Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bp2c4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T09:09:51.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nappe tectonics and inverted metamorphic zonation in the Variscan basement of the Tatra Mountains, Western Carpathians: insights from monazite and zircon geochronology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2026

Ludwik de Doliwa Zieliński*
Affiliation:
AGH University of Krakow , Poland
Karolina Kośmińska
Affiliation:
AGH University of Krakow , Poland
Marian Janák
Affiliation:
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovakia
Michał Bukała
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra, Spain
Ellen Kooijman
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Sweden
Martin J. Whitehouse
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Sweden
Stanisław Mazur
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
Jarosław Majka
Affiliation:
AGH University of Krakow , Poland Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
*
Corresponding author: Ludwik de Doliwa Zieliński; Email: lzielins@agh.edu.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The metamorphic architecture of the Variscan basement in the Tatra Mountains provides evidence for nappe tectonics during Variscan continental collision in the Late Palaeozoic. We reconstruct the metamorphic history of the lower unit using phase equilibrium modelling, zirconium-in-rutile geothermometry and in situ LA-ICP-MS Th–U–Pb monazite geochronology of metapelites. We also present new U–Pb zircon ages from upper unit granitoids. In the lower unit, the peak assemblage in staurolite-kyanite schists is garnet + muscovite + biotite + staurolite + kyanite + plagioclase + rutile + quartz. Structurally higher, a kyanite-fibrolite zone is marked by loss of staurolite and abundant kyanite, commonly replaced by fibrolitic sillimanite. P–T conditions increase from 600–640°C and 6–8 kbar in the staurolite–kyanite zone to 640–655°C and 6.5–8.5 kbar in the kyanite–fibrolite zone. Monazite ages show downward younging from 342–332 Ma in the kyanite–fibrolite zone to 338–315 Ma in the underlying staurolite–kyanite zone, revealing a temporally and structurally inverted metamorphic sequence. These ages are younger than zircon ages in upper unit granitoids (353–346 Ma), indicating prograde metamorphism in the lower unit overlapped with late granitoid intrusion above. The inverted metamorphic sequence and spatially decoupled thermal histories of the upper and lower units suggest that nappe stacking played a dual role: accommodating crustal shortening and driving crustal re-equilibration through partial melting and melt migration. These processes are critical for the long-term rheological evolution of orogenic belts and for understanding the coupling between deformation, metamorphism and plutonism in thickened continental crust.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Location of the Tatra Mountains within the Western Carpathians; (b) simplified map of the Tatra Mountains showing the main tectonostratigraphic units; (c) geological map of the study area with the main tectonic units of the Tatra Mountains. Metamorphic zones and isograds, the Variscan thrust separating the upper and lower units, and the shear sense of Variscan and Alpine deformation are indicated. Blue and orange circles mark the locations of samples from the St–Ky and Ky–Fib metamorphic zones, respectively, while yellow circles indicate the magmatic sample. Modified after Janák et al. (1999).

Figure 1

Table 1. Sample location and mineral assemblages of the studied samples

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a-f) Photomicrographs and BSE images of samples from the St-Ky zone. (a) Staurolite and kyanite with garnet inclusions. (b) Atoll garnet with central part composed of biotite and chlorite. (c) Euhedral grains of staurolite surrounded by chloritized biotite. (d) Rounded and slightly elongated grain of monazite in matrix. (e) Garnet in matrix with numerous inclusions in the central part and inclusion-free rim. (f) Dynamically recrystallized quartz grains displaying subgrain rotation and undulose extinction. (g-l) Photomicrographs of samples from the Ky-Fib zone. (g, h) Kyanite partially replaced by sericite and sillimanite. (i) Pleochroic halos around monazite in biotite. (j) Garnet with numerous inclusions, including monazite. The garnet is slightly elongated parallel to the foliation. (k) BSE image of elongated garnet grain in matrix, with Bt and Ms inclusion. (l) Dynamically recrystallized quartz grains.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Phase equilibrium diagram of mica schist (ZT206) from the St-Ky zone. (b) Phase equilibrium diagram of mica schist (ZT96) from the Ky-Fib zone.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Results of Zr-in-rutile thermometry.

Figure 5

Figure 5. BSE images of monazite grains in different mineral assemblages. The left panel (a-f) shows monazite from the St-Ky zone of the lower unit, while the right panel (g-l) shows monazite from the Ky-Fib zone. (a, b) Rounded monazite grains in matrix. (c) Monazite in kyanite. (d) Monazite in staurolite. (e) Monazite in garnet. (f) Matrix monazite surrounded by coronas of allanite and apatite. (g) Irregularly shaped monazite in muscovite. (h, i) Rounded monazite in matrix. (j) Monazite in kyanite. (k) Monazite at the boundary between biotite and FeOx. (l) Garnet with monazite inclusion, garnet also visible in Figure 2h.

Figure 6

Figure 6. High-contrast BSE images, Th, Y and Ca elemental maps of representative monazite grains from the lower unit. (a–c) Staurolite-Kyanite zone (St-Ky): Monazite grains exhibit pronounced zonation in Y and Th, with Y typically increasing from core to rim, while Th zonation is patchy. LA-ICP-MS (yellow circles) and EMPA (pink dots) analysis spots are marked. (d–g) Kyanite-Fibrolite zone (Ky-Fib): Monazite grains display similar zonation patterns, with Y-enriched rims and patchy Th distribution. Ca zonation is irregular, with Ca-depleted cores and Ca-rich rims in some grains. Analysis spots are indicated.

Figure 7

Figure 7. (a, b) Y vs Th/U diagrams. Orange and blue circles refer to the St-Ky zone and Ky-Fib zone, respectively. The background shading indicates whether the analytical spot was located in the core (yellow) or rim (grey) of the monazite. Variation in Y content between the rim and core is visible but there is no correlation with the Th/U content. (c) Monazite compositional vectors showing dominant huttonite and cheralite substitutions.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Results of U–Pb monazite geochronology, presented in Wetherill Concordia diagrams. All uncertainties are reported at the 2σ level. The diagrams in the upper row represent monazites from the St–Ky zone, whereas those in the two lower rows represent monazites from the Ky-Fib zone.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Cathodoluminescence images of zircon grains from samples LZT15, LZT14 and LZT16, showing internal zoning patterns and analytical U-Pb spots (yellow dots).

Figure 10

Figure 10. (a–c) U–Pb Concordia diagrams for zircon analyses from granitoids (LZT14, LZT15, LZT16); data-point error ellipses and calculation ellipses represent 2σ uncertainties. Only ages belonging to the group interpreted as representing crystallization are shown; inherited and (minor) Pb-loss–affected analyses are omitted. Reported MSWD values correspond to combined concordance and equivalence (after Ludwig, 1998). (d–f) wtd. av. (weighted average) age plots; red analyses are included in the weighted average calculation, whereas blue analyses are excluded. MSWD and probability values are shown for each weighted average. All uncertainties are reported at the 2σ level.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Schematic cross-section of the Western Tatra Mts. with metamorphic zonation across the main Variscan thrust fault. P–T conditions of the lower unit mica schists are from this study and those from the upper unit gneisses, migmatites and eclogites from Janák et al. (1996, 1999, 2022). Geochronology data for mica schists (this study) and eclogite (Burda et al.2021) are also shown.

Supplementary material: File

de Doliwa Zieliński et al. supplementary material

de Doliwa Zieliński et al. supplementary material
Download de Doliwa Zieliński et al. supplementary material(File)
File 197.4 KB