1 Introduction
The western coastal region of the Greenland ice sheet exhibits large areas with temperate bed conditions where fast ice flow occurs. Especially in the Jakobshavn basin, draining 6.5% of the Greenland ice sheet into Disko Bay, high mass fluxes have been observed (Carbonell and Bauer, 1968; Reference Fastook, Brecher and HughesFastook and others, 1995). Ice flow is occasionally concentrated in regions of narrow lateral extent where very fast ice streams form. The fastest of these is Jakobshavn Isbræ with a velocity of about 7 Km a−1 at the calving front and an estimated calving flux of 25–28 km3 a−1 (Carbonell and Bauer, 1968; Reference Lingle, Hughes and KollmeyerLingle and others, 1981; Reference Echelmeyer and HarrisonEchelmeyer and Harrison, 1990; Reference Echelmeyer, Harrison, Clarke and BensonEchelmeyer and others, 1992). Jakobshavn Isbræ flows through a deeply eroded bedrock trough which extends about 80 km inland of the calving front, as indicated in Figure 1 (Reference Clarke and EchelmeyerClarke and Echelmeyer, 1996). Thermomechanically coupled flow models in two and three dimensions have revealed that a basal layer of temperate ice would form in the coastal region as an effect of the geometry, the surface temperature and the mass-balance distribution alone (Reference Budd, Jacka, Jenssen, Radok and YoungBudd and others, 1982; Reference Letréguilly, Reeh and HuybrechtsLetréguilly and others, 1991; Reference Funk, Echelmeyer and IkenFunk and others, 1994; Reference GreveGreve, 1997). An interesting implication is that ice streams are secondary features of the high mass fluxes and temperate bed conditions.
Left: Location of the drill sites on jakobshavn Isbræ. The ice stream is indicated with solid lines inland of jakobshavn Isfjord. The dotted frame is shown enlarged in the right plot. Right: The surface topography interpolated from laser altimeter data of NASA (see text for references). Contour lines are given in m a.s.l., and ice-stream margins are indicated with dotted lines. The 1989 ice-stream drill sites are indicated with dots and are labelled A–C (Reference Iken, Echelmeyer, Harrison and FunkIken and others, 1993). The new (1995) drill sites D and E are located adjacent to the ice stream and in its centre. Velocities measured at stakes on the glacier surface are indicated along a transverse profile over the ice stream (Reference Clarke and EchelmeyerClarke and Echelmeyer, 1996) and around drill site D.
2 Previous Borehole Investigations on the Ice Stream
Englacial temperatures have been recorded in boreholes on Jakobshavn Isbræ, 50 km upstream from the calving front (Reference Iken, Echelmeyer, Harrison and FunkIken and others, 1993). The holes, drilled with a hot-water system, reached the bed near the ice-stream margins at approximately 1600 m, but stopped far above the bed in the ice-stream centre where the ice thickness is 2500 m. At the centre line, the shape of the measured temperature profile differed substantially from that of a modelling study (Reference Funk, Echelmeyer and IkenFunk and others, 1994). This discrepancy was attributed to convergent three-dimensional flow into the bedrock channel, not accounted for by the two-dimensional model. It was suggested that the convergent flow causes enhanced vertical extension of the basal ice at the centre line and thereby a thickening of the temperate (“soft”) basal layer. This could explain the high flow velocity of this ice stream.
3 Goals of the Study
A better understanding of the specific dynamics of the ice stream is obtained by investigating the conditions in the adjacent ice sheet where the ice is of the same origin, but where flow conditions are less complex. In this study we present in situ measurements in boreholes to the bed at a drill site adjacent to Jakobshavn Isbræ. The interpretation of the data is attempted with the help of a flow model, including heat conduction and advection and with a special emphasis on the correct treatment of the transition surface between the cold and the temperate zone.
As a test of the hypothesis of enhanced vertical extension of the basal ice in the ice stream, we attempt to trace certain englacial layers between the ice sheet and the ice stream. By comparing sequences of conductive layers in stream and sheet, it is possible to obtain information on the vertical extension which the ice in the stream has experienced relative to that in the sheet.
The following quantities of relevance to the dynamics of ice sheets and ice streams will be discussed in this study:
-
the englacial temperature distribution,
-
the thickness of the basal temperate layer,
-
the ice deformation and its variation with depth,
-
the basal (sliding) velocity,
-
enhanced deformation of ice-age ice,
-
differences in vertical deformation history between the ice-sheet and the ice-stream drill sites,
-
an approximate dating of the ice,
-
the value of the Clausius–Clapeyron constant,
-
the water content of the ice at the cold–temperate transition surface (CTS) and
-
hydrological constraints on the nature of the subglacial drainage system.
This study is a contribution to the ongoing research effort on the mechanisms of fast flow of Jakobshavn Isbræ. It is a sequel to Reference Iken, Echelmeyer, Harrison and FunkIken and others (1993), further referenced as Part I, and Reference Funk, Echelmeyer and IkenFunk and others (1994), further referenced as Part II.
4 Field Observations
41 Drill sites
Two new drill sites were selected to provide field evidence complementary to that presented in Parts I and II (Reference Iken, Echelmeyer, Harrison and FunkIken and others, 1993; Reference Funk, Echelmeyer and IkenFunk and others, 1994). Site D is located at 69° 14′6″ N, 48° 41′13″ W, 4 km north of the ice-stream centre line and 5 km upstream of the 1989 drill sites. Surface velocities are about 600 m a−1, the ice thickness is 830 m and the surface slope varies between 1° and 2°. The new drill site E in the ice-stream centre was chosen close to the 1989 drill site B (Fig. 1).
The right plot of Figure 1 shows the surface elevation map interpolated from laser altimeter data recorded during the Airborne Topographic Mapper flights of NASA (Reference Krabill, Thomas, Martin, Swift and FrederickKrabill and others, 1995; personal communication from W. Krabill, 1996). All available surface velocity measurements are also given (Fig. 4).
Ice thicknesses along profiles across the ice stream have been determined with the seismic method some kilometres from the drill site (Reference Clarke and EchelmeyerClarke and Echelmeyer, 1996). An extensive set of radar soundings has been measured with the airborne radar system of University of Kansas (Reference Gogineni, Chuah, Allen, Jezek and MooreGogineni and others, 1998). We performed complementary ground-based low-frequency radar measurements in June 1996 around drill site D (profiles 96W, 96SW and 96E in Fig. 2). The measured ice thickness at drill site D is about 830 m, in excellent agreement with the borehole depths of 831 ± 2 m. The bedrock map (Fig. 3) results from the difference of the interpolated surface elevations and the ice thicknesses. Apparently drill site D is located on the downstream side of a long subglacial hill.
Radar profiles recorded during the RSL/NASA flights are indicated with solid lines (RSL: Remote Sensing Laboratory of the University of Kansas). Dash-dotted lines indicate seismic soundings across the ice stream (STR and L25, Reference Clarke and EchelmeyerClarke and Echelmeyer, 1996), and dashed lines mark ground-based radar measurements during the 1996 field season (96W, 96SW and 96E). The ice-stream margins are indicated with dotted lines.
Contour map of bedrock elevations derived from the seismic measurements and the radio-echo soundings in Figure 2. The approximate position of the ice-stream margins is indicated with dotted lines. Contour lines are drawn in m a.s.l
42 Surface velocities
Ice velocities were measured at drill site D and in its surroundings with a global positioning system (GPS Leica 200). The positions of a central marker at site D and of a network of stakes have been surveyed three to six times in 1995 and three times in 1996. The position accuracy is better than ±0.03 m for differential measurements with short baseline (up to 4 km) and ±1 m for the single point solutions of the camp location.
The flow velocity calculated from the 1995 single point measurements is 623 ± 20 m a−1 with an uncertainty of the flow direction of 10°. In 1996 the surface velocity was 550 ± 2 m a−1, with a higher accuracy obtained with the differential GPS method with a reference station operated at Jakobshavn (some 100 km apart). The mean flow velocity calculated from the positions in 1995 and 1996 was 587 ±5 m a−1. All absolute velocities are shown in Figure 1, together with velocities measured along the seismic profile STR (Reference Clarke and EchelmeyerClarke and Echelmeyer, 1996; personal communication from T. Clarke, 1998).
Displacements of eight stakes at a distance of 1–4.5 km were measured relative to drill site D with the differential GPS method. Mean strain rates at the drill site were calculated with a bilinear regression for each velocity component. The resulting principal strain rates are 
(extensive) and 
(compressive). The direction of the principal compressive axis is 49° (with respect to north, Fig. 4). The drill site is located in a region of shearing transverse to the mean ice flow (marked with a dotted line) which is caused by the lateral drag of the nearby ice stream. Hardly any variation in flow velocity was observed along the flow line. This indicates that the thickening of the ice is compensated by laterally convergent flow clearly visible in Figure 4.
Velocities of stakes relative to the reference station at drill site D. Coordinates are relative to the position of the drill site in 1995. Measurements from the 1995 field season are indicated with triangles, those of 1996 with dots. The principal axes of the mean strain rates are indicated with crossing arrows at the location of the drill site in 1995 (D95) and in 1996 (D96). Ice flow is from right to left along the dotted line with a mean velocity of 590 m a−1. The ice-stream margin is 1 km south of the lowermost pole.
43 Drilling operation
In July 1995 a total of eight holes were drilled at site D with the hot-water drilling system of VAW (Reference Iken, Echelmeyer, Harrison, Rado and BeaudoingIken and others, 1989). At a constant discharge of 80 L min−1, the glacier bed at 830 m depth was reached within 6–8 hours. The water immediately drained in all boreholes, and the borehole water level stabilized at the flotation level (see discussion in section 4.5). In August 1995 three 900 m deep holes were drilled at site E near the ice-stream centre line, where the ice thickness is about 2500 m.
Five boreholes at site D were permanently instrumented with tilt sensors, thermistors and pressure cells which were measured with a specially devised telemetry system. (Details of the telemetry system, sensor calibration and the wiring are given in Appendix A.) In one borehole (marked “Electrode” in Fig. 5), a bare wire was frozen to the ice which served as a fixed common line electrode in the cross-borehole conductivity tests. All operations had to be accomplished within 2 hours after drilling, since the boreholes rapidly refreeze. The relative location of the eight boreholes with respect to the reference GPS station D95 is shown in Figure 5.
The location of the boreholes at site D is indicated with dots in a local coordinate system relative to the reference GPS station D95. Cables with thermistors were installed in bore-holes T3-T5, tilt sensors, thermistors and pressure sensors in boreholes Il and 12. One bare wire was frozen into the ice in the borehole labelled “Electrode” Cross-borehole conductivity (CBC) tests were performed between the electrode and bore-holes T4, H6 and H7 (labelled CBC-4, CBC-6 and CBC-7). The borehole depths are indicated where measured.
44 Ice thickness at the drill site
Direct measurements of the ice thickness at the drill site could be achieved with marked cables that were lowered into the boreholes. Due to the great depths, it was impossible to feel changes in cable tension as the weight at the lower end reached the bottom of the hole. Cross-borehole conductivity (CBC) tests allowed determination of the bottom of the borehole, when the electric current measured between a moving electrode and the line electrode frozen into an adjacent borehole stabilized at a constant value. The elastic stretching of the immersed electrode cable is < 0.1% and thus of the order 0.5 m. Ice thicknesses determined with this method are between 828 m (hole T4) and 831 m (hole H6). Measurements in a borehole drilled at an angle of 3° off the vertical would overestimate the ice thickness by about 1 m. The ice thicknesses inferred from readings of the pressure cells are 829.4 m at I1 and 832.8 m at I2 with an accuracy of ±1 m. Both direct methods give ice thicknesses of 828–833 m, in excellent agreement with the radar data. A slight dip of the bedrock in flow direction might be suspected from the data presented in Figure 5 and would agree with the large-scale topography.
45 Borehole water levels
Water pressure was registered with two pressure sensors P1 and P2 installed at the bottom of boreholes I1 and I2 (Fig. 6). No free water surface existed after refreezing of the bore-holes some hours after installation of the instruments. Nevertheless, all readings are given in units of metres of water level below surface, since offset water levels measured with the float switch were corrected for in the data processing (see section 4.6.3 for a conversion to pressure).
(a) Water pressure was measured in two boreholes for nearly 2 months (curves Pl and P2). The initial spikes stem from breakthrough of neighbouring boreholes. A slow increase in water pressure is terminated by a large spike, prior to the rupture of the cables. The dotted line shows the temperature variation measured at thermistor T12, rescaled to water level with the dependence of melting temperature on pressure. (b) The water level stabilizes at the same depth after breakthrough of boreholes I1, I2 and H6, marked with vertical dotted lines. Small diurnal variations of the pressure are also visible. Water levels below surface measured with the float switch are indicated with points.
Both water-level records are nearly identical until the end of August (Fig. 6a). Three peaks on 20, 22 and 24 July were caused by draining nearby boreholes, after drilling reached near bedrock (holes I1, I2 and H6 in Fig. 5). The rise of water level was very fast, followed by a slow decrease, until the initial water level was precisely recovered after 14 hours. A steady increase of ∼0.15 m d−1 water level was observed during August at both sensors. This is likely to be caused by the thickening of the overlying ice column as the instruments wander downslope from the subglacial hill (Fig. 3).
During the quiescent phases between two breakthrough events, small diurnal variations in basal pressure are visible in Figure 6b. The amplitude of these variations is < 1 m water level, but clearly follows a daily pattern with the lowest pressures recorded during the night.
The large pressure variation of 18 m water level (1.8 × 105 Pa) registered at pressure sensor P1, starting on 29 August, would lower the freezing temperature by 0.014 K. The fact that all thermistors near the bed in the same borehole show a temperature decrease of this order indicates that the registered event is not an artefact caused by an instrument error. Temperatures measured at thermistor T12 near the bed and converted to pressure (using the Clausius-Clapeyron equation (Equation (4)) of melting-point depression) are indicated with a dotted line in Figure 6a. The cable failed after the second large pressure increase on 10 September, and the cable of sensor P2 broke several days later. This sharp increase in pressure is likely to be caused either by some bedrock irregularity or by large water-pressure variations in the subglacial system. Such a pressure variation could occur when a lake at the ice surface suddenly drains through freshly opened, deep crevasses (Reference Echelmeyer and HarrisonEchelmeyer and Harrison, 1990), releasing huge amounts of water to the ice-sheet base.
451 Discussion
The equilibrium water level of 75.0 ± 0.2 m below the surface corresponds to the flotation level at the ice thickness of h ice = 831 ± 2 m, if the average ice density is ρ ice = (h w/h ice) ρw ≃ 910 kg m−3, where ρw is the density of water at 0°C. Assuming on the other hand an ice density of 917 kg m−3, a borehole water level of 68.8 m is calculated at floating equilibrium. In this case, the final borehole water levels of 75 m would correspond to an ice over-pressure of roughly 70 kPa.
Three pressure pulses propagated within 2 min to both pressure sensors at some tens of metres distance. Similar observations have been made on Trapridge Glacier (Reference Stone and ClarkeStone and Clarke, 1993) and Ice Stream B (Whillans Ice Stream), Antarctica (Reference Engelhardt and KambEngelhardt and Kamb, 1997). Such fast pressure pulses require an active subglacial water system. The observation that the water level stabilized at the same value (at or nearly at overburden pressure) after each breakthrough event and in all boreholes excludes the existence of a large conduit passing near the drill site. Such a conduit would lower the water level below overburden pressure and would also drain the water away faster than observed.
The interpretation of the borehole water-level variations after breakthrough gives hydraulic transmissivities between 1 × 10−5 and 1 × 10−4 m2 s−1 (Reference LüthiLüthi, 1999). This corresponds to a homogeneous sediment layer of thickness b = 0.1−1 m and a hydraulic conductivity of Ks ∼ 1 × 10−3 to 1 × 10−4 m s−1. This value compares well to the conductivity of a medium-sized sand found beneath many glaciers (Reference Fischer, Iverson, Hanson, Hooke and JansonFischer and others, 1998). The alternative interpretation in terms of an open gap between the bottom of the ice and bedrock yields gap widths of 0.5–1 mm.
We have no means to finally decide on the nature of the drainage system. The high observed basal velocities are consistent with both hypotheses. On the other hand, the storage capacities needed to absorb the initial water pulse (∼7m3) after the breakthrough events, as well as the fast propagation of the pressure pulse to neighbouring boreholes, are readily explained with a system of gaps or linked cavities (Reference KambKamb, 1987).
46 Englacial temperatures
Englacial temperatures were measured with 29 temperature sensors installed in five boreholes at drill site D. Temperatures were recorded at a 3 day interval by data loggers at the surface until the cables failed due to overstretching. The asymptotic adjustment of borehole temperatures to the undisturbed ice temperature was accounted for in the data processing (Reference Humphrey and EchelmeyerHumphrey and Echelmeyer, 1990). The depths of the thermistors in holes I1 and I2 (see Fig. 5 for the location of the holes) are known to an absolute accuracy of ±1 m. The same accuracy is assumed for the thermistors in holes T4 and T5, as the elastic stretching of these cables is small. Thermistors 33 and 34 in hole T3 were caught at approximately 789 m depth which was inferred from the thermistor temperatures and the temperature profile measured in the adjacent holes.
461 Comparison of temperature profiles
The ice temperature profile measured at site D is shown in Figure 7. Temperature profiles from the ice-stream centre site B and site A at the southern margin are shown for comparison (Part I; see Fig. 1 for the location of the drill sites). The temperature profile from site D exhibits the same features as the profile from site A. Both profiles prove the existence of a basal layer of temperate ice and exhibit extremely high temperature gradients of 0.1–0.125 K m−1 above the temperate layer. The temperature minimum of about −22°C and a marked bend of the temperature profile at about 200 m depth are common to all drill sites.
Temperature profiles at ice-stream drill sites A (margin, dotted line) and B (centre, dashed line; data from Reference Iken, Echelmeyer, Harrison and FunkIken and others, 1993) and at the ice-sheet drill site D (solid line; see Fig. l for the location of the drill sites). The straight dashed line indicates the pressure-melting temperature. Depths are given in metres below the surface (a) and on a relative depth scale (b). The bedrock is indicated with a hatched area at drill sites A and D. Bedrock depth at the ice-stream centre line (borehole B) is approximately 2500 m.
Measured temperatures are plotted on a relative depth scale 
(where h is the depth below surface and H is the ice thickness) in Figure 7b. The profile from the ice-sheet site D lies between profiles A and B. The (interpolated) temperature minimum of −21.9 ± 0.2°C is located at 535 ± 10 m depth, corresponding to a relative depth of 
, whereas it is at 0.43 at the ice-stream centre B and at 0.7 at site A.
462 Phase transition boundary (CTS)
The ice temperatures near the base at site D are shown in Figure 8. The CTS (indicated with a grey bar) is located at 799 ± 2 m depth below the surface. The thickness of the temperate basal layer therefore is 31 ± 2 m and corresponds to 3.7 ± 0.3% of the ice thickness of 831 ± 2 m.
Temperature vs depth near the base of the ice sheet. Measurements are shown with black diamonds, and thermistor numbers are indicated. The dashed line indicates the pressure-melting temperature, and hatched areas indicate the bedrock reached in two boreholes. The thickness of the temperate basal layer is 31 ± 2 m (3.7 ± 0.3% of the ice thickness).
The CTS is defined as a singular surface where the moisture content and the temperature gradient may experience a finite jump (Reference HutterHutter, 1993). This idealized transition surface will be somewhat fuzzy in reality, since water in veins and lenses is under different pressures, and melting temperature varies accordingly on the scale of ice grains (Reference LliboutryLliboutry, 1993). The measurements presented in Figure 8 show that this possible gradual transition is confined to within 2 m, and that the concept of the CTS as a singular phase transition surface is well justified. (Similar observations have been made on Hansbreen, Svalbard (Reference Jania, Mochnacki and GadekJania and others, 1996).)
The abrupt change of the temperature profile at the CTS is indicative of a freezing condition which manifests itself by a discontinuous temperature gradient (Reference Blatter and HutterBlatter and Hutter, 1991; Reference HutterHutter, 1993). Assuming therefore an ice flux from the temperate into the cold region, the unfrozen moisture content multiplied with the ice flux across the CTS can be readily calculated. The derivative of the interpolated temperature with respect to the vertical coordinate at the CTS is ∂T/∂z = −0.048 ± K m−1. The total heat released by the refreezing water per unit time and unit area of the CTS is (in the notation of Part II)
where μ is the water content of the temperate ice, L is the latent heat of freezing, ρ w, is the density of water and Ξ is the upward flux of ice through an element of the CTS. The temperature gradients ∂T/∂z and β above and below the CTS are related by
where k = 2.1W m−1 K−1 is the thermal conductivity of ice. Inserting Equation (1) into the above relation yields the product of the moisture content and the mass flux through the phase transition surface
Conventionally, a maximum water content of 1% is assumed in temperate ice. This is based on observations in ice cores in Alpine glaciers at depths up to 250 m (Reference Vallon, Petit and FabreVallon and others, 1976; Reference Lliboutry and DuvalLliboutry and Duval, 1985; Reference LliboutryLliboutry, 1993). Assuming this value, the velocity of the ice with respect to the CTS would be of the order Ξ ∼ 1 m a−1. The above result makes it possible to determine the water content of the basal ice when Ξ is known. This will be accomplished with a flow model in section 5.3.
463 Melting-point depression
The depression of the melting-point temperature T m of pure ice with absolute pressure p is described by
where T tr = 273.16 K and p tr = 611.73 Pa are the triple-point temperature and pressure of water and γ is the Clausius–Clapeyron constant. This equation is used in thermomechanically coupled flow models of polythermal ice sheets in order to determine the thickness of the temperate basal layer. Usually values between γ = 0.0742 K MPa−1 for pure ice and air-free water (Reference PatersonPaterson, 1994) and γ = 0.098 K MPa−1 for air-saturated water are used (Reference HarrisonHarrison, 1972; Reference LliboutryLliboutry, 1993). Several modelling studies use an intermediate value of γ = 0.087 K MPa−1 (e.g. Reference Greve and HutterGreve and Hutter, 1995; Reference Huybrechts and PayneHuybrechts and others, 1996). However, there is no direct evidence for the assumption of this value from measurements in deep bore-holes in ice sheets.
The borehole temperatures measured in the basal temperate layer at site D are between −0.60° and −0.56°C (Table 1). The conversion of depth below the surface to pressure is accomplished with the local gravity acceleration g = 9.825 m s−2 (personal communication from R. Forsberg, 1999) and the density of water ρ w, = 999.841 kg m−3 at 0°C (neglecting the compressibility of water). The equilibrium water level in the open boreholes is 75.0 ± 0.2 m below the surface. Thus at 831 m depth the absolute hydrostatic pressure is p a + 7.4265 MPa where the atmospheric pressure p a is about 0.089 MPa. The accuracy of the data is not good enough to determine the Clausius–Clapeyron constant from the measurements alone. In order to calculate a regression curve, we add the triple point of water. The Clausius–Clapeyron constant then is γ = 0.079 ± 0.002 K MPa−1 which is within the values of previous observations. This value is indicative of a low content of soluble impurities and air in the basal ice.
5 Model Calculations
A model for the calculation of the two-dimensional temperature field as well as the ice-flow velocity has been developed in Part II (Reference Funk, Echelmeyer and IkenFunk and others, 1994) and was successfully applied to the interpretation of temperature profiles measured in Jakobshavn Isbræ. The velocity profile is calculated with Glen’s flow law, consistent with the surface velocities and the ratio of basal motion prescribed as model input. Further assumptions are a linear variation of shear stress with depth (i.e. the longitudinal stress gradient is independent of depth), small surface and bed slopes and a negligible transverse shear stress. The continuity is accounted for by transverse straining, and the azimuth of ice flow is assumed not to vary with depth. These assumptions are justified for ice-sheet flow but are expected to fail if the flow pattern is complicated as in the zone of ice-stream formation. The heat-flow model includes conduction and advection in two dimensions and heat generation due to dissipation. Special attention has been paid to the correct treatment of the phase boundary and the evolution of a basal temperate layer. Technically the model is implemented with the finite-difference method, and heat advection is treated with a moving-column model. The model assumptions and the implementation are described in detail in Part II which was improved to include basal melting.
51 Model input
The model was run with basically the same input data as the original model of Part II. The bedrock and the surface topographies were adapted to the local topography around the ice-sheet drill site D (Figs 1 and 3). The subglacial hill where the drill site is located is taken into account as well as the measured surface topography along an approximate flowline passing through the drill site. The geometry along the flowline starting at the ice divide is shown in Figure 9.
(a) Modelled temperature distribution along a flowline passing through drill site D, marked with an arrow. (b) An enlarged view of the surroundings of site D. The temperate layer is indicated with a shaded area. Note that the vertical scale is greatly exaggerated.
The ice-flow law (Glen’s flow law) has been used in the form 
(
is the deviatoric stress tensor and 
). The temperature dependence B(T) is factored out (Reference Smith and MorlandSmith and Morland, 1981) and flow-law parameters A
0 = 2.85 × 10−16 kPa−2 s−1 (at 0°C) and n = 2 have been used (see Part II for a discussion of these values).
In order to assess the influence of model input quantities that are not accurately known, a reference model run will be compared to results from model runs with altered parameters. The surface velocity measured at the drill site and at a nearby seismic profile (STR in Fig. 2) are prescribed. The ratio of basal motion, defined as the contribution of basal velocity to the surface velocity, was estimated from borehole deformation measurements and amounts to about 60% at the drill site (section 6.1.3). The input for the reference model is shown in Figure 10a (solid line); input quantities of the plain ice-sheet model (Part II; dashed line) are plotted for comparison. The mass balance and the surface temperature are the same as in the previous study (Fig. 10b).
(a) Prescribed values of horizontal velocity vs distance along a flowline. The velocity values of the flowline passing through site D are shown with a solid line, those of the plain ice-sheet model (Part II) with a dashed line. u 0 is the surface velocity, u b the basal velociy. (b) The prescribed mass balance for the reference run is drawn with a solid line, an enhanced accumulation rate with a dashed line (upper panel) and the surface temperature is given in the lower panel. The drill site is located at 515 km.
52 Modelled temperatures
The modelled temperature distribution along the flowline passing through drill site D is shown in Figure 9. A basal temperate layer forms at the horizontal distance of 400 km from the ice divide and reaches some tens of metres thickness at the drill site (515 km from the ice divide). The bedrock hill has a major influence on the temperature distribution (right plot of Fig. 9).
The modelled temperature profile at the drill site is shown in Fig. 11. The agreement of the reference model (solid line) with the measurements is remarkable for both the thickness of the temperate layer and the high temperature gradient near the base. Nevertheless, some important differences exist. The temperature minimum at a relative depth of 0.5 is −22.5° C, whereas the measured minimum is about 1°C higher and is located at a relative depth of 0.6. Also the near-surface temperatures are slightly too low, which could easily be accounted for by altering the prescribed surface temperature distribution. The effect of crevasses filled with meltwater is likely to contribute to increased near-surface temperatures (Part I).
(a) Modelled temperature profiles at site D for zero water content of the temperate ice. The influence of different basal motion ratios and an increase in accumulation rate at a constant basal motion ratio of 60% are shown. Measured temperatures are indicated with black diamonds. (b) An enlarged view of the zone near the CTS.
The ratio of basal motion has a minor influence on the temperature profile and mainly affects the depth of the CTS and the temperature gradient above the CTS (Fig. 11b). It has been shown in Part II that the location of the temperature minimum depends mainly on the accumulation rate controlling the vertical advection. The dotted line in Figure 11 was obtained with an accumulation rate increased by roughly 30% (dashed line in Fig. 10) at a basal motion ratio of 60%. The resulting temperature profile closely matches the measured profile, depressing the relative position of the temperature minimum to 0.6 and leading to a larger temperature gradient above the CTS. The minimum temperature is −21.9° C, in good agreement with the measurements.
This observation raises some doubts concerning the assumption that the mass-balance measurements from the EGIG (Expéditions Glaciologiques Internationales au Groenland) line (located some 80 km north of the ice stream) can be extrapolated to the Jakobshavn basin (Reference Ohmura and ReehOhmura and Reeh, 1991). Mass balance has never been measured in large parts of the Jakobshavn accumulation area, and the model input is based on an interpolation (personal communication from A. Ohmura, 1994). Reference Echelmeyer, Harrison, Clarke and BensonEchelmeyer and others (1992) measured an accumulation rate in the ice-stream region which was 30–40% lower than at the EGIG line. In contrast, the best agreement with modelled temperatures was obtained with an accumulation rate increased by roughly 30% with respect to the EGIG values in the upper part of the ice sheet. A possible explanation for these inconsistencies is that accumulation rates have been higher in the past and/or that the surface elevation of the Jakobshavn basin has changed considerably. An alternative explanation for at least part of this discrepancy is the result of the modelling study of the ice stream, showing that taking into account the climate history since the last ice age in a transient model run results in a lower position of the temperature minimum (Reference Funk, Echelmeyer and IkenFunk and others, 1994, figs 8 and 10).
53 Water content of the ice at the CTS
The model predicts a temperate layer of almost exactly the thickness measured in the boreholes at site D. In accordance with the interpretation of the measured temperatures at the CTS (section 4.6.2), a freezing condition at the CTS is calculated by the model. Thus the temperature profile just above the CTS as well as the vertical position of the CTS depend on the water content of the ice traversing the boundary from the temperate into the cold region. An evaluation of the measured temperature gradient just above the CTS (section 4.6.2) resulted in the product of water content times ice velocity through the CTS of Ξμ∼ 0.01 m a−1.
Calculated temperatures near the CTS are compared to temperatures measured at three thermistors in Figure 12 for water contents of the ice in the range μ = 0–2% and a ratio of basal motion of 60%. A very good agreement with the measured temperatures is obtained with a water content of 1.0–1.5%. The inaccurate absolute vertical position of thermistors 32 and 33 prevents a precise evaluation of the data. Nevertheless, their maximal vertical spacing of 10 m gives an additional constraint and we therefore exclude a moisture content <0.5%.
Modelled temperatures at the position of the CTS for different moisture contents of the ice at the CTS. Comparison with temperatures measured at thermistors (indicated with diamonds and the respective error bars) suggests a moisture content of about 1 %.
54 Discussion
The good agreement of measured and modelled CTS locations indicates that the model incorporates all relevant physical processes along the flowline passing through the ice-sheet site D. The minor ambiguities in the precise location of the temperature minimum and its absolute value are within the expected uncertainties caused by an inaccurate model input.
On the other hand, the mismatch of the modelled temperatures with profiles measured at the ice-stream centre location B and at the marginal location A (Fig. 1) could not be accounted for by varying the model input (Reference Fabri, Funk and IkenFabri and others, 1992). These findings corroborate the conclusion that the form of the temperature profiles at the ice-stream sites is caused by additional deformation processes associated with the convergent flow into the ice stream. The three-dimensional flow field and the extra vertical stretching of the basal ice proposed in Parts I and II are likely to account for this mismatch. Further evidence for these conclusions is given in the next section.
6 Ice Deformation
Two sets of ice-deformation measurements are presented in this section. The progressive deformation of two boreholes at site D has been recorded with tilt sensors frozen to the ice. This allows us to calculate the ice-deformation velocity and to infer the basal (sliding) velocity. High ice-deformation rates have been observed in the lowermost 160 m. With the help of in situ electrical conductivity measurements (ECM) (section 6.2.1) we assign this ice to the Wisconsin (ice-age) period. Comparison of conductivity logs at sites D and E provides information on the different ice-deformation histories in sheet and stream. From these we draw conclusions on the mechanics of the ice-stream formation.
61 Borehole deformation measurements
Two boreholes at drill site D, separated by some 20 m at the surface, were instrumented with a total of 17 tilt sensors. The sensors are labelled I11-I19 (in borehole I1, Fig. 5) and I21–I27 and I29 (in borehole I2). The wiring, the depths of the sensors and the calibration are discussed in Appendix A. Tilt angles were registered for 50–300 days until the respective cable sections failed due to overstretching. Plots of the individual tilt sensor measurements are presented in Appendix B.
611 Interpretation in terms of simple shear
Simple shear is the dominant contribution to the ice deformation at drill site D. Minor additional strain rates are expected as the ice thickens in the flow direction, and lateral convergence and shearing have been observed at the surface (section 4.2). Despite the fact that considerable basal motion takes place, almost no longitudinal extension was observed around the drill site. Close to the bedrock, additional complications enter through the polythermal structure of the ice, the small-scale bedrock topography, spatially varying basal motion influenced by an unknown sliding law and the different rheology of the ice near the bed. Despite these intricate difficulties, a simplified interpretation in terms of simple shear seems to be justified.
Under simple shear, all velocity components are constant except the horizontal velocity u which varies with depth. The measured tilt rates were fitted using an optimization procedure, in which the vertical gradient of horizontal velocity, the initial inclination angle and the initial azimuth angle (with respect to the flow direction) were varied as free parameters. Resulting velocity gradients 
are given in Table 2, together with the maximal deviation Δ∂u/∂z from the fitting curve.
The vertical gradients of horizontal velocity ∂u/∂z are plotted vs depth below the surface in Figure 13. Strain rates increase by an order of magnitude below 680 m depth, decrease at 800 m and increase again within the temperate zone below the CTS. Vertical velocity gradients calculated with the flow model show a good agreement with the measurements down to 660 m depth (dashed line in Fig. 13).
Left: Vertical gradients of horizontal velocity ∂u/∂z measured at site D are indicated with dots and error bars. Integrating the velocity gradients interpolated with the solid line gives a surface velocity due to deformation of 235 m a−1. The alternative interpolation gives 260 m a−1 (dash-dotted line). At a measured surface velocity of 620 m a−1 the ratios of basal motion are 63% and 57% . The Holocene-Wisconsin transition as well as the CTS are indicated with dotted lines. Modelled deformation rates are indicated with a dashed line. Middle: The enhancement factor for flow-law parameters n = 2 and n = 3. Right: Calcium dust measured on the GISP2 core (data from Reference MayewskiMayewski and others, 1997; see text for details).
612 Flow enhancement
The flow model (section 5) predicts that ice below 680 m depth is of pre-Holocene (ice-age) origin. Such ice sometimes deforms at much higher rates than ice from the Holocene era (Reference PatersonPaterson, 1991). Indeed, all tilt sensors below 680m depth exhibit high tilt rates (Table 2; Fig. 13). It is convenient to express the observed deformation rates in terms of an enhancement factor E with respect to the deformation rate calculated with Glen’s flow law (written as 
where A
0 and n are flow-law parameters and B(T) absorbs the temperature dependence). Assuming simple shear, the stress invariant is τ= σxz
and the enhancement factor for sensor k at depth hk
is
The factor C is A 0 (ρg sin α) n for a parallel-sided slab of inclination α. Taking the average for all tilt sensors in the Holocene ice (above 680 m depth) as reference results in the enhancement factors in Table 2 and Figure 13. The variation of E in the Holocene ice is smallest for a flow-law parameter of n = 2 (in accordance with the modelling results discussed in Part II). The pre-Holocene ice shows a flow enhancement of 1.7 (for n = 3) to 2.6 (n = 2). In the temperate ice near the base, the “enhancement” is 0.1–0.25. This might be attributed either to a different ice crystallography or to the influence of the small-scale bedrock topography, altering the velocity field and thus the measured tilt angles.
Enhanced deformation of ice from the late Wisconsin has been reported for several sites in Greenland (Reference Dahl-Jensen and GundestrupDahl-Jensen and Gundestrup, 1987; Reference Shoji and LangwayShoji and Langway, 1988; Reference Thorsteinsson, Kipfstuhl and MillerThorsteinsson and others, 1997, Reference Thorsteinsson, Waddington, Taylor, Alley and Blankenship1999). A possible explanation for this behaviour is the high content of impurities in the ice, leading to smaller ice crystals and rapid recrystallization (Reference PatersonPaterson, 1991; Reference Alley and WoodsAlley and Woods, 1996). In order to give an indication of the impurity content of the ice, calcium concentrations measured on the Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2 (GISP2) core are plotted in Figure 13 (the tentative depth scale is inferred from the matching procedure discussed in section 6.2.2; data from Reference MayewskiMayewski and others, 1997, provided by the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), University of Colorado at Boulder, and the World Data Center-A (WDC-A) for Paleoclimatology, U.S. National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, Colorado). The similar variation of deformation rate with impurity content is in accordance with previous observations.
613 Basal motion
The basal velocity in the ice-stream–ice-sheet transition zone can be estimated with the velocity gradients measured at site D, given in Table 2. Integrating a smooth interpolant through the measurements gives a contribution of ice deformation to the surface velocity of about 235 m a−1 (solid line in Fig. 13). At a measured surface velocity of about 620 m a−1 the ratio of basal motion amounts to 63%. Assuming that the high deformation rates occur throughout the pre-Holocene ice increases the total deformation to 260 m a−1 (dashed-dotted line in Fig. 13) and results in a ratio of basal motion of 57%. Such high ratios are probably not representative for large parts of the ice sheet. Indeed, the shearing transverse to the flow direction observed at the drill site (section 4.2) is different from ideal ice-sheet conditions and is due to the lateral drag of the ice stream.
Heat dissipated by friction during sliding over the bedrock or due to sediment deformation is mainly used to melt ice from the base. At a modelled basal shear stress of 8.7 × 104 Pa and a basal velocity of about 400 m a−1 at site D, about 0.1 m a−1 of ice will melt at the base. Integrated over the zone with temperate bed conditions, the lowest 48 m of ice have been removed from an ice column reaching drill site D.
62 Vertical deformation history
Differences in vertical deformation history between the ice stream and the adjacent ice sheet provide information on the mechanisms leading to the fast flow of the ice stream. Flowlines passing through drill sites D and E exhibit identical conditions (temperature profiles and internal layering structures) at some location Z upstream of the confluence area of the ice stream (Fig. 14). The large differences in the shapes of temperature profiles in the ice stream and at its margins (Fig. 7) provide evidence that the lower half of the ice is disproportionally stretched on its way into the bedrock trough. This was explained in Part I to be a consequence of a narrowing and deepening bedrock trough, leading to horizontally convergent flow of the basal ice.
Sketch of the deformation history assumed in interpreting the vertical deformation. The ice at ice-sheet drill site D and at the ice-stream site E was under similar conditions at some distant point Z upstream of the ice-stream confluence. The position of the GISP2 drill site is also sketched.
The comparison of temperature profiles can only give a rough estimate of the stretching effect. Their precise form is strongly influenced by heat dissipation and the deformation history itself, leading to changing temperature gradients which in turn influence the temperature profile. A method which is unaffected by such complications is exploited below.
621 CBC measurements
A new method was devised to measure the relative vertical stretching in situ. With the aim of detecting layers of high conductivity, the variation of electric direct current between two electrodes in adjacent boreholes was logged. Since the boreholes refreeze after some hours, a bare wire was installed in one hole which served as a fixed line electrode upon refreezing. The second electrode, attached to an insulated wire, was lowered or lifted with constant velocity in a neighbouring borehole. A d.c. voltage of 20–200 V was applied between the electrodes, and the resulting current through the ice was measured with a high-precision ampere meter and registered with a data logger. The passage of marks on the cable was registered, and quasi-continuous logs of the current in intervals of 20 ± 5 cm were obtained.
Several difficulties were encountered using this method. Measurements in the first four boreholes are only reliable at depths of > 500 m. The currents measured in the upper part of the boreholes were always very high, noisy and not reproducible, presumably due to a contamination problem. Ice samples taken at the surface at 1 km distance from the drill site, and water from a river at the ice-stream site had conductivities of 7 and 5, μS, respectively (close to the conductivity of distilled water of 3.8 μS), whereas the conductivity of samples from drill site D was high (30 μS). The cables were possibly contaminated with Diesel dust or oily gloves, thus allowing currents to flow on the outside of the insulation and along the surface to the bare wire. Nevertheless, measurements from the bottom 350 m were reproducible and showed similar signals in experiments performed in different boreholes. The cable was specially protected against contamination in experiment CBC-7 at the ice-sheet drill site and also during both experiments performed at site E on the ice stream.
The distance between the holes and the line electrode was about 10–20m at the surface (Fig. 5). Surprisingly high d.c. conductivities were encountered. For example, in log CBC-6 a voltage of 30 V was applied between the electrodes separated some 10 m. The resulting current varied from 1.2 mA near the surface to 50 μA near the bed, resulting in apparent bulk resistances of 25–620 kΩ. These low apparent bulk resistances are presumably due to the electrode geometry (a fixed line electrode and a moving electrode of 30 cm length). The measured current is therefore a signal smeared out over depth. Nevertheless, the signal exhibits distinct features which are reproducible in measurements from different boreholes (Fig. 15). The influence of ice temperature on the conductivity has been taken into account with an Arrhenius expression and an activation energy of 30 kJ mol−1 (Reference HobbsHobbs, 1974, p. 98; Reference HammerHammer, 1980).
CBC logs performed at site D (sheet) and site E (stream) are plotted in arbitrary units on the vertical axis. Curves are shifted on the vertical axis for clarity. The depth scale for the ice sheet (middle scale) is stretched by 28% with respect to the depth scale of the ice stream (lowest). Features considered identical are connected with dotted lines. Measurements performed with the ECM method on the GISP2 core are shown in the top plot (data fromReference Taylor, Alley, Lamorey and MayewskiTaylor and others, 1997). The GISP2 depth scale is multiplied with a factor of 0.407 in order to approximately match features at drill sites D and E. Key sequences for the identification are marked with grey bars. The age of several features is also given.
622 Comparison of CBC sequences
The CBC logs at site D (sheet) and site E (stream) are compared in Figure 15. In an attempt to match similar sequences of conductivity variations in sheet and stream, the depth scale of the graph representing the ice sheet has been stretched by 28%. The resulting similarity of the middle and lower curves is striking. Features considered to be identical are marked with dotted lines. The conductivity variations agree down to 700 m depth on the ice stream, or 550m in the ice sheet. The single spike at 860 m in the ice stream is likely to correspond to 600 m in the ice sheet.
The outlined matching procedure allows us to determine the differences in vertical stretching between sheet and stream. An ice layer located at 550 m ≙ 0.66 (on a relative depth scale) at the ice-sheet site is located at 700 m ≙ 0.28 at the ice-stream centre line. Thus the bottom 34% of the ice sheet corresponds to the lowest 72% of the ice stream. Consequently, the basal ice at E is stretched with respect to D by 642%! This result agrees qualitatively with the non-uniform vertical stretching inferred from the comparison of the temperature profiles (section 4.6.1). The very high stretching value may, however, cast some doubt on the matching procedure we have applied.
623 Comparison with the GISP2 core
The CBC method bears some similarity to the ECM method used to determine d.c. conductivities of ice cores (Reference HammerHammer, 1980; Reference Taylor, Alley, Lamorey and MayewskiTaylor and others, 1997). A tentative comparison of our CBC measurements to the GISP2 ECM record is shown in Figure 15 (Reference Taylor, Alley, Lamorey and MayewskiTaylor and others, 1997; data provided by NSIDC and WDC-A). The GISP2 depth scale is multiplied with a constant factor of 0.407 in order to simplify the comparison. Features considered identical to those of the CBC logs are marked with dotted lines. We believe that the sequence between 880 and 1000 m, and especially the strong current variation at 1800 m depth (on the GISP2 depth scale, marked with grey bars), correspond to the sequence at 340–390 m depth and the variation at 730 m depth at site D. Provided this matching procedure applies, an absolute dating of the ice at sites D and E can be inferred. The decrease of electrical current at 730 m depth (at site D) would then correspond to 15 600 years BP (before 1950), and the Holocene–Wisconsin transition (end of Younger Dryas at 11 600 years BP) would be at 682 m. The modelled Holocene-Wisconsin transition is at 680 m depth.
63 Consequences for ice-stream dynamics
The matching procedure outlined in sections 6.2.2 and 6.2.3 yields insights concerning the dynamics of the ice stream. If the correlation shown in Figure 15 is correct, this suggests that the Holocene–Wisconsin transition is at a depth of about 1100–1200 m at site E. Considerable portions of this ∼1300 m thick layer of pre-Holocene ice would show enhanced deformation properties. Since ice-stream flow is dominated by shear deformation which is the preferred stress state for enhanced deformation rates of anisotropic ice (Reference Dahl-Jensen and GundestrupDahl-Jensen and Gundestrup, 1987; Reference Thorsteinsson, Kipfstuhl and MillerThorsteinsson and others, 1997, Reference Thorsteinsson, Waddington, Taylor, Alley and Blankenship1999), very high shearing rates are expected. Further enhanced by the high ice temperatures, the internal deformation in the lower half of the ice stream could account for most of the ice-stream motion. This would also explain the observation that ice-stream velocities show no seasonal variations and are therefore not dominated by basal motion (Reference Echelmeyer and HarrisonEchelmeyer and Harrison, 1990).
Such a thick layer of pre-Holocene ice could form during the convergent flow into the ice stream. The warmer basal ice is channelized into the bedrock trough, whereas the overlying cold, rigid ice remains relatively unaffected. We conjecture that the azimuth of ice flow is changing with depth, and basal ice is forced sideways into the channel. This partial flow decoupling could result from the layer of “soft” Wisconsin ice which could act as a shear horizon.
While this line of reasoning is not entirely new (Part I; Reference Clarke and EchelmeyerClarke and Echelmeyer, 1996), the experimental evidence presented in this study strongly supports this hypothesis.
7 Conclusions
Borehole temperature measurements revealed a basal layer of temperate ice of 30 m thickness at site D, adjacent to the ice stream. This corresponds to 3.7% of the ice thickness of 830 m. Englacial temperatures were calculated with a flow model including heat diffusion, advection and allowing for phase transitions. The shape of the modelled temperature profile as well as the thickness of the temperate layer agree with the measurements. From the temperature gradient above the CTS and the modelled velocity field, a water content of 1% in the vicinity of the CTS was inferred. The measured melting-point depression at the bed corresponds to water with a low content of air and impurities, contrary to the assumption made in most modelling studies.
Variations in water pressure measured at the bottom of two boreholes allowed us to draw conclusions on the nature of the subglacial drainage system at the drill site. Large conduits were ruled out and the data are consistent with either a sediment layer, a gap conduit or a linked-cavity system. The measured hydraulic transmissivity of the basal drainage system is between 1 ×10−5 and 1 × 10−4 m2 s−1. Small diurnal variations in basal water pressure were observed, as well as one sudden large increase.
Measurements of borehole inclination at site D (ice sheet) showed that the ice of pre-Holocene origin undergoes strongly enhanced deformation. Integration of the inferred vertical gradients of horizontal velocity gives a contribution from deformation of 235–260 m a−1 to the measured surface velocity of 620 m a−1, and thus a ratio of basal motion of about 60%. Such high basal velocities are probably not representative for the whole ice sheet, but for the lateral shear zone of the ice stream where drill site D was located. We expect a considerably lower ratio of basal motion in the ice stream, as the ice thickness is threefold and the temperate layer is at least 10 times thicker.
By logging of electrical currents between pairs of adjacent boreholes, specific patterns were recorded which could be matched to similar measurements in the ice stream. With a homogeneous vertical stretching of 28%, the uppermost 550 m of the ice sheet correspond to the top 700 m in the ice stream. This corroborates the conclusion of previous studies (Reference Iken, Echelmeyer, Harrison and FunkIken and others, 1993; Reference Funk, Echelmeyer and IkenFunk and others, 1994), that both sites have very different deformation histories and that the basal ice is disproportionally stretched in the vertical direction on its way into the ice stream.
The combined interpretation of different types of data supports the conclusion of previous studies that the fast flow of Jakobshavn Isbræ is mainly due to high ice-deformation rates rather than basal motion. In addition to the previously conjectured mechanism of a thick layer of temperate ice which forms during flow into the bedrock trough, we found that up to 50% of ice in the ice stream is of pre-Holocene origin (if our matching of internal layers is correct). As measured at drill site D, parts of this ice are much less viscous than the Holocene ice and thus are likely to play an important role during the convergent flow into the ice stream as well as during ice-stream flow.
Acknowledgements
We express our thanks to all who contributed to this project. The electronic transmission system was designed and built by H. P. Hächler and C. Senn. Assistance in the field was given by H. Bösch, P. Haffner, B. Jenny, H. Jenny, J. Luthiger and C. Senn. We acknowledge the support by KNI and the pilots and staff of Greenlandair. We thank K. Echelmeyer and T. Clarke for data on ice thickness and surface velocities; W. Krabill and W. Abdalati provided unpublished altitude data, and R. Forsberg gravity measurements of the Jakobshavn region. For their thorough comments which helped improve the manuscript, we are grateful to G. K. C. Clarke, N. Reeh, J. Meyssonnier and K. A. Echelmeyer. This project was funded by Swiss National Science Foundation grant No. 21-39582.93 and ETH Zürich grant No. 0-20-982-95.
Appendix A Instrumentation of the Boreholes
Five boreholes at site D were permanently instrumented with inclinometers, thermistors and pressure cells. Bore-holes I1 and I2 were equipped with sensors attached to the telemetry system (section A.1). Three boreholes (T3–T5) were instrumented with thermistors over the whole depth range. The wiring of the sensors is shown in Figure 16. Horizontal lines indicate the time-span the sensors worked prior to rupture of the cables due to overstretching. It is not surprising to observe that all cables broke in the cold part where cables and sensors were frozen to the ice.
Depth below surface and wiring of the sensor cables. Inclinometer casings, containing tilt sensors and thermistors, are on cables Il and I2, and thermistors on cables T3–T5, corresponding to the designations in Figure 5. Sensor depths are indicated with squares and are annotated with two-digit numbers. The temperate basal layer is below the grey bar (CTS). All sensors near the glacier base worked for a limited time period until the cable broke due to overstretching. Annotations in italics indicate the duration in days that the cable segments worked. (b) An enlarged view of the sensors near bedrock.
A.1 Telemetry system
An electronic telemetry system was developed at the electronics workshop of VAW, ETH Zürich, with the design goals of high reliability, flexibility and low power consumption. The system was designed to measure many sensors over a single, long (>1000 m) two-conductor cable which also served for the power supply. Technically this was achieved with a digital meter bus based on a “master–slave” concept. A data logger activates the main station (the master) which addresses a specific sensing unit (the slave). Upon request from the master, the slave reads an individually addressed sensor and, upon a further request, returns the corresponding sensor value which is stored in the data logger.
The meter bus system was developed at University of Paderborn, Germany (Prof. H. Ziegler), and Texas Instruments Germany. The signal processor was a Texas Instruments TSS400 with an integrated 12-bit analogue/digital converter, allowing a measurement resolution of 212 − 1 = 4095 values. Data connection is bidirectional by either voltage pulses (from the master) or current pulses (from the slave). One master station is designed to address 32 slaves with four sensors each. Quiescent power consumption of the whole transmission system was about 1 mA at 3 V. The system was fail-safe against short circuits, as the resistance of every cable segment was tested before a connection was established.
Two boreholes were equipped with nine (I1) and eight (I2) sensing units. Each unit consisted of the meter bus system (slave), a thermistor (Fenwal 192-101CAG-A01) and a biaxial tiltmeter (see below). The lowest unit in each hole was additionally equipped with a pressure sensor. All sensing units were protected against pressure in steel tubes of 750 mm length and 50 mm diameter that were filled with argon gas and a bag of desiccant. Watertight two-pole connectors (Subconn) were mounted on the top and bottom of each casing.
A special extendable cable (Cortland Cable Company) with six cores was sealed to the connectors (three cores in parallel gave a redundancy). A central Kevlar string, serving as strain relief, was mechanically attached to the sensor casings.
The master units of the telemetry systems were controlled by individual data loggers which periodically switched on the power supply, invoked the measuring commands and stored the instrument readings. Three Campbell CR10 loggers, each equipped with a storage module, were used to register data from boreholes I1, I2 and the three thermistor chains T3–T5. Through this set-up, all three data logging systems were operated independently, which resulted in a higher reliability.
A.2 Sensor calibration
Tilt sensors
The tiltmeters consisted of biaxial electrolytic tilt cells with a measurement range off ±15° (HL-Planartechnik GmbH, HL-Planar NS15/R2). The tilt sensors were calibrated individually at 200 precisely known tilt angles. The angle resolution thus obtained is ±0.01° with an absolute accuracy of ±0.02°. All tilt sensors were measured with the telemetry system described above, allowing again an angle resolution of ±0.01°.
Thermistors
Boreholes T3–T5 were equipped with thermistors mounted on multi-core cables. Measurements were performed with a data logger at the surface, connected to appropriate resistivity bridges. Depending on the expected temperatures, different negative temperature coefficient thermistors were used (Fenwal 135-103FAF-J01 and 135-302FAF-J01). To protect the thermistors against the influence of pressure and humidity, they were sealed into polyamide tubes. All thermistors (including those of the telemetry system) were calibrated in an ice-water bath and at several cold temperatures in the expected measurement range in a mixture of water and antifreeze. The temperature of the bath was measured with four reference temperature probes calibrated to an accuracy of ±0.03° C (±0.04° C below −12° C) by the Swiss Federal Office of Metrology. From the measurements at four or five temperatures, a calibration curve was calculated for each individual thermistor. This gives an absolute accuracy of ±0.03° C near the freezing point and ±0.05° C at temperatures below −10°C.
Pressure cells
Two pressure cells (Keller PA-10-200), labelled P1 and P2, in the lowermost sensing units of the telemetry system were installed at the bottom of boreholes I1 and I2. The instruments were calibrated during lowering of the cable into the borehole. The stretching of the cables by the increasing weight of sensor casings and the cable suspended in the borehole was accounted for in the calibration curve (the elastic modulus of the cables has been measured by Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research (EMPA). Finally, the calibration curve was adjusted to borehole water levels measured with a sounding float.
The resolution of the water-level measurements with the digital transmission system was ∼0.5 m, and the linear calibration curve has a standard deviation of 0.7 m. Water levels measured with the float switch are accurate to some centimetres. Since the borehole water level slightly changed while the inclinometers were submerged, the absolute accuracy is of the order ±1 Pa (±1 m water level).
Appendix B Inclinometer Readings
All measured tilt angles are plotted vs time in Figures 17 and 18. Most tilt angles vary steadily with time, eventually passing a minimal total inclination, for example after 200 days for I18 and after 90 days for I27 (Fig. 17). This occurs if an inclinometer initially tilted in the upstream direction is rotated through the vertical during ice deformation. A non-zero minimal tilt angle indicates that the sensor is inclined in a direction perpendicular to the main ice flow. Some inclinometers in the temperate basal part of the ice rotate around the instrument axis, but still undergo steady ice deformation (e.g. I15 and I23, Fig. 18). Only two inclinometers show anomalous behaviour. We interpret the change in tilt angle after 20 days at I14 as being caused by a motion of the sensor casing in the unfrozen borehole, presumably caused by cable tension. Inclinometer I25 which is frozen to the ice, shows a strongly irregular behaviour.
Measured tilt angles in degrees (vertical scale) are plotted vs time for the tiltmeters installed at depths <700 m. Tilt-angle measurements are indicated with solid dots and triangles for the instrument x and y axis. The interpolated total tilt is plotted with a thick solid line. The dashed line is the result of an interpretation of the measurements in terms of simple shear.
Tilt angles of inclinometers located below 700 m. See Figure 17.
Sensor readings of inclinometers I21–I29 are partially missing during winter, due to a malfunction of the telemetry system connected to the cable in borehole I2. The master bus only worked satisfactorily when temperatures in the logger box exceeded −5°C, possibly due to time-out problems in the sensor communication. Since all measurements follow the general trend and are continuous in spring, we assume that the values recorded in winter are reliable. The telemetry system installed in borehole I1 was not affected by this problem.
