Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g98kq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T06:09:14.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the system by which sandflies maintain a sterile gut

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Y. Schlein ,
A. Warburg  and
B. Yuval
Y. Schlein*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Kuvin Centre, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
A. Warburg
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Kuvin Centre, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
B. Yuval
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Kuvin Centre, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
*
* Y. Schlein, Department of Parasitology, Hadassah Medical School, P.O. Box 1172, Jerusalem, Israel.
Get access

Abstract

This paper combines some of the results from three studies that explain the system by which the gut of Phlebotomus papatasi is maintained bacteria free. This system includes an antibacterial factor in the crop (diverticulum) and feeding behaviour which determines selective routing of meals. When feeding by piercing animal skin or plant tissue, in a ‘blood feeding’ mode, the uncontaminated meals of both sources enter the midgut directly. Free-solution sugar-meals which may contain contaminants, enter the crop where they mix with the antibacterial agent. Feeding on plants is also described.

Résumé

Les résultats de trois études cherchant à expliquer comment le tube digestif de Phlebotomus papatasi est maintenu stérile sont présentés dans ce travail. Cette stérilité, résulte de l'existence d'un facteur antibactérien présent dans le diverticulum et d'un comportement alimentaire qui oriente differentiellement les repas. Quant on nourrit les phlébotomes selon le mode d'un repas de sang (peau d'animal ou végétaux) le repas non contaminé est dirigé directement vers l'estomac. A l'opposé un repas donné sous forme de liquide (glucides) contaminé ou non est dirigé vers le diverticulum où il se mélange avec le facteur antibacterien. Le repas de Phlebotomus papatasi sur les plantes est décrit.

Keywords

Phlebotomus papatasiantibacterial factorfeeding behaviourplant feeding

Information

Type
Special Section: Leishmaniasis Epidemiology
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 231 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adler, S. (1964) Leishmania. Adv. Parasil. 2, 35–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adler, S. and Theodor, O. (1927a) The transmission of Leishmania tropica from artificially infected sandflies to man. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 21, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, S. and Theodor, O. (1927b) Attempts to transmit Leishmania tropica by bite: The transmission of L. tropica by Phlebotomus sergenti. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 23, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, R. W. (1974) Sandflies (Diptera, Phlebotomidae) from Ethiopia: Taxonomic and biological notes. J. med. Ent. 11, 605–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friend, W. G. (1978) Physical factors affecting the feeding responses of Culiseta inornata to ATP sucrose and blood. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 71, 935–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, W. G. and Stofollano, J. G. Jr (1983) Feeding responses of the horsefly Tabanus nigrovittatus (Macq.) to phagostimulants. Physiol. Ent. 8, 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handel, E. van (1972) The detection of nectar in mosquitoes. Mosquito News 32, 458.Google Scholar
Killick-Kendrick, R. (1979) Biology of Leishmania in phlebotomine sandflies. In Biology of Kinetoplastida (Edited by Lumsden, W. H. R. and Evans, D. A.), Vol. 2, pp. 395–449. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. J. and Domoney, C. R. (1966) Sugar meals in Phlebotominae and Simuliidae (Diptera). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Land. 41, 175–179.Google Scholar
Newstead, R. (1911) The papatasi flies (Phlebotomus) of the Maltese Islands. Bull. ent. Res. 2, 47–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ready, P. D. (1978) The feeding habits of laboratory bred Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera:Psychocidae). J. med. Ent. 14, 545–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlein, Y. and Warburg, A. (1985) Feeding behaviour midgut distension and ovarian development in Phlebotomus papatasi. J. Insect Physiol. 31, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlein, Y., Polacheck, I. and Yuval, B. (1985) Mycoses, bacterial infections and antibacterial activity in sandflies (Psychodidae) and their possible role in the transmission of Leishmaniasis. Parasitology. 90, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlein, Y. and Warburg, A. (1986) Phytophagy and the feeding cycle of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) under experimental conditions. J. med. Ent. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, C. J., Turner, D. P., Killick-Kendrick, R., Rioux, J. A. and Leaney, A. J. (1980) Fructose in wild-caught Phlebotomus ariasi and the possible relevance of sugars taken by sandflies to the transmission of leishmaniasis. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 74, 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar