Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-jkvpf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T09:28:10.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing and characterizing a typology of soil fabrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2024

A response to the following question: Bio-calibrated: tools and techniques of biodesign practices

Penmai Chongtoua*
Affiliation:
Climate, Earth and Society MA Program, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Lola Ben-Alon
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
*
Corresponding author: Penmai Chongtoua; Email: pc2913@columbia.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Synthetic textiles, such as polyester, are resistant to natural degradation and constitute approximately 65% of global circulating textile fibers, posing a significant environmental challenge due to their persistence in ecosystems. The global textile industry is responsible for nearly 10% of total global carbon emissions annually and increasing environmental waste. One emerging solution to the industry’s negative environmental impacts is bio-based textile materials that are biodegradable and low-carbon to reduce dependencies on petroleum oil. This paper presents the evolutionary design journey and novel development of earth- and bio-based wearable textiles, coined as BioMud Fabrics, which consist entirely of geo- and bio-based materials. The qualitative and quantitative research-by-design methodological toolkit includes material characterization analysis, microstructural analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and macro-scale structural characterization using tearing tests following ASTM D5587. The developed fabrics were then applied in a series of speculative design demonstrations with fashion design serving as a central case study. This research uniquely combines material science and engineering with exploratory fashion design and architectural practices with the goal of offering radically innovative biomaterials in an effort to shift towards a more circular material paradigm.

Information

Type
Results
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), which permits re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. From left to right: Several garments line drying after being dyed in a mud-field (Image credit: Fukamizu, 2022); resident dyeing Osima tsumugi yarn in mud fields (Image credit: Visvim, 2022); storage of mud for painting and dyeing purposes (Imperato, 2006); mud-painting process on treated cloth-based fabric (Image Credit: Imperato, 2006).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Research-by-design methodological toolkit.

Figure 2

Table 1. Mix-design volume proportions of flexible soil fabric

Figure 3

Figure 3. Molds used to create soil fabrics.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Qualitative index of material experimentations.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (Left) Electron microscopy scans with fiber reinforcement; (Right) electron microscopy scans without fiber reinforcement.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) Body tiles; (b) thick skin; (c) ridged skin; (d) thin skin. Photographer credit: Changbin Kim; Yunha Choi.

Figure 7

Figure 7. BioMud fabric as architectural panels and as a wearable. Photographer credit: Florianne Jacques.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Flexible soil fabrics with and without fiber aggregates. Photographer credit: Emine Taha.

Author comment: Developing and Characterizing a Typology of Soil Fabrics — R0/PR1

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: Developing and Characterizing a Typology of Soil Fabrics — R0/PR2

Comments

The paper presents a compelling argument for utilizing soil-based fabrics to develop biodegradable and carbon-negative textiles, addressing the pressing need for sustainability in the textile industry, building upon traditional methods of designing textiles with soil/mud.

The materials:

Although advocating for soil fabrics as a sustainable option, the paper overlooks the challenges associated with post usage processing, such as composting and/or recycling, as these are stated as critical to the development of more sustainable fabrics in the paper. Insight on the carbon negativity scale and the overall impact of the produced soil textiles, would be desirable to link to the initial objective. The addition of food-grade ingredients to the composite raises concerns regarding their carbon footprint and potential implications for the food industry, which require further explanation.

Scientific rigour:

To enhance repeatability and rigour, detailed protocols and material compositions in experiments are essential and need to be added. An explanation of the rationale for its mixed-material approach, would help better understanding of the composite developments and how they meet the initial objective.

The designs:

Additionally, addressing architectural speculations, which are mentioned but no pieces shown, and contextualizing the speculative fabric designs would enrich the understanding of garment design implications and applicability in the textile industry. The reviewer is aware of this research being early stage, however, some arguments for the design would help to allow for understanding of the link of the speculative designs to the global industry mentioned in the abstract and introduction.

The conclusion and next steps:

The conclusion introduces the idea of "healthy soil", which might be good to be introduced at the beginning of the paper as well as adding details on the definition of healthy.

The researcher states that this research can be applied wherever soil can be found, however a consideration of global soil composition variations would strengthen the argument and allow for interpretation on how this would impact the composite properties. The impact of soil extraction for garments is overlooked, warranting consideration of traditional practices and their environmental implications.

While the conclusion introduces new avenues for research, integrating these themes earlier in the paper and referencing them would enhance coherence. Future research directions, such as analysing microbial impact on wearers of soil garments and assessing the life cycle of the soil organisms in the textile processes, would support promising avenues for further exploration in this emerging field.

Presentation

Overall score 3 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
3 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context and indicate the relevance of the results to the question or hypothesis under consideration? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
2 out of 5

Results

Overall score 4.6 out of 5
Is sufficient detail provided to allow replication of the study? (50%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the results clearly outlined? (50%)
4 out of 5

Review: Developing and Characterizing a Typology of Soil Fabrics — R0/PR3

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Presentation

Overall score 5 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
5 out of 5

Context

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context and indicate the relevance of the results to the question or hypothesis under consideration? (25%)
5 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Results

Overall score 4.6 out of 5
Is sufficient detail provided to allow replication of the study? (50%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the results clearly outlined? (50%)
4 out of 5

Decision: Developing and Characterizing a Typology of Soil Fabrics — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Developing and Characterizing a Typology of Soil Fabrics — R1/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Developing and Characterizing a Typology of Soil Fabrics — R1/PR6

Comments

The paper has been revised to a high standard and offers a significant contribution to the bio-design community.