No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Monopulse auto-tracking architecture based on a PSO algorithm for Oran ground station experimented with satellite ALSAT-2B
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2025
Abstract
This article presents the implementation of a new monopulse auto-tracking architecture at the Oran ground station (GS). This architecture is based on a metaheuristic particle swarm optimisation (PSO) algorithm, which measures and adjusts the Q(R) summation associated with the satellite’s main beam direction to ensure optimal synchronisation between the GS and the satellite in terms of antenna pointing. This implementation was validated through practical tests during ALSAT-2B satellite flybys, comprising two distinct scenarios. In the first scenario, the satellite captures new images while simultaneously transmitting data from previously recorded images, thus leading to a misalignment between its antenna and the GS. The second scenario focused solely on data transmission; the satellite being directly aligned with the GS. The results indicate that the pointing error accuracy remains below 0.6 degrees, in accordance with the nominal specifications, thereby enhancing communication performance with a higher received signal level of −55 dBm, which resulted in no loss of images.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society
References
Hughes, A.D. and Moy, A.J. Advances in automatic electro-optical tracking systems, In Proc. SPIE, Acquisition, Tracking and Pointing VI, 1992, 1688, pp 66–73.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Lee, J. and Lee, I. Antenna tracking techniques for long-range air-to-ground communication systems using a monopulse method, IEEE Access, 2020, 8, pp 166442–166449.10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D.J. Tracking systems for satellite communications, PhD Thesis, University of Bristol, 1987.Google Scholar
Leysieffer, H. Aeronautical satellite systems for air traffic control and communications in the European environment, Aeronaut. J, 1969, 73, (700), pp 283–288.10.1017/S0001924000052969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, J., Mao, X. and Zhao, J. Design of autotrack detecting instrument for solar UV radiation, In Proc. SPIE, Optical Instruments and Technology: Optical Systems and Modern Optoelectronic Instruments, 2009, pp 1–6.10.1117/12.837783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelechi, A.H. et al. The recent advancement in unmanned aerial vehicle tracking antenna: a review, Sensors, 2021, 21, (16), pp 5662.10.3390/s21165662CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raj, A.A.B. Mono-pulse tracking system for active free-space optical communication, Optik, 2016, 127, (19), pp 7752–7761.10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.05.143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varotsos, C.A. and Cracknell, A.P. Remote Sensing Letters contribution to the success of the Sustainable Development Goals—UN 2030 agenda, Rem. Sens. Lett., 2020, 11, (7), pp 715–719.10.1080/2150704X.2020.1753338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darfilal, D. and Gibbon, D. Ground and flight tests of AlSat-1B butane propulsion system, Propul. Power Res., 2022, 11, (1), pp 74–84.10.1016/j.jppr.2022.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzeniar, H. In-orbit results from the attitude determination and control system of ALSAT-2B, Aeronaut. J, 2021, 125, (1293), pp 2039–2064
10.1017/aer.2021.48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-H., Hyun, C.-U. and Kim, S.-B. Assessing sandbar morphology in the Nakdong River Estuary using SPOT series satellite imagery, Marine Geores. Geotechnol., 2024, 42, (1), pp 1–11.Google Scholar
Evans, M., Louza, S. and Audeh, N. Feed for a four-horn monopulse tracking radar, In Proc. IEEE Aerospace Applications Conference Digest, 1991, pp 1–6.Google Scholar
Roy, S.S., et al. Design of a compact multielement monopulse feed for ground-station satellite tracking applications, IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., 2019, 18, (9), pp 1721–1725.10.1109/LAWP.2019.2927236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cide, F., Urebe, J. and Revera, A. Exploring monopulse feed antennas for low Earth orbit satellite communication: Design, advantages, and applications, Nat. J. Antennas Propag., 2022, 4, (2), pp 20–27.Google Scholar
Roy, S.S., et al. Dual band (S–X) ground station antenna for low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite tracking application, IEEE Access, 2022, 10, pp 80910–80917.10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3190417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şişman, İ., et al. Design and realization of an X-band monopulse feed antenna for low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite ground station, Int. J. Antennas Propag., 2024, 2024, (1), pp 6659390.10.1155/2024/6659390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubrovka, F., et al. Circularly polarised X-band H11- and H21-modes antenna feed for monopulse autotracking ground station, In Proc. IEEE Ukrainian Microwave Week (UkrMW), 2020, pp 1–4.10.1109/UkrMW49653.2020.9252600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mothe, A.T., Saha, C. and Roy, S.S. Dual band (X–Ka) smooth-wall multimode monopulse feed for LEO satellite tracking, In Proc. IEEE Indian Conference on Antennas and Propagation (InCAP), 2021, pp 1–5.10.1109/InCAP52216.2021.9726446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidayat, A., et al. LEO antenna ground station analysis using fast Fourier transform, In Proc. IEEE International Annual Engineering Seminar (InAES), 2017, pp 1–6.10.1109/INAES.2017.8068548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekkar Djelloul Saiah, S., et al. Analysis of the communication links between the AlSat-1B satellite and the ground station: the impact of the auto-tracking system on antenna pointing accuracy, Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw., 2021, 39, (5), pp 486–499.10.1002/sat.1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J. and Lowell, R. The autotrack system, Bell Syst. Techn. J., 1963, 42, (4), pp 1283–1307.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1963.tb04035.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, A.L. et al. Antenna pointing system for satellite tracking based on Kalman filtering and model predictive control techniques, Adv. Space Res., 2016, 58, (11), pp 2328–2340.10.1016/j.asr.2016.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, S. et al. Robust adaptive monopulse algorithm based on main-lobe constraints and subspace tracking, EURASIP J. Adv. Sig. Process., 2017, 2017, pp 1–15.Google Scholar
Xuan, L., Ruo-xin, L. and Yi-feng, H. Research on mono-pulse beam angle tracking algorithm of phased array antenna based on CKF, Wirel. Commun. Mobile Comput., 2022, 2022, (1), pp 3631134.10.1155/2022/3631134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latifzade, M.A., Arvan, M.R. and Mohseni Armaki, H. Monopulse antenna-pointing system modelling and simulation, IET Radar, Sonar Navigat., 2019, 13, (4), pp 646–652.10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.5066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyurkchiev, N. and Markov, S. Sigmoidal functions: Some computational and modelling aspects, Biomath. Commun., 2014, 1, (2), pp 1–6.Google Scholar
Sherman, S.M. and Barton, D.K. Monopulse Principles and Techniques, Artech House, 2011.Google Scholar
Van Trees, H.L. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part III: Radar–Sonar Signal Processing and Gaussian Signals in Noise, Wiley, 2001.10.1002/0471221090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uthman, A. and Sudin, S. Antenna azimuth position control system using PID controller and state-feedback controller approach, Int. J. Electric. Comput. Eng. (IJECE), 2018, 8, (3), pp 1539–1550.10.11591/ijece.v8i3.pp1539-1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R. Particle swarm optimization, In Proc. ICNN’95 – Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, 1995, pp 1942–1948.10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boualem, N. et al. Evaluation of optimized inner and outer loop controllers for 4X flyer under faulty actuators, Automat. Contr. Comput. Sci., 2023, 57, (6), pp 563–576.10.3103/S0146411623060032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensikaddour, E., Nasri, B., Bouchiba, F., Baba Hamed, D.E. and Bekkar Djelloul Saiah, S. Implementation of an intelligent solution for acquiring telemetry from AlSat-2 satellites: leveraging machine learning for polarisation drive, Aeronaut. J., 2025, 129, (1339), pp 2480–2496.10.1017/aer.2025.44CrossRefGoogle Scholar