Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kn6lq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T15:20:29.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mismatch between self-estimated and objectively assessed exercise capacity in patients with congenital heart disease varies in regard to complexity of cardiac defects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2020

Julius M. Woile
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Stefan Dirks
Affiliation:
Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Friederike Danne
Affiliation:
Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Felix Berger
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Berlin, Germany
Stanislav Ovroutski*
Affiliation:
Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: Prof Dr Stanislav Ovroutski, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany. Tel: +49-30-45932800; Fax: +49-30-45932900. E-mail: ovroutski@dhzb.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aim:

Regular evaluation of physical capacity takes a crucial part in long-term follow-up in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). This study aims to examine the accuracy of self-estimated exercise capacity compared to objective assessments by cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with CHD of various complexity.

Methods:

We conducted a single centre, cross-sectional study with retrospective analysis on 382 patients aged 8–68 years with various CHD who completed cardiopulmonary exercise tests. Peak oxygen uptake was measured. Additionally, questionnaires covering self-estimation of exercise capacity were completed. Peak oxygen uptake was compared to patient’s self-estimated exercise capacity with focus on differences between complex and non-complex defects.

Results:

Peak oxygen uptake was 25.5 ± 7.9 ml/minute/kg, corresponding to 75.1 ± 18.8% of age- and sex-specific reference values. Higher values of peak oxygen uptake were seen in patients with higher subjective rating of exercise capacity. However, oxygen uptake in patients rating their exercise capacity as good (mean oxygen uptake 78.5 ± 1.6%) or very good (mean oxygen uptake 84.8 ± 4.8%) was on average still reduced compared to normal. In patients with non-complex cardiac defects, we saw a significant correlation between peak oxygen uptake and self-estimated exercise capacity (spearman-rho −0.30, p < 0.001), whereas in patients with complex cardiac defects, no correlation was found (spearman-rho −0.11, p < 0.255).

Conclusion:

The mismatch between self-estimated and objectively assessed exercise capacity is most prominent in patients with complex CHD.

Registration number at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Ethics Committee: EA2/106/14.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Classification of congenital heart defects (CHDs).

Figure 1

Table 2. Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in ml/minute/kg and as percentage of calculated reference values.

Figure 2

Table 3. Count, sex, age, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak, in ml/minute/kg as well as percentage of calculated reference values), divided by subjective evaluation of own exercise capacity; p calculated using Kuskal–Wallis test for metric variables.

Figure 3

Figure 1. Peak oxygen uptake as percentage of calculated reference values and subjective rating of exercise capacity, divided by complex versus non-complex cardiac defects; data is provided as median and quartile (25–75) distribution.