Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T21:29:35.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Basal conditions and glacier motion during the winter/spring transition, Worthington Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Joel T. Harper
Affiliation:
Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Campus Box 450, Boulder, Colorado 80309–0450, U.S.A. E-mail: joelh@tintin.colorado.edu
Neil F. Humphrey
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071–3006, U.S.A.
Mark C. Greenwood
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Observations of the motion and basal conditions of Worthington Glacier, Alaska, U.S.A., during late-winter and spring melt seasons revealed no evidence of a relationship between water pressure and sliding velocity. Measurements included borehole water levels (used as a proxy for basal water pressure), surface velocity, englacial deformation, sliding velocity, and time-lapse videography of subglacial water flow and bed characteristics. The boreholes were spaced 10–15 m apart; six were instrumented in 1997, and five in 1998. In late winter, the water-pressure field showed spatially synchronous fluctuations with a diurnal cycle. The glacier’s motion was relatively slow and non-cyclic. In spring, the motion was characterized by rapid, diurnally varying sliding. The basal water pressure displayed no diurnal signal, but showed high-magnitude fluctuations and often strong gradients between holes. This transition in character of the basal water-pressure field may represent a seasonal evolution of the drainage system from linked cavities to a network of isolated patches and conduits. These changes occurred as the glacier was undergoing a seasonal-velocity peak. The apparent lack of correlation between sliding velocity and water pressure suggests that local-scale water pressure does not directly control sliding during late winter or early in the melt season.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2002
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Vertical air photograph of Worthington Glacier showing the location of the borehole and velocity measurements. Flow direction is from left to right. Holes drilled in 1997 are shown as squares; holes drilled in 1998 are shown as open circles. The survey sites in 1997 (97-Svy) and 1998 (98-Svy) are shown.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Borehole video images of hole 98-H5 filmed 5 days apart in 1998. (a) The hole initially encountered bare bedrock. (b) Five days later the hole had moved over coarse sediment. The sediment remained at the base of the hole throughout the observation period and overturned as the hole moved over the bed.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Time series of surface velocity during 1997 (a) and 1998 (b). In each pair, lower panel shows velocity and upper panel shows the possible error component (σ*). Error is calculated as , where σ1 and σ2 are the standard deviations of the first and second distance measurements and t is the time interval between measurements. The error velocity is considered a worst case, as the errors are not necessarily additive. Measured deformational velocity of hole 97-H6 during 1997/98 (83 mm d−1) is shown by solid horizontal line in each velocity panel. Low-velocity spike at day 180.3 is believed to be a survey error.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Trajectory of borehole 97-H6 after 1 year of deformation. Abscissa gives the displacement of points along the hole relative to the bottom of the borehole. The hole was drilled to the bed and measured to within 1 m of the bed.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Sliding velocity from time-lapse video and effective pressure in borehole 97-H5. (a) Displacement time series of a point on the bed relative to the ice within the borehole wall. Measurements were made from 1930 to 2130 h on the evening of day 171 in 1997. (b) Effective pressure (overburden minus water pressure) during the same period.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Time series of borehole water levels during 1997 displayed as a percentage of overburden pressure. Interval I had roughly synchronous water levels. Interval II had complete asynchroneity between holes. Open circles represent water levels known only as having been less than 55% of the ice overburden pressure; dashed lines have uncertain slopes.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Time series of borehole water levels during 1998 displayed as a percentage of overburden pressure.

Figure 7

Table 1. Mean surface velocities (mm d−1) over hourly time intervals

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Periodograms showing the power spectrum of the pressure and velocity time series during 1997 (spring) and 1998 (late-winter) study intervals.

Figure 9

Table 2. Characteristics of water-pressure and velocity time series