Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-x2lbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T19:12:06.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mantle sources of kamafugitic magmas: insights from partial melting experiments on phlogopite clinopyroxenite and clinopyroxene glimmerite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2025

Francesca Innocenzi*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse – CNR, Roma, Italy School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
Isra S. Ezad
Affiliation:
School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia School of Earth Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
Sara Ronca
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
Samuele Agostini
Affiliation:
Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse – CNR, Roma, Italy
Michele Lustrino
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria – CNR, c/o Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
Svyatoslav Shcheka
Affiliation:
School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia School of Earth Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
Stephen F. Foley
Affiliation:
School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra ACT, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Francesca Innocenzi; Email: francesca.innocenzi@unipd.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Earth’s lithospheric mantle is dominated (usually >90% vol.%) by a nominally volatile-free mineral paragenesis with peridotitic composition. The remaining lithologies are typically hydrous and/or carbonate-bearing assemblages (the latter mostly stable at P >2 GPa), representing the products of mantle metasomatism with, or without, involvement of subduction. Despite their importance, the modal compositions of these metasomes are poorly constrained, probably containing hydrous phases (amphibole and/or phlogopite), coupled with accessory minerals, such as apatite, ilmenite, rutile and/or carbonates. These assemblages are usually considered to be the source of unusual magmas, in particular ultrapotassic compositions, especially kamafugites (K2O-rich, commonly ultracalcic, basic/ultrabasic lithologies). To evaluate if partial melting of such metasomes could effectively produce kamafugites, we performed partial melting experiments at 2.7 and 5 GPa, and 1200°C to 1550°C on clinopyroxenites variably enriched in phlogopite, olivine and accessory phases (apatite, oxides, titanite), and on a clinopyroxene glimmerite (with apatite and magnetite).

At low degrees of melting, the glasses show extremely high TiO2 (<15 wt.%), CaO (<18 wt.%) and P2O5 (<7.4 wt.%), coupled with low SiO2 (>21.6 wt.%), as accessory minerals are the principal contributors in the melting reactions. Although there are no known natural counterparts for these low-degree melt compositions, they might play a key role in re-fertilisation events in the upper mantle. At increased degrees of partial melting (∼50 to ∼90%), the experimental melts approach the compositions of silica-poor, potassic/ultrapotassic and ultracalcic rocks. Indeed, experimental-produced glasses share several geochemical similarities with natural kamafugites, partially overlapping for most of the major oxides. Clinopyroxene- and phlogopite-rich lithologies, variably enriched in olivine and accessory phases (apatite, oxides, titanite) probably occur as veins pervading the lithospheric peridotitic matrix, and their partial melting, especially at high degrees, may be a plausible explanation for the genesis of SiO2-poor, K2O- and CaO-rich compositions.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Figure 0

Table 1. Modal composition (wt.%) of the starting materials for partial melting experiments (Toro Ankole, Alto Paranaiba Igneous Province and Intra-Apennine Province samples) and relative bulk compositions

Figure 1

Table 2. Summary of all the partial melting experiments that have been run, with relative temperature, pressure, hold time and resulting assemblage

Figure 2

Figure 1. Modal abundances (wt.%) of mineral phases and melt (glass) obtained for each experimental sample (TA, IAP and APIP) at 2.7 and 5 GPa.

Figure 3

Figure 2. (a) Field-emission-scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) mineral maps for the TA experimental sample A23-012 (2.7 GPa and 1250°C); (b, c) higher-magnification SEM images of quenched needles; (d) FESEM mineral map for the TA experimental sample A23-016 (2.7 GPa and 1350°C); (e) higher-magnification SEM image of the melt pools. Dark blue represents clinopyroxene, light blue – augite, orange – tschermakite, yellow – phlogopite, red – olivine, purple – ilmenite, pink – apatite, light green – perovskite and green – glass.

Figure 4

Table 3. Averaged composition (SEM and EMP analyses, wt.%) of experimental glasses produced at 2.7 GPa for the three starting materials (Toro Ankole, Alto Paranaiba Igneous Province and Intra-Apennine Province). Values for standard deviation (σ) are given in italics. All data are reported in the Supplementary material

Figure 5

Table 4. Averaged composition (SEM and EMP analyses, wt.%) of experimental clinopyroxene, phlogopite and olivine at 2.7 GPa for the three samples (Toro Ankole, Alto Paranaiba Igneous Province and Intra-Apennine Province). Values for standard deviation (σ) are given in italics. All data are reported in the Supplementary material

Figure 6

Figure 3. (a) FESEM mineral maps for TA experimental sample M22-005 (5 GPa and 1200°C); (b, c) higher-magnification SEM images of quenched needles; (d) FESEM mineral maps for TA experimental sample M22-010 (5 GPa and 1400°C). Colours as in Fig. 2.

Figure 7

Table 5. Averaged composition (SEM and EMP analyses, wt.%) of experimental glasses at 5 GPa for the two samples (Toro Ankole and Intra-Apennine Province). Values for standard deviation (σ) are given in italics. All data are reported in the Supplementary material

Figure 8

Figure 4. (a) FESEM mineral maps for IAP experimental sample A23-012 (2.7 GPa and 1250°C); (b) higher-magnification SEM images of quenched needles; (c) FESEM mineral maps for IAP experimental sample A23-016 (2.7 GPa and 1350°C); (d, e) higher-magnification SEM image of melt pools and olivine microcrysts. Colours as in Fig. 2.

Figure 9

Figure 5. (a) FESEM mineral maps for IAP experimental sample M22-005 (5 GPa and 1200°C); (b, c) higher-magnification SEM images of quenched needles and olivine microcrysts; (d) FESEM mineral maps for IAP experimental sample M22-010 (5 GPa and 1400°C). Colours as in Fig. 2.

Figure 10

Table 6. Averaged composition (SEM and EMP analyses, wt.%) of experimental clinopyroxene, phlogopite, olivine and tschermakite at 5 GPa for the two samples (Toro Ankole and Intra-Apennine Province). Values for standard deviation (σ) are given in italics. All data are reported in the Supplementary material

Figure 11

Figure 6. (a) FESEM mineral maps for APIP experimental sample A23-014 (2.7 GPa and 1300°C); (b, c) higher-magnification SEM images of quenched needles; (d) FESEM mineral maps for APIP experimental sample A23-019 (2.7 GPa and 1400°C); (e) higher-magnification SEM images of melt pools. Colours as in Fig. 2.

Figure 12

Figure 7. Harker diagram for major oxides (TiO2, Al2O3, CaO, K2O, Na2O) and K2O/Na2O vs. silica (wt.%) for TA, IAP and APIP experimental glasses at 2.7 GPa. Kamafugite compositions from the literature are also plotted for comparative purposes (references in Supplementary material).

Figure 13

Figure 8. Harker diagram for major oxides (TiO2, MgO, CaO, K2O, Na2O) and K2O/Na2O vs. silica (wt.%) for TA and IAP experimental glasses at 5 GPa. TA and IAP kamafugite compositions from the literature are also plotted for comparison, references as in Fig. 7.

Supplementary material: File

Innocenzi et al. supplementary material

Innocenzi et al. supplementary material
Download Innocenzi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 133.3 MB