Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T04:23:54.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local Structural Changes of Ion Damaged InGaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Kin Man Yu
Kin Man Yu*
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials, Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

Ion damage and amorphization behavior in InGaAs with InAs mole fractions in the range of 0 to 50%are studied. We found that the degree of dynamic annealing increases as the InAs mole fraction increases in the InGaAs when the implantation is carried out at room temperature (RIT). Extended x-ray absorption fine structure measurements reveal that in the amorphous state the InAs nearest neighbor distance, RIn-As is very different from that in the crystalline InGaAs and is ∼0.01 Å longer than that in pure crystalline InAs. For RT implanted materials, before a complete amorphous layer is formed, the RIn-As remains close to its crystalline value even when the layer is heavily damaged. A sudden increase of the RIn-As is observed when a complete amorphous layer is formed. The behavior of the measured values of RIn-As for InGaAs implanted with various doses, indicates that at RT the formation of amorphous InGaAs occurs by the simultaneous nucleation of the amorphous phase when the critical free energy in the damage layer is exceeded. At liquid nitrogen temperature, when dynamic annealing is negligible, the RIn-As value increases as the damage in the layer increases, suggesting that the amorphous InGaAs is formed by the accumulation and overlapping of amorphous zones created along the individual ion tracks.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 540: Symposium N / Microstructural Processes in Irradiated Materials , 1998 , 79
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Ion Implantation and Beam Processing, edited by Williams, J. S. and Poate, J. M. (Academic Press, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
2. Ion Implantation: Basics to Device Fabrication, edited by Rimini, E. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995).Google Scholar
3. Pearton, S. J., Hobson, W. S., and Abernathy, C. R., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 147, 261 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Rao, M. V., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B79, 645 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Pearton, S. J., Mater. Sci. Rep. 4, 313 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Wesch, W., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B68, 342 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Desnica, U. V., Wagner, J., and Holland, O. W.. J. Appl. Phys. 71, 2592 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Bench, M. W., Robertson, I. M., and Kirk, M. A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B59/60, 372 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Jones, K. S. and Santana, C. J., J. Mater. Res. 6, 1048 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Morehead, F. and Crowder, B. L., Radiat. Eff. 6, 27 (1970).Google Scholar
11. Swanson, M. L., Parson, J. R., and Hoelkae, C. W., Radiat. Eff. 9, 249 (1971).Google Scholar
12. Holland, O. W., Pennycook, S. J., and Albert, G. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 2053 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Motooka, T., Harada, S., and Ishimaru, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2980 (1997).Google Scholar
14. George, G., EXAFSPAK-a Suite of Computer Programs for Analysis of X-Ray Spectra, Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, 1993.Google Scholar
15. Feldman, L. C., Mayer, J. W., and Picraux, S. T., Materials Analysis by Ion Channeling (Academic Press, NY, 1982).Google Scholar
16. Ziegler, J. F., Biersack, J. P. and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Ranges of Ions in Matter (Pergamon, Oxford, 1985).Google Scholar
17. X-Ray Absorption: Principles, Applications, Techniques of EXAFS, SEXAFS and XANES, edited by Koningsberger, D. C. and Prins, P. (Wiley, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
18. Mikkelson, J. C. Jr., and Boyce, J. B., Phys. Rev Lett. 49, 1412 (1982).Google Scholar
19. Yu, Kin Man and Hsu, Leonardo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 824 (1996).Google Scholar