Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-kcxw8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T14:23:20.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: diversity of resistant mechanisms and risk factors for infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2011

Y. J. KIM ,
S. I. KIM ,
Y. R. KIM ,
K. W. HONG ,
S. H. WIE ,
Y. J. PARK ,
H. JEONG  and
M. W. KANG
Y. J. KIM
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
S. I. KIM
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Y. R. KIM
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
K. W. HONG
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
S. H. WIE
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Y. J. PARK
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
H. JEONG
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
M. W. KANG*
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr M. W. Kang, Banpodong 505, Seochogu, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea (137-701). (Email: infect@catholic.ac.kr)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) are an increasing infectious threat in hospitals. We investigated the clinical epidemiology of CRAB infections vs. colonization in patients, and examined the mechanisms of resistance associated with elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for carbapenems. From January to June 2009, 75 CRAB strains were collected. CRAB infection was significantly associated with malignancy and a high APACHE II score. The most dominant resistance mechanism was ISAba1 preceding OXA-51, producing strains with overexpression of efflux pump. Strains carrying blaOXA-23-like enzymes had higher carbapenem MICs than those carrying blaOXA-51-like enzymes; however, the presence of multiple mechanisms did not result in increased resistance to carbapenems. There was no difference in the resistance mechanisms in strains from infected and colonized patients. The majority of strains were genetically diverse by DNA macrorestriction although there was evidence of clonal spread of four clusters of strains in patients.

Keywords

Acinetobacter baumanniiantibiotic resistanceinfectionmolecular epidemiologyrisk factors

Information

Type
Original Papers
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 140 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 137 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

INTRODUCTION

Acinetobacter baumannii is an opportunistic pathogen and is emerging as a cause of numerous global outbreaks in hospitals [Reference Bogaerts1, Reference Bou2] and several widespread strains of the species are increasingly resistant to many classes of antibiotics. Carbapenems have been widely used to treat serious multidrug-resistant A. baumannii infections; however, carbapenem-resistant strains are commonly reported worldwide [Reference Perez3], raising serious concerns about the limited antimicrobial treatment options remaining.

Resistance to carbapenems in A. baumannii occurs due to the accumulation of various resistance mechanisms including β-lactamase production, the loss of outer-membrane protein (OMP) and/or overexpression of efflux pumps or more rarely with penicillin-binding protein alterations [Reference Poirel and Nordmann4]. There are few reports of combinations of different resistance mechanisms in single isolates of A. baumannii, but Bratu et al. showed a correlation of antimicrobial resistance with β-lactamase production and porin and efflux pump, but this was not limited to carbapenem-resistant strains of A. baumannii [Reference Bratu5].

There are marked geographical differences in the prevalence of the various mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii. Various different carbapenemases, for example OXA-58 oxacillinase in Turkey and VIM-2 in South Korea, have been described in Asia and Europe [Reference Poirel and Nordmann4, Reference Gur6, Reference Lee7]. Here, we evaluated the epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) infections in a Korean hospital and investigated various mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in isolates and the effect of combinations of mechanisms on the degree of carbapenem resistance. In addition, we compared the clinical characteristics, outcomes and genotypic analyses of the carbapenem-resistant mechanism of A. baumannii in infected vs. colonized patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient selection and case definition

From January to June 2009, a total of 105 non-repetitive A. baumannii strains in clinical samples were collected from a 1200-bed tertiary hospital in Korea. Demographic characteristics, various risk factors and outcome were compared between patients classified as infected or colonized. Risk factors included comorbidity, prior admission to hospital in the preceding month, prior surgery, the length of stay before isolation of A. baumannii, APACHE (acute physiological and chronic health evaluation) II score, ventilator support, recent invasive procedures, and prior antibiotic therapy in the month before isolation of A. baumannii.

Infection was assessed according to Center for Disease Control (CDC) criteria, and defined by the isolation of A. baumannii from a sterile site in patients with definite clinical signs of infection [Reference Garner8]. Colonization was defined as the growth of A. baumannii from sputum, open wounds or other non-sterile sites, without clinical signs or symptoms of infection. Approval for the study was obtained from the institutional review boards of our hospital.

Bacterial strains and antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Species were identified using the VITEK® 2 system (bioMérieux, France). The bla OXA-51-like gene was detected by PCR to confirm species of A. baumannii [Reference Turton9]. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by agar dilution for the following antimicrobial agents: amikacin (Donga Pharmaceutical Co., Korea), cefepime (Boryung Pharmaceutical Co., Korea), piperacillin (Yuhan Co., Korea), ceftazidime (SK Chemical Co., Korea), ampicillin/sulbactam (Shinpoong Co., Korea), levofloxacin (Ildong Pharmaceutical Co., Korea), imipenem (Choongwae Pharmaceutical Co., Korea), meropenem (Yuhan Co.), tigecycline (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA) and colistin (Sigma Aldrich, USA). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used for quality assurance. Antimicrobial susceptibility was interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [10], except for tigecycline for which susceptibility/resistance breakpoints were interpreted according to the US Food and Drug Administration criteria (susceptible ⩽2 mg/l, intermediate 4 mg/l, resistant ⩾8 mg/l) [11]. Seventy-five meropenem or imipenem non-susceptible, including intermediate resistant, A. baumannii strains were selected for further study.

DNA typing

ApaI digests of genomic DNA from strains were resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as described previously [Reference Seifert12]. Cluster analysis by the unweighted pair-group method with mathematical averaging was performed using the Dice coefficient and a similarity cut-off of ⩾70% on the dendrogram was used to define related strains within a cluster.

Detection of OXA genes, and genes encoding metallo-β-lactamases

Detection of the four main groups of OXA-carbapenemase genes (bla OXA-23-like, bla OXA-24-like, bla OXA-51-like, bla OXA-58-like) was performed using a previously described multiplex PCR assay [Reference Woodford13]. The insertion sequence ISAba1 upstream of the bla OXA-23 and bla OXA-51 genes was sought using combinations of the ISAba1F primer and the OXA23-R/OXA51-R primer [Reference Turton14]. PCR analysis was performed to confirm the presence of MBL genes with primers specific for the bla IMP, bla VIM, bla SIM, bla SPM-1 and bla GIM-1 genes [Reference Ellington15]. Searches and alignments for the nucleotide sequences were performed with the BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/BLAST).

Analysis of and amplication of carO gene

OMPs of strains were analysed by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) by a standard protocol [Reference Carlone16]. A. baumannii ATCC 19606 was used as a positive control for CarO expression. Target mRNA was transcribed into cDNA using oligo(dT)15 primer and optiscript reverse transcriptase (Intron, Korea). PCRs were performed with a 50 μl reaction mixture containing 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8·4), 50 mM KCl, 1·5 mM MgCl2, 200μM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 1 μm each of forward (5′-CAT ATG AAA GTA TTA CGT GTT TTA GTG -3′) and reverse (5′-GGT ACC TTA CCA GTA GAA GTT TAC ACC-3′) primers, 50 ng target cDNA and 2 U Taq polymerase (Enzynomics, Korea). An initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min was followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C with a final extension step of 10 min at 72°C. The carO gene product was sequenced and homology searches in the GenBank database were performed using the BLAST program.

Detection of efflux pump

To determine the presence of efflux mechanism, strains were tested for susceptibility to carbapenems by the agar dilution method with Mueller–Hinton agar plates with and without 100 μg/ml of the efflux pump inhibitor, 1-(1-naphthylmethyl)-piperazine (NMP, Sigma, USA) [Reference Bratu5, Reference Pannek17]. The positive criterion for phenotypic detection of efflux pump was at least a fourfold reduction in the MICs of carbapenem in the presence of NMP [Reference Shi18]. Efflux pump-encoding genes adeA, adeB and adeC, and regulatory genes (adeR, adeS) were detected with primers as described previously [Reference Lin, Ling and Li19].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 13·0 (SPSS Inc., USA), and a P value <0·05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical significance was assessed via χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t test or the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables. Risk factors associated with carbapenem non-susceptible A. baumannii infection were analysed using logistic regression analyses. Variables with a P value <0·1 in the univariate analyses were included in a logistic regression model for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Characteristics of bacterial isolates

We collected 105 clinical isolates of A. baumannii, of which 75 (71·4%) were intermediate or resistant to carbapenems. These strains were recovered from sputum (47), wound (11), catheter tip (6), blood (5), bile/intra-abdominal drainage (4) and urine (2); 49 were from patients in intensive-care units (ICUs), and the remainder from patients in general wards.

Clinical characteristics of patients with CRAB

A comparison of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of the 75 patients colonized or infected with CRAB is shown in Table 1. The mean age was 58·3±23·9 years and 68% were male. Twenty-four patients were defined as infected and 51 patients as colonized. More patients with infection had malignancies and longer duration of hospital stays as well as higher APACHE II scores. The use of carbapenems and glycopeptides prior to A. baumannii isolation was more frequent in the infected group and both the all-cause in-hospital mortality and the A. baumannii-attributable mortality were higher in this group. The presence of invasive devices such as central venous catheter, urinary catheter, or surgical drainage was not a significant risk factor for A. baumannii infection. Univariate analysis showed that the risk factors associated with infection were malignant disease, duration of hospital stay, APACHE II score, and prior use of carbapenems and glycopeptides. Of these, malignancy as underlying disease and high APACHE II score (>15) were significantly associated with A. baumannii infection on multivariate analysis (P< 0·05).

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with A. baumannii

Antimicrobial susceptibility

The susceptibility patterns of the 75 A. baumannii strains are shown in Table 2. Most exhibited resistance (>95%) across different classes of agents notably ampicillin/sulbactam, ceftazidime, levofloxacin and piperacillin. Six isolates showed carbapenem discordant susceptibility (intermediate or resistant to meropenem, but susceptible to imipenem). All strains were susceptible to colistin but 38·7% were intermediate or fully resistant to tigecycline.

Table 2.

Susceptibility patterns of 75 carbapenem non-susceptible A. baumannii strains

MIC, Minimum inhibitory concentration; S, susceptible; I, intermediate resistant; R, resistant.

DNA typing

Eighteen distinct clusters of strains were identified by PFGE. Four clusters (E, I, L, N) accounted for 64% of the strains with pattern E represented by 27 strains (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Dendrogram of PFGE types of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains. Strains producing ISAba1-enhanced bla OXA-23-like (O); efflux pump overexpression (E); surgical intensive-care unit (ICU) (S); medical ICU (M); neurosurgery ICU (N); coronary care unit (C); general wards (W).

Resistance mechanisms

All strains carried the OXA-51-like gene characteristic of A. baumannii, and among them 46 isolates had ISAba1 upstream of the bla OXA-51-like genes. The bla OXA-23-like genes were carried by 28 strains preceded upstream by ISAba1. Coexistence of bla OXA-23-like and ISAba1-activated bla OXA-51-like genes was detected in three strains. Only one strain harboured bla VIM-like genes, and sequencing of bla VIM amplicons identified a bla VIM-2 allele. All strains were negative for the other MBL genes (bla IMP, bla SPM, bla SIM, bla GIM).

Five strains did not yield a carO PCR product with a size of 750 bp, and of these three gave a product of ~1700 bp. The carO sequence of A. baumannii ATCC 19606 was identical to GenBank accession no. FJ652396.1, which was used as a positive control. The ~1700 bp DNA sequence of the PCR fragment corresponding to the ISAba825-interrupted carO gene was deposited in the GenBank database under accession no. AY751532. SDS–PAGE of the OMP profiles of the five strains confirmed the absence of a protein of ~25 kDa.

PCR amplication showed that 74 strains were positive for adeA and adeB genes and all but one carried adeC, adeR and adeS genes. The efflux pump inhibition test using NMP showed that the meropenem MICs decreased by fourfold or greater in 56 strains. Of the 69 imipenem non-susceptible A. baumannii strains, the imipenem MICs decreased by a similar margin in 58 strains.

Influence of resistance mechanism

The MICs of imipenem and meropenem associated with the various resistance mechanisms of the strains are shown in Table 3. Strains carrying bla OXA-23-like genes had higher MICs for both agents than strains with bla OXA-51 (median, 32 vs. 16, respectively, P<0·05). Furthermore, the coexistence of multiple resistance mechanisms did not lead to higher carbapenem MICs than those of strains with a single mechanism. Nine mechanisms of resistance were identified but there was no significant difference in mechanisms of strains from infected and colonized patients. Coexistence of ISAba1-activated bla OXA-51-like genes and overexpression of efflux pump were the most prevalent mechanisms in both groups (54·2% vs. 41·2%, respectively).

Table 3.

Effect on carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of resistance mechanism in A. baumannii

bla OXA-23-like was consistently associated with ISAba1.

DISCUSSION

A. baumannii is usually a healthcare-associated pathogen, particularly in the subset of critically ill patients in ICUs. The emergence of CRAB in the hospital setting is a serious problem worldwide, mainly because of limited therapeutic options for treating this infection. There are several factors that lead to the emergence of multidrug resistance in A. baumannii and include the acquisition of class D carbapenem-hydrolysing oxacillinases and/or class B metallo-β-lactamases, decreased membrane permeability due to loss of porins, and multidrug efflux systems [Reference Poirel and Nordmann4, Reference Munoz-Price and Weinstein20–Reference Siroy23].

Our study showed that multiple factors contribute to carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii, and the most dominant was ISAba1 preceding OXA-51, producing strains with overexpression of efflux pump, followed by OXA-23 with overexpression of efflux pump. OXA-51-like enzymes are capable of hydrolysing carbapenems but their activity is extremely weak and requires an insertional element as a strong transcriptional promoter [Reference Poirel and Nordmann4, Reference Turton14]. Forty-six and 28 of the 75 carbapenem-resistant strains studied here carried respectively ISAba1-activated bla OXA-51-like and bla OXA-23-like genes. The bla OXA-23-like genes have been documented in strains associated with outbreaks of CRAB in Asia, Europe and South America [Reference Poirel and Nordmann4, Reference Gur6, Reference Mugnier24, Reference Villegas25], and the presence of IS elements upstream of this gene may also play a role in gene expression by providing promoter sequences [Reference Poirel and Nordmann4].

There is limited information on the role of OMPs in multidrug-resistant A. baumannii; however, resistance to carbapenems has been associated with the loss of a 29 kDa OMP, designated as CarO [Reference Mussi22, Reference Mussi, Limansky and Viale26], and ISAba1 is reported to cause insertional inactivation of CarO. We showed disrupted expression of carO in five strains and the loss of an OMP of ~25 kDa in these strains compared to a positive control [Reference Siroy23]. However, further research on the outer membrane permeability in CRAB is necessary.

A. baumannii possesses an efflux system, adeABC, that belongs to the resistance-nodulation-division family of transporters [Reference Wieczorek27, Reference Magnet, Courvalin and Lambert28]. An increased level of adeABC expression has been shown to correlate with a reduced level of susceptibility to gentamicin or tigecycline [Reference Wieczorek27–Reference Peleg, Adams and Paterson29]. We demonstrated that the addition of an efflux pump inhibitor (NMP) led to a fourfold or greater reduction in the MICs of meropenem and imipenem [57/75 (76%) vs. 59/69 (85·6%), respectively], which suggests but does not confirm that an efflux mechanism may be involved in carbapenem resistance in this species. However, we did not determine the expression level of adeB by RT–PCR, and did not confirm that the observed reduction of carbapenem MICs in the presence of the inhibitor was associated with expression of adeABC or the regulatory genes. Indeed, sequencing of adeRS revealed several point mutations which did not correlate with adeABC (data not shown).

Our data indicate that the presence of multiple mechanisms in strains such as production of carbapenemase, loss of CarO and efflux pump overexpression did not result in increased carbapenem resistance compared to strains with a single mechanism. It appears that ISAba1-activated bla OXA51-like enzymes have weaker hydrolytic activity than enzymes encoded with bla OXA-23, but no direct evidence for this is provided.

Several case-control studies have identified risk factors associated with the acquisition of A. baumannii, and these include prolonged hospitalization, ICU admission, recent surgical procedures, antimicrobial agent exposure, central venous catheter use and prior hospitalization [Reference Maragakis and Perl30–Reference Jang33]. However, most of these studies lacked a standard methodology, and designated carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii or non-A. baumannii as a control group [Reference Baran31, Reference Lautenbach32, Reference Lee34]. We determined that the risk factors for infection in patients with CRAB were malignancy as an underlying disease and high APACHE II score and showed that resistance mechanisms did not differ between infected and colonized groups. Molecular typing showed that although one clone accounted for about one-third of the strains, the remainder exhibited considerable diversity. Further study using multi-locus sequence typing may allow us to compare the prevalent PFGE types with those from epidemics worldwide.

The main limitation of this study is that it was confined to a single centre and it would be valuable to extend the geographical origin of the strains. In addition, we were unable to follow patients colonized with A. baumannii who went on to develop infection; however, we tried to overcome this bias by including strains from distinct individuals.

In conclusion, CRAB bearing a class D carbapenemase, and OXA-51-like or OXA-23-like enzymes, are relatively widespread in a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea and various factors, including loss of OMP or efflux pump, probably contribute to carbapenem resistance. Multiple resistance mechanisms did not confer higher resistance and the underlying clinical status of patients may play a more important role in the development of CRAB infection.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1.Bogaerts, P, et al. Outbreak of infection by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii producing the carbapenemase OXA-58 in Belgium. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2006; 44: 4189–4192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Bou, G, et al. Characterization of a nosocomial outbreak caused by a multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strain with a carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzyme: high-level carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii is not due solely to the presence of beta-lactamases. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2000; 38: 3299–3305.Google Scholar
3.Perez, F, et al. Global challenge of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2007; 51: 3471–3484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Poirel, L, Nordmann, P. Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: mechanisms and epidemiology. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2006; 12: 826–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Bratu, S, et al. Correlation of antimicrobial resistance with beta-lactamases, the OmpA-like porin, and efflux pumps in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii endemic to New York City. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2008; 52: 2999–3005.Google Scholar
6.Gur, D, et al. Increasing carbapenem resistance due to the clonal dissemination of oxacillinase (OXA-23 and OXA-58)-producing Acinetobacter baumannii: report from the Turkish SENTRY Program sites. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2008; 57: 1529–1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Lee, K, et al. VIM- and IMP-type metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. in Korean hospitals. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2003; 9: 868–871.Google Scholar
8.Garner, JS, et al. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. American Journal of Infectious Control 1988; 16: 128–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Turton, JF, et al. Identification of Acinetobacter baumannii by detection of the bla OXA-51-like carbapenemase gene intrinsic to this species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2006; 44: 2974–2976.Google Scholar
10.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.Eighteenth Informational Supplement M100-S18. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2008.Google Scholar
11.Tygacil package insert. Philadelphia, PA: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2005.Google Scholar
12.Seifert, H, et al. Standardization and interlaboratory reproducibility assessment of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis-generated fingerprints of Acinetobacter baumannii. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2005; 43: 4328–4335.Google Scholar
13.Woodford, N, et al. Multiplex PCR for genes encoding prevalent OXA carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2006; 27: 351–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Turton, JF, et al. The role of ISAba1 in expression of OXA carbapenemase genes in Acinetobacter baumannii. FEMS Microbiology Letters 2006; 258: 72–77.Google Scholar
15.Ellington, MJ, et al. Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding acquired metallo-beta-lactamases. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007; 59: 321–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Carlone, GM, et al. Rapid microprocedure for isolating detergent-insoluble outer membrane proteins from Haemophilus species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986; 24: 330–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Pannek, S, et al. Multidrug efflux inhibition in Acinetobacter baumannii: comparison between 1-(1-naphthylmethyl)-piperazine and phenyl-arginine-beta-naphthylamide. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006; 57: 970–974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Shi, WF, et al. Inhibitory effects of reserpine and carbonyl cyanide m-chloro-phenylhydrazone on fluoroquinolone resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii. Chinese Medical Journal (English edition) 2005; 118: 340–343.Google ScholarPubMed
19.Lin, L, Ling, BD, Li, XZ. Distribution of the multidrug efflux pump genes, adeABC, adeDE and adeIJK, and class 1 integron genes in multiple-antimicrobial-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus complex. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2009; 33: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Munoz-Price, LS, Weinstein, RA. Acinetobacter infection. New England Journal of Medicine 2008; 358: 1271–1281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Livermore, DM. The impact of carbapenemases on antimicrobial development and therapy. Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs 2002; 3: 218–224.Google Scholar
22.Mussi, MA, et al. CarO, an Acinetobacter baumannii outer membrane protein involved in carbapenem resistance, is essential for L-ornithine uptake. FEBS Letters 2007; 581: 5573–5578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Siroy, A, et al. Channel formation by CarO, the carbapenem resistance-associated outer membrane protein of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2005; 49: 4876–4883.Google Scholar
24.Mugnier, PD, et al. Worldwide dissemination of the bla OXA-23 carbapenemase gene of Acinetobacter baumannii. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2010; 16: 35–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Villegas, MV, et al. Dissemination of Acinetobacter baumannii clones with OXA-23 Carbapenemase in Colombian hospitals. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2007; 51: 2001–2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Mussi, MA, Limansky, AS, Viale, AM. Acquisition of resistance to carbapenems in multidrug-resistant clinical strains of Acinetobacter baumannii: natural insertional inactivation of a gene encoding a member of a novel family of beta-barrel outer membrane proteins. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2005; 49: 1432–1440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Wieczorek, P, et al. Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii – the role of AdeABC (RND family) efflux pump in resistance to antibiotics. Folia Histochemistry Cytobiology 2008; 46: 257–267.Google Scholar
28.Magnet, S, Courvalin, P, Lambert, T. Resistance-nodulation-cell division-type efflux pump involved in aminoglycoside resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii strain BM4454. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2001; 45: 3375–3380.Google Scholar
29.Peleg, AY, Adams, J, Paterson, DL. Tigecycline efflux as a mechanism for nonsusceptibility in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2007; 51: 2065–2069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Maragakis, LL, Perl, TM. Acinetobacter baumannii: epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment options. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2008; 46: 1254–1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Baran, G, et al. Risk factors for nosocomial imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2008; 12: 16–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Lautenbach, E, et al. Epidemiology and impact of imipenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2009; 30: 1186–1192.Google Scholar
33.Jang, TN, et al. Risk factors and impact of nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in the adult intensive care unit: a case-control study. Journal of Hospital Infection 2009; 73: 143–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Lee, SO, et al. Risk factors for acquisition of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a case-control study. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2004; 48: 224–228.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with A. baumannii

Figure 1

Table 2. Susceptibility patterns of 75 carbapenem non-susceptible A. baumannii strains

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Dendrogram of PFGE types of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains. Strains producing ISAba1-enhanced blaOXA-23-like (O); efflux pump overexpression (E); surgical intensive-care unit (ICU) (S); medical ICU (M); neurosurgery ICU (N); coronary care unit (C); general wards (W).

Figure 3

Table 3. Effect on carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of resistance mechanism in A. baumannii