Dear Editor: Dignity Therapy (DT) is a brief, individualized intervention, which provides terminally ill patients with an opportunity to convey memories and essential disclosures that culminate in a legacy document. DT often broaches psychosocial and existential issues, hence bolstering a sense of meaning and purpose (Chochinov et al., Reference Chochinov, Hack and Hassard2005). During DT, trained therapists guide a psychotherapeutic session based on a framework of questions developed from key tenets of the Dignity Model (Chochinov et al., Reference Chochinov, Hack and McClement2002). DT is presently well established in adult populations, but its application to younger people has received little attention (Rodriguez et al., Reference Rodriguez, Smith and McDermid2018; Julião et al., Reference Julião, Antunes and Santos2020). To address this gap, Julião and colleagues adapted the Portuguese DT question framework to make it applicable to adolescents (ages 10–18) (Julião et al., Reference Julião, Antunes and Santos2020).

To operationalize the revision of DT for adolescents (DT-QF-Adol) two investigators (A.S. and S.A.), both children psychologists working with children and adolescents experiencing grief and loss, developed various facilitating techniques consisting of various metaphors, tasks, and support phrases. Their aim was to better enable clinicians to carry out DT-QF-Adol and make it more suitable and engaging for adolescent patients facing life-threatening or life-limiting conditions. These facilitative techniques, summarized in Table 1, were submitted to an expert committee panel familiar with DT, comprised of three adult and pediatric palliative care physicians (M.J., M.A.S., D.S.S.), two pediatric palliative care physician (C.C., M.J.P.), one pediatric palliative care nurse (E.F.), one adult psychologist (B.A.), and one child psychiatrist (M.C.). Panel members were asked to provide feedback regarding the following: (a) overall approval of the initial DT-QF-Adol revisions; (b) belief that the metaphors, tasks, and support phrases would clarify and facilitate the revised question framework; (c) believe that the techniques summarized in Table 1 captured fundamental dimensions of personhood and dignity for adolescents and their lived experience; (d) clarity, comprehensibility, and ambiguity; and (e) other comments, amendments or revisions to better operationalize DT-QF-Adol.

Table 1.

The Portuguese Dignity Question Framework for Adolescents — additional supporting table

English translations are merely indicative for readers to understand.

After receiving all the expert input, a final consensus version of the table was created with more than 90% agreement. A linguistic expert was consulted, and no changes were deemed necessary. The final consensus table was then sent to the originator of DT (H.M.C.), who agreed that this additional tool could be useful in supporting DT interviews and that its content captured the fundamental elements of the Dignity Model itself.

We believe that these additional techniques will help, both for clinicians and researchers engaged in palliative care. Next steps will be to recruit adolescent patients approaching death, in order to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of DT-QF-Adol, informed by these facilitative techniques uniquely designed for this unique and often understudied patient population.