Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7cz98 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T10:54:08.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cochlear implant failures: lessons learned from a UK centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2011

L Masterson*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, UK
S Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, UK
J H K Kong
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, UK
J Briggs
Affiliation:
Emmeline Hearing Implant Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, UK
N Donnelly
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, UK
P R Axon
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, UK
R F Gray
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Liam Masterson, Department of Otolaryngology, Cambridge University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK Fax: +44 (0)1223 586 735 E-mail: lmm398@doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Objectives:

To review our experience of cochlear implant failure and subsequent revision surgery, and to illustrate the experience we have gained by presenting a series of lessons learned.

Methods:

A combined retrospective and prospective study of revision surgery in a UK regional cochlear implant centre.

Results:

Of the 746 cochlear implantations undertaken, 33 (4.7 per cent of adults and 4.1 per cent of children) had a registered failure requiring re-implantation. The mean time to device failure was 60 months in adults and 35 months in children. Causes of cochlear implant failure were medical (n = 11), electrode displacement (n = 2), ‘hard device failure’ (n = 15) and ‘soft device failure’ (n = 5). Chronic suppurative otitis media and post-auricular mastoid abscess were the commonest causes of medical failure. There was one case of electrode array displacement as a direct result of skin flap revision surgery. In 80 per cent of cases, audiological performances were stable or improved following re-implantation.

Conclusion:

As the number of cochlear implants increase and patients outlive the lifespan of their devices, we will face a growing number of revision procedures. Audiologists and otologists should be competent in diagnosing and managing device failure and medical complications requiring cochlear re-implantation.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable