Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-lrvh5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-18T03:57:14.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tracking coarse sediment in an Alpine subglacial channel using radio-tagged particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2023

Matt Jenkin*
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Margaux Hofmann
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Bryn Hubbard
Affiliation:
Department of Geography & Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK
Davide Mancini
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Floreana M. Miesen
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Frédéric Herman
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Stuart N. Lane
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
*
Corresponding author: Matt Jenkin; Email: mjenkin@unil.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a method for tracking radio-tagged pebbles and cobbles through subglacial meltwater channels under shallow temperate glaciers. Natural particles tagged with active radio transmitters were injected directly into a large subglacial channel 300 m up-glacier from the terminus of the Glacier d'Otemma, Switzerland. A roving antenna was developed to localise tagged particles planimetrically in subglacial and proglacial channel reaches (350 and 150 m long, respectively) using a probabilistic technique, delivering records of the change in particle location and transport distance over time with uncertainty. The roving antenna had a ±5−15 m planimetric precision, a 75% particle localisation rate and operated at a maximum ice depth of 47 m. Additionally, stationary supraglacial and proglacial antennas continuously monitored the passage of tagged particles through consecutive reaches of the channel, constraining the timing of particle transport events. The proglacial antenna system had a 98.1% detection rate and was operational to 0.89 m water depth during testing. Roving and stationary antenna records were combined to create a transport distance model for each particle, which may be used in conjunction with hydraulic data to investigate the kinematics of particle motion. When applied at scale in future studies, this method may be used to reveal the mechanisms and timescales of coarse sediment export from Alpine glaciers.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Glaciological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Study area at the Glacier d'Otemma, western Switzerland. (a) Main features of the snout marginal zone: estimated subglacial channel location in 2018 (dashed orange line, adapted from Egli et al.2021b), 2021 channel centreline estimated using particle tracking data (dashed blue line), proglacial channel (solid blue line, arrow indicates flow direction), supraglacial antenna locations (yellow points), the proglacial antenna location (red triangle) and the overall survey zone (dashed black line). (b) Locations of boreholes BH1-7 (green points) relative to the estimated subglacial channel centreline and banks (blue dashed lines). (c) Overview of the Glacier d'Otemma (red line) and the survey zone (yellow line) (Imagery ©2023 Google, CNES/Airbus, Maxar Technologies).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Flowchart of the RFID-tagged particle tracking method.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Tagging natural particles with active RFID transmitters. (a) Cavity creation with a drill press and diamond-tipped core bits. (b) Cross-section and top-down view of pebbles following transmitter insertion.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Ice drilling and tagged particle deployment. (a) Hot water ice drill winch system above borehole BH4. (b) Lowering a tagged particle into the subglacial channel via BH4.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Images of the glacier bed and subglacial channel. (a) Subglacial channel thalweg observed via borehole BH4. (b) True-right bank of the subglacial channel observed via BH2.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Roving antenna survey. (a) Performing a survey for subglacial RFID-tagged particles. (b) The master survey track (solid grey line) and survey extent (dashed black line) over a reach of the subglacial channel (blue dashed line) and the main proglacial channel (solid blue line). Particle injection location indicated with a green circle.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Supraglacial and proglacial antenna systems. a) Supraglacial antenna pair (5 and 6) positioned approximately over the subglacial channel (yellow line) ~35 m below. (b) The proglacial antenna array located 140 m downstream of the subglacial channel outlet.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Tagged particle localisation using a roving antenna. (a) Spatial distribution and rescaled signal strength (RSSI) of received radio transmissions from a single tagged particle (P1) observed during a roving antenna survey on 20 August 2021 (n = 690). (b) Close-up of the gridded heuristic index data derived from the binned RFID points in panel a, accounting for detection rate and mean RSSI per 5 m grid square. (c) Weighted 2D KDE performed on the heuristic index data in panel b, and the resulting estimated point location of the tagged particle (KDEmax) with 95% CI contour. (d) Change in KDEmax position with corresponding 95% CI contours over consecutive daily surveys.

Figure 8

Figure 9. The estimated location of the subglacial channel in 2021 (dashed blue line). Derived by linking linear clusters of all KDEmax points (grey points) produced for the 56 particles in all roving antenna surveys (n = 399). The 2018 subglacial channel centreline (dashed orange line) is shown for reference (adapted from Egli and others, 2021a). See Fig. 8 for main legend.

Figure 9

Figure 10. Translating planimetric particle location to downstream transport distance from the injection borehole. (a) Deriving along-channel transport distance for particle P1 on 18 August 2021 by mapping the kernel density estimate to the estimated channel centreline. See Fig. 8 for main legend. (b) Roving antenna-based daily particle transport distances and a non-adjusted linear transport model (dashed black line) for particle P1.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Adjusted (solid black line) and non-adjusted (dashed grey line) transport distance models for tagged particles P1–4 (panels a–d). Particle injection in the borehole and initial detection at the proglacial antennas indicated with a green point and a red triangle, respectively. Text boxes display the number of RFID points used to derive the roving antenna distance estimate. Vertical grey bars indicate the time periods in which the particle was in range of a stationary antenna. A stationary antenna noise threshold of 32, 80, 32 and 21 s h−1 was set for particles P1–4, respectively. The x-axes have different scales.

Figure 11

Figure 12. The estimated planimetric coverage of each stationary antenna's (triangle) sensing field (circle) along the estimated subglacial channel centreline. See Fig. 8 for main legend.

Figure 12

Figure 13. The adjusted transport distance models for subglacially deployed tagged particles P1–4.

Figure 13

Table 1. Detection rate of roped tagged particles transmitting with different time intervals at the proglacial antenna array, for both high and low river stage and discharge (Qw)

Supplementary material: File

Jenkin et al. supplementary material

Jenkin et al. supplementary material
Download Jenkin et al. supplementary material(File)
File 669.1 KB