Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-6mz5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T06:17:33.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative study of efficacy and toxicities of cisplatin vs vinorelbine as radiosensitisers in locally advanced head and neck cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2007

S K Sarkar*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Medical College Hospital, Kolkata, India
N B Patra
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Medical College Hospital, Kolkata, India
J Goswami
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Medical College Hospital, Kolkata, India
S Basu
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Medical College Hospital, Kolkata, India
*
Address for correspondence: Dr (Prof) Shyamal Kumar Sarkar, 80/1E Kankulia Road, Kolkata 700029, India. E-mail: prof_s_sarkar@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction:

Currently, concomitant chemoradiation using cisplatin is one of the standards of care for the management of head and neck cancer, but at the cost of increased acute toxicity. Our aim was to assess whether vinorelbine was less toxic and of at least comparable efficacy, if not better, compared with cisplatin.

Materials and methods:

A total of 72 patients with squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region were recruited, 40 in arm A and 32 in arm B. Patients in arm A received 40 mg/m2 cisplatin weekly. Patients in arm B received 6 mg/m2 vinorelbine weekly. Both arms also received 66 Gy of radiation in conventional fractionation.

Results and analysis:

There was no statistically significant difference in response rate or toxicities between the two arms, except for nausea and/or vomiting, which was significantly less frequent in the vinorelbine arm.

Conclusion:

Vinorelbine was as effective as cisplatin in controlling locoregional disease in locally advanced head and neck cancer, but was only marginally less toxic than cisplatin.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable