Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-s74w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T11:09:45.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Testa morphology and permeability of weedy Amaranthus species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2026

Morag Wood
Affiliation:
Crop Protection Research, Syngenta Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, UK
Giovambattista Depietra
Affiliation:
Crop Protection Research, Syngenta Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, UK
Jonathan Rains
Affiliation:
Crop Protection Research, Syngenta Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, UK
Neil Carter
Affiliation:
Crop Protection Research, Syngenta Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, UK
Bo Li
Affiliation:
Crop Protection Research, Syngenta Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, UK
Marta Pérez
Affiliation:
Biodiversity Research Institute, Universidad de Oviedo, Campus de Mieres (IMIB is the affiliation), Spain
Gerhard Leubner-Metzger
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, UK
Kazumi Nakabayashi
Affiliation:
Department of Agro-Environmetal Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Japan
Thomas Edward Holloway*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London Faculty of Science: Royal Holloway Universit, UK
*
Corresponding author: Thomas Edward Holloway; Email: thomas.holloway@syngenta.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The testa (seed coat) plays an important role in the regulation of seed dormancy and germination as well as the exchange of water, gas and solutes from the environment. In this study, we investigated testa permeability and its relationship with germination kinetics in contrasting populations of three weedy Amaranthus spp.: A. palmeri, A. retroflexus and A. tamariscinus. The microstructure of the testa was observed for two of these species using scanning electron microscopy, and a bespoke image analysis solution was developed to quantify the thickness of the testa in different regions of the seed. The permeability of the testa in contrasting populations was assessed using a range of pesticidal compounds with varying physicochemical properties, and germination responses to gibberellic acid and norflurazon were evaluated. Our results revealed both within- and between-species differences in testa thickness and permeability; however, it was challenging to associate these differences with responses to germination stimulants. Burial experiments demonstrated that testa permeability is a dynamic trait which can change over time depending on the solute. This work provides insights for colleagues using germination stimulants or inhibitors to study seed physiology as well as a fundamental understanding for developing more effective weed management strategies. Future work could focus on the biochemical and molecular basis of differential testa permeability in seeds.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Germination kinetics of Amaranthus sp. (A–C) Visible stages during the germination of various Amaranthus sp. (D–E) Germination kinetics of A. retroflexus JH89 at (D) 20°C and (E) 32°C in the presence or absence of 10 µM ABA. NG, not germinated; TR, testa rupture; ER, endosperm rupture. Error bars represent standard error of the mean for 4 replicates of ⁓30 seeds.Figure 1 long description.

Figure 1

Table 1. Information on the harvest year and viability of all Amaranthus sp. populations used in this studyTable 1 long description.

Figure 2

Table 2. Physical properties of all the solutes used in this studyTable 2 long description.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Diagram showing the anatomy of the germination process in Amaranthus sp. A cross-section diagram of an Amaranthus sp. Seed highlights the structures involved in the germination process. TR, testa rupture; ER, endosperm rupture.Figure 2 long description.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Response of Amaranthus sp. populations to exogenously applied GA3 when incubated at 20°C, each graph (A–F) representing a different population. Lines represent the cumulative percentage of seeds at or after the endosperm rupture stage over time. The light blue represents 10 µM GA3, the darker blue line 100 µM GA3 and the black dotted line represents the untreated control. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean for 4 replicates of ⁓30 seeds.Figure 3 long description.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Response of Amaranthus sp. populations to exogenously applied norflurazon when incubated at 32°C, each graph (A–F) representing a different population. Lines represent the cumulative percentage of seeds at or after the endosperm rupture stage over time. The light blue represents 10 µM norflurazon, the darker blue line 100 µM norflurazon and the black dotted line represents the untreated control. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean for 4 replicates of ⁓30 seeds.Figure 4 long description.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Morphological characterization of seeds and testa. SEM images of mature seeds from two contrasting populations of two Amaranthus species: A. retroflexus (JH71 and JH89, A–F) and A. tamariscinus (JH54 and JH82, G–I). A low-magnification image of whole seeds for each population is shown (A, D, G, F) alongside a cross-sectional view showing the overall seed architecture, including the embryo, cotyledon and surrounding testa (B, E, H, K). High-resolution images show a cross-section of the testa’s structure, showing its multi-layered composition and relative thickness (C, F, I, L). Scale bars are shown for each image. C, cotyledon area of the seed; R, radicle area of the seed; T, testa; P, perisperm. Error bars: A, D, G and J = 1.00 mm; B, E, H and K = 400 µm; and C, F, I and L = 50.0 µm.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Testa thickness measurements. (A) Illustration demonstrating the method employed to measure the thickness of the testa by approximating the testa boundaries (red lines) and measuring the distance between adjacent points (green lines). (B) Diagram of the seed structure, showing the position of the different regions of the testa, which were measured. The boxplots (C and D) show the average thickness measurements of seeds in different regions of the seed for two A. retroflexus populations (JH89 and JH71, C) and two A. tamariscinus populations (JH54 and JH82, D). Box plots show the mean and range of measurements. Statistically significant differences (α = 0.05), as determined by unpaired t-tests, are indicated by an asterisk. Profile plots (E, F) are shown for the perisperm region of seeds for the two A. retroflexus (E) and A. tamariscinus (F) populations, where each line represents 100 individual thickness measurements for one seed, coloured by population. COT, testa surrounding cotyledon region; PER, testa surrounding perisperm region; RAD, testa surrounding radicle region.Figure 6 long description.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Uptake of solutes by Amaranthus sp. seeds. A series of graphs showing the uptake of seven different compounds (AIs) into contrasting populations of (A) A. retroflexus, (B) A. palmeri and (C) A. tamariscinus. The coloured bars represent the amount of solute recovered after 24 hours of incubation in a 10 ppm solution of solute, for two contrasting populations (blue and red) for each species. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences based on unpaired t-tests evaluated at α = 0.01.Figure 7 long description.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Effect of burial on the uptake of solutes (AIs) by Amaranthus sp. seeds. Graphs showing the recovery of seven different solutes from (A) A. palmeri (JH93) and (B) A. tamariscinus (JH82) seeds. The red lines represent seeds which have not been buried, and the blue line represents seeds which have been buried for 21 weeks before treatment. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences based on unpaired t-tests evaluated at α = 0.01.Figure 8 long description.