Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pztms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T10:52:40.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Party Polarization, Ideological Sorting and the Emergence of the US Partisan Gender Gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2018

Daniel Q. Gillion
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania
Jonathan M. Ladd*
Affiliation:
McCourt School of Public Policy and Department of Government, Georgetown University
Marc Meredith
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jonathan.ladd@georgetown.edu

Abstract

This article argues that the modern American partisan gender gap – the tendency of men to identify more as Republicans and less as Democrats than women – emerged largely because of mass-level ideological party sorting. As the two major US political parties ideologically polarized at the elite level, the public gradually perceived this polarization and better sorted themselves into the parties that matched their policy preferences. Stable pre-existing policy differences between men and women caused this sorting to generate the modern US partisan gender gap. Because education is positively associated with awareness of elite party polarization, the partisan gender gap developed earlier and is consistently larger among those with college degrees. The study finds support for this argument from decades of American National Election Studies data and a new large dataset of decades of pooled individual-level Gallup survey responses.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: PDF

Gillion et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Gillion et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 578.2 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Gillion et al. Dataset

Link