Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T16:01:38.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatial, seasonal and interannual variability of supraglacial ponds in the Langtang Valley of Nepal, 1999–2013

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2016

EVAN S. MILES*
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
IAN C. WILLIS
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
NEIL S. ARNOLD
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, UK
JAKOB STEINER
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Geography, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands Institute for Hydrology, ETH-Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
FRANCESCA PELLICCIOTTI
Affiliation:
Institute for Hydrology, ETH-Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Department of Geography, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
*
Correspondence: Evan Miles <esm40@cam.ac.uk>
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Supraglacial ponds play a key role in absorbing atmospheric energy and directing it to the ice of debris-covered glaciers, but the spatial and temporal distribution of these features is not well documented. We analyse 172 Landsat TM/ETM+ scenes for the period 1999–2013 to identify thawed supraglacial ponds for the debris-covered tongues of five glaciers in the Langtang Valley of Nepal. We apply an advanced atmospheric correction routine (Landcor/6S) and use band ratio and image morphological techniques to identify ponds and validate our results with 2.5 m Cartosat-1 observations. We then characterize the spatial, seasonal and interannual patterns of ponds. We find high variability in pond incidence between glaciers (May–October means of 0.08–1.69% of debris area), with ponds most frequent in zones of low surface gradient and velocity. The ponds show pronounced seasonality, appearing in the pre-monsoon as snow melts, peaking at the monsoon onset at 2% of debris-covered area, then declining in the post-monsoon as ponds drain or freeze. Ponds are highly recurrent and persistent, with 40.5% of pond locations occurring for multiple years. Rather than a trend in pond cover over the study period, we find high interannual variability for each glacier after controlling for seasonality.

Information

Type
Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Geographic context of the study area within Nepal. (b) The upper Langtang basin, with the principal debris-covered glaciers identified. Backdrop is 6S-corrected Landsat TM false-color composite from 16 June 2009. (c) Photo taken 24 May 2013 near the terminus of Langtang Glacier (position at ‘Photo Point’), showing high-turbidity ponds and extremely variable relief of up to 50 m.

Figure 1

Table 1. Comparison of morphometric and dynamic characteristics with pond observations for the five debris-covered glaciers in the study area

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Temporal distribution of scenes processed in the study, with histograms indicating monthly (left) and annual (bottom) counts of observations. Red marks are those scenes with <50% debris-covered area observable, which were removed from the analysis (26 removed from 198 scenes processed). Black marks are the scenes used in the analysis (n = 172).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. (a) Processing workflow for supraglacial pond classification, with intermediate steps shown in insets (b)–(e). (b) Subset of Landsat TM false-color composite for 19 August 2009 after Landcor/6S processing. (c) Cloud, snow/ice and shadow (not shown) masks determined by subroutines, showing some difficulty with cloud identification. (d) Slope mask and determination of high-probability water seeds. (e) Pond cover output after image morphological operations and reclassification.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Spatial distribution of supraglacial ponds as percent of May–October observations (n = 68), also showing results for other lakes outside the debris-covered tongues (orange ellipses), 1999–2013. Cross-glacier transects used for measurement of glacier width and DGM are shown as black lines.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Log/log plot of observed supraglacial pond size distribution for each glacier, 1999–2013. Each Landsat pixel covers 900 m2.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Comparison of features identified by Landsat ETM+ and Cartosat-1 for October 2006 and November 2009, showing strong agreement between the datasets. Landsat misses small ponds and occasionally misidentifies pond features. The 30 m resolution is the dominant source of error for the Landsat routine.

Figure 7

Table 2. Landsat ETM+ and Cartosat-1 pond observations for a 3.03 km2 area of Langtang Glacier (Fig. 6)

Figure 8

Table 3. Landsat commission and omission rates of pond features and size for each scene comparison, and the overall error in pond area for each scene

Figure 9

Fig. 7. An example of rapid pond filling and draining during the late pre-monsoon of 2013, at 4560 m.a.s.l. on Langtang Glacier (location indicated on Fig. 11). Blue lines indicate the approximate filled water level as seen in the 24 May photo (b), with red markers identifying recognizable clean patches on the ice cliff. Observations on 17 May (a) had found a 400 m2 pond in a 5900 m2 depression ringed with ice cliffs. By 24 May (b), in the absence of any precipitation, the depression had flooded to overflowing, which also filled adjacent depressions for a total pond area of 30 000 m2. Two days later (c), following a 14 h rainfall event, the pond had drained, leaving the subaqueous portion of the ice cliff clean.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Annual velocity and surface gradient for the debris-covered areas of the study glaciers. Annual velocity was derived using the method of Dehecq and others (2015) but with Landsat ETM+ panchromatic data (band 8). Surface gradient was derived by a method similar to Quincey and others (2007).

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Distribution of local surface gradient and velocity for all observed ponds, with marker size indicating the number of pixels for each pond. Categories A–D correspond to Table 4 and Quincey and others (2007).

Figure 12

Table 4. Distribution of debris area, observed pond area and count of ponds within each gradient and slope category with (–) denoting no area

Figure 13

Fig. 10. Seasonal pattern of thawed pond cover as percent of observable debris-covered glacier area (left), with individual scenes coloured by year of observation (n = 172) and dot tails highlighting the effect of a 34% overestimation of pond area. The solid black line is the monthly mean, with dashed lines showing the ± 1σ spread. The seasonal pattern is demonstrated by pond frequency maps derived from all data for each season (right), highlighting the widespread prevalence of ponds during the monsoon. This panel shows only Langtang Glacier for space considerations.

Figure 14

Fig. 11. Distribution of supraglacial ponds as percent of cloud-free debris-covered glacier area for 5-year subsets, highlighting the increase in overall ponded area and the persistence of individual ponds. Ghanna Glacier is not shown due to its lack of pond cover. The colour scale is limited to 50% for clarity, but the 5-year windows had maximum May–October pond frequency values of 91, 72 and 81% for 1999–2003, 2004–08 and 2009–13, respectively.

Figure 15

Fig. 12. Interannual pattern of supraglacial ponding by season for Langtang Glacier, showing the mean ±1σ expressed as percent of observable debris-covered glacier area (left). Post-monsoon interannual variability of supraglacial ponding at the four larger glaciers, showing the mean ±1σ expressed as percent of observable debris-covered glacier area (right). For both panels, data included have at least 80% of the debris area visible and <10% covered by snow.