Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T22:04:07.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Connecting the dots: Tracing the evolutionary pathway of polar ring galaxies in the cases of NGC 3718, NGC 2685, and NGC 4262

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2025

Krishna R. Akhil*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Electronics, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India
Sreeja S. Kartha*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Electronics, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India
Ujjwal Krishnan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Electronics, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India
Blesson Mathew
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Electronics, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India
Thomas Robin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Electronics, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India
Shankar Ray
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Electronics, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India
Ashish Devaraj
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Electronics, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India
*
Corresponding authors: Sreeja S. Kartha; Email: sreeja.kartha@christuniversity.in, Krishna R. Akhil; Email: akhil.r@res.christuniversity.in
Corresponding authors: Sreeja S. Kartha; Email: sreeja.kartha@christuniversity.in, Krishna R. Akhil; Email: akhil.r@res.christuniversity.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Polar ring galaxies (PRGs) are a unique class of galaxies characterised by a ring of gas and stars orbiting nearly orthogonal to the main body. This study delves into the evolutionary trajectory of PRGs using the exemplary trio of NGC 3718, NGC 2685, and NGC 4262. We investigate the distinct features of PRGs by analysing their ring and host components to reveal their unique characteristics through spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting. Using CIGALE, we performed SED fitting to independently analyse the ring and host spatially resolved regions, marking the first decomposed SED analysis for PRGs, which examines stellar populations using high-resolution observations from AstroSat UVIT at a resolved scale. The UV-optical surface profiles provide an initial idea that distinct patterns in the galaxies, with differences in FUV and NUV, suggest three distinct stages of ring evolution in the selected galaxies. The study of resolved-scale stellar regions reveals that the ring regions are generally younger than their host galaxies, with the age disparity progressively decreasing along the evolutionary sequence from NGC 3718 to NGC 4262. Star formation rates (SFR) also exhibit a consistent pattern, with higher SFR in the ring of NGC 3718 compared to the others, and a progressive decrease through NGC 2685 and NGC 4262. Finally, the representation of the galaxies in the HI gas fraction versus the NUV–$\text r$ plane supports the idea that they are in three different evolutionary stages of PRG evolution, with NGC 3718 in the initial stage, NGC 2685 in the intermediate stage, and NGC 4262 representing the final stage. This study concludes that PRGs undergo various evolutionary stages, as evidenced by the observed features in the ring and host components. NGC 3718, NGC 2685, and NGC 4262 represent different stages of this evolution, highlighting the dynamic nature of PRGs and emphasising the importance of studying their evolutionary processes to gain insights into galactic formation and evolution.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Astronomical Society of Australia
Figure 0

Table 1. The fundamental physical characteristics of the three galaxies. The references for each property are given as footnotes for the table. The parameters listed include right ascension and declination, distance, apparent diameter in kiloparsecs, position angle, total V-band apparent magnitude, NUV magnitude, logarithmic HI total mass, logarithmic stellar mass, and logarithmic star formation rate.

Figure 1

Table 2. UVIT observation details.

Figure 2

Figure 1. The UV and optical colour composites of the selected three PRGs are shown here. The upper panel showcases the UV colour composite, where the blue and yellow colours correspond to the images in UVIT FUV and NUV filters, respectively. The physical scale bar of 5 kpc is shown in the bottom left corner. The lower panel exhibits the optical colour composite, with blue, green, and red colours representing the galaxy images in SDSS g, r, and i bands, respectively.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Upper and lower panels show the variations of the optical isophotal parameters: position angle and ellipticity in SDSS $\it g$ band-filter as a function of radius. The separation radius of the host galaxy is indicated by a green vertical dotted line.

Figure 4

Figure 3. The UV and optical surface brightness profiles of NGC 3718, NGC 2685, and NGC 4262. It is observed that the FUV profile dominates ($\sim$1 mag/arcsec${}^{2}$ than NUV) in NGC 3718, there is an overlap of FUV and NUV profiles in NGC 2685, and the NUV profile dominates in NGC 4262. The separation radius of the host galaxy obtained is indicated by a green vertical dotted line.

Figure 5

Table 3. Filters and their wavelengths used in the SED fitting.

Figure 6

Table 4. Models and parameter values used to build the SED. The values are derived from the SED fit and compared with the best available literature values. We use the default values for the parameters that are not listed here. References are: Boquien et al. (2019), Hunt et al. (2019), Turner et al. (2021).

Figure 7

Figure 4. SED of all the spatially resolved regions identified in galaxies NGC 3718, NGC 2685, and NGC 4262 from left to right. The blue and red shaded regions are based on the 16th and 84th percentiles of SEDs identified in the ring and host components, respectively.

Figure 8

Figure 5. The output parameters from SED fitting for the two-by-two combinations of parameters and histograms are presented for all four parameters: stellar mass, dust mass, SFR, e-folding time and age. The black contour regions represent the total stellar population distribution in all three PRGs. The mean values of each parameter are listed at the top of each histogram. Additionally, in each corresponding histogram, a list of three fractional quantiles [0.16, 0.5, and 0.84] indicates the upper and lower errors. In the top right corner, the total best-fit chi-squared values, the SFR at 10 and 100 Myr are also shown. In all the plots, the red and blue colours represent regions belonging to the host and ring in the selected sample of PRGs.

Figure 9

Figure 6. The histograms for the parameters – stellar mass, dust mass, SFR, e-folding time, and age – are presented separately for the host and ring regions, shown in blue and red, respectively. The first, second, and third rows correspond to the galaxies NGC 3718, NGC 2685, and NGC 4262. In each histogram, the mean values of the density distributions are labelled for both populations. These mean values represent the spatially resolved regions in the galaxies, not the total properties of the entire host and ring components.

Figure 10

Table 5. Mean values of the physical parameters for the spatially resolved ring and host regions of the three galaxies, derived from CIGALE SED fitting. These values represent only the spatially resolved regions and do not reflect the total properties of the host or ring components.

Figure 11

Figure 7. The left panel shows the regions identified in the PRGs overlaid on the UVIT FUV images. Blue regions represent the regions in the ring, while red regions represent those within the host. The right panels illustrate the radial distance versus SFR of the regions. We observe higher SFR in the ring component for NGC 3718 and NGC 2685 compared to NGC 4262.

Figure 12

Figure 8. The HI mass fraction as a function of NUV – r colour. The region within the green dashed line corresponds to the green valley from (Salim 2014), and the region on the left and right correspond to the star-forming and quenched region, respectively. The black-shaded regions are the sample of galaxies from the GALEX Arecibo SDSS Survey (Catinella et al. 2010; Catinella et al. 2018). NGC 3718 lies within the star-forming region, NGC 2685 is transitioning into the green valley, and NGC 4262 is situated inside the green valley. The blue and orange squares represent the selected 11 sub-sample of PRGs from the literature. To facilitate a comparison of the ring structures, we included well-studied PRGs, specifically NGC 4650A, NGC 660, NGC 3656, and NGC 4324 (represented by blue-filled squares). Also, optical colour images from the DECaLS survey of these well-studied PRGs are displayed on the right side of the plot. These images illustrate various evolutionary phases in the morphology of the galaxies.

Figure 13

Figure A1. All available images of the three galaxies used in this study are shown here.

Figure 14

Figure A2. The UV (blue) and IR (red) contours obtained from UVIT and IRAC images are overlaid on the optical SDSS image of PRG NGC 3718. On the right side of the image, the top panel shows a zoomed-in view of a ring component with identified regions marked by blue ellipses. Below this, a zoomed-in view of the centre of the galaxy displays identified regions in green (overlap) and red (host).

Figure 15

Figure A3. The UV (blue) and IR (red) contours obtained from UVIT and IRAC images are overlaid on the optical SDSS image of PRG NGC 2685. The identified regions in green, blue and red represent overlap, ring and host regions, respectively.

Figure 16

Table A1. Properties of the selected subset of PRGs from the literature, including galaxy name, right ascension, declination, logarithmic neutral hydrogen mass, stellar mass, NUV, and r magnitudes. References are 1. Hall et al. (2012), 2. Parkash et al. (2018) 3. Gil de Paz et al. (2007), 4. Brown et al. (2014), 5. Seibert et al. (2012), 6. Zacharias et al. (2012), 7. Bouquin et al. (2018), 8. Tempel et al. (2017), 9. Bianchi et al. (2011), 10. Alam et al. (2015), 11. Gavazzi et al. (2013).