Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T20:09:43.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The emplacement, alteration, subduction and metamorphism of metagranites from the Tso Morari Complex, Ladakh Himalaya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2022

Anna K. Bidgood*
Affiliation:
Irish Centre for Research in Applied Geosciences, O'Brien Centre for Science (East), University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
David J. Waters
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3AN, UK Museum of Natural History, University of Oxford, OX1 3PW, UK
Brendan J. Dyck
Affiliation:
Department of Earth, Environmental and Geographical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, V1V 1V7, Canada
Nick M.W. Roberts
Affiliation:
Geochronology and Tracers Facility, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, UK, NG12 5GG
*
*Author for correspondence: Anna K. Bidgood, Email: akbidgood@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eclogite-facies mineral assemblages are commonly preserved in mafic protoliths within continental terranes. It is widely accepted that the entirety of these continental terrains must also have been subducted to eclogite-facies conditions. However, evidence that the felsic material transformed at eclogite-facies conditions is lacking. Low-strain metagranites of the ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic Tso Morari Complex in Ladakh, Himalaya, are host to eclogite-facies mafic sills and preserve evidence of subduction to eclogite-facies conditions. Following the eclogite-facies metamorphism, the granites and their gneissic equivalents were overprinted by amphibolite-facies Barrovian metamorphism, obscuring their earlier metamorphic history. We present evidence that the Tso Morari metagranites preserve a complex magmatic, hydrothermal and polymetamorphic history that involved four stages. Stage 1 was magmatic crystallisation, a record of which is preserved in the primary igneous mineralogy and relict igneous microstructures. Monazite grains record a U–Pb age of 474.0 ± 11.6 Ma, concurrent with a published zircon crystallisation age. Stage 2 represents pervasive late-magmatic hydrothermal alteration of the granite during emplacement and is evident in the mineral composition, particularly in the white micas preserved in the igneous domains. Stage 3 involved the (ultra)high-pressure metamorphism of these granite bodies during the Himalayan subduction of continental material. The high-pressure stage of the metamorphic history (>25 kbar at 550–650°C) is preserved as thin coronas of garnet and phengite around igneous biotite, garnet with kyanite inclusions in pseudomorphs after cordierite, and rare palisade quartz textures after coesite. Stage 4 was a result of Barrovian metamorphism of the Tso Morari Complex and is evident in the replacement of garnet by biotite. Many of these features are preserved in localised textural domains in the rock, where local equilibrium was important and the anhydrous conditions limited reaction progress, though aided preservation potential. Collectively, these four stages record a 480 Myr history of metamorphism and reworking of the northernmost Indian plate.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geological map adapted from Epard and Steck (2008), St-Onge et al. (2013) and references therein, showing the location of geochronological samples. The approximate location of Polokongka La granite outcrops and boulder field are outlined with a black dashed line. Red dots show locations of low-strain granite samples collected by Anna Bidgood in 2016 and 2017 field seasons. The yellow square shows the approximate location of a low-strain granite sample within the Polokongka La granite region, collected in 2008 by Mike Searle and featured in St-Onge et al. (2013). Background USGS Landsat data downloaded from https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/. Colouring corresponds to bands 762, greyscale by luminosity.

Figure 1

Table 1. Sample locations, rock type, assemblage and domains present. A description of different domains can be found in the text. Sample name is as referred to in field notebooks.

Figure 2

Table 2. Representative compositions for mineral phases in the Tso Morari granites.*

Figure 3

Table 3. Composition of garnet + mica domain 5 taken from the representative element map from Sample TMG01.

Figure 4

Fig 2. (a) Sample TMG01 (scanned thin section) showing the location of representative domains with igneous textural relationships, as referred to in the text. (b) Quartz-rich domain 1, crossed-polars image of euhedral quartz with strain lamellae. (c) K-feldspar + white mica domain 2, crossed polars. (d) White mica + albite (domain 3), plane-polarised light (PPL). (e) Micaceous domain 4, PPL image of euhedral biotite partially replaced by ilmenite and muscovite following the older sagenitic texture. (f) White mica + garnet domain 5, PPL. (g) Sample TMG10 cut hand specimen showing granitic texture.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. (a–c) Photomicrographs showing variations of quartz microstructures in the quartz-rich domain 1. (a) Sample TMG01: PPL image showing euhedral quartz grains with face contacts. (b) Sample TMG05: crossed-polars image showing chessboard subgrains strongly developed parallel to the quartz c-axis, with recrystallisation along grain boundaries. (c) Sample TMG04: crossed-polars image showing chessboard subgrains within a relict quartz grain with some fine-grained recrystallisation internal to the grain. (d) Sample TMG08: crossed-polars image showing euhedral quartz grains with irregular lobate grain boundaries. (e) Sample TMG04: crossed-polars image showing relict quartz grains with elongate subgrains and recrystallisation along grain boundaries. (f) Sample TMG06: crossed-polars image showing quartz domains with a palisade texture and grain boundary migration along column boundaries.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Photomicrographs of feldspars in K feldspar + white mica (2) and albite + white mica (3) domains. (a) K-feldspar + white mica domain (sample TMG02): crossed-polars image showing perthitic texture in K-feldspar with an approximately rectangular inclusion replaced by white mica. (b) K-feldspar + white mica domain (Sample TMG02): crossed-polars image showing cloudy K-feldspar crystal with coarse white micas surrounded by finer phengitic white mica. (c) K-feldspar + white mica domain (sample TMG11): crossed-polars image showing a relict microcline crystal with a large cross-cutting white mica and patchy domains of fine-grained white mica. (d) K-feldspar + white mica domain (sample TMG08): crossed-polars image showing coarse-grained skeletal white mica with an irregular outline in a domain of fine-grained white mica + albite. (e) Albite + white mica domain (sample TMG04): crossed-polars image showing rectangular domain of white mica + albite surrounded by quartz with recrystallisation by grain boundary migration along grain boundaries. (f) Albite + white mica domain (sample TMG11): crossed-polars image showing albite + white mica with needles of clinozoisite in radial structures.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Compositional data and photomicrographs of white micas. (a–c) White mica compositions for different domains. Circles = coarse-grained white mica, diamonds = fine-grained white mica. Pure muscovite end-member (black circle) Si = 6 pfu, total Al = 6. Phengite end-member Si = 7 pfu, Mg + Fe = 1 pfu, total Al = 4 pfu. Paragonite end-member Si = 6 pfu, total Al = 6 pfu, Na = 2 pfu. (d) Sample TMG08: crossed-polars image showing coarse white mica with fine white mica at the rim in K-feldspar + white mica domain 2. (e) Sample TMG01: PPL image showing coarse-grained white mica of skeletal habit, associated with fine white mica and garnet, in garnet + mica domain 5. (f) Sample TMG08: crossed-polars image showing fine white mica aggregate with remnants of coarse white mica in K-feldspar + white mica domain 2.

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Photomicrographs of biotite in the micaceous domain 4. (a) Sample TMG01: BSE image of zoned garnet rim and intergrown ilmenite and phengite around igneous biotite (top = micaceous domain 4) in contact with albite + white mica (bottom = albite + white mica domain 3). (b) Sample TMG01: PPL image showing red biotite cluster with phengite + ilmenite intergrowth replacing biotite along the grain boundary. (c) Sample TMG01: PPL image showing granular garnet texture around igneous biotite. (d) Sample TMG06: coarse garnet with a thin rim of brown biotite. (e) Sample TMG06: PPL image showing garnet replacing red biotite aggregate. (f) Sample TMG04: PPL image showing white mica with biotite aggregate around the rim, commonly associated with garnets. Zoned garnets replacing rectangular biotite inclusions within K feldspar + white mica domain 2 (bottom).

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Photomicrographs of garnet + mica domain. (a) Sample TMG01: cordierite pseudomorph with large brown biotite, dark garnets and a matrix of fine-grained white mica. (b) Sample TMG01: BSE image of cordierite pseudomorph showing bright garnets and fine-grained white mica matrix. (c) Sample TMG01: EDS Mg map of cordierite pseudomorph with Mg-rich biotite (red), garnet (pale blue) and white mica (dark blue). (d and e) Sample TMG09: coarse biotite and white mica of skeletal habit around the edge, associated with fine white mica and garnet. (f) Sample TMG02: garnets completely replaced by brown biotite.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. (a–c) BSE images of monazite in pseudomorphs after cordierite (garnet + mica domain). (d) BSE image of monazite in igneous biotite (micaceous domain). (e) Wetherill concordia plot showing concordant (blue) and non-concordant (grey) analyses of monazite from sample TMG01; concordia centroid shown as white ellipse. Ellipses and ages are shown and quoted at 2σ.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Pressure-temperature equilibrium assemblage diagram for the composition of the garnet + mica (cordierite) domain, to account for the development of garnet with kyanite inclusions in a matrix of fine-grained phengitic white mica. Pale red band marks the interval of significant garnet growth; red dashed isopleths show the range of pyrope mole fraction (0.18 to 0.26) observed in garnet. Solid blue curve and blue dashed isopleths show first appearance and volume % of kyanite. Green dashed isopleths are Si content in white mica on the basis of 22(O); observed micas have 6.4 to 6.7 Si pfu. Grey paths and box show: (a) overall P–T path after St-Onge et al. (2013) and Palin et al. (2014), based on phase equilibrium modelling of zoned garnet in metabasic eclogite, overprinted eclogite, and amphibolite-facies re-equilibrated gneisses; (b) P–T path from outer zones of zoned garnet adjusted for fractionation of components, St Onge et al. (2013); and (c) peak conditions determined by Bidgood (2020), straddling the quartz–coesite transition.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Schematic representation of the four stages preserved within the Tso Morari metagranites within five microstructural domains.

Figure 13

Table 4. Inferences of mineral paragenesis in the Tso Morari granites.

Figure 14

Fig. 11. (a, b) Skeletal muscovite forming after K-feldspar in the biotite granite described by Wickham (1987) in the Trois Seigneurs Massif. (c) Sample TMG02 from the Tso Morari Complex showing skeletal muscovite after K-feldspar. (d) Sample TMG05 showing coarse-grained irregular muscovite after K-feldspar (after Booth, 1968).

Figure 15

Fig. 12. Photomicrographs of cordierite pseudomorphs. (a) PPL image showing pinitised cordierite pseudomorph from biotite granite from the Trois Seigneurs Massif, with coarse-grained biotite and muscovite cross-cutting the domain. (b) Crossed-polars image showing pinitised cordierite pseudomorph from the Trois Seigneurs Massif, with coarse-grained biotite and white mica around the edge of the pseudomorph. (c) Sample TMG01 from the Tso Morari Complex: crossed-polars image showing a coarse white mica grain penetrating across a cordierite pseudomorph. (d) Sample TMG01 from the Tso Morari Complex: crossed-polars image showing coarse white mica around the edge of a cordierite pseudomorph.

Supplementary material: File

Bidgood et al. supplementary material

Bidgood et al. supplementary material 1

Download Bidgood et al. supplementary material(File)
File 115.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bidgood et al. supplementary material

Bidgood et al. supplementary material 2

Download Bidgood et al. supplementary material(File)
File 122 KB