Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kn6lq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T14:31:12.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geochemical characteristic of the Lutetian black shale (Bayburt, NE-Turkey): amount, nature, origin of organic matter and palaeo-environment conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2024

Çiğdem Saydam Eker*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, Gümüşhane University, Gümüşhane, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: Ç. Saydam Eker; Email: csaydam@gumushane.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To define the amount, thermal maturity and type of organic matter (OM), a comprehensive analysis of major and trace elements, organic carbon isotope and organic geochemistry was conducted on Lutetian black shales found in the Everek (Bayburt) region of northeastern Turkey. Total organic carbon (TOC) levels in the shale samples range from 0.62% to 6.75%, and type II–III to type III kerogen is generated, displaying a combination of high terrigenous and low marine OM. The δ13C values (ranging from –28.22‰ to –28.23‰), aromatic hydrocarbon compounds (methyl phenanthrene, dibenzothiophene, tri-aromatic and monoaromatic steroids), saturated hydrocarbon compounds (sterane and terpane), acyclic isoprenoids, n-alkane distribution (n-C13–n-C36) and inorganic geochemical characterization support that the black shales were deposited in a terrestrial-marine transition environment and had a high proportion of terrestrial OM with small amounts of marine OM preserved in relatively arid to hot climate and oxic to suboxic conditions. The analysis of biomarker thermal maturity markers, Tmax (ranging from 449–458 oC) and estimated vitrinite reflectance (varying from 0.92 to 1.08%) values suggest that the black shales have reached the oil window. As a result, black shales are thought to contain low to high amounts of TOC, have a mixed kerogen type, reach a high thermal maturity level and produce little hydrocarbons.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Simplified geological map of the eastern Pontides (after Güven, 1993) and location map of the study area. (b) Geological map of the study area (after Musaoğlu, 1987).

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Stratigraphic section of Eocene rocks, (b) measured stratigraphic sections of Lütetian detrital rocks, (c) and (d) photographs of black shale and (e) photograph of plant fragments.

Figure 2

Table 1. Concentrations of elements in the analyzed groups of black shale

Figure 3

Table 2. Concentrations of elemental ratios in the analyzed groups of black shale

Figure 4

Table 3. Rock-Eval and carbon isotope analysis results and calculated parameters

Figure 5

Table 4. The parameters were calculated from gas chromatograms (GC) for selected shale samples

Figure 6

Figure 3. Organic geochemical proxy profiles of the black shale samples.

Figure 7

Figure 4. Gas chromatograms of saturated hydrocarbons of two representative black shale samples.

Figure 8

Figure 5. The m/z 191 mass fragmentograms (on top) and m/z 217 mas fragmentograms (below) saturated hydrocarbon fractions of two representative black shale samples.

Figure 9

Figure 6. The m/z 178-192, m/z 184-198, m/z 231 and m/z 253 ion fragmentograms aromatic hydrocarbon fractions of two representative black shale samples.

Figure 10

Table 5. Selected saturated and aromatic biomarker parameters for the selected black shale samples

Figure 11

Figure 7 (a) The plot of Tmax vs. HI indicates kerogen types for the black shale samples (Lafargue et al.1998), (b) the plot of S1 vs. S2 and (c) TOC vs. S2/S3 for the black shale samples.

Figure 12

Figure 8. The plot of Pr/n-C17 vs. Ph/n-C18 of the black shale samples (Shanmugam, 1985).

Figure 13

Figure 9. The ternary diagram indicating the distribution of C27, C28, C29 ααα 20R steranes (modified from Huang and Meinschein, 1979, after Qiao et al.2021).

Figure 14

Figure 10 (a), (b). Inorganic geochemical and proxy profiles of the black shale samples.

Figure 15

Figure 11. Cross-plot of sulphur (TS) and V/(V+Ni) ratio, indicating highly marine reducing environmental conditions black shale samples (Bechtel et al.2001).

Figure 16

Figure 12. The plot of Tmax vs. PI shows hydrocarbon potential for the black shale samples.

Figure 17

Figure 13. The plots of biomarker parameters sensitive to the thermal maturity of the two black shale samples a) (a) C29 ααα 20S/(20S + 20R) vs. C29 ββ/(ββ + αα), (b) C31 homohopan S/(S+R) vs. C32 homohopan S/(S+R), (George et al.2001), c)20S(20S+20R) C29 sterane vs. C32 22S(22S+22R) homohopane (modified from Peters and Cassa, 1994, from Hakimi & Abdullah, 2014).

Figure 18

Figure 14. The plots of (a) TOC vs. HI (Zhang et al.,2021) and (b) TOC vs S1+S2 (Kostova et al.2022) show source rock characteristics for the black shale samples.

Figure 19

Figure 15. The plots of (a) TOC vs. RC and (b) TOC vs. PC show hydrocarbon potential for the black shale samples.

Figure 20

Figure 16. Schematic figure showing the organic matter accumulation and sedimentation model of Lutetian clastic rocks, (a) stage I, (b) stage II, (c), stage III.

Supplementary material: File

Saydam Eker supplementary material

Saydam Eker supplementary material
Download Saydam Eker supplementary material(File)
File 22.6 KB