Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-rxg44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T02:11:09.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rate-effect experiments on round-tipped penetrometer insertion into uniform snow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

James A. Floyer
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada E-mail: jafloyer@gmail.com
J. Bruce Jamieson
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada E-mail: jafloyer@gmail.com Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Snow penetrometers are being developed to detect stratigraphy indicative of slab avalanches. Results are presented here from experiments performed to assess the relationship between the velocity of a round-tipped penetrometer through uniform snow and the resulting force response. The range of velocities used is commensurate with that used to drive a manually driven penetrometer through the snow. A characteristic spike is noted in profiles during the initial stage of deformation, which appears to be more pronounced for the harder snow layers tested. An investigation of snow deformation using video analysis of a split-axis rod deforming snow against a clear plastic window indicates that the spike in the force signal corresponds to the development of a compaction zone below the penetrometer tip. Once shear forces that develop in the compacted snow are overcome, deformation proceeds in a steady state and there is little or no relationship between the force response and velocity over the velocity range of our experiments.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Apparatus for performing rate-effect experiments. The SABRE penetrometer (A), guided by the displacement platform (B), was pushed horizontally into a thick, uniform snow layer (C). Data were recorded on a data logger (D).

Figure 1

Table 1. Snow properties for the layers used for the rate-effect experiments

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Diagram of apparatus for analysing snow-deformation patterns around the penetrometer tip. A split-axis rod (A) was pushed manually into a snow box with removable sides (B) that was filled with uniform snow and seeded with chilli flakes (C). The pushes were recorded with a video camera (D). A ruler fixed to the side (E) was used to convert deformation vectors from pixels to millimetres.

Figure 3

Table 2. Snow properties for the layers used for the snow-deformation experiments

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Typical force (solid curve) and velocity (dashed curve) trace for dry pencil-hardness snow.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Combined force/velocity pairs (all data used) for all traces for (a) dry pencil-hardness snow, (b) moist pencil-hardness snow, (c) dry 1-finger hardness snow and (d) dry 4-finger hardness snow.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Combined force/velocity pairs with early-push spike data excluded for (a) dry pencil-hardness snow, (b) moist pencil-hardness snow, (c) dry 1-finger hardness snow and (d) dry 4-finger hardness snow. Regression lines and coefficients are shown on each graph. R2 = 0.99 for (a), (c) and (d); R2 = 0.96 for (b).

Figure 7

Fig. 6. ‘Flow vectors’ for dry 4-finger hardness snow, ρ = 137 kg m−3, showing the movement of indicator particles relative to the tip.

Figure 8

Table 3. Maximum extent of deformation zone for the four snow layers described in Table 2

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Deformation sequence during the transient phase of compaction zone development. Images are spaced approximately every 10 mm and the total deformation field was calculated over the preceding 10 mm of insertion. Shading shows total deformation, with light-coloured areas indicating greater deformation.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Relative deformation zone size represented by the cross-sectional area of a slice through the centre of the total deformation field at different insertion depths for (a) layer 1, 4-finger dry snow, (b) layer 2, 1-finger dry snow, (c) layer 3, pencil dry snow and (d) layer 4, 4-finger moist snow. Dashed curve in (a–c) represents a visually interpreted trend. Dashed curve in (d) represents a two-point moving average.