Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7fx5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T08:10:41.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Imaging pulsar census of the galactic plane using MWA VCS data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2024

S. Sett*
Affiliation:
International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, PO Box 76 Epping NSW 1710 Australia
M. Sokolowski
Affiliation:
International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
E. Lenc
Affiliation:
CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, PO Box 76 Epping NSW 1710 Australia
N.D.R. Bhat
Affiliation:
International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
*
Corresponding author: S. Sett; Email: 284033G@curtin.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Traditional pulsar surveys have primarily employed time-domain periodicity searches. However, these methods are susceptible to effects like scattering, eclipses, and orbital motion. At lower radio frequencies ($\lesssim$300 MHz), factors such as dispersion measure and pulse broadening become more prominent, reducing the detection sensitivity. On the other hand, image domain searches for pulsars are not limited by these effects and can extend the parameter space to regions inaccessible to traditional search techniques. Therefore, we have developed a pipeline to form 1-second full Stokes images from offline correlated high time-resolution data from the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA). This led to the development of image-based methodologies to identify new pulsar candidates. In this paper, we applied these methodologies to perform a low-frequency image-based pulsar census of the galactic plane (12 MWA observations, covering $\sim$6 000 $\textrm{deg}^\textrm{2}$ sky). This work focuses on the detection of the known pulsar population which were present in the observed region of the sky using both image-based and beamformed methods. This resulted in the detection of 83 known pulsars, with 16 pulsars found only in Stokes I images but not in periodicity searches applied in beamformed data. Notably, for 14 pulsars these are the first reported low-frequency detections. This underscores the importance of image-based searches for pulsars that may be undetectable in time-series data, due to scattering and/or dispersive smearing at low frequencies. This highlights the importance of low-frequency flux density measurements in refining pulsar spectral models and investigating the spectral turnover of pulsars at low frequencies.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Astronomical Society of Australia
Figure 0

Figure 1. The MWA VCS observations processed as part of this work are shown in blue and the details of the observations can be found in Table 1. The grey points indicate the known pulsars recorded in the ATNF catalogue (Manchester et al., 2005). The red bold line is the part of the sky available to the MWA and the dotted green, yellow and purple line shows the sky that is visible to LOFAR, GBT and GMRT respectively.

Figure 1

Table 1. The details of the 12 observations processed as part of this work, duration, mean RMS achieved for the Stokes I image. The survey covered the dense region of the Galactic plane with declination south of $<$$30^{\circ}$ and right ascension range $>$7 h and $<$21 h. It also shows the number of pulsar imaging detections (column $\textrm{N}_\textrm{psr}$), the total number of pulsars in the 3dB (half power point) beam (column $\textrm{N}_{\textrm{3db}}$) and the total number of sources (column $\textrm{N}_\textrm{src}$) extracted using AEGEAN for each Stokes I image before the application of any criteria.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Stokes I image cutout of the on Galactic Plane observation. The pulsars detected in this part of the sky are circled in white. The mean RMS for the image is 5 mJy/beam. The Galactic supernova remnants can be seen in the middle of the image. Every single dot in the image corresponds to a source, the information of which is extracted using source extraction software, AEGEAN. The RMS of the image increases as we go closer to the Galactic Plane or at the image edges due to high confusion noise and lower sensitivity respectively.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Stokes I image cutout of the off Galactic Plane observation. The mean RMS for the image is 6 mJy/beam. As the Galactic Plane is not in the image, the RMS of noise is much lower due to significantly lower confusion noise. The number of sources in the off-GP image is lower, which makes the source finding and processing easier and faster. The pulsar in the field is circled in white. As this is an off-GP field the number density of pulsars is lower in comparison to an on-GP field.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Distribution of known pulsars with colour dots showing pulsars detected in this work. Grey-filled circles are the all-sky distribution of known pulsars in the ATNF pulsar catalogue (Manchester et al., 2005). The purple-filled circles denote the pulsars that are detected by both periodicity searches and imaging. The yellow-filled circles are the pulsars that are detected only in imaging and the orange-filled circles are the pulsars detected only in periodicity searches.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Known pulsars detected in this survey are shown in the DM-flux density plane. The purple-filled circles denote the pulsars that are detected by both periodicity searches and imaging. The yellow-filled circles are the pulsars that are detected only in imaging and the orange-filled circles are the pulsars detected only in periodicity searches. The blue and green dashed line indicate the mean flux density threshold for a 5${\unicode{x03C3}}$ detection of pulsars in Stokes image of mean RMS of 5 and 8 mJy/beam respectively. The two thresholds are taken based on the range of mean RMS of the Stokes I image from the observations. The red dashed line indicates the DM threshold beyond which periodicity searches become less sensitive due to the scattering and DM smearing of the pulses at low frequencies. The blue-shaded region is the parameter space that is exclusively available to image-based searches.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Minimum detectable flux density as a function of DM for the MWA SMART survey (Bhat et al., 2023a). The same can be applied to this work due to similar observational and processing parameters. This shows the sensitivity limits for 10-min integration time for different pulse periods, for two different $T_{sys}$ (one for regions away from the Galactic Plane and the other for the mean in the plane excluding regions of Galactic Centre. The effect of pulse broadening is shown in the dotted lines (Bhat et al., 2004). The minimum pulsar flux density required for detection rapidly increases for pulsars beyond a DM of 250 pc cm$^{-3}$ due to the significant effect of pulse broadening, making it harder to detect such pulsars in periodicity searches.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Percentages of the detections with the two search methods. 60% of pulsars were detected by both methods, while imaging is seen to perform as well as beamforming for the Galactic Plane observations.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Detection of PSR J1141-6545 in both imaging (13${\unicode{x03C3}}$) and beamformed (12${\unicode{x03C3}}$) searches. It shows the detection of the pulsar as a continuum source in MWA and RACS images (left panel) along with the PRESTO detection plot (right panel) based on the MWA data. The significance of the detection is comparable for both methods.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Image-based detection of PSR J1823-1115. It can be seen as a 125 mJy continuum source in the MWA image (25${\unicode{x03C3}}$). The corresponding source in the RACS Stokes I image is also shown in the bottom panel.

Figure 10

Figure 10. EPN pulse profile of PSR J1823-1115 at 410 and 925 MHz. It can be seen that the profile is more scattered at lower frequencies which makes it more difficult to detect at lower frequencies.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Beamformed detection of PSR J1320-5359 (right panel). The pulsar was below the detection threshold for the MWA Stokes I image and hence is not detected in the image domain (left panel).

Figure 12

Figure 12. The comparison of pulsar flux density measurements in this work with the literature. All the pulsars detected via image-based method (66) are included in this plot. A 1:1 line is shown in red and most of the data points are within error limits from the line. The disagreements may be due to scintillation of the pulsars at low frequencies or differences in the mean flux density measurement method.

Figure 13

Table 2. Table showing the efficiency of the criteria before they were combined. It shows the candidates that each criterion selects and the corresponding pulsars that are selected. The last column shows the efficiency percentage for each of the criteria. Spectral index criteria perform better than the other two criteria.

Figure 14

Table 3. Table showing the efficiency of the combined criteria. It shows the candidates selected by each combined criterion along with the corresponding pulsars detected. The final column indicates the efficiency percentage for each criterion.

Figure 15

Table 4. List of acronyms for the spectral fits used in spectral modelling analysis in this work.

Figure 16

Table 5. The list of pulsars whose spectral fits changed after the addition of the flux density measurements from this work. The table shows the model that fits the different data sets and the corresponding AICs. AIC is mainly aimed at finding the ‘minimal model’ (corresponding to the lowest AIC value) which describes the data without over-fitting sufficiently well. The table shows the model and the corresponding AIC (${\textrm{AIC}}_\textrm{oo}$) for the fits to the flux density data points from the literature. New model is the model that best fits the data after the addition of the flux density data points from this work. ${\textrm{AIC}}_\textrm{nn}$ is AIC value for this model fit. ${\textrm{AIC}}_\textrm{on}$ is the AIC obtained when the old model is fit to the new data. SPL stands for a simple power law, BPL is a broken power law, LFTO is a power law with low-frequency turn-over, HFCO is a power law with a high-frequency cut-off and DTOS is a double turn-over spectrum.

Figure 17

Figure 13. Spectral fits for the pulsars that changed fits from LFTO to BPL after the addition of our measurements. The flux density from this work is circled in black.

Figure 18

Figure 14. Spectral fits for the pulsars that changed fits from SPL to HFCO after the addition of our measurements. The flux density from this work is circled in black.

Figure 19

Figure 15. Spectral fits for the pulsars that changed fits from LFTO to DTOS after the addition of our measurements. The flux density from this work is circled in black.

Figure 20

Figure 16. Spectral fits for the pulsar that changed fits from SPL to LFTO after the addition of our measurements. The flux density from this work is circled in black.

Figure 21

Figure 17. Spectral fits for the pulsars that changed to other less or more complicated fits after the addition of our measurements. The flux density from this work is circled in black.

Figure 22

Figure 18. Simple power law fit for MSP J1902-5105. The red box shows the low-frequency flux density measurement from this work. The flux density from this work is circled in black.

Figure 23

Figure 19. Broken power law fit for PSR J1827-0958 after the addition of the low-frequency flux density measurements from this work. The spectral fit is less reliable due to a lack of measurements between the low and high-frequency measurements. The flux density from this work is circled in black.

Figure 24

Figure 20. SNR G320.4-1.2 is shown in the middle of the image. The bright pulsar, PSR J1513-5908 is shown as a red dot amongst the diffuse emission of the supernova remnant. It is extremely difficult to detect this pulsar in the image domain due to the source being confused by the bright, extended emission of its surroundings. However, this can be detected in targeted beamformed searches.