Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T01:50:02.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Roles of MAPK and Nrf2 signaling pathways in quercetin alleviating redox imbalance induced by hydrogen peroxide in mammary epithelial cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2024

Yongxin Li
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Ning Han
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Pengfei Hou
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Feng-Qi Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
Hongyun Liu*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
*
Corresponding author: Hongyun Liu; Email: hyliu@zju.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Oxidative stress is a risk factor for mammary health, resulting in decreased milk yield and milk quality. Application of exogenous bioactive compounds has been a research focus of antioxidation of animals in the mammary gland. Quercetin is a flavonoid extracted from vegetables, fruits and tea and has been shown to have a variety of biological activities, but the effect of quercetin on redox imbalance in mammary epithelial cells is unclear. In this study, cells of HC11, a mouse mammary epithelial cell line, were treated with quercetin, and the effects and molecular mechanisms of quercetin protection on hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress were studied. Results showed that 20 μΜ quercetin attenuated hydrogen peroxide-induced lactate dehydrogenase release and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and alleviated the reduction of cell viability and antioxidant capacity. Quercetin significantly restored the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathways induced by hydrogen peroxide. Importantly, the inhibitors of p38 MAPK and extracellular regulated protein pathways affected the activation of Nrf2 pathway. All inhibitors of MAPK and Nrf2 pathways reduced the protective effects of quercetin on cell proliferation, the activity of catalase and the expression of glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier subunit. Meanwhile, the effects of quercetin on the production of ROS and expression of glutamate/cystine reverse transporter light chain were mainly dependent on Nrf2 pathway. In summary, the protective effect of quercetin in mammary epithelial cells was mediated via MAPK and Nrf2 pathways.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Zhejiang University and Zhejiang University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Effects of different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and quercetin on cell viability and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release in HC11 cells. (A) Cell viability and (B) LDH release in HC11 cells after 24 h treatment with different concentrations of H2O2 (0, 50, 100, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 μΜ). (C) Cell viability and (D) LDH release in HC11 cells after 24 h treatment with different concentrations of quercetin (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 μΜ). (E) Cell viability and (F) LDH release in HC11 cells pretreated with different concentrations of quercetin (0–25 μΜ) for 2 h, followed by treatment of 100 μΜ H2O2 for 24 h. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison was used to determine the differences between the groups. Data represent the mean ± SEM. Data marked with different small letters (a, b, c and d) indicated P < 0.05, while data with the same letter indicated no significant difference.

Figure 1

Figure 2. The ameliorating effects of quercetin on redox balance in HC11 cells. HC11 cells were pretreated with or without 20 μΜ quercetin for 2 h, followed by treatment with or without 100 μΜ H2O2 for 24 h to determine (A and B) the production of ROS, (C) T-AOC, enzyme activity of (D) CAT and (E) SOD. (F) Representative grayscale photographs of immunoblots and quantitative protein expression of (G) xCT, (H) GCLM and (I) TXNRD1. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison was used to determine the differences between four groups. Data represent mean ± SEM. Data marked with different lowercase letters (a, b and c) indicated P < 0.05, while data with the same letter indicated no significant difference.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Effects of quercetin on the H2O2-induced activation of MAPK pathway in HC11 cells. HC11 cells were pretreated with or without 20 μΜ quercetin for 2 h, followed by treatment with or without 100 μΜ H2O2 for 24 h. (A) Representative grayscale photographs of immunoblots. Quantitative protein expression of (B) p-p38/p38, (C) p38, (D) p-p38, (E) p-ERK/ERK, (F) ERK, (G) p-ERK, (H) p-JNK/JNK, (I) JNK and (J) p-JNK. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison was used to determine the differences between four groups. Data represent the mean ± SEM. Data marked with different lowercase letters (a, b and c) indicated P < 0.05, while data with the same letter indicated no significant difference.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Effects of quercetin on the H2O2-induced activation of Nrf2 pathway in HC11 cells. HC11 cells were pretreated with or without 20 μΜ quercetin for 2 h, followed by treatment with or without 100 μΜ H2O2 for 24 h. (A) Representative grayscale photographs of immunoblots. (B) Quantitative presentation of the ratio of p-NRF2/NRF2 protein and protein expression level of (C) NRF2 and (D) p-NRF2. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison was used to determine the differences between four groups. Data represent mean ± SEM. Data marked with different lowercase letters (a and b) indicated P < 0.05, while data with the same letter indicated no significant difference.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Effects of the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (25 µM), ERK inhibitor PD98059 (100 µM) and JNK inhibitor SP600125 (10 µM) on the quercetin’s ameliorating effect on H2O2-induced activation of Nrf2 pathway in HC11 cells. HC11 cells were pretreated with or without an individual inhibitor for 1 h, then the cells were treated with or without 20 μΜ quercetin for 2 h, followed by treatment with or without 100 μΜ H2O2 for 24 h. (A) Representative grayscale photographs of immunoblots. (B) Quantitative presentation of the ratio of p-NRF2/NRF2 protein and the protein expression level of (C) NRF2 and (D) p-NRF2. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison was used to determine the differences between the groups. Data represent mean ± SEM. Data marked with different lowercase letters (a, b and c) indicated P < 0.05, while data with the same letter indicated no significant difference.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Effects of the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (25 µM), ERK inhibitor PD98059 (100 µM), JNK inhibitor SP600125 (10 µM) and Nrf2 inhibitor ML385 (5 µM) on the quercetin’s ameliorating effects on H2O2-induced oxidative stress in HC11 cells. HC11 cells were pretreated with or without an individual inhibitor for 1 h, then the cells were treated with or without 20 μΜ quercetin for 2 h, followed by treatment with or without 100 μΜ H2O2 for 24 h to determine (A) cell proliferation, (B) LDH release, (C and D) the production of ROS, (E) T-AOC and (F) CAT enzyme activity. (G) Representative grayscale photographs of immunoblots. Quantitative protein expression of (H) xCT and (I) GCLM. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison was used to determine the differences between the groups. Data represent mean ± SEM. Data marked with different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d and e) indicated P < 0.05, while data with the same letter indicated no significant difference.

Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material 1

Li et al. supplementary material
Download Li et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 334.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material 2

Li et al. supplementary material
Download Li et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 630.4 KB