Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bkrcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T02:16:01.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stability of Filaments in Star-Forming Clouds and the Formation of Prestellar Cores in Them

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2015

S. Anathpindika*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, Karnataka, India
J. Freundlich
Affiliation:
LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, 61 av. de l’Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The exact process(es) that generate(s) dense filaments which then form prestellar cores within them is unclear. Here we study the formation of a dense filament using a relatively simple set-up of a pressure-confined, uniform-density cylinder. We examine if its propensity to form a dense filament and further, to the formation of prestellar cores along this filament, bears on the gravitational state of the initial volume of gas. We report a radial collapse leading to the formation of a dense filamentary cloud is likely when the initial volume of gas is at least critically stable (characterised by the approximate equality between the mass line-density for this volume and its maximum value). Though self-gravitating, this volume of gas, however, is not seen to be in free-fall. This post-collapse filament then fragments along its length due to the growth of a Jeans-like instability to form prestellar cores. We suggest dense filaments in typical star-forming clouds classified as gravitationally super-critical under the assumption of: (i) isothermality when in fact, they are not, and (ii) extended radial profiles as against pressure-truncated, that significantly over-estimates their mass line-density, are unlikely to experience gravitational free-fall. The radial density and temperature profile derived for this post-collapse filament is consistent with that deduced for typical filamentary clouds mapped in recent surveys of nearby star-forming regions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1. Parameters used for each realisation.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Cross-sectional rendered density-plots of the mid-plane of the collapsing cylinder in realisation 1. Overlaid on these images are velocity vectors representing local gas-motion; shorter vectors indicate relatively lower velocity as compared with those that are longer. Time in units of Myr has been marked on the top-right hand corner of each image.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Upper-panel: A rendered density plot through the mid-plane of the post-collapse filament in realisation 1. Black blobs on this plot represent the positions of prestellar cores in this filament and those that have formed at this epoch are separated by approximately a Jeans-length for this calculation ( ~ 0.2 pc). Lower-panel: Plot showing a time-sequence of density profile within the collapsing filament for this case. The density distribution for the post-collapse filament (t = 0.8 Myr), is very well approximated by the Ostriker-profile.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Shown here is the time-variation of the stability factor, S(r), defined by Equation (3) as a function of the radial coordinate within the collapsing filament in realisation 1. Interestingly, gas in the collapsing cylinder always remains gravitationally sub-critical; S(r) < 1.

Figure 4

Figure 4. A plot showing the accretion history of the cores that form in the post-collapse filament in the first realisation.

Figure 5

Figure 5. As in the plot shown in Figure 1, this is the radial distribution of gas density within the collapsing filament at different epochs in realisation 2.

Figure 6

Figure 6. As in Figure 2, shown in this plot is the time-variation of the stability factor, S(r), calculated for different radii at various epochs of the collapsing filament in realisation 2.

Figure 7

Figure 7. This plot shows the radial variation of density averaged gas temperature at different epochs within the collapsing filament in realisation 2.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Same as the plot in Figure 3, but now for the cores that form in the post-collapse filament in realisation 2.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Upper-panel: Rendered image showing a projection of the mid-plane of the post-collapse filament (t=1.) in realisation 6 (only a small volume of the medium confining the filament has been shown on this plot). Fine black blobs on top of the image represent the positions of cores in the post-collapse filament at the time of termination of calculations. Perturbations, in this realisation, were imposed on the length-scale LJeans, defined by Equation (5). Not all density perturbations have condensed at this epoch, but those that are relatively closely spaced are separated on a scale on the order of LJeans ~ 0.08 pc. Lower-panel: Same as the picture shown in the upper- panel, but now for the realisation 4 that was developed with a somewhat lower resolution, though sufficient to avoid artificial fragmentation along the length of the post-collapse filament.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Similar to the plot shown in Figure 8, but with perturbations now imposed on the length-scale, LJeans/2 (the second harmonic), in realisation 7. Again, not all density perturbations have condensed at this epoch, but those that are relatively closely spaced are separated on a scale on the order of LJeans/2 ~ 0.04 pc.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Same as the plot in Figure 8, but now for the cores that form in the post-collapse filament in realisation 4 (upper-panel) and 6 (lower-panel). In the former, the realisation with relatively lower-resolution, the sink-formation begins a little earlier and sinks are a little more massive than those in the latter realisation, one of those that had the highest resolution in this work.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Same as the plot in Figure 10, but now for the cores that form in the post-collapse filament in realisation 7.

Figure 13

Figure 13. The radial variation of the stability factor, S(r), calculated at different epochs for the cylindrical distribution of gas in realisation 8. As was seen in Figures 2 and 5 for realisations grouped under Case 1, in this realisation as well the magnitude of S(r) remains unchanged and gas always remains sub-critical even as the initial cylindrical distribution is squashed into a spheroidal globule.

Figure 14

Figure 14. Radial distribution of the density averaged gas temperature within the post-collapse globule in realisation 8 at the time of termination of calculations (t = 2.5 Myrs).

Figure 15

Figure 15. A rendered density image showing a projection of the mid-plane of the elongated globule in simulation 8. Time in the top left-hand corner of the image is marked in Myrs (t = 2.5 Myrs).

Figure 16

Figure 16. Gas within the post-collapse globule shown in Figure 14 exhibits a weak velocity field. The inwardly directed gas in the outer regions of the globule as it is being squashed has negative velocity on this plot.

Figure 17

Figure 17. Same as the plot shown in Figure 16 but now for simulations 4 and 6 grouped under Case 1. As usual, a negative velocity indicates inwardly moving gas. Although the plots are qualitatively similar, the resolution of the simulations developed here is insufficient to achieve convergence in the magnitude of velocity of the collapsing gas. (See Section 3.3 for a discussion about the resolution).