No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Pusey and Scripture: Dead End or Fertile Ground?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
Pusey is often characterised as obscurantist and conservative in his rejection of the higher literary criticism of the Bible in the later part of the nineteenth century. Much of the criticism of Pusey has focused on a limited assessment of Pusey as a scriptural scholar and on unfair psychological analysis. This article examines Pusey's epistemology more deeply and concludes that he had a breadth of vision which commends itself to the modern world as a critique of reason rather than a rejection of reason. Pusey's role as a biblical scholar is reassessed within the broad context of the Oxford Movement.
Information
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2019 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 Larsen, Timothy, ‘Anglo-Catholics: E.B. Pusey and Holy Scripture’, in Larsen, T., A People of One Book: The Bible and the Victorians (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 See Douglas, Brian, The Eucharistic Theology of Edward Bouverie Pusey: Sources, Context and Doctrine within the Oxford Movement and Beyond (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 See Matthew, H.G.G., ‘Edward Bouverie Pusey: From Scholar to Tractarian’, The Journal of Theological Studies, XXXII (1981), pp. 101-124CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Brown, David, ‘Pusey as consistent and wise: Some comparisons with Newman’, Anglican and Episcopal History, 71 (2002), 3, pp. 328-349Google Scholar.
5 Matthew, ‘Edward Bouverie Pusey’, p. 115.
6 Matthew, ‘Edward Bouverie Pusey’, p. 118.
7 Matthew, ‘Edward Bouverie Pusey’, p. 118.
8 Inman, Daniel, The Making of Modern English Theology: God and the Academy at Oxford 1833-1945 (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014), p. 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Inman, The Making of Modern English Theology, p. 48.
10 Inman, The Making of Modern English Theology, p. 49.
11 Matthew, ‘Edward Bouverie Pusey’, p. 115.
12 Pusey, Edward, Daniel the Prophet: Nine Lectures delivered in the Divinity School of the University of Oxford (London: Parker, 1868)Google Scholar.
13 Essays and Reviews (London: Parker, 1860).
14 Inman, The Making of Modern English Theology, pp. 109-111.
15 Pusey, Daniel the Prophet, p. iii.
16 Pusey, Daniel the Prophet, p. iv.
17 Jowett, Benjamin, ‘On the Interpretation of Scripture’, in Essays and Reviews (London: Parker, 1860), pp. 330-433Google Scholar.
18 See Pattison, Mark, ‘Tendencies of Religious Thought in England 1688-1750’, in Essays and Reviews (London: Parker, 1860), p. 257Google Scholar.
19 Pattison, ‘Tendencies of Religious Thought in England’, p. 257.
20 Edward Pusey, Lectures on Types and Prophecies, Unpublished manuscript in the Library of Pusey House, Oxford, 1836, p. 9. See also Douglas, Brian, ‘Pusey's “Lectures on Types and Prophecies of the Old Testament”: Implications for Eucharistic Theology’, International Journal of Systematic Theology, 14 (2012), 2, pp. 194-216CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21 Pusey, Daniel the Prophet, p. xiv.
22 See George Westhaver, The Living Body of the Lord: E.B. Pusey's ‘Types and Prophecies of the Old Testament, PhD Thesis, Durham University, 2012. Available in Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/6373, p. 33.
23 Pusey, Daniel the Prophet, p. xxiv.
24 Pusey, Daniel the Prophet, p. xvi.
25 Pusey, Daniel the Prophet, p. xxiv.
26 Pusey, Lectures on Types and Prophecies, p. 2.
27 Matthew, ‘Edward Bouverie Pusey’, p. 123.
28 Westhaver, The Living Body of the Lord, p. 87.
29 Westhaver, The Living Body of the Lord, p. 88.
30 Avis, Paul, Anglicanism and the Christian Church, (London: T&T Clark, 2002), p. 224Google Scholar.
31 Avis, Anglicanism and the Christian Church, p. 226.
32 Pusey, Edward, An Historical Enquiry into the Probable Causes of the Rationalist Character lately Predominant in the Theology of Germany. Part I (London: Rivington, 1828)Google Scholar.
33 Avis, Anglicanism and the Christian Church, p. 229.
34 Frappell, Leighton, ‘“Science” in the Service of Orthodoxy’, in Butler, Perry (ed.) Pusey Rediscovered (London: SPCK, 1983), pp. 1-33Google Scholar.
35 Avis, Anglicanism and the Christian Church, p. 225.
36 Frappell, ‘“Science” in the Service of Orthodoxy’, p. 12.
37 Frappell, ‘“Science” in the Service of Orthodoxy’, p. 12.
38 Westhaver, The Living Body of the Lord, p. 43, Note 59.
39 Westhaver, The Living Body of the Lord, p. 81.
40 Frappell, ‘“Science” in the Service of Orthodoxy’, p. 11.
41 Frappell, ‘“Science” in the Service of Orthodoxy’, p. 11.
42 Nockles, Peter, ‘An Academic Counter-Revolution: Newman and Tractarian Oxford's Idea of a University’, History of Universities, 10 (1991), p. 161Google Scholar.
43 Nockles, ‘An Academic Counter-Revolution’, p. 163. The British Association was a symbol of a rationalizing and liberalizing spirit which the Tractarians rejected.
44 Pusey, Edward, ‘The Spirit in which the researches of learning and science should be applied to the study of the Bible’, in Authorized Report of the Church Congress held at Norwich on the 3rd, 4th and 5th October, 1865 (Norwich: Cundall and Miller, 1866), pp. 181-198Google Scholar.
45 Pusey, ‘The Spirit in which the researches of learning and science should be applied to the study of the Bible’, p. 189.
46 Nockles, ‘An Academic Counter-Revolution’, p. 163.
47 Gore, Charles, Lux Mundi: A Series of Studies in the Religion of the Incarnation (London: John Murray, 1889)Google Scholar.
48 Seitz, Christopher, Figured Out: Typology and Providence in Christian Scripture (Louisville and London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001), p. 54Google Scholar.
49 Frappell, Leighton, ‘Protestant and Catholic in the Oxford Fathers’, in Moses, John A. (ed.) From Oxford to the Bush. Essays on Catholic Anglicanism in Australia (Adelaide: SPCKA, 1997), p. 263Google Scholar.
50 Frappell, ‘Protestant and Catholic in the Oxford Fathers’, p. 268.
51 Frappell, ‘Protestant and Catholic in the Oxford Fathers’, p. 269.
52 Frappell, ‘Protestant and Catholic in the Oxford Fathers’, p. 269.
53 Knetsch, Robert, A Darkened Reading: A Reception History of the Book of Isaiah in a Divided Church (Cambridge: James Clarke & Co, 2014), p. 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54 Pusey left instructions in his will that they were not to be reprinted.
55 Franklin, William, ‘The Impact of Germany on the Anglican Catholic Revival in the Nineteenth Century’, Anglican and Episcopal History, LXI (1992), 4 December, p. 442Google Scholar.
56 See the evidence of Stanley, quoted in Bill, Edward, University Reform on Nineteenth-Century Oxford: A Study of Henry Halford Vaughan, 1811-1885 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973), p. 252Google Scholar. This is discussed in Chapter 1 of this book.
57 Letter of Edward Pusey to John Newman, Berlin, 25 November, 1826, quoted in Liddon, Henry (Johnston, J.O. and Wilson, R., eds.), Life of Edward Bouverie Pusey: Doctor of Divinity, Canon of Christ Church, Regius Professor of Hebrew in the University of Oxford (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1893), I, p. 102Google Scholar.
58 Frappell, ‘“Science” in the Service of Orthodoxy’, p. 22.
59 Rowell, Geoffrey, The Vision Glorious: Themes and Personalities in the Catholic Revival of Anglicanism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983), p. 9Google Scholar.
60 Frappell, ‘“Science” in the Service of Orthodoxy’, p. 25.
61 Matthew, ‘Edward Bouverie Pusey’, p. 115 and Avis, Anglicanism and the Christian Church, p. 213.
62 Avis, Anglicanism and the Christian Church, p. 233.
63 Livesley, A.G., ‘E.B. Pusey as Hebrew Scholar’, Expository Times, 94 (1982), 2, pp. 43-47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
64 Forrester, David, Young Doctor Pusey: A Study in Development (London: Mowbray, 1989), p. 50Google Scholar.
65 Jowett, ‘On the Interpretation of Scripture’, p. 371.
66 Pusey, Daniel the Prophet, p. vi.
67 Pusey, Daniel the Prophet, p. xii.
68 Matthew 24: 15 – ‘So when you see the desolating sacrilege standing in the holy place, as was spoken of by the prophet Daniel (let the reader understand)’ and Mark 13: 14 – ‘But when you see the desolating sacrilege set up where it ought not to be (let the reader understand), then those in Judea must flee to the mountains’.
69 Pusey, Daniel the Prophet, p. viii.
70 Pusey, Daniel the Prophet, p. ix.
71 Pusey, Daniel the Prophet, p. x.
72 Larsen, ‘E. B. Pusey and Holy Scripture’, p. 513.
73 Seitz, Christopher, Figured Out: Typology and Providence in Christian Scripture (Louisville and London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001), p. 17Google Scholar.
74 Driver, Samuel, The Book of Daniel. With Introduction and Notes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1922), pp. ciii-civGoogle Scholar.
75 Inman, The Making of English Theology, p. 110.
76 Seitz, Figured Out, p. vii.
77 Johann Adam Möhler (1796-1838) was a German Roman Catholic historian and theologian who interestingly was study at the University of Tübingen at the same time Pusey was a student there in the 1820s.
78 Jean Daniélou (1905-1974) was a French Roman Catholic Cardinal, theologian and historian.
79 Henri de Lubac (1896-1991) was a French Roman Catholic Cardinal and theologian.
80 See Härdelin, Alf, ‘The Sacraments in the Tractarian Universe’, in Rowell, G. (ed.) Tradition Renewed: The Oxford Movement Conference Papers (London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1986), p. 79Google Scholar who argues that Pusey anticipated de Lubac in his Lectures on Types and Prophecies of the Old Testament.
81 See Boersma, Hans, Nouvelle Théologie and Sacramental Ontology: A Return to Mystery (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Boersma, Hans, Heavenly Participation: The Weaving of a Sacramental Tapestry (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 2011)Google Scholar.
82 Seitz, Figured Out, p. 6.
83 Seitz, Figured Out, p. 7.
84 Seitz, Figured Out, p. 5.
85 See Goldingay, John, Daniel: World Biblical Commentary. Volume 30 (Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson, 1989)Google Scholar and Collins, John J., Daniel. A Commentary on the Book of Daniel (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993)Google Scholar.
86 Goldingay, Daniel, p. xxxvi and p. xxxix.
87 Seitz, Figured Out, p. 17.
88 Collins, Daniel, p. 26.
89 Seitz, Figured Out, p. 18.
90 Larsen, ‘E. B. Pusey and Holy Scripture’, p. 507.
91 Seitz, Figured Out, p. 19.
92 Knetsch, A Darkened Reading, p. 130.
93 Nockles, ‘An Academic Counter-Revolution’, p. 156.
94 Nockles, ‘An Academic Counter-Revolution’, p. 146.
95 Matthew, ‘Edward Bouverie Pusey’, p. 115.
96 Inman, The Making of English Theology, p. 49.
97 Nockles, ‘An Academic Counter-Revolution’, p. 178.
98 Westhaver, The Living Body of the Lord, p. 113.
99 Pusey, Theology of Germany, I, p. 164.
100 Pusey, Theology of Germany, I, p. 164.
101 Pusey, Lectures on Types and Prophecies, p. 6.
102 Pusey, Lectures on Types and Prophecies, p. 6.
103 Pusey, Lectures on Types and Prophecies, p. 6.
104 Pusey, Lectures on Types and Prophecies, p. 6.
105 Pusey, Lectures on Types and Prophecies, p. 6.
106 Westhaver, The Living Body of the Lord’, p. 124.
107 Pusey, Lectures on Types and Prophecies, p. 16. There is great similarity here to the work of the modern theologian Catherine Pickstock who also speaks of the ‘the presence of the infinite in the finite’ and of how ‘infinity does paradoxically invade the finite’. Pickstock, After Writing, p. 62 and p. 66.
108 Pusey, Theology of Germany, I, p. 31.
109 Pusey, Theology of Germany, I, p. 52, note 3.
110 Coleridge, S. T., Biographia Literaria, (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983), I, p. 304Google Scholar. See also Douglas, Brian and Douglas, Jane, ‘Pusey and the Romantic Poets: Some Links to Eucharistic Theology’, New Blackfriars, 98, 1077, September (2017), pp. 539-554CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
111 Edward Pusey, ‘Emblematic Language’, Supplemental Material to the Lectures on Types and Prophecies. Loose papers held at Pusey House, Oxford.
112 Butler, Joseph, The Analogy of Religion: Natural and Revealed (London: Dent, 1936), p. 16Google Scholar.
113 Butler, The Analogy of Religion, pp. 16-17.
114 Pusey, Edward, The Spiritual Letters (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1901)Google Scholar and Pusey, Edward, Private Prayers (Liddon, Henry, ed.) (London: Rivington, 1883)Google Scholar together with many of his sermons express an ecstatic joy in the knowledge and experience of God that was beyond any empirical investigation.