Element contents
Literate Workers and the Production of Early Christian Literature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2025
Summary
This Element provides a historical overview of the sources and key scholarship related to literate workers in early Christianity. It argues that literate workers were indispensable for the creation, production, maintenance, interpretation, and preservation of ancient Christian thought, theology, and literature. This Element centres the embodiment and lived experience of literate workers-as much as is able to be retrieved from our extant Christian sources. Who were they? What did they look like? What was their relationship with named authors? What kinds of aspirations and career trajectories did they have? The aim of this project is to help researchers reconfigure their perspectives on ancient works, that such documents not only represent the genius of named authors but also of (enslaved) literate workers as well.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009527224Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 18 December 2025
Bibliography
Amidon, Philip R. trans. Philostorgius: Church History. Writings from the Greco-Roman World 23. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2007.Google Scholar
Arns, Evaristo. La technique du livre d’après sain Jérôme. Paris: E. de Boccard, 1953.Google Scholar
Bakhos. “Orality and Writing.” Pages 482–99 in The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Daily Life in Roman Palestine. Edited by Hezser, Catherine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Sarah. “In Manus: Pliny’s Letters and the Arts of Mastery.” Pages 89–108 in Roman Literary Cultures: Domestic Politics, Revolutionary Poetics, Civic Spectacle. Edited by Keith, Alison and Edmonson, Jonathan. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Blake, Sarah. “Now You See Them: Slaves and Other Objects as Elements of the Roman Master.” Helios 39 (2013): 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonar, Chance. “Notes.” Pages 90–105 in Writing, Enslavement, and Power in the Roman Mediterranean, 100 BCE–300 CE. Edited by Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.Google Scholar
Bonar, Chance. The Author in Early Christian Literature. Cambridge Elements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Vincent. “Social Death and Political Life in the Study of Slavery.” American Historical Review 114 (2009): 1231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnard, Trevor. Writing the History of Global Slavery of Elements in Historical Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Cain, Andrew. Jerome’s Commentaries on the Pauline Epistles and the Architecture of Exegetical Authority. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, Michael M. Grammar and Christianity in the Late Roman World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Coleman, Javal and Padilla Peralta, Dan-el. “Rhetorics.” Pages 232–51 in Writing, Enslavement, and Power in the Roman Mediterranean, 100 BCE–300 CE. Edited by Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.Google Scholar
Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. “Introduction.” Pages 1–15 in Writing, Enslavement, and Power in the Roman Mediterranean, 100 BCE–300 CE. Edited by Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coogan, Jeremiah. “Notes.” Pages 156–66 in Writing, Enslavement, and Power in the Roman Mediterranean, 100 BCE–300 CE. Edited by Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coogan, Jeremiah. “Tabular Thinking in Late Ancient Palestine: Instrumentality, Work, and the Construction of Knowledge.” Pages 57–82 in Knowledge Construction in Late Antiquity. Edited by Amsler, Monika. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2023.Google Scholar
DeCock, Miriam. “Origen’s Sources of Exegetical Authority: The Construction of an Inspired Exegete in the Pauline Lineage.” New Testament Studies 70 (2024): 149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrman. Forgery and Counter-Forgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Elder, Nicholas. Gospel Medi: Reading, Writing, and Circulating Jesus Traditions. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2024.Google Scholar
Eno, Robert. Saint Augustine. Letters. Volume IV (1*–29*). Fathers of the Church 81. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Augustine. trans. The Letters of Synesius of Cyrene. London: Oxford University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Flower, Harriet I. “The Most Expensive Slave in Rome: Quintus Lutatius Daphnis.” Classical Philology 117 (2022): 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garzya, Antonio, Roques, Denis, and Cyrène, Synésios de. Correspondance. Lettres I-LXIII. Paris: Belles lettres, 2000.Google Scholar
Glancy, Jennifer. Slavery in Early Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Martin. “Text, Scribes and Power in Roman Judea.” Pages 79–90 in Judaism in the Roman World. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 66. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Graumann, Thomas. The Acts of the Early Church Councils: Production and Character. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, Michael. Jerome’s Hebrew Philology: A Study Based on His Commentary on Jeremiah. VCSup. 90. Leiden: Brill, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunberger-Kirsh, Ella. “‘Etched into the Soul’: The Education of Shorthand-Writers in Late Antiquity.” Journal of Roman Studies 114 (2024): 61–84.Google Scholar
Habinek, Thomas. “Slavery and Class.” Pages 385–93 in A Companion to Latin Literature. Edited by Harrison, Stephen. London: Blackwell, 2005.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, Harald. “Die Bedeutung der Stenographie für die spätlateinische christliche Literatur.” Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 14 (1971): 24–38.Google Scholar
Haines-Eitzen, Kim. “Girls Trained in Beautiful Writing’: Female Scribes in Roman Antiquity and Early Christianity.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 6 (1998): 629–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines-Eitzen, Kim. Guardians of Letters: Literacy, Power, and the Transmitters of Early Christian Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines-Eitzen, Kim. “The Social History of Early Christian Scribes.” Pages 479–95 in The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis. Edited by Ehrman, Bart D. and Holmes, Michael W.. Second Edition. New Testament Tools, Studies and Documents 42. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Havelková, Brukner, et al. “Ancient Egyptian Scribes and Specific Skeletal Occupational Risk Markers (Abusir, Old Kingdom).” Scientific Reports 14, 13317 (2024): 1–19.Google Scholar
Head, Peter M. “Named Letter-Carriers among the Oxyrhynchus Papyri.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 31 (2009): 279–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Ronald E. The Commentary of Origen on the Gospel of St. Matthew. Oxford Early Christian Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hezser, Catherine. Jewish Literacy in Roman Palestine. Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism 81. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.Google Scholar
Horsfall, Nicholas. “Rome without Spectacles.” Greece & Rome 42 (1995): 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, H. A. G. “The Fourth Century and the Beginning of the Vulgate.” Pages 19–42 in The Latin New Testament: A Guide to Its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howley, Joseph. Aulus Gellius and Roman Reading Culture: Text, Presence, and Imperial Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howley, Joseph. “Despotics.” Pages 24–43 in Writing, Enslavement, and Power in the Roman Mediterranean, 100 BCE–300 CE. Eds. Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.Google Scholar
Howley, Joseph. “Intellectual Narratives and Elite Roman Learning in the ‘Noctes Atticae’ of Aulus Gellius.” PhD Dissertation. St. Andrews University, 2011.Google Scholar
Howley, Joseph. “Reading in Ancient Rome.” Pages 15–27 in Further Reading. Edited by Rubery, Matthew and Price, Leah. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Huemoeller, Katherine. “Lost and (Not) Found: An Enslaved Woman’s Voice in Plutarch’s Life of Crassus.” Classical Philology (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Johnson, William A. Readers and Reading Cultures in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Communities. Classical Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshel, Sandra R. and Petersen, Lauren Hackworth. The Material Life of Roman Slaves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearey, Talitha. “Editing.” Pages 186–204 in Writing, Enslavement, and Power in the Roman Mediterranean, 100 BCE–300 CE. Edited by Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.Google Scholar
Lambert, Cat. “Gender.” Pages 44–59 in Writing, Enslavement, and Power in the Roman Mediterranean, 100 BCE–300 CE. Edited by Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.Google Scholar
Lapin, Hayim. Rabbis as Romans: The Rabbinic Movement in Palestine, 100–400 CE. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcdonnell, Myles. “Writing, Copying, and Autograph Manuscripts in Ancient Rome.” The Classical Quarterly 46 (1996): 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Niall. The Invention of Ancient Slavery? Duckworth Classical Essays. London: Duckworth, 2007.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. Historical and Literary Studies: Pagan, Jewish, and Christian. New Testament Tools, Studies and Documents 8. Leiden: Brill, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Elizabeth. “Roman Tabulae, Egyptian Christians, and the Adoption of the Codex.” Chiron. Mitteilungen der Kommission für Alte Geschichte und Epigraphik des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 37 (2007): 295–348.Google Scholar
Moss, Candida. “Disability.” Pages 60–70 in Writing, Enslavement, and Power in the Roman Mediterranean, 100 BCE–300 CE. Edited by Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.Google Scholar
Moss, Candida. “Fashioning Mark: Early Christian Discussions about the Scribe and Status of the Second Gospel.” New Testament Studies 67 (2021): 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, Candida. God’s Ghostwriters: Enslaved Christians and the Making of the Bible. New York City: Little, Brown, and Company, 2024.Google Scholar
Moss, Candida. “The Secretary: What Large Letters: Enslaved Workers, Stenography, and the Production of Early Christian Literature.” The Journal of Theological Studies 74 (2023): 20–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nobbs, Alanna M. “Philostorgius’ Ecclesiastical History: An ‘Alternative Ideology’.” Tyndale Bulletin 42 (1991): 271–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nongbri, Brent. February 4, 2025. “A Mosaic from Thabraca with a Writer at a Desk.” Variant Readings. https://brentnongbri.com/2025/02/05/a-mosaic-from-thabraca-with-a-writer-at-a-desk/Google Scholar
Nongbri, Brent. August 11, 2024. “A Relief from Ostia Showing Writers at Desks.” Variant Readings. https://brentnongbri.com/2024/08/11/a-relief-from-ostia-showing-writers-at-desks/Google Scholar
Nongbri, Brent. August 13, 2024. “A Relief from Portus Showing a Writer at a Desk.” Variant Readings. https://brentnongbri.com/2024/08/13/a-relief-from-portus-showing-a-writer-at-a-desk/Google Scholar
Nongbri, Brent. “Maintenance.” Pages 167–85 in Writing, Enslavement, and Power in the Roman Mediterranean, 100 BCE–300 CE. Edited by Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.Google Scholar
Nongbri, Brent. March 8, 2025. “The So-called Scriptorium at Bu Njem.” Variant Readings. https://brentnongbri.com/2025/03/08/the-so-called-scriptorium-at-bu-njem/Google Scholar
Norden, Eduard. Die antike Kuntsprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chrs. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance. Band II. Berlin: Teubner, 1995.Google Scholar
Ommundsen, Å., et al. “How Many Medieval and Early Modern Manuscripts Were Copied by Female Scribes? A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Colophons.” Humanities and Social Science Communications 12 (2025): 346.Google Scholar
Preuschen, Erwin. “Die Stenographie im Leben des Origenes.” Archiv für Stenographie 56 (1905): 6–15, 49–55.Google Scholar
Price, Richard and Gaddis, Michael, trans. The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon. Volume Two. Translated Texts for Historians 45. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ratkus, Artūras. “Greek ἀρχιερεύς in Gothic Translation.” Nowele 71 (2018): 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, Brendon. “Agriculture, Writing, and Cato’s Aristocratic Self-Fashioning.” Classical Antiquity 24 (2005): 331–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richlin, Amy. Slave Theater in the Roman Republic: Plautus and Popular Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schams, Christine. Jewish Scribes in the Second-Temple Perio. JSOTSup 291. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schlumberger, Jörg. “‘Non scribo sed dicto’: (HA, T 33,8). Hat der Autor der Historia Augusta mit Stenographen gearbeitet?” Pages 221–38 in Bonner Historia-Augusta-Colloquium 1972/1974. Antiquitas, Reihe 4, Beiträge zur Historia-Augusta-Forschung. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag, 1976.Google Scholar
Schultz, Alexandra Leewon. “Collection.” Pages 205–24 in Writing, Enslavement, and Power in the Roman Mediterranean, 100 BCE–300 CE. Edited by Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.Google Scholar
Shaner, Katherine. Enslaved Leadership in Early Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeat, T. C. “Early Christian Book-Production: Papyri and Manuscripts.” Pages 54–79 in The Cambridge History of the Bible. Edited by Lampe, G. W. H.. The Cambridge History of The Bible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Skeat, T. C. “The Use of Dictation in Ancient Book Production.” Pages 1–32 in The Collected Biblical Writings of T.C. Skeat. Edited by Elliot, J. K.. NovTSup 113. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Soon, Isaac. A Disabled Apostle: Impairment and Disability in the Letters of Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soon, Isaac. “The Alexamenos Graffito as Christian Self-Parody.” New Testament Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Starr, Raymond J. “The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Roman World.” The Classical Quarterly 37 (1987): 213–23.Google Scholar
Teilter, Hans. Notarii and exceptores: An Inquiry into Role and Significance of notarii and exceptores in the Imperial and Ecclesiastical Bureaucracy of the Roman Empire (from the Early Principate to circa 450 A.D.). Dutch Monographs on Ancient History and Archaeology 1. Amsterdam: Gieben, 1985.Google Scholar
Tempest, Kathryn. “Tiro, Marcus Tullius.” Pages 6764–67 in The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, First Edition. Edited by Bagnall, Roger S. et al. London: Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Roger S. O. Roman London’s First Voices: Writing Tablets from the Bloomberg Excavations, 2010–14. Museum of London Archaeology Monograph 72. London: Museum of London Archaeology, 2016.Google Scholar
Tupamahu, Ekaputra. “Language and Ethnicity.” Pages 71–83 in Writing, Enslavement, and Power in the Roman Mediterranean, 100 BCE–300 CE. Edited by Coogan, Jeremiah, Moss, Candida R., and Howley, Joseph A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025.Google Scholar
Vlassopoulos, Kostas. Historicizing Ancient Slavery. Edinburgh Studies in Ancient Slavery. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Wise, Michael Owen. Language and Literacy in Roman Judea: A Study of the Bar Kokhba Documents. Anchor Bible Yale Reference Library. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadin, Yigael J., et al., Documents from the Bar Kokhba Period in the Cave of the Letters, Vol. 3. Hebrew, Aramaic and Nabatean-Aramaic Papyri. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 2002.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this element
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
- 1
- Cited by