depression, 1.04 percent anxiety), with p-values less than 0.001 and 0.002.

Note: Bold values are used to highlight the statistically significant p-values. Values are presented as row percentages unless otherwise stated.

Multivariable analysis of the association between intimate partner violence and mental health outcomes

Women experiencing Physical IPV showed about fourfold higher odds of depression compared to unexposed women (aOR = 3.89; 95% CI: 2.16–6.95, p < 0.001). Similarly, Emotional IPV was associated with 3.5-fold higher odds (aOR = 3.50; 95% CI: 2.09–5.86, p < 0.001). Overall exposure to Any IPV also significantly increased the odds of depression (aOR = 2.90; 95% CI: 1.80–4.67, p < 0.001). Additionally, Emotional IPV and Any IPV were significantly associated with higher odds of anxiety. Women exposed to Emotional IPV had nearly double the odds of anxiety (aOR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.05–3.72; p = 0.034), while exposure to Any IPV doubled the odds of anxiety (aOR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.20–3.50; p = 0.008) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Associations of IPV exposures and mental health indicators (N = 13, 951)

A statistical table showing associations between I P V exposures and mental health outcomes like Anxiety and Depression using Odds Ratios. See long description.
Table 3. Long description

The table presents data for a sample size N = 13, 951. It is divided into two main outcome sections: Anxiety and Depression. Columns include Outcome, Exposure, Unadjusted O R (95% C I) with P-value, and Adjusted O R (95% C I) with P-value.

For Anxiety:

* Physical I P V (Yes): Unadjusted O R 1.84 (0.91–3.69), P = 0.085; Adjusted O R 1.84 (0.89–3.83), P = 1.84.

* Sexual I P V (Yes): Unadjusted O R 2.50 (0.95–6.59), P = 0.065; Adjusted O R 2.46 (0.90–6.70), P = 0.077.

* Emotional I P V (Yes): Unadjusted O R 2.11 (1.15–3.89), P = 0.015; Adjusted O R 1.97 (1.05–3.72), P = 0.034.

* Any I P V (Yes): Unadjusted O R 2.06 (1.23–3.44), P = 0.005; Adjusted O R 2.05 (1.20–3.50), P = 0.008.

For Depression:

* Physical I P V (Yes): Unadjusted O R 3.32 (1.93–5.69), P < 0.001; Adjusted O R 3.89 (2.16–6.95), P < 0.001.

* Sexual I P V (Yes): Unadjusted O R 1.64 (0.58–4.67), P = 0.53; Adjusted O R 1.75 (0.60–5.06), P = 0.298.

* Emotional I P V (Yes): Unadjusted O R 3.29 (2.01–5.40), P < 0.001; Adjusted O R 3.50 (2.09–5.86), P < 0.001.

* Any I P V (Yes): Unadjusted O R 2.59 (1.64–4.07), P < 0.001; Adjusted O R 2.90 (1.80–4.67), P < 0.001.

Reference category for all exposures is No. Adjusted models account for maternal age, education, wealth, residence, and other demographic factors.

Note: Bold values are used to highlight the statistically significant p-values. Reference category (Ref): No These confounders are added in final adjusted model: maternal age, maternal education, household wealth status, place of residence, maternal employment, number of living children, age at cohabitation, household head sex, media access, internet status, household materials, household assets, abstaining status, menstruation status, administrative province(division), contraception status, religion status, household size, household ownership and health card access.

Spatial distribution of anxiety and depression across Zambia

The highest prevalence of anxiety and depression was shown in the Copperbelt. Besides, moderate levels of anxiety and depression are shown in Central, Eastern, Lusaka and Southern provinces. On the other hand, Northern, Muchinga, Luapula and North-Western provinces showed the lowest prevalence (Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1.

Spatial inequalities of anxiety.

A choropleth map of Zambia showing regional anxiety percentages ranging from 2% to 4%. See long description.
Figure 1. Long description

A geographical map of Zambia divided into ten provinces. A vertical color scale on the right, titled Anxiety percent, ranges from light blue at 2 percent to dark blue at 4 percent. A north arrow is in the top left and a 400 kilometer scale bar is at the bottom left.

Regional distribution of anxiety:

* Northern regions: Northern, Luapula, and Muchinga provinces are light blue, indicating lower anxiety levels near 2 percent.

* Central and Eastern regions: Central and Eastern provinces are medium blue, approximately 3 percent. Copperbelt province is the darkest blue, representing the highest anxiety level at 4 percent.

* Southern and Western regions: Western province is a solid medium-dark blue. Southern and Lusaka provinces are medium blue, similar to the Central region. North-Western province is light blue, matching the northern provinces.

Figure 2.

Spatial inequalities of depression.

A choropleth map of Zambia showing the percentage of depression across ten provinces. See long description.
Figure 2. Long description

A geographical map of Zambia is divided into ten provinces, each shaded according to a color scale representing Depression percentage from 2 percent (light cream) to 4 percent (dark orange).

* In the North, Northern and Luapula provinces are shaded light orange, while Muchinga is light cream.

* In the West and Northwest, Western province is medium-dark orange, while North-Western is light cream.

* In the Center, Copperbelt province shows the highest concentration with the darkest orange shading, followed by Central province in medium orange.

* In the East, Eastern province is shaded medium orange.

* In the South, Southern and Lusaka provinces are shaded medium orange.

The map includes a North arrow in the top-left corner, a 400 kilometer scale bar at the bottom-left, and axes labeled Latitude and Longitude. A vertical legend on the right titled Depression percent provides the color gradient with markers at 2 percent, 2.5 percent, 3 percent, 3.5 percent, and 4 percent.

Spatial distribution of IPV exposures across Zambia

The maps reveal substantial geographic variation in all types of intimate partner violence (IPV) across Zambia. Central, Southern and Eastern provinces consistently show the highest IPV burden, while Muchinga, Luapula, Western, Northern and North-Western provinces report comparatively lower prevalence. Central and Southern provinces exhibit the highest kinds of IPV. Emotional IPV showed the highest prevalence in Southern and Central provinces, and lower prevalence showed Northern, North-Western, Muchinga and Luapula. The highest physical IPV was shown in Southern and Central provinces, and Western, Muchinga and Luapula showed the lowest levels. Additionally, the highest Sexual IPV prevalence is in Central province, with notable burdens in Eastern and Southern provinces; Muchinga, Luapula and North-Western provinces report the lowest prevalence. Overall, the spatial variation shows a southern central belt of Zambia as the main location for all forms of IPV (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figures S3–S5).

Figure 3.

Spatial inequalities of any form of IPV.

A choropleth map of Zambia showing the prevalence of I P V by province. Data is concentrated in the central and southern regions. See long description.
Figure 3. Long description

A geographical map of Zambia divided into ten provinces, colored by I P V percentage. A legend on the right indicates a color gradient from light pink (2 percent) to dark burgundy (4 percent).

* In the North, Northern and Luapula provinces are medium pink, while Muchinga in the Northeast is the lightest shade at approximately 2 percent.

* The Central and Southern provinces are the darkest burgundy, representing the highest prevalence near 4 percent.

* Eastern province is a deep pink, approximately 3.5 percent.

* Lusaka province in the Southeast is light pink, around 2.5 percent.

* To the West, North-Western, Copperbelt, and Western provinces are shaded in medium-light pink, ranging between 2.5 percent and 3 percent.

A north arrow is located in the top-left corner, and a 400 kilometer scale bar is positioned at the bottom-left.

Discussion

This national representative sample of 13,951 ever-married Zambian women aged 15–49 years indicates a strong and significant association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and mental health indicators. The odds of depression were almost four times higher among women who were exposed to physical IPV (aOR = 3.89; 95% CI: 2.16–6.95, p < 0.001) and 3.5 times higher among women who were exposed to emotional IPV (aOR = 3.50; 95% CI: 2.09–5.86, p < 0.001). Exposure to any IPV was associated with an almost threefold risk of depression (aOR = 2.90; 95% CI: 1.80–4.67, p < 0.001). Both emotional and any IPV were also strongly associated with anxiety, and the proportion of affected women doubled (Emotional IPV: aOR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.05–3.72, p = 0.034; Any IPV: aOR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.20–3.50, p = 0.008).

The burden of anxiety and depression was shown to be the highest in the Copperbelt province, showing moderate prevalence in Central, Eastern, Lusaka and Southern provinces, and minimal prevalence in Northern, Muchinga, Luapula and North-Western provinces. Equally, the IPV mapping revealed that the burden is continuously recorded to be in the Central, Southern and Eastern provinces, which led to the demonstration of a southern-central focus of vulnerability. Spatial disparities in IPV and mental health highlight the importance of targeted, location-specific mitigation strategies.

The results are largely in line with the evidence in sub-Saharan Africa (Antabe et al., Reference Antabe, Sano, Antabe and Saaka2025). Research in Zambia, Malawi and Tanzania has reported an increased psychiatric morbidity in women who have been physically and emotionally subjected to IPV, specifically in depression (Brar et al., Reference Brar, Rosenberg, Phanga, Maseko, Bhushan, Vansia, Chikhungu, Nthani, Bamuya, Libale, Madomola, Bekker and Pettifor2017; Patwardhan et al., Reference Patwardhan, Gil, Arrieta, Cagney, DeGraw, Herbert, Khalil, Mullany, O’Connell, Spencer, Stein, Valikhanova, Gakidou and Flor2024; Casella et al., Reference Casella, Kousoulis, Kohrt, Bantjes, Kieling, Cuijpers, Kline, Kotsis, Polanczyk, Stein, Szatmari, Merikangas, Mneimneh and Salum2025). The current research is based on new evidence with national representative data on standardized instruments of mental health (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) in the 2023–2024 ZDHS dataset, providing both individual-level association and spatial clues (Maila et al., Reference Maila, Paul, Mayimbo and Kabwita2022; Mabena et al., Reference Mabena, Mhele and Tsabedze2025). The insignificant relationship between sexual IPV and mental health is in contrast with certain SSA research with high risk (Jacobs et al., Reference Jacobs, Moshabela, Maswenyeho, Lambo and Michelo2017). This discrepancy may reflect cultural norms, reporting bias or methodological factors, underlining the need for sensitive measurement and qualitative investigation of sexual IPV in Zambia (Munne et al., Reference Munne, Fischer, Escudero, Warner, Colls and Cohen2007; Alam et al., Reference Alam, Sajib, Rahman, Ether, Hanson, Sayeed, Akter, Nusrat, Islam, Raza, Tanvir, Chisti, Sadeq-Ur Rahman, Hossain, Layek, Zaman, Rana, Rahman, El Arifeen and Ahmed2024; Tohan et al., Reference Tohan, Zaman, Saha, Juhi, Mahbub and Howlader2025).

The prevalence rate for mental health disorders among Zambian women appears low, with 1.3% for anxiety and 1.6% for depression. Though prevalences are low, these represent a meaningful population affected by mental health disorders, potentially due to lack of awareness or stigma, emphasizing the continued importance of mental health screenings (Graham et al., Reference Graham, Atherton, Mroczek, McGhee, Pieramici, Lewis-Thames, Curtis, Cella, Opsasnick, Lovett, O’Conor and Wolf2024). The findings also emphasize that these could be affected populations that have resulted due to a lack of awareness or stigma associated with these disorders. The findings also endorse the continued importance associated with mental health screenings (Nabila Ashraf et al., Reference Nabila Ashraf, Jennings, Chakma, Farzana, Islam, Maruf, Uddin, Uddin Ahmed, McDaid and Naheed2021; Dadras, Reference Dadras2025).

Spatial analysis shows Southern and Central provinces, along with Eastern province, bear the highest burden of IPV and associated mental health outcomes. On the contrary, Northern, North Western, Muchinga, Luapula and Western provinces had lower IPV prevalence. These observations point toward a southern-central belt region with maximum prevalence of all types of IPV as the major hot spot region, which needs IMCI intervention at the level of this region in view of the prevailing inequality with regard to IPV exposure (Wainberg et al., Reference Wainberg, Scorza, Shultz, Helpman, Mootz, Johnson, Neria, Bradford, Oquendo and Arbuckle2017; Jester et al., Reference Jester, Thomas, Sturm, Harvey, Keshavan, Davis, Saxena, Tampi, Leutwyler, Compton, Palmer and Jeste2023). This highlights a southern-central belt hotspot requiring targeted interventions to reduce inequalities in IPV exposure. These regional inequalities may be driven by variations in socioeconomic conditions, cultural norms regarding gender and violence, urbanization and access to reporting mechanisms and health services, which can influence both exposure to IPV and the recognition of mental health needs (Budge et al., Reference Budge, Shaikh, Mikhail, Bakus, LaRosa, Ogedegebe and Oladipo2025; Mokwena and Makhozonke, Reference Mokwena and Makhozonke2024; S. M. Murray et al., Reference Murray, Bass, Bourey, Murray, Tol, Bass, Ba, Mahenge, Mulemba and Falb2025; Shimels et al., Reference Shimels, Shewamene, Habteyesus, Sium and Teshome2025; Ullman et al., Reference Ullman, Dutra and Mathews2025).

The results revealed that both emotional and physical IPV have significant associations with increased rates of anxiety and depression among Zambian women, though the Sexual IPV had nonsignificant results, possibly due to the culture and stigma associated with it (N. Ahmed et al., Reference Ahmed, Chu, Mustafa, Javanmard, Jui and Lee2025; S. Ahmed et al., Reference Ahmed, Adams, Islam, Hasan and Panciera2019). While emotional IPV could have widespread psychosocial consequences by causing a reduction in self-esteem and coping mechanisms, it could also be a chronic cause of stress that could further increase the risks associated with both anxiety and depression (Khan, Reference Khan1985; Sultana et al., Reference Sultana, Ali, Salan and Kabir2025). Physical IPV could be a direct cause of trauma, fear and helplessness that could further increase the risks associated with depression (Padgett, Reference Padgett2020; Sen et al., Reference Sen, Nilima, Zahura and Bari2023). Exposure to multiple IPV types compounds mental health risks(Zafri et al., Reference Zafri, Nurullah, Neema and Waliullah2021; Faruk et al., Reference Faruk, Khan, Chowdhury, Jahan, Sarker, Colucci and Hasan2023). The disparities also point toward the fact that women living in provinces with higher prevalence of IPV could have higher mental health risks, making it important to develop site-specific strategies (Kundu et al., Reference Kundu, Rahman, Chowdhury, Hagan, Dey, Dey, Karmoker, Sharif and Ahmed2024; Saba et al., Reference Saba, Nessa, Islam, Kaley and Koly2024).

The identified pattern of the south-central concentration of IPV and mental health burden is probably due to a complex of social, economic and cultural factors, such as gender norms, poverty and access to health services (Roth et al., Reference Roth, Mensah, Johnson, Addolorato, Ammirati, Baddour, Barengo, Beaton, Benjamin, Benziger, Bonny, Brauer, Brodmann, Cahill, Carapetis, Catapano, Chugh, Cooper, Coresh and Fuster2020). The problem of urban and rural disparities implies that females in the city have a higher level of awareness and reporting ability, and females in the country might face underreporting as a result of stigmatization (Gunarathne et al., Reference Gunarathne, Nedeljkovic, Apputhurai and Bhowmik2024; Kurvinen et al., Reference Kurvinen, Ekström and Deuba2025). Household internet access and material resources suggest potential for digital and community-based interventions to screen and educate women (Meekers et al., Reference Meekers, Pallin and Hutchinson2013; Miah & Ullah, Reference Miah and Ullah2025a.

Therefore, these findings are consistent with studies in Nepal, Bangladesh, Canada and Mozambique; emotional and physical IPVs in Zambia are strongly associated with anxiety and depression, with the highest burden concentrated in southern-central provinces (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Augusto, Ásbjörnsdóttir, Akullian, Cumbe, Rao, Gimbel, Sherr, Wagenaar, Manuel, Hicks, Mahumane, Pfeiffer, Gloyd, Cuembelo, Nhumba, Lequechane, Covele, Napua and Michel2019; Miao et al., Reference Miao, Zai, Joiner, Burnside and Walker2024; Rahman et al., Reference Rahman, Tohan, Zaman, Islam, Rahman, Howlader and Kundu2024; Antabe et al., Reference Antabe, Antabe, Sano and Pienaah2025; Barini et al., Reference Barini, Ongeri and Mogeni2025; Shaikh, Reference Shaikh2025; Miah and Kabir, Reference Miah and Kabir2026).

Policy implications

The findings demonstrate that policy-based integrated mental health and IPV interventions are urgently needed in Zambia, with certain implications on policies: (i) Geographically focused interventions: Focus on mental health screening and IPV prevention at high-burden provinces (Copperbelt, Central, Southern and Eastern). (ii) Integrated service provision: Integrate primary healthcare and mental health care with IPV support, such as legal protection, psychosocial counseling and safe shelter. (iii) Digital and community-based interventions: Use the internet and media to create awareness, offer counseling and lower the stigma of IPV and mental health. (iv) SDG-congruent interventions: Position interventions in line with SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), SDG 5 (Gender Equality) and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) to have sustainable effects. Overall, policies should target high-burden provinces, integrating mental health and IPV services through community and digital platforms.

Strengths

The study was the first national representative research in Zambia to integrate mental health measures using the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 within the ZDHS, capturing data from a large sample of 13,951 women. The inclusion of these validated instruments allows robust assessment of depression and anxiety at a population level. The study applied rigorous conceptual and statistical processes for model selection, enhancing the reliability of the findings. Additionally, spatial mapping techniques enable the identification of provincial hotspots, informing targeted interventions for intimate partner violence (IPV) and mental health. The strong survey design, including appropriate weighting and stratification, ensures generalizability of results to Zambian women aged 15–49 years.

Limitations

It was a cross-sectional design; therefore, it was not possible to draw a causal inference. Additionally, it was based on self-reported data to drive stigma or recall bias. Besides, residual confounding existed. Future studies should use longitudinal designs to better assess causality. Mixed-methods approaches and validated objective measures may reduce reporting bias. Including additional contextual and behavioral factors could help minimize residual confounding and improve study robustness.

Theoretical contributions

This study is informed by an ecological stress trauma framework and conceptualizes IPV as a multilevel psychosocial stressor that outlines women’s mental health outcomes and their spatial inequalities across Zambia.

Conclusions

This article generates strong, nationally representative data that indicate that physical, emotional and general IPV are strongly linked with depression and anxiety in Zambian women. The spatial distribution gives emphasis on southern-central provinces as high-priority areas that need intervention. These results underpin the idea of poor-law-tailored, SDG-consistent and culturally mindful interventions based on mental health services and IPV prevention and response to enhance the health and well-being of women in Zambia. These findings suggest the urgent need for targeted maternal health policies and interventions to address IPV, supporting progress toward SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 5 (Gender Equality). Spatially informed strategies can help prioritize high-burden regions for effective resource allocation and prevention programs.

These findings are likely generalizable to other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where comparable socioeconomic settings, gender control inequities and inadequate access to mental health services similarly improve women’s vulnerability to intimate partner violence and common mental disorders. The co-occurrence of IPV and depression–anxiety observed in Zambia reflects structural and cultural shapes widely recognized across LMIC settings, signifying that the acknowledged relations are not context-specific but revealing of broader provincial and global trends.

Abbreviation

aOR

adjusted odds ratio

CI

confidence interval

DHS

Demographic and Health Survey

GAD-7

Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7

GBV

gender-based violence

IPV

intimate partner violence

LMICs

lower middle-income countries

LRT

likelihood ratio test

PHQ-9

Patient Health Questionnaire-9

PTSD

post-traumatic stress disorder

RECMTH

Mental Health and Well-being Module

SDG

Sustainable Development Goal

SSA

Sub-Saharan Africa

STROBE

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

USAID

United States Agency for International Development

VIF

variance inflation factor

WHO

World Health Organization

YLDs

years lived with disability

ZDHS

Zambia Demographic and Health Survey

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.

Data availability statement

This secondary dataset is available on request from the DHS program website at: (https://www.dhsprogram.com/data).

Author contribution

M.S.M.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, writing – original draft, final manuscript, resources and project administration. M.S.U.: review the manuscript and provide valuable and constructive feedback.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding.

Ethics statement

Ethical clearance for the ZDHS 2023–2024 was provided by the Zambia National Health Research Ethics Board and the ICF Institutional Review Board. The study used publicly available, de-identified data, so no additional ethical approval was required. However, details at https://dhsprogram.com/Methodology/Protecting-the-Privacy-of-DHS-Survey-Respondents.cfm.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Declaration of AI use

The study used generative AI tools like Grammarly, QuillBot and ChatGPT (GPT-4) just to improve the language. These tools were not used for any data work, such as data generation, data analysis or data interpretation.

References

Afifi, M. (2007). Gender differences in mental health. Singapore Medical Journal. 48(5), 385–391.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S, Adams, AM, Islam, R, Hasan, SM and Panciera, R (2019) Impact of traffic variability on geographic accessibility to 24/7 emergency healthcare for the urban poor: A GIS study in Dhaka, Bangladesh. PLoS One 14(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222488.Google Scholar
Ahmed, N, Chu, E, Mustafa, F, Javanmard, R, Jui, J and Lee, J (2025) Understanding inequalities in spatial accessibility to multi-tier healthcare for older adults in rapidly aging Bangladesh. Journal of Transport and Health 44, 102121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2025.102121.Google Scholar
Alam K and GBD 2021 Forecasting Collaborators (2024) Burden of disease scenarios for 204 countries and territories, 2022–2050: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet 403(10440), 2204–2256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00685-8.Google Scholar
Alam, MA, Sajib, MRUZ, Rahman, F, Ether, S, Hanson, M, Sayeed, A, Akter, E, Nusrat, N, Islam, TT, Raza, S, Tanvir, KM, Chisti, MJ, Sadeq-Ur Rahman, Q, Hossain, A, Layek, MA, Zaman, A, Rana, J, Rahman, SM, El Arifeen, S and Ahmed, A (2024) Implications of big data analytics, AI, machine learning, and deep learning in the health care system of Bangladesh: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 26, e54710. https://doi.org/10.2196/54710.Google Scholar
Ali, FA and Zuberi, RW (2012) Association of sociodemographic factors with depression in women of reproductive age. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 24(1), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539510364668.Google Scholar
AL-shahrani, HF and Hammad, MA (2025) Mental health disorders and quality of life among Saudi women who have experienced domestic violence. Frontiers in Public Health 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1568733.Google Scholar
Anik, AI, Ghose, B and Rahman, MM (2021) Relationship between maternal healthcare utilisation and empowerment among women in Bangladesh: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 11(8), e049167. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049167.Google Scholar
Antabe, R, Antabe, G, Sano, Y and Pienaah, CKA (2025) Women’s household decision-making autonomy and mental health outcomes in Mozambique. Global Mental Health 12, e40. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.29.Google Scholar
Antabe, R, Sano, Y, Antabe, G and Saaka, SA (2025) Association of intimate partner violence with probable depression and symptoms of anxiety among women in Mozambique. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 28(5), 1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-025-01578-x.Google Scholar
Brauer, M, Roth, GA, Aravkin, AY, Zheng, P, Abate, KH, Abate, YH, Abbafati, C, Abbasgholizadeh, R, Abbasi, MA, Abbasian, M, et al. (2024) Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. 2021 The Lancet 403(10440). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00933-4.Google Scholar
Babandi, F, Habib, ZG, Umar, MU, Taura, AA, Gudaji, MI, Salihu, AS, Owolabi, DS, Aghukwa, C, Baguda, AS and Umar, MM (2024) Intimate partner violence, social support and depression in pregnant women in Nigeria. Pyramid Journal of Medicine 7(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/pjm.2024.334.Google Scholar
Barini, G, Ongeri, L and Mogeni, P (2025) Mental health outcomes and intimate partner violence among nepalese women: A propensity score matched study. PLOS Mental Health 2(7), e0000374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000374.Google Scholar
Brar, S, Rosenberg, N, Phanga, T, Maseko, B, Bhushan, N, Vansia, D, Chikhungu, M, Nthani, T, Bamuya, C, Libale, C, Madomola, E, Bekker, L-G and Pettifor, A (2017) The association between intimate partner violence and depression symptoms in a cohort of adolescent girls and young women in Lilongwe, Malawi. Annals of Global Health 83(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2017.03.212.Google Scholar
Budge, KL, Shaikh, S, Mikhail, M, Bakus, C, LaRosa, S, Ogedegebe, C and Oladipo, AF (2025) The imperative for universal screening of domestic violence: Social determinants of health disparities during COVID-19 within New Jersey. Public Health in Practice 9, 100597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100597.Google Scholar
Casares, MÁ, Díez-Gómez, A, Pérez-Albéniz, A, Lucas-Molina, B and Fonseca-Pedrero, E (2024) Screening for anxiety in adolescents: Validation of the generalized anxiety disorder Assessment-7 in a representative sample of adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders 354, 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.047.Google Scholar
Casella, C. B., Kousoulis, A. A., Kohrt, B. A., Bantjes, J., Kieling, C., Cuijpers, P., Kline, S., Kotsis, K., Polanczyk, G. V, Stein, D. J., Szatmari, P., Merikangas, K. R., Mneimneh, Z. and Salum, G. A. (2025) Data gaps in prevalence rates of mental health conditions around the world: a retrospective analysis of nationally representative data. The Lancet Global Health 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00563-1Google Scholar
Celentano, DD and Szklo, M (2019) Gordis Epidemiology, 6th Edn. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cuschieri, S (2019) The STROBE guidelines. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia 13(5), 31–S34. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18.Google Scholar
Dadras, O (2025) Mental health and help-seeking behaviors among Mozambican youth: Insights from a post-pandemic National Survey Amidst Internal Conflict. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 60(7), 1681–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02817-3.Google Scholar
Dokkedahl, SB, Kirubakaran, R, Bech-Hansen, D, Kristensen, TR and Elklit, A (2022) The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Systematic Reviews 11(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02025-z.Google Scholar
Fan, Y, Fan, A, Yang, Z and Fan, D (2025) Global burden of mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2021: Results from the global burden of disease study 2021. BMC Psychiatry 25(1), 486. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06932-y.Google Scholar
Faruk, MO, Khan, AH, Chowdhury, KUA, Jahan, S, Sarker, DC, Colucci, E and Hasan, MT (2023) Mental illness stigma in Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional survey. Global Mental Health 10, e59. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.56.Google Scholar
Flor, LS, Spencer, CN, Cagney, J, Gil, GF, Aalruz, H, Abd ElHafeez, S, Abdelwahab, SI, Abdoun, M, Abebe, M, Abebe, Y, Abedi, A, Abeldaño Zuñiga, RA, Abie, A, Abiodun, O, Aboagye, RG, Abreu, LG, Abu Farha, RK, Abubakar, B, Abuhammad, S, Achore, M, Adams, LC, Adebiyi, BO, Adedokun, KA, Adegbile, OE, Adegoke, NA, Adeleke, OT, Adeniyi, MA, Adesina, MA, Adewuyi, HO, Adnani, QES, Adzigbli, LA, Afolabi, AA, Afolabi, RF, Afzal, MS, Afzal, S, Agyemang-Duah, W, Ahinkorah, BO, Ahmad, A, Ahmad, D, Ahmad, MM, Ahmed, A, Ahmed, A, Ahmed, H, Ahmed, MS, Ahmed, O, Akin-Odanye, EO, Akosile, W, Akpabio, IU, Alam, Z, al-Amer, RM, Alansari, AN, Alanzi, TM, Aleidi, SM, Alemu, MB, Alhalaiqa, FN, al-Iede, M, Alinejad Rokny, H, Almagharbeh, WT, al-Mamun, M, Almazan, JU, Alnaeem, MM, Alrimawi, I, Alshahrani, NZ, Alyahya, MSI, Amin, TT, Amini, S, Amiri, S, Amu, H, Amzat, J, Anderson, DB, Anuoluwa, BS, Anvari, S, Anyasodor, AE, Aravkin, AY, Arias de la Torre, J, Armocida, B, Arrieta, A, Arumuganainar, D, Ashraf, T, Aslam, B, Asri, Y, Athari, SS, Atorkey, P, Atre, SR, Atsbaha, AH, Atta, JA, Atteraya, MS, Azzam, AY, B, S, Baghlaf, KK, Baig, AA, Balcha, WF, Balmori-de-la-Miyar, J, Bandyopadhyay, S, Barik, M, Barker-Collo, SL, Bashar, MDA, Bashir, S, Bashiri, A, Bastan, MM, Beeraka, NM, Belayneh, M, Belge Bilgin, G, Bell, ML, Berihun, AA, Bermudez, ANC, Bhatnagar, A, Bhattarai, AH, Biswas, MS, Bjertness, E, Bolarinwa, OA, Bolourinejad, P, Boppana, SH, Botero Carvajal, A, Bouaoud, S, Brugha, T, Buonsenso, D, Burns, RA, Bustanji, Y, Carugno, A, Carvalho, AF, Carvalho, F, Castaldelli-Maia, JM, Cerrai, S, Chandan, JS, Chandradasa, M, Charalampous, P, Chattu, VK, Chaudhary, AA, Chaudhuri, S, Chen, H, Ching, PR, Chopra, H, Chukwu, CW, Chukwu, IS, Chung, S, Cullen, P, da Silva, AG, Dachew, BA, Dadras, O, Dai, X, Dalal, K, Dandona, R, D’Anna, L, Darcho, SD, Dayal, H, DeGraw, EM, Dellie, E, Deuba, K, Dewan, SMR, Dias da Silva, D, Diaz, D, Dohare, S, Dowou, RK, Dumbili, EW, Dunne, J, Eboreime, E, Edeh, C, Edinur, HA, Ekholuenetale, M, el Morsi, DAW, Eshun, G, Fagbamigbe, AF, Fan, Q, Farahani, A, Faro, A, Fasanmi, AO, Feizkhah, A, Ferreira, N, Franklin, RC, Fry, DA, Gao, X, Gebregergis, MW, Gebrehiwot, M, Geda, YF, Gelchu, M, Getahun, GK, Ghasemi Assl, S, Gholami, E, Gholizadeh, N, Ghotbi, E, Gilani, JA, Girmay, AA, Golechha, M, Goleij, P, Grivna, M, Guan, SY, Gunawardane, DA, Gupta, S, Halder, P, Halil, HM, Hanif, A, Hanifi, N, Hareru, HE, Haro, JM, Has, EMM, Hasaballah, AI, Hasani, H, Hay, SI, Herbert, ME, Hesari, M, Hlongwa, M, Hossain, M, Hossain, MM, Hossain, MS, Hossain, MB, Hu, C, Huang, J, Huang, Y, Iftikhar, PM, Iqbal, M, Irham, LM, Iskander, TR, Islam, MS, Islam, SMS, Jabbarinejad, R, Jena, BH, Jha, RP, Joseph, N, Joshua, CE, Kang, J, Kanmodi, KK, Karajizadeh, M, Karami, J, Kashoo, FZ, Khaing, IK, Khajuria, H, Khalil, M, Khan, IH, Khan, RM, Khanmohammadi, S, Khasbage, SU, Kheirallah, KA, Khoshvaght, S, Khosrowjerdi, M, Khubchandani, J, Kim, J, Kim, K, Knaul, FM, Knudsen, AKS, Koomson-Yalley, E, Kretchy, IA, Krishan, K, Kuate Defo, B, Kuddus, M, Kuitunen, I, Kulimbet, M, Kumar, D, Kumar, GA, Kumar, K, Kumar, M, Kumar, R, Kumar, V, Kusi Amponsah, A, Kusnali, A, Kuwornu, JP, Kyei-Arthur, F, L C, P, Laflamme, L, Lahariya, C, Lajunen, T, Langguth, B, Laslett, AM, Lassi, ZS, Latif, A, Lawal, SA, Lawan, A, Lee, SW, Leshargie, CT, Li, J, Li, Z, Liu, J, Liu, X, Llanaj, E, Loreche, AM, Ma, KSK, Ma, ZF, Madadizadeh, F, Madureira-Carvalho, AM, Mahmood, NH, Makram, AM, Mallick, T, Malta, DC, Manjani, L, Maravilla, JC, Marzouk, S, Matei, CN, Mathangasinghe, Y, Mattoo, KA, Maulik, PK, Mbachu, II, McLaughlin, SA, McPhail, SM, Meles, HN, Mendoza, W, Menezes, RG, Mengesha, EW, Mestrovic, T, Mettananda, S, Mewoabi, SDD, Michelerio, A, Miller, TR, Minervini, G, Mirghafourvand, M, Mittal, C, Mohamed, MG, Mohamed, NS, Mohamed Ahmed, KAH, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, S, Mohammadian-Hafshejani, A, Mohammed, S, Mokdad, AH, Molavi Vardanjani, H, Monasta, L, Moradi, Y, Moreira, RS, Motappa, R, Mozahheb Yousefi, K, Mubarik, S, Mujica, OJ, Mullany, EC, Murray, CJL, Myung, W, Nagarajan, K, Nargus, S, Nashwan, AJ, Nassar, M, Navaratna, SNK, Nayak, BP, Nayak, SG, Nazri-Panjaki, A, Ndungu, AW, Nearchou, F, Nega, AT, Negoi, I, Nguyen, CD, Nguyen, CT, Nguyen, HLT, Nguyen, L, Noor, STA, Noreen, M, Norouzy, A, Nri-Ezedi, CA, Nwakama, CN, Nyande, FK, O’Connell, EM, Okonji, OC, Okunlola, JO, Olabisi, OI, Olorunsaiye, CZ, Onie, S, Onwujekwe, OE, Orscelik, A, Ortiz-Prado, E, Osborne, A, Osuagwu, UL, Ouyahia, A, P A, M, Padubidri, JR, Palma-Alvarez, RF, Pantazopoulos, I, Parikh, RR, Parmar, A, Pashaei, A, Pasovic, M, Patel, J, Patel, SK, Patil, S, Pawar, S, Pawar, S, Peprah, P, Poluru, R, Pourtaheri, N, Pradhan, J, Prates, EJS, Puthussery, S, Puvvula, J, Qattea, I, Qi, X, Qi, Z, Qiao, Y, Raheem, KA, Rahimi-Movaghar, V, Rahman, MM, Rahman, M, Rahman, MA, Raimondo, I, Rajaa, S, Rajpoot, PL, Ramadan, MM, Ramazanu, S, Ranabhat, CL, Rao, SJ, Rathish, D, Rauniyar, SK, Rezaeian, M, Rhee, TG, Rodriguez, JAB, Roever, L, Ronfani, L, Rony, MKK, Ross, AGP, Rouzbahani, H, Rouzbahani, S, Roy, P, Roy, S, Rudolf, R, Sabet, CJ, Saeed, M, Saeed, U, Sagar, R, Sagoe, D, Sahoo, PM, Sajadi, SM, Salihu, D, Sameen, S, Samy, AM, Santomauro, DF, Santric-Milicevic, MM, Sarkar, T, Sarode, GS, Sarode, SC, Satpathy, M, Sawhney, M, Selvaraj, S, Sethi, Y, Shahab, M, Shahid, S, Shahwan, MJ, Shaikh, MA, Shaikh, N, Shamsi, A, Shamsutdinova, A, Shan, D, Shanawaz, M, Shannawaz, M, Sharma, V, Shetty, M, Shetty, PK, Shi, W, Shimul, MMH, Shiri, R, Shittu, A, Shiue, I, Shorofi, SA, Siddig, EE, Silva, GCB, Singh, A, Singh, B, Sousa, MA, Stanikzai, MH, Stein, C, Stein, DJ, Stubbs, B, Subramaniyan, V, Suhaib, M, Sullman, MJM, Sun, J, Swain, CK, T Y, SS, Tabarés-Seisdedos, R, Tabatabaei, SM, Tabche, C, Tampa, M, Tareke, M, Taridashti, S, Tasnim, A, Temsah, MH, Tesfu, AA, Thapar, R, Thiruvengadam, M, Tian, W, Tovani-Palone, MR, Tran, TQM, Tran, TH, Tromans, SJ, Truppa, C, Tsai, AC, Tsermpini, EE, Twalibu, A, Unnikrishnan, B, Vally, Z, Vasconcelos, NM, Vieira, A, Villarreal-Zegarra, D, Vinayak, M, Vos, T, Waheed, Y, Walia, M, Wang, Q, Wang, W, Wang, YP, Wickramasinghe, ND, Wiredu Agyekum, M, Xie, W, Xu, W, Yahoo (Syed, S, Yan, G, Yang, Y, Ye, P, Yesodharan, R, Yi, S, Yismaw, YE, Yon, DK, Yonemoto, N, Yu, C, Yunusa, U, Zadey, S, Zamagni, G, Zandam, H, Zeariya, MGM, Zemariam, AB, Zhang, B, Zhang, H, Zhumagaliuly, A, Zinchuk, M, Zoromba, MA, Zyoud, SH and Gakidou, E (2026) Disease burden attributable to intimate partner violence against females and sexual violence against children in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2023: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. The Lancet 407(10523), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)02503-6.Google Scholar
Francis-Tan, A (2024) How does empowering men affect intimate partner violence? Evidence from Bangladesh. SSM - Population Health 26, 101656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101656.Google Scholar
Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (2022) Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. The Lancet Psychiatry 9(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3.Google Scholar
Graham, EK, Atherton, OE, Mroczek, DK, McGhee, C, Pieramici, L, Lewis-Thames, M, Curtis, L, Cella, D, Opsasnick, L, Lovett, R, O’Conor, R and Wolf, MS (2024) Longitudinal associations between multimorbidities and patient-reported quality of life. Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 79(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbad173.Google Scholar
Gunarathne, L, Nedeljkovic, M, Apputhurai, P and Bhowmik, J (2024) Impact of intimate partner violence on mental health among married women in Sri Lanka: A study based on women’s wellbeing Survey-2019. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom) 46(3), e410–e418. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdae082.Google Scholar
Hasan, MM, Asif, CAA, Barua, A, Banerjee, A, Kalam, MA, Kader, A, Wahed, T, Noman, MW and Talukder, A (2023) Association of access to water, sanitation and handwashing facilities with undernutrition of children below 5 years of age in Bangladesh: Evidence from two population-based, nationally representative surveys. BMJ Open 13(6), e065330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065330.Google Scholar
Howe, LD, Galobardes, B, Matijasevich, A, Gordon, D, Johnston, D, Onwujekwe, O, Patel, R, Webb, EA, Lawlor, DA and Hargreaves, JR (2012) Measuring socio-economic position for epidemiological studies in low- and middle-income countries: A methods of measurement in epidemiology paper. International Journal of Epidemiology 41(3), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys037.Google Scholar
Jacobs, C, Moshabela, M, Maswenyeho, S, Lambo, N and Michelo, C (2017) Predictors of antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, and postnatal care utilization among the remote and poorest rural communities of Zambia: A multilevel analysis. Frontiers in Public Health 5, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00011; Available at https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00011/full (accessed 30 June 2026).Google Scholar
Jester, DJ, Thomas, ML, Sturm, ET, Harvey, PD, Keshavan, M, Davis, BJ, Saxena, S, Tampi, R, Leutwyler, H, Compton, MT, Palmer, BW and Jeste, DV (2023) Review of major social determinants of health in schizophrenia-Spectrum psychotic disorders: I. Clinical outcomes. Schizophrenia Bulletin 49(4), 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbad023.Google Scholar
Jia, J, Snider, A, Collishaw, A, McNamara, PE and Tumusiime, E (2025) Pathways linking WASH access and women’s empowerment: Evidence from Zambia and Honduras. Journal of Rural Studies 116, 103602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103602.Google Scholar
Kamanga, A, Ngosa, L, Aladesanmi, O, Zulu, M, McCarthy, E, Choba, K, Nyirenda, J, Chizuni, C, Mwiche, A, Storey, A, Shakwelele, H and Prust, ML (2022) Reducing maternal and neonatal mortality through integrated and sustainability-focused programming in Zambia. PLOS Global Public Health 2(12), e0001162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001162.Google Scholar
Khan, AA (1985) Analyzing spatial disparities in access to health care: A methodology with application in Bangladesh. GeoJournal 10(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174672.Google Scholar
Kundu, S, Rahman, MH, Chowdhury, SSA, Hagan, JE, Dey, SR, Dey, R, Karmoker, R, Sharif, AB and Ahmed, F (2024) Spatial variation and predictors of women’s sole autonomy in healthcare decision-making in Bangladesh: A spatial and multilevel analysis. Healthcare (Switzerland) 12(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12242494.Google Scholar
Kurvinen, M, Ekström, AM and Deuba, K (2025) Burden of intimate partner violence, mental health issues, and help-seeking behaviors among women in Nepal. Women’s Health 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251326416.Google Scholar
Liu, W, Zhang, Y, Chen, J, Li, X, Huang, Y, Zhao, F, Chen, F, Qu, P and Li, Y (2025) Global burden and trends of major mental disorders in individuals under 24 years of age from 1990 to 2021, with projections to 2050: Insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Frontiers in Public Health 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1635801.Google Scholar
Lund, C, Brooke-Sumner, C, Baingana, F, Baron, EC, Breuer, E, Chandra, P, Haushofer, J, Herrman, H, Jordans, M, Kieling, C, Medina-Mora, ME, Morgan, E, Omigbodun, O, Tol, W, Patel, V and Saxena, S (2018) Social determinants of mental disorders and the sustainable development goals: A systematic review of reviews. The Lancet Psychiatry 5(4), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30060-9.Google Scholar
Lushington, K, Washer, S, Wicking, P, Wicking, A and Dorrian, J (2026) Validation of the PHQ-4 as a unidimensional screener in 191,519 Australian children and adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders 400, 121216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121216.Google Scholar
Mabena, K. M. E., Mhele, K. and Tsabedze, W. F. (2025).African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.Google Scholar
Mahfuzur, MR, Billah, MA, Liebergreen, N, Ghosh, MK, Alam, MS, Haque, MA and Al-Maruf, A (2022) Exploring spatial variations in level and predictors of unskilled birth attendant delivery in Bangladesh using spatial analysis techniques: Findings from nationally representative survey data. PLoS One 17(10), e0275951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275951.Google Scholar
Maila, B, Paul, R, Mayimbo, S and Kabwita, K (2022) Prevalence and correlates of antenatal depression at Chelstone First Level Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia: A cross-sectional study. African Health Sciences 22(4), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v22i4.39.Google Scholar
Manea, L, Gilbody, S and McMillan, D (2012) Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9): A meta-analysis. CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal 184(3), E191–E196. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110829.Google Scholar
Meekers, D, Pallin, SC and Hutchinson, P (2013) Intimate partner violence and mental health in Bolivia. BMC Women’s Health 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-13-28.Google Scholar
Melkam, M, Fente, BM, Negussie, YM, Asmare, ZA, Asebe, HA, Seifu, BL, Gebrehana, AK, Tsega, SS, Bezie, MM and Asnake, AA (2025) Postpartum depression and associated factors among childbearing women from the recent demographic and health survey data of Mozambique: Multilevel analysis. Heliyon 11(1), e41106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41106.Google Scholar
Miah, MS and Kabir, MB (2026) Decision-making autonomy and depressive symptoms among women in Lesotho: Rural–urban differences. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports 25, 101080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2026.101080.Google Scholar
Miah, MS and Ullah, MO (2025a) Associations of internet use and pregnancy loss with depression and anxiety among women in Bangladesh: Evidence from the 2022 BDHS. BMC Women’s Health 26(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-04166-4.Google Scholar
Miah, MS and Ullah, MO (2025b) Identifying the determinants of depression among ever married women in Bangladesh: A machine learning approach. International Journal of Statistical Sciences 25(2), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.3329/ijss.v25i2.85733.Google Scholar
Miah, MS and Ullah, MO (2026) Associations of internet use and pregnancy loss with depression and anxiety among women in Bangladesh: Evidence from the 2022 BDHS. BMC Women’s Health 26(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-04166-4.Google Scholar
Miah, MS, Lamia, FF, Begum, ML, Shied, M and Akhter, R (2026) Household water and handwashing facilities and early childhood education participation in Nepal: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Health Science Reports 9(4), e72254. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.72254.Google Scholar
Miao, Q, Zai, G, Joiner, I, Burnside, J and Walker, M (2024) Associations between mental health conditions in pregnancy and maternal socioeconomic status: A population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada. BMC Women’s Health 24(1), 663. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03499-w.Google Scholar
Mokwena, KE and Makhozonke, N (2024) The prevalence of postnatal depression and associated factors among clinic attendees in Maseru, Lesotho. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies 7(2), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v7i2.2644.Google Scholar
Muchemwa, M, Phiri, M, Hollington, M and Sodi, T (2025) Intimate partner violence and mental health outcomes among ever-married women in Mozambique. BMC Women’s Health 25(1), 447. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03990-y.Google Scholar
Munakampe, MN (2020) Strengthening mental health systems in Zambia. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 14(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00360-z.Google Scholar
Munne, S, Fischer, J, Escudero, T, Warner, A, Colls, P, Cohen, J, et al. (2007) O-230 New recommendations for male factor and repeated pregnancy loss patients who are considering IVF and are at risk of having translocations. Fertility and Sterility 88(Suppl 1), S144–S145.Google Scholar
Murray, CJL, Mokdad, AH, Ballestros, K, Echko, M, Glenn, S, Olsen, HE, Mullany, E, Lee, A, Khan, AR, Ahmadi, A, Ferrari, AJ, Kasaeian, A, Werdecker, A, Carter, A, Zipkin, B, Sartorius, B, Serdar, B, Sykes, BL, Troeger, C and Murray, CJL (2018) The state of US health, 1990-2016: Burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors among US states. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association 319(14), 1444–1472. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.0158.Google Scholar
Murray, SM, Bass, JK, Bourey, C, Murray, SM, Tol, WA, Bass, JK, Ba, A, Mahenge, B, Mulemba, S and Falb, K (2025) Integrating mental health care to reduce intimate partner violence in complex humanitarian emergencies. The Lancet Global Health 13(8), e1484–e1488.Google Scholar
Musaka, B and Musekiwa, A (2024) The spatial distribution of intimate partner violence prevalence and its associated factors among women aged 15–49 years in Zambia: Evidence from the 2018 demographic and health survey. BMC Public Health 24(1), 3443. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20964-1.Google Scholar
Nabila Ashraf, M, Jennings, H, Chakma, N, Farzana, N, Islam, MS, Maruf, T, Uddin, MMJ, Uddin Ahmed, H, McDaid, D and Naheed, A (2021) Mental health issues in the COVID-19 pandemic and responses in Bangladesh: View point of media reporting. Frontiers in Public Health 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.704726.Google Scholar
Negash, WD and Wubneh, HD (2025) Skilled birth attendance and its associated factors in Chad and Nigeria: A multilevel analysis of DHS data. PLOS Global Public Health 5(12), e0005290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005290.Google Scholar
Padgett, DK (2020) Homelessness, housing instability and mental health: Making the connections. BJPsych Bulletin 44(5), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2020.49.Google Scholar
Pandey, AR, Adhikari, B, Bista, B, Lamichhane, B, Joshi, D, Saugat Pratap, KC, Sharma, S and Baral, S (2024) Prevalence, determinants and care-seeking behaviour for anxiety and depression in Nepalese population: A secondary analysis of data from Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2022. BMJ Open 14(8), e078582. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078582.Google Scholar
Patel, V., Saxena, S., Lund, C., Thornicroft, G., Baingana, F., Bolton, P., Chisholm, D., Collins, P. Y., Cooper, J. L., Eaton, J., Herrman, H., Herzallah, M. M., Huang, Y., Jordans, M. J. D., Kleinman, A., Medina-Mora, M. E., Morgan, E., Niaz, U., Omigbodun, O., Prince, M., Rahman, A., Saraceno, B., Sarkar, B. K., de Silva, M., Singh, I., Stein, D. J., Sunkel, C. and UnÜtzer, Jü. (2018). The lancet commission on global mental health and sustainable development. The Lancet 392, 10157, 1553–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X.Google Scholar
Patwardhan, V, Gil, GF, Arrieta, A, Cagney, J, DeGraw, E, Herbert, ME, Khalil, M, Mullany, EC, O’Connell, EM, Spencer, CN, Stein, C, Valikhanova, A, Gakidou, E and Flor, LS (2024) Differences across the lifespan between females and males in the top 20 causes of disease burden globally: A systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021. The Lancet Public Health 9(5), e282–e294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00053-7.Google Scholar
Pengpid, S, Peltzer, K and Hasan, MT (2025) Undiagnosed depressive and anxiety disorders in a nationally representative sample of Bangladeshi and Nepali women: Prevalence and associated factors. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 19(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-025-00677-7.Google Scholar
Rafi, MA, Anika, US, Hasan, MT and Hossain, MG (2025) Association between women’s empowerment and mental health help-seeking behaviour in Bangladesh: Findings from a nationally representative survey. BMJ Open 15(9), e099770. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099770.Google Scholar
Rahman, MA, Tohan, MM, Zaman, S, Islam, MA, Rahman, MS, Howlader, MH and Kundu, S (2024) A structural equation modelling to explore the determinants of mental health disorders among reproductive-aged women in Nepal: A nation-wide cross-sectional survey. BMC Psychiatry 24(1), 867. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06249-2.Google Scholar
Rasch, V, Van, TN, Nguyen, HTT, Manongi, R, Mushi, D, Meyrowitsch, DW, Gammeltoft, T and Wu, CS (2018) Intimate partner violence (IPV): The validity of an IPV screening instrument utilized among pregnant women in Tanzania and Vietnam. PLoS One 13(2), e0190856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190856.Google Scholar
Roth, GA, Mensah, GA, Johnson, CO, Addolorato, G, Ammirati, E, Baddour, LM, Barengo, NC, Beaton, A, Benjamin, EJ, Benziger, CP, Bonny, A, Brauer, M, Brodmann, M, Cahill, TJ, Carapetis, JR, Catapano, AL, Chugh, S, Cooper, LT, Coresh, J and Fuster, V (2020) Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: Update from the GBD 2019 study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 76(25), 2982–3021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010.Google Scholar
Saba, J, Nessa, Z, Islam, S, Kaley, A and Koly, K N (2024). “I don’t care about my mental health because I have a physical disability”: A qualitative study on the mental healthcare-seeking behaviours of people with disabilities in Bangladesh. Acta Psychologica, 251, 104624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104624Google Scholar
Semrau, M, Evans-Lacko, S, Alem, A, Ayuso-Mateos, JL, Chisholm, D, Gureje, O, Hanlon, C, Jordans, M, Kigozi, F, Lempp, H, Lund, C, Petersen, I, Shidhaye, R and Thornicroft, G (2015) Strengthening mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries: The emerald programme. BMC Medicine 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0309-4.Google Scholar
Sen, KK, Nilima, S, Zahura, FT and Bari, W (2023) Do education and living standard matter in breaking barriers to healthcare access among women in Bangladesh? BMC Public Health 23(1), 1431. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16346-8.Google Scholar
Shaikh, MA (2025) Intimate partner violence among Nepalese women and associated factors in 2021–2022. PLOS Global Public Health 5(3), e0003267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003267.Google Scholar
Shawon, MSR, Hossain, FB, Ahmed, R, Poly, IJ, Hasan, M and Rahman, MR (2024) Role of women empowerment on mental health problems and care-seeking behavior among married women in Nepal: Secondary analysis of nationally representative data. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 27(4), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-024-01433-5.Google Scholar
Shimels, T, Shewamene, Z, Habteyesus, D, Sium, AF and Teshome, G (2025) The intersections of climate change, gender, migration, and sexual and reproductive health in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. Discover Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ABGQE.Google Scholar
Steinman, L, Phal, O, Srou, R, Ung, K, LoGerfo, J, Veith, RC and Harachi, TW (2025) Improving recognition of common mental health disorders in Cambodia: Validation of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 and development of a brief mental health screener. PLOS Mental Health 2(4), e0000228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000228.Google Scholar
Sultana, A, Ali, A, Salan, SA and Kabir, MA (2025) Exploring the spatial and temporal dynamics of the health index of Bangladesh using Bayesian framework. Journal of Public Health Research 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251351156.Google Scholar
Tesfaye, B, Chia, JE, Nomhwange, T, Owuor, DC, Muluh, TJ, Nosheen, S, Wakem, AYD, Jimoh, A, Saatcioglu, A, Touray, K, Hamisu, AW, Ndoutabe, M, Ahmed, JA and Kfutwah, A (2025) Epidemiology and genetic characterization of orphan polioviruses in Africa, 2022–2024: Unmasking silent transmission and implications for eradication. Vaccine 27, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100752.Google Scholar
Tharp, AT, DeGue, S, Valle, LA, Brookmeyer, KA, Massetti, GM and Matjasko, JL (2013) A systematic qualitative review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse 14(2), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012470031.Google Scholar
Thomson, H, Thomas, S, Sellstrom, E and Petticrew, M (2009) The health impacts of housing improvement: A systematic review of intervention studies from 1887 to 2007. American Journal of Public Health 99(Suppl 3), S681–S692. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2008.143909.Google Scholar
Tohan, MM, Zaman, S, Saha, BR, Juhi, NJ, Mahbub, SB and Howlader, MH (2025) Marital control, domestic violence justification, and mental health: A study of married women in Bangladesh. BMC Psychiatry 25(1), 886. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07133-3.Google Scholar
Ullman, C, Dutra, F and Mathews, S (2025) What works to prevent violence against adolescent girls in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health 78(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.09.020.Google Scholar
Vyas, S and Kumaranayake, L (2006) Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy and Planning 21(6), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czl029.Google Scholar
Wainberg, ML, Scorza, P, Shultz, JM, Helpman, L, Mootz, JJ, Johnson, KA, Neria, Y, Bradford, JME, Oquendo, MA and Arbuckle, MR (2017) Challenges and opportunities in global mental health: A research-to-practice perspective. Current Psychiatry Reports 19(5), 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0780-z.Google Scholar
WHO (2015) Mental Health. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders (accessed 30 June 2026).Google Scholar
WHO (2022) World Mental Health Report: Transforming Mental Health for All. Available at https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049338 (accessed 30 June 2026).Google Scholar
WHO (2025) Over a Billion People Living with Mental Health Conditions – Services Require Urgent Scale-up. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Winter, JC, Darmstadt, GL, Lee, SJ and Davis, J (2021) The potential of school-based WASH programming to support children as agents of change in rural Zambian households. BMC Public Health 21(1), 1812. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11824-3.Google Scholar
Yi, YT, Zheng, YJ, Bargiota, SI, Dri, CE, Teopiz, KM, Wong, S, Han Le, G, Kwan, ATH, Cao, B, Ho, R, Balanag, EMP and McIntyre, RS (2026) The effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on anxiety: A systematic review. Psychoneuroendocrinology 188, 107844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2026.107844.Google Scholar
Zafri, NM, Nurullah, M, Neema, MN and Waliullah, M (2021) Spatial accessibility to healthcare facilities in coastal region of Bangladesh. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 36(3), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3107.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y, Augusto, O, Ásbjörnsdóttir, K, Akullian, A, Cumbe, V, Rao, D, Gimbel, S, Sherr, K, Wagenaar, BH, Manuel, JL, Hicks, L, Mahumane, A, Pfeiffer, J, Gloyd, S, Cuembelo, F, Nhumba, M, Lequechane, J, Covele, A, Napua, M and Michel, C (2019) Geographic distribution and determinants of mental health stigma in Central Mozambique. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 54(11), 1391–1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01708-8.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Classification of IPV exposuresTable 1. long description.

Figure 1

Table 2. Bivariate association between intimate partner violence, sociodemographic characteristics and maternal mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety) among women in Zambia (N = 13,951)Table 2. long description.

Figure 2

Table 3. Associations of IPV exposures and mental health indicators (N = 13, 951)Table 3. long description.

Figure 3

Figure 1. Spatial inequalities of anxiety.Figure 1. long description.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Spatial inequalities of depression.Figure 2. long description.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Spatial inequalities of any form of IPV.Figure 3. long description.

Supplementary material: File

Miah and Uddin supplementary material

Miah and Uddin supplementary material
Download Miah and Uddin supplementary material(File)
File 212 KB

Author comment: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R0/PR1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr1 [Opens in a new window]
Md Salek Miah [Opens in a new window] Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh
Revision round: 0
Role: author

Comments

Dear Editor-in-Chief,

We are pleased to submit our manuscript entitled Intimate Partner Violence and the Dual Burden of Anxiety and Depression Among Women in Zambia: Spatial Inequalities and Implications for the Sustainable Development Goals for consideration for publication in Global Mental Health.

This study uses nationally representative data from the 2024 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS) to examine the association between multiple dimensions of intimate partner violence (physical, emotional, and overall IPV) and common mental disorders specifically depression and anxiety among ever-married women aged 15–49 years. By applying survey-weighted multivariable regression alongside spatial mapping techniques, the study identifies both the magnitude of mental health inequalities associated with IPV and their geographic clustering across provinces. The novelty of this work lies in its integration of validated mental health screening tools (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) with spatial analysis in a low-income country context, generating policy-relevant evidence on province-level inequalities. The identification of high-burden regions in southern-central Zambia highlights the need for geographically targeted, IPV-responsive mental health interventions. These findings are highly relevant to the aims of Global Mental Health, particularly its focus on population-level mental health disparities, gender-based violence, and actionable evidence aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 3 and SDG 5). The manuscript has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript and have no competing interests to declare. We believe this study will be of strong interest to the readership of Global Mental Health, including researchers, practitioners, and policymakers working in global mental health, gender equity, and health systems strengthening in low- and middle-income countries. Finally, this student project received no funding.

Thank you for considering our manuscript. We look forward to your response.

Yours sincerely,

Md Salek Miah

Corresponding Author

Department of Statistics

Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST)

Sylhet-3114, Bangladesh

Email: saleksta@gmail.com

ORCID: 0009-0005-5704-0155

Review: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R0/PR2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr2 [Opens in a new window]
Zacharie Tsala Dimbuene [Opens in a new window] Department of Population Sciences , Universite de Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the)
Date of review:  27 February 2026
Revision round: 0
Role: reviewer
Recommendation/decision: major-revision

Conflict of interest statement

None

Comments

Title: Intimate Partner Violence and the Dual Burden of Anxiety and Depression Among Women in Zambia: Spatial Inequalities and Implications for the Sustainable Development Goals

The paper addresses an important issue by linking intimate partner violence (IPV) and mental health which are both critical health challenges in developed and developing countries. Overall, the paper is intelligible but shows a bit of neglect during the preparation of the manuscript. Here is the breakdown of my comments:

1. References are incomplete (e.g., many references are n.d.) and other references are mispresented

2. Table 2. Percentages have been calculated in columns. It is not clear what this means and how this was truly interpreted. It makes more sense to calculate row percentages and that might be interpreted as rate; and this can be compared among the NO (no IPV/components) and YES groups. See Table 2. This is critical to better understand and interpret the findings.

3. Maps about anxiety and depression and the Figure about anxiety and depression (ln 303) seem to contradict. In Fig less than 2% of ever-married women experienced anxiety and/or depression. In the maps, I can see that the percentage of women with anxiety and depression ranged from 0 to >30% (depression), and from 0 to >20% (anxiety). What is the explanation because the simple logic does not hold.

4. Pie chats with binary variables are irrelevant and you know the “why”

5. Check Table 1 (e.g. burnedd105f: actsd105k:)

6. ln 263 province(division)

7. ln 295 - Among 13, 951 ever married women

Decision: Major Revision

Review: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R0/PR3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr3 [Opens in a new window]
Reviewer_1
Date of review:  11 March 2026
Revision round: 0
Role: reviewer
Recommendation/decision: major-revision

Conflict of interest statement

I have no competing interests.

Comments

Abstract

Authors should correct grammar in the second last sentence “These findings highlight to provide evidence based, actionable insights for policymakers to integrated mental health and IPV prevention in high burden province to meet the target of SDG 3 and 5”.

Line 5: On background information. There is a problem with word choice. ‘Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) highlights an important global public health issue….”

The entire background information paragraph should be rephrased; it lacks clarity and several grammar issues are evident. For example, the authors should simply say ‘IPV is an important global health issue….’

‘….IPV is barrier to achieving….’

Objective lines 9, 10: authors to address grammar issues.

Method lines 12-18: Authors to address glaring grammar issues. There is also lack of clarity.

Impact statement lines 34-54: This section is poorly written with several grammatical errors.

Introduction lines 34-54: Grammar issues. Issue on citation on lines 60, 67, and 81.

On lines 133-135: Assess the precise associations between all dimensions of IPV (physical, sexual, emotional, and any IPV) and mental health indicators (anxiety and depression) among women aged 15-49 years in Zambia using the 2024 ZDHS data. How did authors assess precise association? Statistically we estimate. Moreover, there is no such a thing as precise estimate!

Methodology

Line 163, 177, and 196: errors citation

Variables (lines 183-196)

Authors should address glaring grammar issues. Paragraph on lines 183-196 is extremely poorly written.

Authors should explain how co-occurring symptoms of the two disorders were handled in the analysis. How respondent who were on treatment for either disorder but their score were was below threshold handled?

Exposure variables.

Does exposure to physical, emotional, or sexual IPV preclude exposure to the other forms? For example, does exposure to physical IPV preclude exposure to sexual or emotional IPV? This should be clear.

Choice of confounders

Authors claim to have selected confounders based on availability and relevant studies without citing any source.

Set of confounders in final model

Authors should justify why the final model included household wealth status alongside other factors such household ownership, household materials, household assets, from which is derived. Lines 259-264.

Results

Authors should rewrite this section. For example in lines 303-306, ‘Among all types of IPV prevalence, physical IPV showed about 2.3%, sexual IPV 1.1%, emotional IPV 3.15%, any kinds of IPV 4.5%’. This lacks clarity.

The Discussion, policy Implications, and strengths sections also need to be revised to ensure clarity and consistency with the previous sections

Recommendation: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R0/PR4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr4 [Opens in a new window]
Di Liang Fudan University, China
Date of review:  19 March 2026
Revision round: 0
Role: Handling Editor
Recommendation/decision: major-revision

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R0/PR5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr5 [Opens in a new window]
Dixon Chibanda [Opens in a new window] London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Revision round: 0
Role: Editor in Chief
Recommendation/decision: major-revision

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R1/PR6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr6 [Opens in a new window]
Md Salek Miah [Opens in a new window] Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh
Revision round: 1
Role: author

Comments

March 28, 2026

To

Academic Editor

Global Mental Health (GMH)

Subject: Submission of Revised Manuscript

Dear Editor,

We sincerely thank you, Prof. Dixon Chibanda, and the reviewers for the thoughtful and constructive feedback on our manuscript:

“Intimate Partner Violence and the Dual Burden of Anxiety and Depression Among Women in Zambia: Spatial Inequalities and Implications for the Sustainable Development Goals.”

We greatly appreciate the time, effort, and insightful guidance provided by the reviewers, which has helped us improve the clarity, rigor, and overall quality of our manuscript. In particular, we are grateful to Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 2 for the detailed methodological and analytical suggestions, which significantly strengthened our approach to covariate selection, outcome modeling, and interpretation.

This study uses nationally representative data from the 2024 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS) to examine the association between multiple dimensions of intimate partner violence (physical, emotional, and overall IPV) and common mental disorders (depression and anxiety) among ever-married women aged 15–49 years. By applying survey-weighted multivariable regression alongside spatial mapping techniques, the study identifies both the magnitude of mental health inequalities associated with IPV and their geographic clustering across provinces. The novelty of this work lies in its integration of validated mental health screening tools (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) with spatial analysis in a low-income country context, generating policy-relevant evidence on province-level inequalities. The identification of high-burden regions in southern-central Zambia highlights the need for geographically targeted, IPV-responsive mental health interventions.

We have carefully revised the manuscript with tracked changes, addressing all reviewer comments and suggestions. Specifically, we have:

• Corrected grammar, improved clarity, and addressed all language-related issues.

• Updated and clarified methodological and statistical details, including outcome, exposure, and covariate definitions.

• Ensured clarity and consistency in the results, discussion, policy implications, and strengths sections.

• Revised references to ensure completeness and proper formatting according to GMH style.

• Corrected all figures, tables, and supplementary materials as recommended.

• Incorporated recent literature to strengthen context and support for covariate selection and interpretation.

Below, we provide a detailed, point-by-point response to all reviewer comments. Reviewer comments are presented in italic, and our responses are in blue, with page and line numbers referencing the tracked-changes version of the revised manuscript.

Additionally, we have updated the ORCID of the corresponding author:

Md Salek Miah – https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5973-461X

Submitted Files:

1. GMH_IPV_MH - Clean.docx

2. GMH_IPV_MH - Revised.docx

3. Point-to-Point Reply.pdf

We hope that these revisions fully address the reviewers’ and your insightful comments, and we are confident that the manuscript is now clearer, more accurate, and fully aligned with the journal’s standards. We are very grateful for the careful evaluation and guidance provided and look forward to your feedback on the next steps in the review process.

Best regards,

Md Salek Miah (Corresponding Author)

Department of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet-3114, Bangladesh

Email: saleksta@gmail.com | Mobile: +8801687831074 | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5973-461X

Co-author:

Mohammad Shahab Uddin

Department of Management, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh

Review: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R1/PR7

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr7 [Opens in a new window]
Zacharie Tsala Dimbuene [Opens in a new window] Department of Population Sciences , Universite de Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the)
Date of review:  05 April 2026
Revision round: 1
Role: reviewer
Recommendation/decision: major-revision

Conflict of interest statement

None

Comments

I commend the authors did efforts to incorporate reviewers’ comments with gallantry. That has significantly improved the manuscript. However, I am not convinced by authors’ responses on the following. On page 40 (Map shows province-level prevalence of depression among ever-married women. National prevalence is low (about 2–4%), and the map highlights relative geographic variation rather than the national average.). If the national estimate of depression ranges (this is false because a national estimate is a point estimate), in no ways provincial estimates with range between 0 and 30%. Same can be said on anxiety.

Second, Figures reported in Table 2, especially between sociodemographics and (i) depression and (ii) anxiety are totally wrong. Let’s take an example. For youth aged 15-24, here are the Figures reported:

Depression:

Age group No Yes

15-24 5826 (42.39) 63 (30.43)

Just to take this example, I don’t know where this Figures come. First, the sum should be 100%. This is not the case. Correct maths should be depression rate = 63/(5826+63)*100 = 1.07%. Therefore, 1.07% of youth suffered from depression vs. 98.93% who did not suffer from depression; etc.

With these two crucial comments which invalidate many statistics reported in the paper, I leave the Editors for final decision.

Review: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R1/PR8

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr8 [Opens in a new window]
Reviewer_1
Date of review:  13 April 2026
Revision round: 1
Role: reviewer
Recommendation/decision: accept

Conflict of interest statement

I declare no competing interests.

Comments

None

Recommendation: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R1/PR9

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr9 [Opens in a new window]
Di Liang Fudan University, China
Date of review:  13 April 2026
Revision round: 1
Role: Handling Editor
Recommendation/decision: minor-revision

Comments

The current presentation of data in Table 2 and the Figures lacks consistency, which likely underlies Reviewer 1’s confusion. Specifically, Table 2 switches between column percentages for sociodemographic characteristics and row percentages for IPV exposures. Furthermore, the shift from reporting general proportions in Figures 1 and 2 to prevalence rates in Figure 3 creates an inconsistent narrative. To ensure clarity, the authors should standardize the presentation—ideally using row percentages throughout Table 2 to consistently show the distribution of outcomes across groups—and explicitly define the metrics used in each Figure caption.

Decision: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R1/PR10

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr10 [Opens in a new window]
Dixon Chibanda [Opens in a new window] London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Revision round: 1
Role: Editor in Chief
Recommendation/decision: major-revision

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R2/PR11

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr11 [Opens in a new window]
Md Salek Miah [Opens in a new window] Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh
Revision round: 2
Role: author

Comments

Dear Academic Editor,

We are pleased to resubmit our revised manuscript entitled:

“Intimate Partner Violence and the Dual Burden of Anxiety and Depression Among Women in Zambia: Spatial Inequalities and Implications for the Sustainable Development Goals.”

We sincerely thank you and the reviewers for the constructive and insightful comments. We have carefully addressed all concerns and substantially revised the manuscript to improve clarity, consistency, and methodological rigor.

In particular, we have:

Standardized the presentation of results (including row percentages in Table 2)

Corrected and clarified all statistical reporting

Revised figures and captions to ensure consistency in prevalence interpretation

Separated figures from the clean manuscript for clarity, as recommended

Improved language, structure, and overall readability

All changes have been clearly indicated in the revised version, and a detailed point-by-point response has been provided.

We believe these revisions have significantly strengthened the manuscript and addressed all reviewer and editorial concerns. We respectfully hope the manuscript is now suitable for publication in Global Mental Health.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Md Salek Miah

(Corresponding Author)

Recommendation: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R2/PR12

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr12 [Opens in a new window]
Di Liang Fudan University, China
Date of review:  08 May 2026
Revision round: 2
Role: Handling Editor
Recommendation/decision: minor-revision

Comments

The presentation of row and column percentages in Table 3 is still inconsistent. Currently, rows under “IPV exposures” are reported as column percentages, whereas rows under “Sociodemographic Characteristics” use row percentages. I recommend standardizing the table by also presenting the values for “IPV exposures” as row percentages.

Decision: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R2/PR13

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr13 [Opens in a new window]
Dixon Chibanda [Opens in a new window] London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Revision round: 2
Role: Editor in Chief
Recommendation/decision: minor-revision

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R3/PR14

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr14 [Opens in a new window]
Md Salek Miah [Opens in a new window] Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh
Revision round: 3
Role: author

Comments

Dear Academic Editor,

We are pleased to resubmit our revised manuscript entitled:

“Intimate Partner Violence and the Dual Burden of Anxiety and Depression Among Women in Zambia: Spatial Inequalities and Implications for the Sustainable Development Goals.”

We sincerely thank you, Prof. Dixon Chibanda, and the reviewers for the valuable and constructive feedback. The comments have been extremely helpful in improving the clarity, methodological rigor, and overall quality of our manuscript.

In this revised version, we have carefully addressed all comments raised by the reviewers and the Handling Editor. Specifically, we have:

• Improved language clarity, grammar, and overall readability

• Revised and standardized statistical reporting, including correction and clarification of percentage calculations

• Ensured consistency in the presentation and interpretation of results across tables and figures

• Standardized Table 2 to use row percentages throughout, as recommended

• Revised figures and captions to ensure consistent interpretation of prevalence estimates

• Updated and separated figures for clarity in the clean manuscript

• Strengthened the discussion and policy implications using recent literature

• Updated references to meet journal formatting requirements

• Included a graphical abstract as a separate PDF file, as encouraged by the Editor

All revisions have been clearly marked in the tracked-changes version, and a detailed point-by-point response to reviewers has been provided.

We believe these revisions have substantially improved the manuscript and fully address all concerns raised. We respectfully hope that the manuscript is now suitable for publication in Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Md Salek Miah

(Corresponding Author)

Department of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh

Email: saleksta@gmail.com | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5973-461X

Co-author:

Mohammad Shahab Uddin

Department of Management, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh

Recommendation: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R3/PR15

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr15 [Opens in a new window]
Di Liang Fudan University, China
Date of review:  20 May 2026
Revision round: 3
Role: Handling Editor
Recommendation/decision: accept

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals — R3/PR16

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10261.pr16 [Opens in a new window]
Dixon Chibanda [Opens in a new window] London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Revision round: 3
Role: Editor in Chief
Recommendation/decision: accept

Comments

No accompanying comment.