Impact statement
College and university students are at high risk for binge drinking. Our systematic review focused on preventative interventions directed toward college and university students and young people who may be at increased risk of developing binge drinking behavior and their sequelae. We sought to identify the characteristics of efficacious interventions and develop recommendations. The review has provided evidence that some interventions are being provided to overcome this problem behavior among college students and young adults. However, there is a need to develop more robust interventions based on newer behavior change models. Such interventions would alter the trajectory of binge drinking disorder and its serious health problems, along with the cost associated with binge drinking. This systematic review would lead to valuable clinical and educational research to prevent binge drinking in youth. This review would also pave the way for policy changes for early intervention programs, strategic planning and controlling underage drinking.
Introduction
Substance abuse and its repercussions affect young adults’ families, communities and society as a whole (Das et al., Reference Das, Salam, Arshad, Finkelstein and Bhutta2016; Lipari and Van Horn, Reference Lipari and Van Horn2017). Substance use relates to increased morbidity and mortality among youth, with substantial consequences such as missed classes, sexual and physical assault, sexually transmitted infections and even death (DiFulvio et al., Reference DiFulvio, Linowski, Mazziotti and Puleo2012; Sharma et al., Reference Sharma, Anyimukwu, Kim, Nahar and Ford2018; Hennessy et al., Reference Hennessy, Tanner-Smith, Mavridis and Grant2019). The prevalence of alcohol use among young adults under the age of 21 was 30%, based on data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) in 2022. The most used substance is alcohol, with one in every eleven young adults reporting binge drinking (BD) (American Addiction Centers, 2023). A blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or 0.08 g of alcohol per deciliter or greater is the threshold for BD, according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA, 2023). According to the NIAAA (2023), and the SAMHSA (2023), this pattern corresponds to an average adult consuming five or more drinks (for men) or four or more drinks (for women) within 2 h. BD among college students has been shown to have an impact on the social, physical and academic lives of both binge drinkers and non-binge drinkers (NIAAA, 2022; SAMHSA, 2022). According to 2019 countrywide research, over 53% of full-time college students aged 18–22 used alcohol, with approximately 33% BD during the same time period (NIAAA, 2019; SAMHSA, 2019). According to SAMHSA (2021), alcohol contributed to 599,000 unintentional injuries, 97,000 sexual assault cases, including acquaintance rape, suicide attempts, vandalism, 696,000 physical assaults and 3,360,000 driving under the influence. According to an earlier prediction by NIAAA, 43,000 women and 97,000 men were projected to die from alcohol-related causes in 2022. In the United States, BD is the fourth-leading preventable cause of mortality (Bock et al., Reference Bock, Deutsch, Dunsiger, Rosen, Walaska, Lantini and Foster2021).
Excessive alcohol use is one of the most significant social medical costs, costing more than $250 billion per year (Sacks et al., Reference Sacks, Gonzales, Bouchery, Tomedi and Brewer2015; Kazemi et al., Reference Kazemi, Borsari, Levine, Li, Lamberson and Matta2017). Interest in BD has grown in recent decades, resulting in an increase in the number of scholarly studies, although there is always an opportunity for improvement. A recent nationwide study in the United States found that approximately 24% of 19–20-year-olds had engaged in BD in a 2-week period (Patrick and Terry-McElrath, Reference Patrick and Terry-McElrath2017). BD is also more prevalent among college students than among non-college students, and it increases as young adults enter college due to a lack of parental guidance on campus (NIAAA, 2023; Welsh et al., Reference Welsh, Shentu and Sarvey2019). In the United States, 38% of 18–22-year-old college students reported indulging in BD in the preceding month, compared to 33% of non-college students (Norman et al., Reference Norman, Webb and Millings2019; SAMHSA, 2015). More than 60% of university students in the United Kingdom reported engaging in BD (Norman et al., Reference Norman, Webb and Millings2019). The rising prevalence of BD among college students may be due, in part, to the fact that attending college generally entails moving away from home. This provides freedom from parental supervision, especially at a time when youth are likely to be experimenting and exploring various risky activities (Mosel, Reference Mosel2023). Furthermore, excessive alcohol consumption is seen as a vital part of a student’s identity, particularly among student athletes and college campuses provide numerous possibilities for BD (NIAAA, 2023). Despite improvements in college drinking interventions, alcohol consumption among college students remains high and students believe that alcohol use is not an issue (Patrick et al., Reference Patrick, Evans-Polce, Arterberry and Terry-McElrath2023).
Despite numerous treatments aimed at lowering BD among college students and its accompanying repercussions, BD remains high. Targeting preventive and intervention efforts at young adults may boost effectiveness and prevent both the short- and long-term consequences of BD. National and local efforts to prevent BD among young adults include drinking age reduction regulations and media campaigns. Many college campuses have also implemented alcohol prevention initiatives, but many of them fail to produce significant effects. According to Talmon (Reference Talmon2019), those in ‘Generation Z’ who have significant access to digital devices see communication via this technology (SMS, online messaging, email and mobile phone apps) as normal, comfortable and necessary in social settings. College students and young people are more accustomed to communicating privately on a regular basis via mobile devices. Furthermore, therapies delivered through mobile devices and technology increase this population’s receptivity to new information and verbalization. Peer-led treatments are increasingly being used in colleges and universities worldwide to prevent BD or promote safe drinking (Eaton et al., Reference Eaton, Magill, Capone, Cramer, Mastroleo, Reavy and Borsari2018; Pueyo‐Garrigues et al., Reference Pueyo‐Garrigues, Pardavila‐Belio, Pueyo‐Garrigues and Canga‐Armayor2023). The review found limitations in having high attrition rates between baseline and follow-up in several of the trials. Another drawback was the inability to respond to SMS messages.
BD is a pervasive issue affecting young adults across the globe (Courtney and Polich, Reference Courtney and Polich2009). It transcends geographic boundaries and socioeconomic disparities, making it a matter of global concern. Understanding effective interventions is essential to mitigate these global health challenges. High-income countries often serve as trendsetters in various domains, including public health and intervention strategies. Research conducted in these countries can influence policies and interventions not only within their borders but also internationally (McGregor et al., Reference McGregor, Henderson and Kaldor2014). By examining BD interventions in high-income countries, this study contributes to the global dialog on alcohol consumption and prevention, providing valuable insights for countries at all income levels. One of the significant contributions of this research is the potential for interventions to be transferred across different contexts. Effective strategies identified in high-income countries can serve as models for adaptation in low- and middle-income countries, provided they are culturally sensitive and contextually relevant (McGregor et al., Reference McGregor, Henderson and Kaldor2014). This research can facilitate knowledge transfer and help bridge the gap between diverse regions. A systematic review allows for a comprehensive comparison of interventions across high-income countries. By identifying differences in effectiveness, cultural sensitivity and potential biases, this study sheds light on the nuances of addressing BD in various settings. Policymakers and researchers worldwide can benefit from the insights provided by such comparative analyses.
BD’s consequences extend far beyond individual behavior, affecting public health and well-being on a global scale (World Health Organization, 2024). Addressing this issue among college students and young adults is a shared concern for countries worldwide. Therefore, research that offers evidence-based solutions is crucial to mitigate the negative impact of BD on societies and healthcare systems. Researchers and policymakers from various countries can benefit from the comprehensive overview provided by this study. It contributes to the global research landscape by aggregating evidence and offering a structured assessment of BD interventions.
The purpose of this present review was to identify current peer-reviewed research studies that identified BD interventions among college students focusing on preventing or practicing responsible drinking to develop future recommendations. The review focuses on the study’s design, number of study participants, type of intervention and intervention description, key findings and limitations. It is envisaged that the review will add to the evidence-based literature and guide health practitioners and researchers about the viability and efficacy of therapies for reducing BD in young adults, particularly those in college.
Methods
The inclusion criteria for the studies in this systematic review were as follows: (i) the article had to be published in English, (ii) it had to evaluate a BD reduction program among college students or young adults between the ages of 17 and 24 years, (iii) it had to be published between 2017 and 2023 and (iv) it had to be a randomized control trial (RCT). Exclusion criteria included research not published in English, systematic review articles, qualitative studies, designs other than RCTs and discussion articles on college students drinking with no findings. We considered multiple published studies on the same intervention together as one study.
The main outcomes measured the students’ health outcomes in terms of the beneficial effects of the intervention.
-
• Prevention of BD among college students.
-
• Reduction of BD among college students.
-
• Quitting BD among college students.
-
• Reduction in consequences associated with BD among college students.
-
• Practicing responsible drinking and/or abstinence.
Search strategy
We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) standards to conduct a search of various interventions. The authors identified and looked for relevant research in three databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), APA PsycINFO and ERIC. Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” were utilized for different combinations of keywords, substance abuse, BD, alcohol abuse, alcohol interventions and BD interventions.
Search details: BBD AND interventions AND college students AND interventions filters: From 2017 to 2023.
(("binge drinking"[MeSH Terms] OR ("binge"[All Fields] AND “drinking”[All Fields]) OR “binge drinking”[All Fields]) AND ("intervention s"[All Fields] OR “interventions”[All Fields] OR “interventive”[All Fields] OR “methods”[MeSH Terms] OR “methods”[All Fields] OR “intervention”[All Fields] OR “interventional”[All Fields]) AND (("college"[All Fields] OR “college s”[All Fields] OR “colleges”[All Fields]) AND ("student s"[All Fields] OR “students”[MeSH Terms] OR “students”[All Fields] OR “student”[All Fields] OR “students s”[All Fields])) AND ("intervention s"[All Fields] OR “interventions”[All Fields] OR “interventive”[All Fields] OR “methods”[MeSH Terms] OR “methods”[All Fields] OR “intervention”[All Fields] OR “interventional”[All Fields])) AND (2017:2023[pdat])
Selection of studies
PRISMA were used. The authors prescreened the electronic search using the keywords identified in the electronic search. The authors received complete texts of all potentially relevant studies and analyzed the full texts that were to be included in the research.
Article screening and data collection
After duplicates were removed, all studies were screened in two stages: titles/abstracts and complete texts. The abstracts and titles were examined in accordance with the inclusion criteria outlined above. If there was any ambiguity about the abstracts, the publications were included for full-text examination. One reviewing author independently re-reviewed all entire papers to confirm that they matched the inclusion criteria. If any disagreements emerge, they were handled by a second and third reviewing author. The researchers piloted and executed the data extraction procedure. The data were retrieved from the studies using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to obtain key information for the, following:
1. Last name of the author, year and country. 2. Population and sample size. 3. Study design. 4. Intervention and Description. 5. Salient findings. The reviewers verified the data extraction and a PRISMA flow diagram (please see Figure 1) and checklist (please see the Appendix) were prepared.
Figure 1. Search strategy using the PRISMA diagram.
Quality assessment
Study quality assessment or appraisal tools are served for the purpose of assessing the quality of research publications. Systematic reviews have included its use and have shown to be beneficial in evaluating the constraints of a research project. One aspect of critical analysis is the assessment of potential bias in research. The assessment of our studies’ risk of bias helped in assessing the internal validity of the included studies by the JBI’s critical appraisal tools. This entailed determining if the study was conducted without any systematic errors, thereby increasing the likelihood that the reported findings are accurate (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2023). The execution, analysis and interpretation of data in a research project may be susceptible to bias. Evaluating the potential for bias in research is a crucial component of doing a systematic assessment of quantitative data.
Results
Results of the search
After removing duplicates, the reviewers scoured various electronic databases and other resources specified in the methodology section and found 2,140 studies. For eligibility, 1,857 research studies were excluded based on the titles, theses, abstracts and full texts of 283 articles. Twelve articles were found to have met the inclusion criteria after reading these scholarly articles. The PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1) describes the search approach in detail.
Details of studies included
The reviewer has included trials in detail in characteristics of included studies in Table 1. Nine of the studies were conducted in the United States, two in the United Kingdom, and one (1) each in Spain and Italy. King et al. (Reference King, Richner, Tuliao, Kennedy and McChargue2019), Lyden et al. (Reference Lyden, Vock, Sur, Morrell, Lee and Patrick2022), Morris et al. (Reference Morris, Langwerden, Wagner and Hospital2022), Patrick et al. (Reference Patrick, Lyden, Morrell, Mehus, Gunlicks-Stoessel, Lee, King, Bonar, Nahum-Shani, Almirall, Larimer and Vock2021), Suffoletto et al. (Reference Suffoletto, Kirisci, Clark and Chung2019), Tahaney and Palfai (Reference Tahaney and Palfai2017), Wisk et al. (Reference Wisk, Magane, Nelson, Tsevat, Levy and Weitzman2021) and Yurasek et al. (Reference Yurasek, Merrill, Metrik, Miller, Fernandez and Borsari2017), included participants from the United States. Norman et al. (Reference Norman, Cameron, Epton, Webb, Harris, Millings and Sheeran2017; Reference Norman, Webb and Millings2019) included participants in the United Kingdom. Pueyo‐Garrigues et al. (Reference Pueyo‐Garrigues, Pardavila‐Belio, Pueyo‐Garrigues and Canga‐Armayor2023) included participants from Spain and Fantini et al. (Reference Fantini, Gostoli, Artin and Rafanelli2023) included participants from Italy.
Table 1. Description of study populations in alphabetical order of first author (n = 12)
Interventions
Details of the populations and interventions are described in Tables 1 and 2. Table 3 summaries the description of studies, sites (country), samplings and quality assessment of the studies. Included studies provided mobile-based/phone-based, or face-to-face, or computer-based interventions in the treatment. The shortest study was 2 weeks (Norman et al., Reference Norman, Webb and Millings2019) and the longest study lasted 28 weeks (Suffoletto et al., Reference Suffoletto, Kirisci, Clark and Chung2019).
Table 2. Description of intervention programs, duration and outcomes in alphabetical order of first author (n = 12)
Table 3. Description of studies, sites, sampling and quality assessment (n = 12)
Discussion
The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic assessment of scholarly literature on interventions aimed at lowering or reducing BD or practicing responsible drinking among college students and students of college-going age. The study designs in the articles were comparable as they were all RCTs. Despite the fact that numerous RCTs were employed in this literature, more are required in this domain. This is suggested since RCTs are considered the gold standard for program evaluations. More studies in these areas will allow researchers to undertake larger meta-analyses, sensitivity and subgroup analyses to provide common effect estimates for measures such as alcohol-use frequency and alcohol-related outcomes.
Few interventions (n = 5) employed behavioral theory, specifically, social cognitive theory and theory of planned behavior. One article combined the theory of planned behavior, self-affirmation and implementation intentions. In terms of the intervention approach, two studies used M-bridge (n = 2). M-bridge intervention was conducted among freshmen. The aim of the M-bridge was to develop an adaptive preventive intervention. Two articles used text messages and computer-based interventions. Two articles used brief motivational interventions (n = 2). Two articles used Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention of College Students (n = 2). The final article used a well-being intervention (n = 1). The application of behavioral theories provides a good foundation for the implementation and study of the efficacy of an intervention in reducing BD or responsible drinking among college students. However, the theories used were not directed at behavior change but at behavior acquisition. There is a need to use behavior change theories such as the transtheoretical model (Han et al., Reference Han, Pettee Gabriel and Kohl2017; de Freitas et al., Reference de Freitas, de Menezes, dos Santos, Pimenta, Ferreira and Lopes2020) or the multi-theory model (MTM) of health behavior change (Sharma et al., Reference Sharma, Batra, Chen, Dai, Batra and Cappelli2022). The use of such theories will enhance the efficacy and effectiveness of binge drinking interventions among youth. According to previous reviews and meta-analyses, screening and therapies in primary care settings are successful in lowering BD for up to a year (Bridges and Sharma, Reference Bridges and Sharma2015). Hence, more long-term follow-ups are required by future researchers.
Then, 10 (Norman et al., Reference Norman, Cameron, Epton, Webb, Harris, Millings and Sheeran2017, Reference Norman, Webb and Millings2019; Tahaney and Palfai, Reference Tahaney and Palfai2017; King et al. Reference King, Richner, Tuliao, Kennedy and McChargue2019; Suffoletto et al., Reference Suffoletto, Kirisci, Clark and Chung2019; Patrick et al., Reference Patrick, Lyden, Morrell, Mehus, Gunlicks-Stoessel, Lee, King, Bonar, Nahum-Shani, Almirall, Larimer and Vock2021; Wisk et al. Reference Wisk, Magane, Nelson, Tsevat, Levy and Weitzman2021; Lyden et al., Reference Lyden, Vock, Sur, Morrell, Lee and Patrick2022; Fantini et al. Reference Fantini, Gostoli, Artin and Rafanelli2023; Pueyo‐Garrigues et al., Reference Pueyo‐Garrigues, Pardavila‐Belio, Pueyo‐Garrigues and Canga‐Armayor2023) of the 12 interventions studied were shown to be successful in reducing BD among college students although the effect sizes were small to medium. One of the remaining interventions was not significant in lowering BD, but it was significant in lowering heavy marijuana users’ alcohol intake (Yurasek et al., Reference Yurasek, Merrill, Metrik, Miller, Fernandez and Borsari2017). The theoretical frameworks that produced significant changes were the theory of planned behavior, social cognitive theory, self-affirmation and implementation intentions. As suggested earlier, the use of fourth-generation MTMs can be used to enhance the effect sizes of future interventions (Sharma et al., Reference Sharma, Batra, Chen, Dai, Batra and Cappelli2022).
Nearly all the interventions in this review were delivered over the phone or through a computer. Some of the research studies were conducted in person or on college campuses. The findings of this systematic analysis indicate that treatments for lowering BD among college students can be carried out in a variety of media, particularly via mobile devices and emails. Future researchers must utilize technology to augment their interventions directed at youth to curtail BD.
The duration of the interventions ranged from 2 weeks to 6 months in this review. Most of the interventions were brief interventions (n = 4 weeks). Some of the interventions lasted for only 7.5 min of video content from peer counselors, psychologists and social workers. This form of intervention is a brief intervention. TPB, self-affirmation and social cognitive theories ranged from 2 to 4 weeks and were followed up after 6 months. Two of the interventions lasted for 6 months. There is a need for future researchers to follow-up the interventions over longer periods of time.
In terms of intervention fidelity rates or satisfaction, none of the studies reported employing process evaluation techniques to analyze program strategy execution. Process evaluations are becoming more common in pragmatic RCT and intervention trial for healthcare treatment and behavioral change modalities (French et al., Reference French, Pinnock, Forbes, Skene and Taylor2020). These evaluations play a critical role in improving the knowledge, attitude and practice for change after the results of interventions. There has been little discussion on process evaluation in settings pertaining to college and university students. The concurrent process evaluation has also been utilized in peer-led intervention mechanisms where social media influencers can act as change agents (Sebire et al., Reference Sebire, Banfield, Jago, Edwards, Campbell, Kipping, Blair, Kadir, Garfield, Matthews, Lyons and Hollingworth2019). Another example was a teacher-facilitated high-intensity interval training intervention to assess feasibility and efficacy in older adolescents (Harris et al., Reference Harris, Warbrick, Atkins, Vandal, Plank and Lubans2021). Another relevant example would be community health worker-delivered support intervention for children and adolescents living with HIV and their caregivers for fidelity, feasibility and acceptability of community-based intervention (Dziva Chikwari et al., Reference Dziva Chikwari, Simms, Busza, Dauya, Bandason, Chonzi, Munyati, Mujuru and Ferrand2018). In our review, while the majority of the studies used three measurements: pretest, posttest and follow-up, they did not employ process evaluations. Hence, future researchers testing efficacy must utilize process evaluation, especially for fidelity assessment and satisfaction.
Implications for practice
BD interventions are more efficacious if newer behavioral theory models, such as the MTM of health behavior change, can be used by future researchers. The MTM has been utilized in a cross-sectional study to explain the change of BD to responsible drinking and abstinence behavior among college students (Sharma et al., Reference Sharma, Anyimukwu, Kim, Nahar and Ford2018). The researchers concentrated on two concepts: initiation and sustenance. For initiation or starting the behavior change of transitioning from binge drinking to responsible drinking/abstinence, three constructs were operationalized. The first construct, participatory dialog, entailed underscoring advantages over disadvantages, the second construct, changes in the physical environment, included removing or reducing alcohol exposure in the individual’s surroundings, and the third construct, behavioral confidence, built the surety for change. To sustain the behavior change of switching BD to responsible drinking/abstinence, the following are needed: (i) emotional transformation whereby using emotions to develop goals for responsible drinking or quitting BD, (ii) practice for change or regular thoughts on the necessity of responsible drinking or quitting BD and ultimately (iii) changes in the social environment whereby obtaining family and friend support and assistance in maintaining the quitting behavior. This theory can be applied in developing future interventions for youth to quit BD.
Limitations of the studies
The studies utilized in this research were composed of a small number of relevant research studies. The small sample sizes used in these studies were a constraint. Furthermore, the duration of intervention delivery and the follow-up period of the studies were short. Future researchers must work with larger sample sizes and follow-up with youth for longer periods of time to gauge the sustenance of behavior change. Furthermore, the majority of the studies did not undertake process evaluations. The inability to fully comprehend how and why particular approaches were successful or unsuccessful restricts the ability to create more specialized and focused interventions. The fact that the studies represented are western, industrialized nations, these findings may not be generalized to dissimilar populations. The study’s focus was on individuals between the ages of 17 and 24 years. Even though this is a crucial age range for binge drinking, it leaves out some young adults and older college students who may also engage in harmful drinking habits. Again, without teasing out the aforementioned demographic specifiers, we are unsure as to which subsets of college-aged students these findings may really apply to.
Limitations of the review
First, publication bias may have played a role whereby studies with favorable results may have had a greater chance of publication and those with non-significant results have less chance. Second, this review included only papers published in English, eliminating those published in other languages that may have met the inclusion criteria. Third, systematic reviews of RCTs for interventional studies are widely recognized as the most reliable and rigorous kind of evidence. Despite the growing number of RCTs published in the field, our systematic review did not analyze other designs routinely used in interventions or management regimens for binge drinking behaviors in college and university students. The exclusion of qualitative studies may have limited our knowledge of the underlying causes and motives for college students’ binge drinking. Quantitative data can be complemented with qualitative information. Fourth, articles published from 2017 to 2023 were included in the study. This little window of time may have eliminated pertinent interventions that were carried out prior to 2017 or are still in progress after 2023. Finally, our systematic review was limited to the extraction of reporting selective outcomes. Only those indicators were extracted with selectively existent behaviors that were considered statistically significant for the results that aligned with research questions and interests. Future researchers must keep these aspects in mind when conducting further reviews.
Recommendations
This systematic review would be beneficial to anyone working in the domains of public health, health education, college health and other allied health fields who work with substance and drug education. While this review demonstrates various efficacious interventions for reducing BD among college students, more research in this area is required, including adapting, utilizing and evaluating the effectiveness of various intervention approaches such as, but not limited to, BASICs, mHealth, self-affirmation, Mbridge and social cognitive theory, as well as process evaluation of program studies. Again, to avoid publication bias, researchers should also attempt to obtain unpublished data and gray literature and conduct a quality assessment analysis. Assessment and reporting on the heterogeneity of the included studies, both clinical and methodological, and exploration of potential sources of variations are crucial for future researchers.
As binge drinking is still a problem for those above the age of 17–24, future studies should account for extending the age range to include older college students and young adults. The inclusion of qualitative research can lead to a deeper comprehension of the social and psychological causes of binge drinking, enabling more thorough interventions. To evaluate the durability of behavior change over time, researchers should undertake treatments with extended follow-up times. This can be used to assess the sustainability of the reported declines in binge drinking. When developing interventions, researchers should consider adopting cutting-edge theories of behavior change, such as the MTM of health behavior change. These theories might offer a more thorough framework for comprehending and modifying binge drinking habits. Moreover, future research should also examine cross-cultural studies because they can shed light on how cultural variations affect binge drinking behaviors and guide culturally appropriate interventions. Finally, we encourage the development of comprehensive and multifaceted solutions for preventing binge drinking that consider both individualized and environmental aspects by working together with researchers, academic institutions and local communities. Future research can lead to more effective and specialized interventions aimed at lowering binge drinking among college students and young adults by addressing these constraints and putting these recommendations into practice.
Conclusion
This systematic review supports the growing evidence that health interventions are a means of addressing binge drinking and warrants further development and study. The quality of evidence from the fewer studies supports the need for more research in this area. Despite having modest to moderate effect sizes, most of the interventions were helpful in lowering binge drinking. Despite this, there is room for advancement in the planning and execution of such initiatives. This study made several important recommendations, including the need to extend the age range of participants, include qualitative research, use longer follow-up periods, incorporate behavior change theories, carry out process assessments and use technology for intervention delivery. It is undeniable that binge drinking among young adults and college students continues to be a serious public health issue with negative effects across many domains. Although there has been progress in designing interventions, there is still more to be done to increase their sustainability and efficacy. We recommend policymakers, clinicians and educators design many interventions that will encourage college students or young people of college age to quit engaging in responsible drinking. More interventions based on behavior change sustenance are desperately needed in this field. Continued empirical research is required to determine the efficacy of strategies for reducing BD among college students on college and university campuses. We recommend policymakers, clinicians and educators design many interventions that will encourage college students or young people of college age to quit or adopt responsible drinking. More interventions based on behavior change sustenance are desperately needed in this field. Continued empirical research is required to determine the efficacy of strategies for reducing BD among college students on college and university campuses.
Open peer review
To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.24.
Data availability statement
Available from the corresponding author upon request.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to acknowledge our institution, the University of Nevada, Las Vegas for support in the writing of this manuscript.
Author contribution
Conceptualization, L.B and M.S. Methodology, L.B, P.K, A.A and M.S. Validation, L.B, P.K, A.A and M.S. Writing-original draft preparation, L.B, P.K, A.A and M.S. Review and editing, L.B and M.S. Supervision, M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Financial support
This study received no financial support.
Competing interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethics statement
No ethical approval was sought since this is a review study.
Open access
Comments
Cambridge Prisms Cover Letter
Laurencia Bonsu
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Victoria Lane
Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health
FAO Global Mental Health
University Printing House. Shaftesbury Road
Cambridge. CB2 8BS
United Kingdom
November 3, 2023
Dear Victoria,
We wish to submit an original research article titled “A Systematic Review of Binge Drinking Interventions and Bias Assessment among College Students and Young Adults” for consideration for publication in your highly esteemed journal; Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health.
The manuscript is 33 pages long and includes 3 tables and 2 figures including the graphical abstract. We wish to submit this manuscript for closed review.
In this paper, we showed preventative interventions directed towards college and university students, and young people who may be at increased risk of developing binge drinking behavior and their sequelae. This is significant because it has provided evidence that some interventions are being provided to overcome this problem behavior among youth population. We have searched three data bases to find twelve randomized control studies from 2017 to 2023, which described interventions resulting in successful reduction of binge drinking in college/university students. The review is important in futuristic synthesis of latest research and intervention insight in the field of alcohol binge drinking.
We believe that this manuscript is appropriate for publication by Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health, because it adheres to the meticulous research relevance criteria as described in the journal’s Aims & Scope for this particular edition.
We confirm that this work is original, has not been previously published elsewhere, and is not under consideration by any another journal or book (print or electronic).
We will also not submit the material to another journal until the completion of the editorial decision process by the Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health. We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Thank you for your consideration of this manuscript.
Sincerely,
Laurencia Bonsu. bonsul1@unlv.nevada.edu
Priyambda Kumra. kumrap2@unlv.nevada.edu
Asma Awan. asma.awan@unlv.edu
Manoj Sharma. manoj.sharma@unlv.edu