Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-kcxw8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T18:45:55.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interventions to improve therapeutic communications between Black and minority ethnic patients and professionals in psychiatric services: Systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Kamaldeep S. Bhui*
Affiliation:
Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London
Rabeea'h W. Aslam
Affiliation:
Barts & The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London
Andrea Palinski
Affiliation:
Barts & The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London
Rose McCabe
Affiliation:
University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter
Mark R. D. Johnson
Affiliation:
Mary Seacole Research Centre, De Montfort University, Leicester
Scott Weich
Affiliation:
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry
Swaran P. Singh
Affiliation:
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry
Martin Knapp
Affiliation:
London School of Economics, London
Vittoria Ardino
Affiliation:
London School of Economics, London
Ala Szczepura
Affiliation:
Centre for Technology Enabled Health Research (CTEHR), Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
*
K. S. Bhui, Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Old Anatomy Building, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6Q, UK. Email: k.s.bhui@qmul.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Communication may be an influential determinant of inequality of access to, engagement with and benefit from psychiatric services.

Aims

To review the evidence on interventions designed to improve therapeutic communications between Black and minority ethnic patients and clinicians who provide care in psychiatric services.

Method

Systematic review and evidence synthesis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42011001661). Data sources included the published and the ‘grey’ literature. A survey of experts and a consultation with patients and carers all contributed to the evidence synthesis, interpretation and recommendations.

Results

Twenty-one studies were included in our analysis. The trials showed benefits mainly for depressive symptoms, experiences of care, knowledge, stigma, adherence to prescribed medication, insight and alliance. The effect sizes were smaller for better-quality trials (range of d 0.18–0.75) than for moderate- or lower-quality studies (range of d 0.18–4.3). The review found only two studies offering weak economic evidence.

Conclusions

Culturally adapted psychotherapies, and ethnographic and motivational assessment leading to psychotherapies were effective and favoured by patients and carers. Further trials are needed from outside of the UK and USA, as are economic evaluations and studies of routine psychiatric care practices.

Information

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2015
Figure 0

Fig. 1 PRISMA diagram showing selection of papers at each stage.BME, Black and minority ethnic; ADHD, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Figure 1

TABLE 1 Quality scores, given as percentages of maximum score possible

Figure 2

TABLE 2 Components of interventions emerging from thematic analysis

Supplementary material: PDF

Bhui et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Download Bhui et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 311.7 KB

This journal is not currently accepting new eletters.

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.