Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-lqwgf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T06:05:54.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trivial aortic valve regurgitation in children and adolescents with structurally normal hearts: physiologic or pathologic?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2023

James J. Joyce*
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology Division, Wolfson Children’s Hospital, Jacksonville, FL, USA Jacksonville Pediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology, Jacksonville, FL, USA
Thomas R. Joyce
Affiliation:
Jacksonville Pediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology, Jacksonville, FL, USA The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Sunita J. Ferns
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology Division, Wolfson Children’s Hospital, Jacksonville, FL, USA Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
*
Corresponding author: J. J. Joyce; Email: jaxpaccardiology@comcast.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Trivial regurgitation from a normal aortic valve is rarely seen in healthy children and adolescents. The aim of this study was to evaluate timing of presentation, associated conditions, and medium-term prognosis of this incidental finding.

Methods:

Paediatric patients observed to have trivial aortic valve regurgitation with otherwise normal echocardiograms were retrospectively analysed. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were measured and categorised on presentation and follow-up.

Results:

Sixty patients (39 males) were identified over a 13-year period. Age at presentation was 14.8 years (IQR 12.9–16.0), height z-score was + 0.71 (95% CI + 0.48– + 0.94), and body mass index z-score was + 0.66 (95% CI + 0.40– + 0.92). Median aortic regurgitation vena contracta diameter was 1.0 mm (IQR 0.8–1.3). Aortic valve strands were visualised in 28% and physiologic mitral regurgitation in 32%. Aortic annulus, sinotubular junction, and mid-ascending aorta diameters were normal, and mean aortic sinus diameter was only slightly increased (z-score + 0.23, 95% CI + 0.02– + 0.44). Follow-up data were obtained in 36 patients from 1 to 6.7 years later (median 2.1). Aortic regurgitation was no longer detectable in 28%, and none exhibited worsening. Mitral regurgitation prevalence was lower in those with aortic regurgitation resolution versus persistence (10% versus 50%, p = 0.03).

Conclusions:

Trivial aortic regurgitation in paediatric patients with normal hearts is more common in adolescents and is associated with an increased prevalence of aortic valve strands and physiologic mitral regurgitation. These findings do not worsen during growth and may resolve consistent with being physiologic rather than pathologic.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Trivial aortic regurgitation in (a) Apical 5-chamber view, (b) Parasternal long-axis view, and (c) Parasternal short-axis view.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Aortic valve strand in parasternal long-axis view.

Figure 2

Table 1. Trivial aortic regurgitation: demographics and clinical data at presentation.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Initial and final aortic diameter z-scores in the follow-up group.

Figure 4

Table 2. Trivial aortic regurgitation: demographics and clinical data at follow-up.

Supplementary material: File

Joyce et al. supplementary material

Table S1
Download Joyce et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.5 KB

Joyce et al. supplementary material

Video S1 Trivial Aortic Regurgitation

Download Joyce et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 5.1 MB

Joyce et al. supplementary material

Video S2 Aortic Valve Strand

Download Joyce et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 8.3 MB