Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T17:59:07.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental colonization of pigs with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): insights into the colonization and transmission of livestock-associated MRSA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2010

A. MOODLEY*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
F. LATRONICO
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
L. GUARDABASSI
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr A. Moodley, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Stigbøjlen 4, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark. (Email: asm@life.ku.dk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two models were used for colonizing pigs under experimental conditions. In the first model, six 5-week old piglets were challenged by nasal and gastrointestinal inoculation with a mixture of four strains representing the most prevalent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) sequence types (ST398, ST9) and spa types (t08, t011, t034, t899) associated with pig farming. In the second model, the vagina of a pregnant sow was inoculated with the same MRSA mixture shortly before farrowing. While MRSA carriage was unstable following nasal-gastrointestinal inoculation of piglets, vaginal inoculation of the sow resulted in persistent carriage of t011-ST398 and t899-ST9 in all newborn piglets. The results from the two models provide evidence that livestock-associated MRSA can efficiently spread by vertical perinatal transmission and that direct colonization of weaned piglets is hampered by unknown host, bacterial or environmental factors. The vaginal inoculation model described in this study represents a useful tool for studying MRSA–host interactions in pigs having the same genetic background.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious public health concern and an economic burden to national healthcare systems [Reference Seybold1, Reference Rubin2]. Various MRSA lineages have emerged in animals over the last 5 years [Reference Weese and van Duijkeren3]. In pigs, two novel MRSA lineages belonging to multi-locus sequence types ST398 and ST9 were first reported in The Netherlands in 2005 [Reference Voss4] and in Hong Kong [Reference Guardabassi5] and China [Reference Wagenaar6] in 2009. Contact with pigs has been shown to be a risk factor for human carriage of ST398 and ST9 [Reference Lewis7Reference Cui11]. These two MRSA lineages are regarded as emerging zoonotic agents associated with pig farming but display a different geographical distribution. ST398 is the most prevalent porcine MRSA lineage in Europe [12], Canada [Reference Khanna13] and in mid-western USA [Reference Smith14], whereas ST9 is widespread in Asia [Reference Guardabassi5, Reference Wagenaar6, Reference Neela10, Reference Cui11].

Current knowledge of transmission of livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) is based on field epidemiological studies of ST398. This sequence type is thought to be transmitted through the pig production chain from breeders to finishing farms through purchase of MRSA-positive animals [Reference van Duijkeren15]. The farm environment seems to play an important role in the transmission of MRSA ST398. Dust and air samples taken from pig pens have been shown to harbour MRSA, including ST398 [Reference Van den Broek16, Reference Harper17]. MRSA-negative pigs kept in a MRSA-positive environment have been shown to have an increased risk of acquiring MRSA [Reference Broens18]. Recently, rodents have been identified as possible reservoirs for transmission of MRSA ST398 on pig farms [Reference van de Giessen19]. Little information is available on the transmission dynamics of ST9 within the pig population, since its occurrence in pigs was first described in 2009.

The primary objective of this study was to develop a model to investigate colonization and transmission of LA-MRSA under controlled conditions. Two experimental models were used for this purpose: a nasal-gastrointestinal inoculation model and a sow vaginal inoculation model. As a secondary objective, the colonization properties of four strains belonging to ST398 and ST9 were compared in the two models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and inoculum

Four genetically distinct MRSA strains isolated from the nasal cavity of healthy pigs were used to prepare the inoculum. The four strains differed with respect to multi-locus sequence type (ST398, ST9), spa type (t08, t011, t034, t899) and antimicrobial susceptibility profile (Table 1). For each strain, colonies from an overnight blood agar culture were suspended in saline and the density of the suspension was adjusted to the turbidity of a 0·5 MacFarland standard (about 1·5×108 c.f.u./ml) using a nephelometer (Sensititre, Trek Diagnostic Systems, UK). Equal volumes of the individual strain suspensions were then mixed together to obtain the MRSA inoculation mix.

Table 1. Strains used in the in vivo colonization experiment

OX, Oxacillin; TET, tetracycline; CIP, ciprofloxacin; ERY, erythromycin; GEN, gentamicin.

Nasal-gastrointestinal inoculation model

Six MRSA-negative, 5-week-old Danish Landrace piglets with starting weights ranging from 8 to 9 kg were purchased from a specific-pathogen-free (SPF) farm in Denmark. The carriage status of each piglet was tested at the farms and confirmed upon arrival at the animal facility. All animals were housed together in a single pen. After 1 week's adaptation, ~800 μl of the MRSA mix was sprayed into each nostril. Thereafter, an endogastric tube, inserted into the stomach via the mouth, was used to inoculate 10 ml of the same MRSA mix. In order to enhance colonization, a standard 7-day tetracycline therapeutic regimen [Terramycin® Vet, Orion Pharma, Denmark, 25 mg/kg body weight (BW)] was given mixed with feed (Fig. 1). Nasal and rectal swabs were collected on days 2, 9, 16, and 23 post-inoculation (Fig. 1). Swabs were enriched in Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) containing oxacillin (4 μg/ml) and tetracycline (16 μg/ml) for selection of the inoculation strains and azetronam (50 μg/ml) for inhibition of Gram-negative bacteria. Following overnight incubation at 37°C, 10 μl of the enrichment was plated on oxacillin resistance screening agar base (ORSAB, Oxoid, UK) containing tetracycline (16 μg/ml) and a combination of ciprofloxacin (4 μg/ml), erythromycin (8 μg/ml) and/or gentamicin (8 μg/ml) to enable detection of the different strains based on their susceptibility profiles (Table 1). Two denim blue colonies per plate were subcultured on 5% blood agar and strains exhibiting S. aureus colony morphology were confirmed to be MRSA by mecA PCR [Reference Zhang20] and characterized by spa typing [Reference Harmsen21] and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) [Reference Murchan22]. MRSA colonization was defined as four consecutive positive cultures over 4 weeks.

Fig. 1. Nasal inoculation model. Experimental design and sampling times (S1–S4).

Sow vaginal inoculation model

A MRSA-negative 97-day pregnant Yorkshire sow from the same SPF farm supplying animals in the previous experiment was intra-vaginally inoculated with the MRSA mix over three consecutive days (Fig. 2). First, 10 ml of the MRSA cocktail was flushed into the vagina. Thereafter, a tampon was inserted into the vagina and left for up to 6 h to allow the bacteria to be present in the vaginal cavity for a longer period of time. Tetracycline (Terramycin® Vet) mixed with pig feed (25 mg/kg BW) was administered for 18 days until date of farrowing. The partum resulted in seven piglets. Swab samples were taken from the sow's nose, teats, inner vagina and rectum, together with samples taken from the nose, mouth, rectum and a 5 cm×5 cm area of the skin of each of the seven piglets on days 0 (farrowing day), 7, 14, 21 and 28 (end of experiment). A swab was also taken from the inner placenta immediately after farrowing. Samples were cultured and bacterial isolates were characterized as described for the previous experiment. Similar to the nasal-gastrointestinal inoculation model, MRSA colonization was defined as four consecutive positive cultures over 4 weeks.

Fig. 2. Sow vaginal inoculation model. Experimental design and sampling times (S1–S5).

In vitro growth competition studies

Two experiments were performed to determine if the four strains used in the MRSA inoculum had antagonistic effects on each other. In the first experiment, equal quantities (103 c.f.u./ml) of each strain were grown in the enrichment broth used for the two in vivo experiments. At 1-h intervals, 100 μl of culture was serially diluted and plated on the different selective agar plates to measure the concentration (c.f.u./ml) of each strain. The resulting viable counts were used to generate growth curves. A second experiment was conducted to determine if any of the strains produced bacteriocins that could inhibit the growth of the other strains. A 50-μl volume of supernatant derived from a centrifuged overnight culture of each strain was spotted onto an agar plate previously inoculated with another strain. All strain combinations were tested. After overnight incubation at 37°C, plates were examined for the presence of inhibition zones indicating bacteriocin production.

Statistical analyses

The frequency of PIL69 and B40 at different body sites was compared using the z test for paired proportions. To assess if there was any difference between the growth curves, MRSA counts for the four strains were compared using Poisson regression taking into account the repeated structure of the data. This analysis was performed using the genmod procedure in SAS v. 9.2 (SAS Inc., USA).

Safety and ethical issues

Animals were housed in a level-2 isolation unit at the Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen. Procedures used in the animal experiments were performed in compliance with the Animals Scientific Act, and approved by the Danish National Animal Experiment Inspectorate (License no. 2006/561-1141). The health status of the pigs was monitored twice a day. After completion of the experiments, all animals were euthanized by captive bolt pistol insensibilization and bleeding.

RESULTS

Nasal-gastrointestinal inoculation model

All piglets were sampled in the nose and rectum at the farm prior to arrival at the animal facility, and were MRSA-negative. Two days after inoculation (S1), all nasal swabs and 3/6 rectal swabs were positive for MRSA. On day 9 (S2), only one piglet was positive in the nose. All animals were negative after 16 days (S3). On day 22 (S4), four piglets were positive in the nose only, and included the positive piglet from S2. According to the predefined criteria for colonization, none of the piglets were successfully colonized.

Sow vaginal inoculation model

The sow was sampled from the nose and vagina on the farm prior to arrival at the animal facility and was MRSA-negative. After farrowing, MRSA was isolated from the nose, inner vagina, rectum and teats on all sampling days. A sample taken from the placenta immediately after farrowing was also positive for MRSA. Samples taken after farrowing from the nose, vagina, rectum and teats of the sow were MRSA-positive. All newborn piglets were positive in all sampled body sites except on days 14 and 28. On day 14, only 3/7 piglets were positive on the skin and 6/7 in the rectum. On day 28, only 6/7 piglets were positive in the rectum. All newborn piglets were successfully colonized according to the predefined criteria for colonization.

Strain typing

Based on spa typing, only ST398-t011 (PIL69) was detected in the nasal inoculation model. In the sow vaginal inoculation model, both ST398-t011 and ST9-t899 (B40) were detected. These two strains were also detected in swabs taken from the placenta. PIL77 (t034-ST398) and PIL74 (t108-ST398) were not detected in either models. In 80% of MRSA-positive samples, both PIL69 and B40 were isolated. However, PIL69 was more commonly isolated from rectal samples (23/28) than B40 (5/28), P<0·001 (Table 2). PFGE analysis confirmed that the band patterns of t011 and t899 isolates obtained during the experiment were identical to those of the inoculated strains PIL69 and B40, respectively (data not shown).

Table 2. Distribution of PIL69 (ST398, spa type t011) and B40 (ST9, spa type t899) in the different sampled body sites of the seven piglets obtained by the sow vaginal inoculation model

* For each body site the total number of MRSA-positive samples is indicated in parentheses.

Assessment of antagonistic effects between strains

No statistically significant difference (P=0·89) was observed when comparing the growth curves of the four strains (Fig. 3), indicating no competition between strains during growth. No inhibition zones, indicating bacteriocin production, were observed when supernatant from one strain culture was spotted onto plates previously inoculated with another strain.

Fig. 3. Competitive growth of the four strains in Mueller–Hinton broth containing oxacillin (4 μg/ml), tetracycline (16 μg/ml), and azetronam (50 μg/ml). PIL69 (ST398-t011), PIL74 (ST398-t108), PIL77 (ST398-t034), and B40 (ST9-t899).

DISCUSSION

Vertical perinatal transmission of MRSA was demonstrated under controlled experimental conditions. All newborn piglets were naturally colonized with MRSA following artificial colonization of the sow's vagina and their carriage status was stable over the 28 days of the experiment, suggesting that MRSA can efficiently be transmitted from sows to their progeny. As this result was based on a single sow/observation, further epidemiological investigation is warranted to assess the importance of this route of MRSA transmission in pig farming. On the contrary, direct nasal and gastrointestinal inoculation of 5-week-old piglets did not result in persistent carriage. This result indicates that experimental colonization is difficult in pigs at this age, possibly due to the already established microbial flora exerting an antagonistic effect on the ‘invading’ MRSA. Light et al. [Reference Light23] showed that in humans, active colonization with a non-pathogenic S. aureus prevented colonization and subsequent infections with virulent strains. Similar results were demonstrated by Allaker et al. [Reference Allaker, Lloyd and Smith24] for S. hyicus in gnotobiotic piglets. Bacterial interference between S. aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae in children may explain why children are less likely to be persistent carriers of S. aureus in early infancy [Reference Regev-Yochay25, Reference Lebon26]. Failure of the nasal-gastrointestinal inoculation method could also be related to inherent variability in host susceptibility to MRSA colonization, since our experiment was conducted on a small number of genetically related animals. It is also possible that unknown bacterial or environmental factors required to facilitate natural colonization were not provided in the artificial inoculation experiment, illustrating that S. aureus colonization is a complex phenomenon requiring an optimal fit between the host, bacteria and the environment.

In humans, there are two types of carriage status based on rate of nasal elimination and anti-staphylococcal antibody profiles: persistent carriers and others (non-carriers and intermittent carriers) [Reference van Belkum27]. It remains to be fully elucidated why some individuals are resistant to colonization. To date, polymorphisms in at least four human genes that play a role in the immune system have been associated with nasal S. aureus carriage [Reference van den Akker28, Reference Emonts29]. Similar to humans, pig host factors such as breed, sex and other immune factors could influence S. aureus colonization. The effect of pig breed on S. aureus colonization may be difficult to assess due to the widespread use of cross-breeding in intensive pig production. In Denmark, intensively reared pigs are cross-bred between three main breeds (Danish Landrace, Yorkshire, Duroc) to maximize heterosis and increase productivity. Studies are underway to investigate the anti-staphylococcal antibody profiles in sera from MRSA-negative and MRSA-positive pigs.

All pigs were treated with tetracycline to enhance colonization. This was done because the inoculated strains were resistant to this antibiotic. Colonization failed in the nasal-gastrointestinal inoculation model despite treatment with tetracycline. However, the role of tetracycline in MRSA colonization cannot be assessed with the current study design. Weese et al. [Reference Weese30] recently demonstrated under field conditions that colonized piglets could be obtained even from apparently MRSA-negative sows in the absence of antimicrobial use. However, since MRSA colonization in sows was assessed by culture of nasal swabs, it cannot be excluded that they may have been positive in other body sites. The present study shows that MRSA can also be present on other sow body sites including teats, providing a potential route of transmission to piglets during feeding. Shortly after intra-vaginal MRSA inoculation, the sow became positive in various other body sites, highlighting the important role of environmental contamination in the dissemination of MRSA. The environment could also be a potential source for MRSA acquisition by the piglets.

The four strains (PIL69, PIL74, PIL77, B40) used in the colonization models represent the most common spa types among MRSA ST398 (t011, t108, t034) and MRSA ST9 (t899). The results obtained by both models suggest that PIL69 (t011) could be a better colonizer than PIL74 (t108) and PIL77 (t034). This observation is of potential interest since t011 is by far the predominant spa type in both breeding and production holdings in the European Union [31]. However, comparison of larger number of isolates belonging to these three spa types would be needed to assess whether the increased colonization properties of PIL69 are strain-specific or generalized to other strains having this spa type. Limited to the sow vaginal inoculation model, B40 (ST9-t899) appeared be a good nasal and skin colonizer together with PIL69. However, while gastrointestinal carriage of B40 could not be detected 7 days after birth, PIL69 was isolated from rectal swabs throughout the entire duration of the experiment. No antagonistic effects between the strains were observed in the in vitro competition experiments, indicating that failure to detect PIL74 and PIL77 was not a result of suppression by PIL69 or B40. PIL74 and PIL77 appeared to have a slightly slower growth rate than PIL69 and B40, although this could not be determined statistically. Therefore, PIL74 and PIL77 could have been outgrown during enrichment by PIL69 or B40 due to a lower concentration of these strains in the initial sample or slower growth in the enrichment broth.

Animal models are useful to study factors that influence nasal colonization as both bacterial and host colonization factors can be evaluated under controlled conditions. Prior to this study, only two animal models have been described for studying nasal S. aureus colonization. Kiser et al. [Reference Kiser, Cantey-Kiser and Lee32] and Kokai-Kun et al. [Reference Kokai-Kun33] have developed murine S. aureus nasal colonization models. Such models require anaesthetization of the animals prior to inoculation and in one model, long-term nasal carriage was only obtained after antibiotic treatment [Reference Kokai-Kun33]. Furthermore, González-Zorn et al. [Reference González-Zorn34] showed that S. aureus did not grow and multiply in the nasal cavity of mice, illustrating that S. aureus is not a natural colonizer of mice and that this animal is not an ideal model for human S. aureus colonization. The natural occurrence of S. aureus in pigs and the anatomical and physiological similarity between porcine and human skin [Reference Vodicka35] suggest that the pig could be a useful model for studying S. aureus colonization in humans.

By using the vaginal inoculation model described in this study, naturally MRSA-colonized piglets can be easily obtained by implantation of MRSA in the vagina shortly before farrowing. No invasive procedures such as anaesthetization are required. As such the model could represent a valuable tool to investigate MRSA–host interaction during colonization and to test the in vivo efficacy of MRSA decolonization and environmental decontamination strategies.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The study was supported by the EU FP7 PILGRIM project (Project no. 223050).

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1.Seybold, U, et al. Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 genotype as a major cause of health care-associated blood stream infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2006; 42: 647656.Google Scholar
2.Rubin, RJ, et al. The economic impact of Staphylococcus aureus infection in New York City hospitals. Emerging Infectious Diseases 1999; 5: 917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Weese, JS, van Duijkeren, E. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in veterinary medicine. Veterinary Microbiology 2010; 140: 418429.Google Scholar
4.Voss, A, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2005; 11: 19651966.Google Scholar
5.Guardabassi, L, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 9 in pig carcasses in Hong Kong: a novel lineage associated with pig farming? Emerging Infectious Diseases 2009; 15: 19982000.Google Scholar
6.Wagenaar, JA, et al. Unexpected sequence types in livestock associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): MRSA ST9 and a single locus variant of ST9 in pig farming in China. Veterinary Microbiology 2009; 139: 405409.Google Scholar
7.Lewis, HC, et al. Pigs as source of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 infections in humans, Denmark. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2008; 14: 13831389.Google Scholar
8.Cuny, C, et al. Nasal colonization of humans with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) CC398 with and without exposure to pigs. PLoS One 2009; 4: e6800.Google Scholar
9.Denis, O, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in swine farm personnel, Belgium. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2009; 15: 10981101.Google Scholar
10.Neela, V, et al. Prevalence of ST9 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among pigs and pig handlers in Malaysia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2009; 47: 41384140.Google Scholar
11.Cui, S, et al. Isolation and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from swine and workers in China. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2009; 64: 680683.Google Scholar
12.European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in holdings with breeding pigs, in the EU, 2008 [1] – Part A: MRSA prevalence estimates. Parma, Italy, 2009 (http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/scdoc/1376.htm). Accessed 9 July 2010.Google Scholar
13.Khanna, T, et al. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in pigs and pig farmers. Veterinary Microbiology 2008; 128: 298303.Google Scholar
14.Smith, TC, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain ST398 is present in midwestern U.S. swine and swine workers. PLoS One 2009; 4: e4258.Google Scholar
15.van Duijkeren, E, et al. Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains between different kinds of pig farms. Veterinary Microbiology 2008; 126: 383389.Google Scholar
16.Van den Broek, IV, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in people living and working in pig farms. Epidemiology and Infection 2009; 137: 700708.Google Scholar
17.Harper, AL, et al. An overview of livestock-associated MRSA in agriculture. Journal of Agromedicine 2010; 15: 101104.Google Scholar
18.Broens, EM, et al. Transmission of MRSA ST398 during transport of pigs from farm to slaughterhouse and during time spent in lairages at the slaughterhouse. ASM Conference on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococci in Animals: Veterinary and Public Health Implications, 2009. London, United Kingdom: American Society for Microbiology, 2009.Google Scholar
19.van de Giessen, AW, et al. Occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in rats living on pig farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2009; 91: 270273.Google Scholar
20.Zhang, K, et al. New quadriplex PCR assay for detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance and simultaneous discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2004; 42: 49474955.Google Scholar
21.Harmsen, D, et al. Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 54425448.Google Scholar
22.Murchan, S, et al. Harmonization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for epidemiological typing of strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a single approach developed by consensus in 10 European laboratories and its application for tracing the spread of related strains. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 15741585.Google Scholar
23.Light, IJ, et al. V. Use of bacterial interference to control a staphylococcal nursery outbreak. Deliberate colonization of all infants with the 502A strain of Staphylococcus aureus. American Journal of Diseases in Children 1967; 113: 291300.Google Scholar
24.Allaker, RP, Lloyd, DH, Smith, IM. Prevention of exudative epidermitis in gnotobiotic piglets by bacterial interference. Veterinary Record 1988; 123: 597598.Google Scholar
25.Regev-Yochay, G, et al. Association between carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus in Children. Journal of the American Medical Association 2004; 292: 716720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Lebon, A, et al. Dynamics and determinants of Staphylococcus aureus carriage in infancy: the Generation R Study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2008; 46: 35173521.Google Scholar
27.van Belkum, A, et al. Reclassification of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage types. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2009; 199: 18201826.Google Scholar
28.van den Akker, EL, et al. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage is associated with glucocorticoid receptor gene polymorphisms. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2006; 194: 814818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Emonts, M, et al. Host polymorphisms in interleukin 4, complement factor H, and C-reactive protein associated with nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and occurrence of boils. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2008; 197: 12441253.Google Scholar
30.Weese, JS, et al. Longitudinal Investigation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Piglets. Zoonoses and Public Health. Published online: 24 June 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01340.xGoogle Scholar
31.European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in holdings with breeding pigs, in the EU, 2008, Part B: factors associated with MRSA contamination of holdings. Parma, Italy, 2010 (http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/scdoc/1597.htm). Accessed 28 July 2010.Google Scholar
32.Kiser, KB, Cantey-Kiser, JM, Lee, JC. Development and characterization of a Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization model in mice. Infection and Immunity 1999; 67: 50015006.Google Scholar
33.Kokai-Kun, JF, et al. Lysostaphin cream eradicates Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in a cotton rat model. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2003; 47: 15891597.Google Scholar
34.González-Zorn, B, et al. Bacterial and host factors implicated in nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in mice. Infection and Immunity 2005; 73: 18471851.Google Scholar
35.Vodicka, P, et al. The miniature pig as an animal model in biomedical research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2005; 1049: 161171.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Strains used in the in vivo colonization experiment

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Nasal inoculation model. Experimental design and sampling times (S1–S4).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Sow vaginal inoculation model. Experimental design and sampling times (S1–S5).

Figure 3

Table 2. Distribution of PIL69 (ST398, spa type t011) and B40 (ST9, spa type t899) in the different sampled body sites of the seven piglets obtained by the sow vaginal inoculation model

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Competitive growth of the four strains in Mueller–Hinton broth containing oxacillin (4 μg/ml), tetracycline (16 μg/ml), and azetronam (50 μg/ml). PIL69 (ST398-t011), PIL74 (ST398-t108), PIL77 (ST398-t034), and B40 (ST9-t899).