Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-zzw9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T05:43:07.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Snow accumulation rates in northern Victoria Land, Antarctica, by firn-core analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Barbara Stenni
Affiliation:
Department of Geological, Environmental and Marine Sciences, University of Trieste, Via E. Weiss 1, 1-34127 Trieste, Italy Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, Piazza della Scienza 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy
Francesca Serra
Affiliation:
Department of Geological, Environmental and Marine Sciences, University of Trieste, Via E. Weiss 1, 1-34127 Trieste, Italy
Massimo Frezzotti
Affiliation:
ENEA CR, Casaccia, P.O. Box 2400, I-00100 Rome, Italy
Valter Maggi
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, Piazza della Scienza 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy
Rita Traversi
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Environmental Analytical Chemistry, University of Florence, Via Gino Capponi 9, I-50121 Florence, Italy
Silvia Becagli
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Environmental Analytical Chemistry, University of Florence, Via Gino Capponi 9, I-50121 Florence, Italy
Roberto Udisti
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Environmental Analytical Chemistry, University of Florence, Via Gino Capponi 9, I-50121 Florence, Italy Department of Chemistry, University of Calabria, I-87030 Arcavacata di Rende (Cosenza), Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A multiparametric (chemical, isotopic and physical) study on three shallow firn cores sampled in northern Victoria Land was carried out to obtain glaciological information and climatic data in this Antarctic region. Sampling areas were accurately prospected to identify sites, located at different altitudes and distances from the sea, where the snow accumulation was not influenced by katabatic wind redistribution or summer melting. Stratigraphic, isotopic (δ l8O) and chemical (H2O2, MSA and nssSO4 2−) profiles were mutually examined for dating purposes and to determine the mean snow-accumulation rates at three different stations. Annual accumulation rates of 85–420 kg m−2 a−1 were determined in the period 1971–92. An inverse pattern between accumulation rate and altitude was shown by the progression of the mean annual rates of 160, 203 and 260 kg m−2 a−1, respectively, in the highest, medium and lowest stations. The mean accumulation value of all northern Victoria Land data available, 170 kg m−2 a−1, represents a decrease of up to 35% with respect to the estimated value most widely used until now. Our accumulation value is very close to that required for a zero net surface mass balance according to ice discharge. A linear relationship with a gradient of 0.81‰ °C−1 has been found between mean δ 18O values and mean annual surface temperature for different ice cores drilled in northern Victoria Land.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2000
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sketch map of Victoria Land area. Station numbers relate to Table 1.

Figure 1

Table 1. Mean accumulation rates, δ18O and mean annual temperature for different sites in northern Victoria Land (sites 1–19 are shown in Fig. 1)

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Stratigraphic profiles of the firn cores drilled at McCarthy Ridge, Styx Glacier and Hercules Névé stations. The first column shows a simplified stratigraphy, the second column shows the ice crusts and the third their thickness. McCarthy Ridge: 1. Crystal size 0.2–0.5 mm; pore diameter 2–5 mm. 2. Crystal size 0.2–0.5 mm; pore diameter 1–3 mm. Styx Glacier and Hercules Névé: 1. Crystal size 0.3–0.6 mm; pore diameter 1–3 mm. 2. The same, but layer thickness < 5 cm. 3. Crystal size 0.3–0.6 mm; pore diameter 1 mm. 4. The same, but layer thickness <5 cm. 5. Crystal size 0.3–0.6 mm; pore diameter <1 mm. 6. Crystal size 0.3–0.6 mm; pore diameter 1–3 mm; layer thickness < 5 cm.

Figure 3

Table 2. Fundamental statistical parameters for the components used for dating at the three sampling stations

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Concentration/depth profiles for the three ice cores of nssSO42− (order 3 smoothed) and Cl.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. McCarthy Ridge station: depth profiles of H2O2 (a), nssSO42− (b), MSA (c), normalized sum (d) and δ18O (e). For calculation of normalized sum profile from original H2O2, nssSO42− and MSA concentration values see text.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Styx Glacier station: depth profiles of H2O2 (a), nssSO42− (b), MSA (c), normalized sum (d) and δ18O (e). For calculation of normalized sum profile from original H2O2, nssSO42− and MSA concentration values see text.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Hercules Névé station: depth profiles of H2O2 (a), nssSO42− (b), MSA (c), normalized sum (d) and δl8O (e). For calculation of normalized sum profile from original H2O2 nssSO42− and MSA concentration values see text.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Concentration trends with the altitude and the seasonality of Cl (a), total SO42− (b), nssSO42− (c), MSA (d) and H2O2 (e) for the three firn cores.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Annual accumulation trends (kg m−2 a−1) for the three sampled stations.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Least-squares regression between δ18O and temperature for firn cores drilled in northern Victoria Land. The dashed line refers to the Lorius and Merlivat (1977) equation.