Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nf276 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T08:12:33.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accelerated glacier mass loss in the largest river and lake source regions of the Tibetan Plateau and its links with local water balance over 1976–2017

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2021

Wenfeng Chen*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environmental Changes and Land Surface Processes, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Tandong Yao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environmental Changes and Land Surface Processes, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Guoqing Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environmental Changes and Land Surface Processes, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Shenghai Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environmental Changes and Land Surface Processes, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101, China
Guoxiong Zheng
Affiliation:
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
*
Author for correspondence: Wenfeng Chen, E-mail: chenwf@itpcas.ac.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Variations in glacier meltwater in the source regions of the Tibetan Plateau's (TP) largest lake (Selin Co) and China's longest river (Yangtze River) regulate the local and downstream water balance under the warming climate. However, the magnitude of their variations over the past four decades is still unknown. Here, we examine long-term changes in glacier mass balance over 1976–2017 using KH-9 and CoSSC-TanDEM-X data. We find that the mean rate of glacier mass loss (GML) has accelerated from −0.21 ± 0.11 m a–1 over 1976–2000, to −0.28 ± 0.14 m a–1 over 2000–11, and subsequently to −0.48 ± 0.10 m a–1 over 2011–17. Changes in temperature and precipitation are the major causes of GML. Over 1976–2017, the contribution of decadal GML to Tuotuohe sub-basin runoff ranges from 4.3 to 8.0%, while its contribution to increased lake volume change in Selin Co and Chibzhang Co-Dorsoidong Co ranges from 3.5 to 16.3% and 19.2 to 21.4%, respectively. The GML of source regions made relatively small contributions to river runoff and lake supply, but plays a vital role when precipitation decreases. The quantitative evaluation of the water balance for the sources of great rivers and lakes over the TP is therefore important for water resource management and hydrological cycle studies.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location of study region and data coverage. (a) Location of study area and three sub regions: CC-DC (labeled A), Selin Co (labeled B) and Yangtze River basin (labeled C). The glacier outlines are derived from the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI 6.0). Measured glaciers are all located within the dashed rectangular area zoomed in (b). The left-upper inset indicates the location of the study area in the TP. (b) The spatial and temporal coverage of KH-9 and TanDEM-X CoSSC pair datasets used. The background is the orthorectified KH-9 image on 7 January 1976. The TanDEM-X data, marked in blue and black, are used to calculate the glacier elevation change in the periods 2000–11 and 2000–17, respectively. It should be noted that only one TanDEM-X scene on 7 April 2014, covering the eastern part of the study area, is adopted due to the lack of available data. The TanDEM-X data marked in red are used to calculate the seasonal glacier changes.

Figure 1

Table 1. Glacier mass balance in the Geladandong region using different methods from previous studies

Figure 2

Table 2. Datasets used to calculate glacier surface elevation change

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Flowchart illustrating the methods used to derive seasonal glacier surface elevation change.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Seasonal glacier surface elevation changes in 2016/17 referenced to 8 January 2017. Data from two orbits are utilized to acquire monthly change. The outlines in red in (h) are the coverage of (a, c, e, g). The overlapping region of red and blue outlines in (h) are the coverage of (b, d, f). The dates are in the format YYYYMMDD.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. (a) Changes in glacier surface elevation in each elevation bin. Coverage of data over each period is shown in Figure 3. The histogram at the bottom shows the glacier area (covered by outlines in red in Fig. 3h) percentage in each 50-m elevation bin. (b) Time series of mean glacier surface elevation change over eight time periods.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Region- and basin-scale changes in glacier surface elevation from 1976 to 2017: (a) 1976–2000, (b) 2000–11 and (c) 2000–17. The rates of glacier elevation change for the whole region are labeled in black at the top of each figure. The rates of glacier elevation change in the three subregions are labeled in dark blue text.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Changes of glacier surface elevation for different types with longitude: (a) 1976–2000, (b) 2000–11 and (c) 2011–17. The red box indicates an outlier area, where the 2014 TanDEM-X images shown in Figure 1b were used. The size of the circles denotes the glacier area. A 1.5 std dev. range is adopted to denote the error range of each glacier.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Rates of glacier surface elevation changes with sizes in 1976–2000, 2000–11 and 2011–17 in Basins A (a), B (b), C (c) and whole study area (d). The coverage of the three basins is shown in Figure 1. The Black circles denote the area averaged glacier elevation change rate. The three columns in each size category denote the periods 1976–2000, 2000–11 and 2011–17.

Figure 9

Table 3. Changes in lake volume and river discharge corresponding to glacier mass balance over three periods

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Seasonal temperature and precipitation at the Anduo and Tuotuohe weather stations. (a, b) Monthly mean and maximum temperature and precipitation from 1980 to 2017. (c, d) Monthly mean and maximum temperature and precipitation from January 2016 to September 2017. Note that several months of temperature data from the Anduo station are not available.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Long-term temperature and precipitation at the Anduo and Tuotuohe weather stations. (a) Annual summer temperature (June–August). (b) Annual precipitation. (c) Annual summer precipitation. The numbers at the top of (b) and (c) are mean precipitation of the two stations during the three periods.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Relationship between glacier surface elevation change and glacier mean slope. The 95% prediction bounds are shown.

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Relationship between glacier surface elevation change and mean glacier aspect. (a) A simple SRI is used to define the solar radiation in different aspects. (b) The relationship between glacier elevation change and SRI. The glacier elevation change rates for each 0.05 SRI interval are shown. The trend line is calculated based on the median value of glacier elevation change rate in each interval.

Figure 14

Table 4. Glacier area percentage and SRI in different directions

Figure 15

Table 5. Comparisons of glacier elevation change rates before and after glacier surging

Supplementary material: File

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material

Download Chen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.6 MB