Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T04:00:50.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nearshore mixing and nutrient delivery along the western Antarctic Peninsula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

D. Reide Corbett*
Affiliation:
East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA University of North Carolina Coastal Studies Institute, Wanchese, NC 27981, USA
Jared Crenshaw
Affiliation:
East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
Kimberly Null
Affiliation:
East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA Current address: Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, CA 95039, USA
Richard N. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Coastal and Marine Systems Science, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC 29526, USA
Leigha E. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Coastal and Marine Systems Science, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC 29526, USA
W. Berry Lyons
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences and Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The surface waters of the Southern Ocean play a key role in the global climate and carbon cycles by promoting growth of some of the world’s largest phytoplankton blooms. Several studies have emphasized the importance of glacial and sediment inputs of Fe that fuel the primary production of the Fe-limited Southern Ocean. Although the fertile surface waters along the shelf of the western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) are influenced by large inputs of freshwater, this freshwater may take multiple pathways (e.g. calving, streams, groundwater discharge) with different degrees of water-rock interactions leading to variable Fe flux to coastal waters. During the summers of 2012–13 and 2013–14, seawater samples were collected along the WAP, near Anvers Island, to observe water column dynamics in nearshore and offshore waters. Tracers (223,224Ra, 222Rn, 18O, 2H) were used to evaluate the source and transport of water and nutrients in coastal fjords and across the shelf. Coastal waters are compared across two field seasons, with increased freshwater observed during 2014. Horizontal mixing rates of water masses along the WAP ranged from 110–3600 m2 s-1. These mixing rates suggest a rapid transport mechanism for moving meltwater offshore.

Information

Type
Biological Sciences
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2017
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Sample collection sites and transects (dashed line) during the 2012 (blue squares; T1, 2, 3) and 2014 (red circles; T4, 5, 6) cruises offshore of the western Antarctic Peninsula. Dotted line represents the delineation of nearshore versus offshore samples. Box encompassing sites within Flandres Bay and the T2,T5 line were used to produce the density cross-section (see Fig. 4). Yellow triangle denotes the approximate location of Palmer Station.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Air temperature measured at Palmer Station from 2012 through to the end of 2014. Offshore sampling took place in December 2012 (squares) and March 2014 (circles). Hatched boxes are used to illustrate temperatures two months prior to the cruise. Note temperatures below freezing prior to 2012 cruise and above freezing prior to 2014.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Spatial distribution of salinity and temperature in surface waters during the 2012 and 2014 cruises. Note the lower salinities and higher temperatures nearshore during the 2014 relative to the 2012 cruise.

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Density cross-section starting inside Flandres Bay and moving across the shelf on T2 (2012) and T5 (2014). Refer to box area in Fig. 1 for cross-section sampling sites. Dashed lines are isopycnals, vertical lines and black circles refer to CTD cast sites and sampling depths. Note increased depth and gradient during 2014.

Figure 4

Table I Groundwater and surface runoff (i.e. streams) endmember values from the 2012 and 2014 field seasons. Data presented are mean and standard error.

Figure 5

Table II Comparison of nearshore and offshore parameters during the 2012 and 2014 field seasons. See Fig. 1 for delineation of offshore versus nearshore samples. Data presented are mean and standard error.

Figure 6

Fig. 5 Spatial distribution of radiotracer surface activities from the 2012 and 2014 cruises. Tracer concentrations follow no particular pattern offshore. Nearshore samples typically show a decreasing concentration with greater distance from the shoreline.

Figure 7

Fig. 6 Spatial distribution of water isotope (δO18, δD) surface water concentrations from the 2012 and 2014 cruises. All surface samples are reported, including those that are probably outliers leading to a shelf ‘bullseye’ in 2012. Note more depleted isotopic signatures nearshore during the 2014 cruise.

Figure 8

Fig. 7 Spatial distribution of nutrient (NH4+, NO3-, HPO4-2) surface water concentrations from the 2012 and 2014 cruises. Concentrations nearshore are more depleted in 2014.

Figure 9

Fig. 8 The a. ln222Rn and b. ln224Ra profiles from Flandres Bay in 2012 and 2014, and well as Beascochea Bay in 2014. Lines represent the best-fit trend line used to calculate mixing rates for each tracer during each sampling year.