Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T07:52:12.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inoculant, nitrogen and phosphorus improves photosynthesis and water-use efficiency in soybean production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2021

C. E. N. Savala*
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.O. Box 709, Nampula, Mozambique
A. N. Wiredu
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.O. Box 709, Nampula, Mozambique
J. O. Okoth
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.O. Box 30258, Lilongwe 3, Malawi
S. Kyei-Boahen
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.O. Box 709, Nampula, Mozambique
*
Author for correspondence: C. E. N. Savala, E-mail: C.Engoke@cgiar.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soybean yield within the Southern Africa falls below its potential despite similar climatic conditions across some agroecologies, replicable agronomic management practices and introduced improved varieties. Understanding physiological processes and water-use efficiency (WUE) of soybean offer information on bridging this yield gap. A field study was conducted in 2017 and 2018 seasons in two agroecologies (Angonia and Ruace) in Mozambique to evaluate the effects of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens strain USDA110 formerly known as Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculant, nitrogen and phosphorus on nodulation, physiology and yield of non-promiscuous (Safari) and promiscuous (TGx 1740-2F) soybean varieties. Data on transpiration, photosynthesis, leaf area index, radiation interception and WUE from the beginning of flowering to maturity were collected. Transpiration rate varied considerably with interaction between locations, growth stages, varieties and treatments. At podding, phosphorus-treated soybean at Angonia transpired less (6.3 mmol/m2/s) than check plants (6.6 mmol/m2/s). Photosynthesis rate and WUE were distinct with variety, growth stages and inputs within agroecologies. For instance, in Angonia 2018 season, phosphorus fertilized TGx 1740-2F photosynthesized more at flowering (25.3 μmol/m2/s) while the lowest was phosphorus-treated Safari at podding with 17.2 μmol/m2/s. At the same site in 2017, inoculated soybean photosynthesized more at 22.8 μmol/m2/s leading to better WUE of 3.6 that corresponded to 2894 kg/ha yield. Overall, soybean WUE was higher when inoculated than N-treated, while P application yielded better. Results from this study will complement breeders’ effort in developing phosphorus efficient varieties suited for a wide range of changing climatical conditions.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021
Figure 0

Table 1. Amount of rainfall for the growth stages of Safari and Wamini soybean varieties recorded in the 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons at Angonia and Ruace

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Colour online. Rainfall and atmospheric temperature during the experiment in (a) Angonia and (b) Ruace.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Colour online. Transpiration rate at growth stages of soybean in Angonia (a) and Ruace (b) at P < 0.05 significance level between the treatments at each growth stage. The error bars are ± s.e.m.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Colour online. Photosynthesis rate of two soybean varieties at three growth stages Angonia (dotted lines) and Ruace (solid lines). Significance level at P < 0.05 between the varieties at each growth stage. The error bars are ± s.e.m.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Colour online. Influence of nutrient amendments on WUE of soybean at different growth stages in (a) Angonia and (b) Ruace at P < 0.05 significance level between the treatments at each growth stage. The error bars are ± s.e.m.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Colour online. Transpiration (dotted lines) and WUE (solid lines) of Safari and TGx 1740-2F at three growth stages in (a) Angonia and (b) Ruace at P < 0.05 significance level between the varieties at each growth stage. The error bars are ± s.e.m.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Colour online. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) intercepted at (a) Angonia and (b) Ruace and LAI of soybean at (c) Angonia and (d) Ruace at different growth stages as influenced by nutrient amendments at significance level of P < 0.05 between the treatments at each growth stage. The error bars are ± s.e.m.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Colour online. The effect of nutrient amendments on N in the biomass at soybean flowering stage at the two sites-Angonia and Ruace. Means are significantly different at P < 0.05 between the treatments and varieties. The error bars are ± s.e.m.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Colour online. The interaction of grain yield at the two sites-Angonia and Ruace. Means are significantly different at P < 0.05 between the treatments and varieties across the seasons. The error bars are ± s.e.m.

Figure 9

Table 2. The amount of total N, P and K in biomass at R3 growth stage

Figure 10

Table 3. Nutrient amendments effect on the number of nodules and weight at Angonia and Ruace

Figure 11

Table 4. Yield and yield components of soybean varieties under nutrient amendments

Figure 12

Table 5. Soil properties (0–20 cm) and texture at Angonia and Ruace study sites