Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7fx5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-23T00:52:24.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation explantation in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2024

Zachary Chu
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Chen Zhang
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Enoch Kwok
Affiliation:
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Yaoyi Ng
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Tony Tang
Affiliation:
Yale-NUS College, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Song Tar Toh
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Singhealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore
Shaun Loh
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Singhealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore
John Loh*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
*
Corresponding author: John Loh; Email: john.loh.m.r@singhealth.com.sg

Abstract

Objective

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for obstructive sleep apnoea patients who are intolerant to continuous positive airway pressure therapy. This paper aimed to explore reasons for hypoglossal nerve stimulation device explantation and associated complications.

Methods

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search across Embase Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane library yielded 14 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were (1) systematic reviews and meta-analyses, conference posters and editorials; (2) non-English studies; and (3) studies published before 2010.

Results

Of the 121 patients identified as having undergone hypoglossal nerve stimulation device explantation, 126 reasons were identified for the procedure. The primary reasons included device malfunction (19.8 per cent), infection (19.0 per cent) and device migration (18.3 per cent). Other reasons included discomfort (9.5 per cent), improper placement (6.3 per cent) and ineffective devices (6.3 per cent). Complications were infrequent (2.48 per cent).

Conclusion

Device malfunction, infection and device migration were prominent reasons for hypoglossal nerve stimulation device explantation. Complications post-explantation were rare but included temporary hypoglossal paresis.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: File

Chu et al. supplementary material

Chu et al. supplementary material
Download Chu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 42.3 KB