Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bkrcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T10:27:13.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contention and the Pendulum Pivot: Weighting Equal Justice

Review products

Goodman, Philip, Joshua Page, and Michelle Phelps. Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle Over Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2019

Geoff K. Ward
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle Over Criminal Justice (2017), Philip Goodman, Joshua Page, and Michelle Phelps advocate replacing the pendular notion of penal change with an agonistic approach, where contention is central. This Essay reflects on a pendulum component that has escaped theoretical or empirical scrutiny in pendular accounts of penal change: the pivot determining how freely a pendulum weight swings, and its resting equilibrium. In this parting glance at the pendulum heuristic, I relate this pivot to the agonistic perspective on punishment and—focusing on racial politics of juvenile justice—imagine an antiracist calibration of struggle over penal change.

Information

Type
Review Symposium: Rethinking the Pendulum Model of Criminal Justice History
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , August 2019 , pp. 806 - 813
Copyright
© 2019 American Bar Foundation 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Agyepong, Tera P. The Criminalization of Black Children: Race, Gender, and Delinquency in Chicago’s Juvenile Justice System, 1899–1945. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Thomas J. The Cycle of Juvenile Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: Capricorn Books, 1967.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Jeremy. “Charles Tittle’s Control Balance and Criminological Theory. Theoretical Criminology 1, no. 1 (1997): 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Angela Y. Freedom is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Ely, Robin J., and Thomas, David A.. “Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes.” Administrative Science Quarterly 46, no. 2 (2001): 229–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ Age.” New Left Review 212 (1995): 68.Google Scholar
Goodman, Philip, Page, Joshua, and Phelps, Michelle. Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle Over Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Jerry, et al. “Implicit Bias in the Courtroom.” UCLA Law Review 59 (2011): 1124–86.Google Scholar
Logan, Rayford. The Negro in American Life and Thought: The Nadir, 1877–1901. New York: Dial Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Mennel, Robert. Thorns and Thistles: Juvenile Delinquents in the United States, 1815-1857. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1973.Google Scholar
Miller, Lisa. The Perils of Federalism: Race, Poverty, and the Politics of Crime Control. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Michael I., and Sommers, Samuel R.. “Whites Wee Racism as a Zero-Sum Game that They Are Now Losing.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, no. 3 (2011): 215–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshinsky, David M. Worse Than Slavery. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1997.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca. Freedom Is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Tittle, Charles Control Balance: Toward a General Theory of Deviance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Ward, Geoff. The Black Child-Savers: Racial Democracy and Juvenile Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Geoff, and Hanink, Peter A.. “Deliberating Racial Justice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Criminal Justice Ethics. Edited by Jacobs, Jonathan and Jackson, Jonathan, 282–300. Abingdon, UK; New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Watkins, John C. Juvenile Justice Century: A Sociological Commentary on American Juvenile Courts. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic, 1998.Google Scholar