Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bkrcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T13:58:16.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The benthic foraminiferal response to the mid-Maastrichtian event in the NW-European chalk sea of the Maastrichtian type area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2022

Iris Vancoppenolle*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Division Geology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Johan Vellekoop
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Division Geology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium OD Earth and History of Life, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium
Monika Doubrawa
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Division Geology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Pim Kaskes
Affiliation:
Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Matthias Sinnesael
Affiliation:
Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium IMCCE, CNRS, Observatoire de Paris, PSL University, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
John W.M. Jagt
Affiliation:
Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Philippe Claeys
Affiliation:
Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Robert P. Speijer
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Division Geology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
*
Author for correspondence: Iris Vancoppenolle, Email: vancoppenolleiris@live.be

Abstract

The mid-Maastrichtian carbon isotope event (MME), dated at ∼69 Ma, reflects a perturbation of the global carbon cycle that, in part, correlates with the enigmatic global extinction of ‘true’ (i.e., non-tegulated) inoceramid bivalves. The mechanisms of this extinction event are still debated.

While both the inoceramid extirpation and MME have been recorded in a variety of deep-sea sites, little is known about their expression in epicontinental chalk seas. In order to study the shallow-marine signature of the MME in this epicontinental shelf sea, we have generated quantitative foraminiferal assemblage data for two quarries (Hallembaye, NE Belgium; ENCI, SE Netherlands) in the Maastrichtian type area, complemented by a species-specific benthic δ13C record. In contrast to deep-sea records, no significant changes in benthic foraminiferal assemblages and benthic foraminiferal accumulation rates are observed across the MME in the type-Maastrichtian area. At the Hallembaye quarry, the otherwise rare endobenthic species Cuneus trigona reaches a transient peak abundance of 33.3% at the onset of the MME, likely caused by a local transient change in organic matter flux to the seafloor. Nevertheless, high and near-constant species evenness shows that neither oxygen nor organic matter flux was limited across the extinction level or during the MME. Benthic foraminiferal data from the uppermost part of the studied section, above the MME, indicate a significant increase in food supply to the seafloor. Decreased amounts of terrigenous elements across this interval document a lesser riverine or aeolian influx, which means that the increased benthic productivity is linked to a different origin. Potentially, the continuous precipitation of chalk under nutrient-poor conditions in the Late Cretaceous chalk sea was enabled by efficient nutrient recycling in the water column. In shallower depositional settings, nutrient recycling took place closer to the seafloor, which allowed more organic matter to reach the bottom. These results provide insights in the importance of nutrient cycling for biological productivity in the NW-European chalk sea.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Netherlands Journal of Geosciences Foundation
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Correlation of the type-Maastrichtian δ13C record (Vellekoop et al., 2022) to the age-scaled δ13C record for Gubbio (Voigt et al., 2012; age reassigned by Batenburg et al., 2018a), plotted alongside inoceramid extinction levels at different sites. Full lines mark extinction levels that are relatively well constrained in time, while those less well constrained are indicated by dotted lines. Image is based on Vellekoop et al. (2022). Inoceramid extinction references are as follows: 1MacLeod & Huber (2001; age reassignment by Huber et al., 2008); 2Dameron et al. (2017); 3Gómez-Alday et al. (2004) and Batenburg et al. (2014); 4Chauris et al. (1998); 5Walaszczyk et al., (2010; age reassignment by Vellekoop et al., 2022). Dinoc. = dinocysts, Macro. = macrofossil, Nanno. = nannofossil, Foram. = planktic foraminifera stratigraphy. A. coro. = Areoligera coronat, P. tub. = Pervosphaeridium tubuloaculatum, D. ga. = Deflandrea galeata, I. cook. = Isabellidinium Cooksoniae, CMBE = Campanian–Maastrichtian Boundary Event, MME = mid-Maastrichtian carbon isotope event.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (A) Paleogeographical setting of the type-Maastrichtian during the Maastrichtian, after Vellekoop et al. (2022): open ocean in dark blue; shelf seas in light blue; landmasses in green. (B) Geographic location of the Maastrichtian type area in the Netherlands-Belgium border region. (C) ENCI and Hallembaye quarries.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Sections exposed (in part) at the Hallembaye (A) and ENCI quarries (B), with members and horizons marked.

Figure 3

Table 1. Sample list for the ENCI quarry with preservation state indicated.

Figure 4

Table 2. Sample list for the Hallembaye quarry with preservation state indicated.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Photomicrographs of Cibicidoides bembix, spiral view (A), detail of spiral view (B), umbilical view (C), apertural view (D), detail of apertural view (E), broken specimen shows recrystallisation and internal and external overgrowth, but no infilling (F). The specimens in this figure are from sample ENCI_19_B_9.00 (Lixhe 2 Member).

Figure 6

Fig. 5. δ13C vs δ18O cross plot of the isotope ratio measurements of the benthic foraminifera, showing no statistically significant correlation.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Planktic percentage, benthic foraminiferal accumulation rate (BFAR), endobenthic and bi-/tri-serial foraminiferal percentage, relative abundance of Cuneus trigona, Shannon’s diversity, species evenness and bulk carbonate vs benthic δ13C. Biostratigraphy and bulk carbonate δ13C are based on Vellekoop et al. (2022). Dinoc. = dinocysts, Macro. = macrofossil, Nanno. = nannofossil stratigraphy. P. tub. = Pervosphaeridium tubuloaculatum, D. ga. = Deflandrea galeata, I. cook. = Isabellidinium Cooksoniae, MME = mid-Maastrichtian carbon isotope event.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Relative abundances of the most common benthic foraminifera taxa at the Hallembaye quarry. Biostratigraphy after Vellekoop et al. (2022), for abbreviations see caption of Fig. 6.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Relative abundances of the most common benthic foraminifera taxa and Cuneus trigona at the ENCI quarry. Biostratigraphy after Vellekoop et al. (2022), for abbreviations see caption of Fig. 6.

Figure 10

Plate 1. (1) Monothalamus costata [HAL18_A_24.50]. (2) Monothalamus smooth [ENCI_19_A_4.00]. (3) Uniserial costate [ENCI_19_A_14.00]. (4) Uniserial smooth [ENCI_19_B_7.00]. (5) Agglutinated disc [HAL18_A_24.50]. (6) Agglutinated tri-serial [HAL18_A_24.50]. (7) Ammodiscus sp. [ENCI_19_B_7.00]. (8) Astacolus sp. [HAL18_A_24.50]. (9) Globulina sp. [HAL18_A_36.50]. (10) Pyrulinoides sp. [ENCI_19_A_4.00]. (11) Praebulimina sp. [ENCI_19_B_7.00]. (12) Sitella laevis [ENCI_19_B_7.00]. (13) Guttulina sp. [ENCI_19_A_4.00]. (14) Frondicularia sp. [HAL18_A_24.50]. (15) Bolivinoides decoratus [ENCI_19_A_4.00]. (16) Coryphostoma plaitum [ENCI_19_A_4.00]. (17) Bolivinopsis rosula [HAL18_A_32.50]. (18) Bolivina decurrens [HAL18_A_36.50]. (19) Eouvigerina cretae [ENCI_19_A_8.00]. All scale bars represent 0.1 mm.

Figure 11

Plate 2. (20) Cuneus trigona [ENCI_19_A_4.00]. (21) Cuneus minutus [ENCI_19_A_8.00]. (22) Pseudouvigerina cimbrica [ENCI_19_A_8.00]. (23) Pseudouvigerina cristata [HAL18_A_24.50]. (24) Saracenaria sp. [HAL18_A_30.50]. (25) Quadrimorphina allomorphinoides [ENCI_19_A_4.00]. (26) Lenticulina sp. (lateral view, apertural view) [HAL18_A_24.50]. (27) Pullenia sp. (lateral view, apertural view) [ENCI_19_A_4.00]. (28) Cibicidoides bembix (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [ENCI_19_B_7.00]. (29) Cibicidoides dorsoconvexus (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [ENCI_19_A_4.00]. (30) Cibicidoides voltzianus (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [HAL18_A_32.50]. (31) Alabamina dorsoplana (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [HAL18_A_32.50]. (32) Epistominella alata (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [ENCI_19_A_4.00]. All scale bars represent 0.1 mm.

Figure 12

Plate 3. (33) Discorbia bosqueti (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [ENCI_19_A_4.00]. (34) Gyroidinoides lenticulus (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [HAL18_A_32.50]. (35) Gyroidinoides umbilicatus (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [HAL18_A_32.50]. (36) Gavelinella sp. (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [ENCI_19_B_7.00]. (37) Eponides beisseli (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [HAL18_A_32.50]. (38) Eponides cf. primitiva (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [ENCI_19_A_16.00]. (39) Eponides concinna (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [ENCI_19_A_14.00]. (40) Anomalinoides nobilis (spiral view, umbilical view, apertural view) [HAL18_A_44.50]. All scale bars represent 0.1 mm.

Figure 13

Fig. 9. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of the assemblage data; the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index was used.

Figure 14

Fig. 10. Weight percentage of aluminium (Al), titanium (Ti) and manganese (Mn) in the bulk carbonate (data from Vellekoop et al., in review) vs. benthic foraminiferal accumulation rate (BFAR) and stratigraphic height.

Figure 15

Fig. 11. Illustration of our hypothesis to explain the increased organic matter flux to the seafloor during the deposition of the Lanaye Member.

Supplementary material: File

Vancoppenolle et al. supplementary material

Vancoppenolle et al. supplementary material 1

Download Vancoppenolle et al. supplementary material(File)
File 17.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Vancoppenolle et al. supplementary material

Vancoppenolle et al. supplementary material 2

Download Vancoppenolle et al. supplementary material(File)
File 22.8 KB