Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-7lfxl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T06:19:41.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Meaning of Irish Freedom Constitutionalism in the Free State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Charles Townshend
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The performance of Ireland as an autonomous state since 1922 remains a contentious subject. Joseph Lee's withering critique of Irish economic backwardness and cultural parochialism, which he holds to be rooted in a narrow adhesion to the ‘possessor principle’ against the ‘performance ethic’, charts a long-term failure to rise to the challenge of statehood. It is not appropriate here to attempt even a summary of his sprawling, bristling account; I want to focus on an aspect highlit by Denis Donoghue when he reviewed it in die London Review of Books. ‘The first and most important fact about modern Ireland,’ Donoghue contended, ‘is that, after die Civil War, there was unquestioned transition to democracy.’ On this view, modern Irish history is, pace Lee, in essence a success story. As Brian Farrell put it, die capacity of die Irish parliamentary tradition to ‘encompass, neutralise and institutionalise’ the disastrous split of 1922 ‘makes die Irish experience unique among the new nation-states of the twentiedi-century world’. Tom Garvin has recendy reinforced this verdict by pointing to the surprising speed with which any tendency to military intervention in Irish politics disappeared. This after a Civil War in which die new Army—lacking any experience of subordination to the civil power— had saved die life of the infant Irish Free State. Indeed, far from witnessing the politicisation of the military, Ireland ‘rapidly became one of the most demilitarised societies in Europe’.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 8 , December 1998 , pp. 45 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Lee, J. J., Ireland 1912–1985. Politics and Society (Cambridge, 1989)Google Scholar, passim.

2 London Review of Books, 5 April 1990, 9.

3 Farrell, B., ‘The Paradox of Irish Polities’, in The Parliamentary Tradition in Ireland (Dublin, 1972), p. 14Google Scholar. Cf, with the modified ‘virtually unique’, Farrell, B. (ed.) The Creation of the Dáil (Dublin, 1994), p. 5Google Scholar.

4 Garvin, T., 1922. The Birth of Irish Democracy (Dublin, 1996), ch.4Google Scholar; see also O'Halpin, E., ‘The Army and the Dáil’, in Farrell, B. (ed.), The Creation of the Dáil, p. 108Google Scholar.

5 Kissane, Bill, ‘The Not-so-amazing Case of Irish Democracy‘, Irish Political Studies, 10 (1995): 43–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. Munger, F., The Legitimacy of Opposition: the Change of Government in Ireland in 1932 (Beverly Hills, 1975)Google Scholar; Garvin, T., ‘Unenthusiastic Democrats: the Emergence of Irish Democracy’, in Hill, R. and Marsh, R. (eds.), Modem Irish Democracy (Dublin, 1993), 8–23Google Scholar.

6 Ward, Alan J., The Irish Constitutional Tradition. Responsible Government and Modem Ireland 1782–1992 (Dublin, 1994)Google Scholar.

7 Sartori, G., ‘Constitutionalism: a Preliminary Discussion’, American Political Science Review 56 (1962), 853CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Giovanni Sartori charmingly described the British avoidance of constitutional normality as ‘coquetry’.

9 Hallam, Henry, Constitutional History of England, vol. III, p. 11Google Scholar; Dicey, A. V., The Law of the Constitution (1905), pp. 231–2Google Scholar.

10 Pugh, M., The Making of Modern British Politics 1867–1939 (Oxford, 1982), 3Google Scholar. See more generally LeMay, G. H. L., The Victorian Constitution. Conventions, Usages and Contingencies (London, 1979)Google Scholar.

11 Hammond, J. L., Gladstone and the Irish Nation (London, 1938), 251Google Scholar.

12 The destructive impact of alien institutions on the ‘hereditary mind’ of Ireland was forcefully argued in Figgis, Darrell, The Gaelic State in the Past and Future (Dublin, 1917), passim and pp. 83–4Google Scholar.

13 Fitzpatrick, D., Politics and Irish life. Provincial Experience of War and Revolution 1913–21 (Dublin, 1977)Google Scholar, chs. 3–4.

14 The Irish Constitution explained by Figgis, Darrell (Dublin, 1922), 34Google Scholar.

15 Whyte, J. H., Church and State in Modern Ireland 1923–1979 (Dublin, 1980)Google Scholar, ch. II; Keogh, D., ‘The Constitutional Revolution: an Analysis of the Making of the Constitution’, in Litton, F. (ed.), The Constitution of Ireland 1937–1987 (Dublin, 1988), 4–84Google Scholar.

16 Kohn, L., The Constitution of the Irish Free State (London, 1932)Google Scholar; Gwynn, D., The Irish Free State 1922–1927 (London, 1928)Google Scholar; Macardle, D., The Irish Republic (London, 1937)Google Scholar; Hopkinson, M., Green aganst Green. The Irish Civil War (Dublin, 1988)Google Scholar.

17 Curran, J. M., The Birth of the Irish Free State (Alabama University, 1980)Google Scholar.

18 Murphy, J. A., Ireland in the Twentieth Century (Dublin, 1975), 52–3Google Scholar; Foster, R. F., Modem Ireland 1600–1972 (London, 1988), 516Google Scholar.

19 Ayearst, M., The Republic of Ireland. Its Government and Politics (London, 1971)Google Scholar; Chubb, B., The Government and Politics of Ireland (London, 1970)Google Scholar; O'Leary, C., Irish Elections 1918–1977. Parties, Voters and Proportional Representation (Dublin, 1979)Google Scholar. Cf Mansergh, N., The Irish Free State. Its Government and Politics (London, 1934)Google Scholar.

20 Sacks, P. M., The Donegal Mafia. An Irish Political Machine (New Haven, 1976), 45Google Scholar.

21 Cf. Garvin, T., The Evolution of Irish Nationalist Politics (Dublin, 1981)Google Scholar; Bew, P., Hazelkorn, E. and Patterson, H., The Dynamics of Irish Politics (London, 1989)Google Scholar.

22 Brown, T., Ireland. A Social and Cultural History 1922–79 (London, 1981), 15Google Scholar.

23 Farrell, B., ‘The New State and Irish Political Culture’, Administration 16, 3 (1968), 238Google Scholar.

24 Keogh, D., ‘The Irish Constitutional Revolution: an Analysis of the Making of the Constitution’, Litton, F. (ed) The Constitution of Ireland 1937–1987 (Administration 35, 4, 1987), 66Google Scholar.

25 As Munger, Frank noted, ‘From our present acquaintance with political processes in new nations, we know how strange these events are. What seemed to the Irish natural, normal, even inevitable, has occurred in few other places.’ The Legitimacy of Opposition, 6Google Scholar.

26 Farrell, , ‘The New State and Irish Political Culture’, 238–46Google Scholar.

27 Munger, , Legitimacy of Opposition, 23–5Google Scholar; Garvin, 1922, ch. 2.

28 Farrell, , ‘The New State’, 241–2Google Scholarconcentrated on the process of land transfer; Kissane, , ‘Irish Democracy’, 53–65Google Scholar, argues that the elimination of landlords and peasants was a concurrent process.

29 Prager, J., Building Democracy in Ireland. Political order and cultural integration in a newly independent nation (Cambridge, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Ibid., 23.

31 Akenson, D.W. and. Fallin, F., ‘The Irish Civil War and the Drafting of the Free State Constitution’, Eire-Ireland 5 (1970) nos.1, 2, 4: 10–26Google Scholar, 42–93, 28–70. Farrell, B., ‘The Drafting of the Irish Free State Constitution’, Irish Jurist (1970), 115–40Google Scholar, 343–56, (1971), 345–59.

32 Prager, , Building Democracy in Ireland, 30, 31Google Scholar.

33 Ibid., 68.

34 Ibid., 88. The Provisional Government certainly seems to have hoped that republicans (in particular Eamon de Valera) would be mollified by the inclusion of a ‘separatist’, as distinct from ‘democratic’, strain in the Constitution. Notes by Kevin O'Higgins, June 1922. Irish National Archive [NA], Taoiseach S 6695.

35 Tom Garvin has recently noted the permeability of these categories, and offered ‘by way of supplementing rather than replacing’ them, two further labels - ‘republican moralism’ and ‘nationalist pragmatism’ – for ‘the two subcultures or collective political styles’. Birth of Irish Democracy, 145.

36 Figgis, Irish Consitution, ch. VII; Mansergh, , Irish Free State, 320–7Google Scholar.

37 Prager, , Building Democracy in Ireland, 38, 76–7Google Scholar.

38 Ibid., 84. Note that Darrell Figgis explained these elements quite differently, as checks on party, not parliamentary, power.

39 Kohn, , The Constitution of the Irish Free State, 272–6Google Scholar.

40 Prager, , Building Democracy in Ireland, 82Google Scholar.

41 E.g. O'Malley, Ernie, elected on the fourteenth count for the eighth North Dublin seat in August 1923, ‘hated to be a T.D.’ The Singing Flame (Dublin, 1978), 238Google Scholar.

42 Walker, Brian, ‘The 1885 and 1886 General Elections: a Milestone in Irish History’, Dancing to History's Tune (Belfast, 1996), 15–33Google Scholar.

43 Lyons, F. S.L., ‘Charles Stewart Parnell’, in Farrell, , ed., Irish Parliamentary Tradition, 181–94Google Scholar.

44 Bull, P. J., ‘The Reconstruction of the Irish Parliamentary Movement, 1895–1903’, Ph.D thesis, Cambridge University 1972Google Scholar.

45 Raven, J. and Whelan, C., Political Culture in Ireland. The Views of Two Generations (Institute of Public Administration, Dublin, 1976)Google Scholar. Schmitt, D. E., ‘Catholicism and Democratic Political Development in Ireland’, Eire-Ireland 8 (1973)Google Scholar.

46 Lee, , Ireland, 1912–1985, 63–6Google Scholar.

47 MacDonagh, O., ‘The Politics of Gaelic’, in States of Mind. A Study of Anglo-Irish Conflict 1780–1980 (London, 1983)Google Scholar.

48 The special Protestant Loyalist sense of ‘the constitution’ is best analysed in Miller, D. W, Queen's Rebels. Ulster leyalism in Historical Perspective (Dublin, 1977)Google Scholar.

49 Boyce, D. G., Nationalism in Ireland (London, 1982), 310Google Scholar.

50 ‘Notes by General Michael Collins, August 1922’, The Path to Freedom (Dublin, 1922Google Scholar:repr. Cork, 1995), 15.

51 Ibid., 25.

52 Collins, M., ‘Distinctive Culture. Ancient Irish Civilization’, The Path to Freedom, 96–8Google Scholar.

53 Collins, M., ‘Advance and Use Our Liberties’, The Path to Freedom, 37Google Scholar.

54 Garvin perceptively notes the function of strict legalism as a substitute ideal for those who had been driven to abandon the republic, but he sees Collins' commitment to democracy as more than pragmatic politics.1922, 128–9.

55 Memorandum by W.S. Churchill, 23 May 1922. PRO CAB 21 256.

56 To Collins' quip that the Viceregal Lodge would make an admirable cancer hospital, Austen Chamberlain primly observed that ‘jokes were so dangerous. The question was of the greatest importance to His Majesty's Government who could not consent to the humiliation of the representative of the Crown.’ Cabinet Conference with Irish Ministers, 26 February 1922.PRO CAB 21 250.

57 This draft was not found by Akenson and Fallin. Farrell found a copy in in papers of James Douglas, in Douglas' hand but headed ‘M. Collins draft’, together with some notes, in which Collins insisted that ‘the Constitution should be as simple as possible’. Farrell, ‘Drafting of the Irish Free State Constitution: I’, 122–5. It seems clear from the fact that Collins wrote the further set of notes in S 6541, which Farrell did not find, that his input at this early stage was more substantial than writers such as Akenson and Fallin have suggested.

58 Notes by Miceál O. Coileán, March 1922. NA, Taoiseach S 6541.

59 Lyons, F. S. L. also noted of Arthur Griffith that ‘his definition of independence was clouded by ambiguities which were to haunt him until his dying day’. ‘The Meaning of Independence’, Irish Parliamentary Tradition, 228Google Scholar.

60 Berlin, I., ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ (Inaugural Lecture, Oxford University 1958)Google Scholar; Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford, 1964)Google Scholar.

61 Neumann, F. L., ‘The Concept of Political Freedom’, Columbia Law Review 53 (1953), 903CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Ibid., 907.

63 Ibid., 911.

64 As did J. G. Swift MacNeill, whose extensive gloss on the constitution argued that it incorporated the spirit of the British constitution, but ‘improved’ by inscribing many conventions as law. Studies in the Constitution of the Irish Free State (Dublin, 1925), vii–xxiiiGoogle Scholar.

65 Neumann, , ‘The Concept of Political Freedom’, 901Google Scholar, 927, 915.

66 Nationality, 30 November 1918.

67 Prager, , Building Democracy in Ireland, 79Google Scholar.

68 Towey, Thomas, ‘Hugh Kennedy and the Constitutional Development of the Irish Free State, 1922–1923’, Irish Jurist 12 (1977), 355Google Scholar.

69 Akenson, and Fallin, , The Irish Civil War, 47Google Scholar.

70 Ward, , Irish Constitutional Tradition, 168Google Scholar.

71 Kennedy, Hugh, ‘Character and Sources of the Constitution of the Irish Free State’, American Bar Association Journal vol. 14 (1928), 443Google Scholar.

72 Towey, , op cit., 358Google Scholar.

73 Farrell, B., The Founding of Dáil Éireann. Parliament and Nation-Building (Dublin, 1971)Google Scholar. The absence of this book from Prager's sources is as puzzling as the absence of Parnell from his text.

74 Laifan, M., ‘The Unification of Sinn Féin in 1917’, Irish Historical Studies xvii (1971), 353–79Google Scholar.

75 Hepburn, A. C., ‘The Ancient Order of Hibernians in Irish Politics 1905–14’, Cithara x (1971)Google Scholar. O'Brien, J. V., William O'Brien and the Course of Irish Politics 1881–1918 (Berkeley, 1976)Google Scholar.

76 Farrell, , The Founding of Dáil Éireann, 51ffGoogle Scholar.

77 Ibid., 67.

78 Ibid., 68. See also Farrell, B., ‘The First Dáil and its Constitutional Documents’, in The Creation of the Dáil, 61–74Google Scholar.

79 E.g. McMahon, D., Republicans and Imperialists. Anglo-Irish Relations in the 1930s (London, 1984)Google Scholar. Sexton, B., Ireland and the Crown 1922–1936. The Governor-Generalship of the Irish Free State (Dublin, 1989)Google Scholar.

80 More specifically, O'Higgins added, ‘No police force was functioning through the country, no system of justice was operating, the wheels of administration hung idle, battered out of recognition by the clash of rival jurisdictions.’

81 Collins, M., The Path to Freedom, 20Google Scholar.

82 Magee, C., ‘Uses and Abuses of Law. Political Violence, Law and State in Ireland since 1922’ (Ph.D. thesis, Trinity College, Dublin 1987)Google Scholar.

83 Kohn, , The Constitution of the Irish Free State, 147Google Scholar, 157. The significance of the case Ex parte D. F. Marais (1902) in the evolution of emergency powers is outlined in Townshend, C., ‘Martial Law: Legal and Administrative Problems of Civil Emergency in Britain and the Empire, 1800–1940’, Historical Journal 25 (1982), 182CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Campbell, C., Emergency Law in Ireland, 1918–25 (Oxford, 1994)Google Scholar.

85 Magee, , ‘Uses and Abuses of Law’, 88Google Scholar.

86 Ibid., 89–90.

87 Memorandum by Minister for Justice, 20 January 1923. Executive Council Conference on Maintenance of Order, 26 September 1923. NA, Taoiseach S.3306.

88 Finn, J. E., Constitutions in Crisis. Political Violence and the Rule of Law (OUP, New York 1991), 30Google Scholar.

89 Aireacht um Gnothai Duithche: memo for Attorney-General by O'Friel, Henry, loc at. (05–06 1923)Google Scholar.

90 Ibid.

91 Kohn, , The Constitution of the Irish Free State, 131Google Scholar.

92 Press conference (Press Association), London, following Proclamation of National Emergency, 20 November 1926. Irish Times, 23 November 1923.

93 Proclamation, May 1922. NA Taoiseach S 1168.

94 And incidentally indicating what the British government might have achieved if it had disarmed the old RIC, as most RIC men seem to have wished. Garvin, , 1922, 114Google Scholar.

95 Garvin, , 1922, 105Google Scholar. But he seems unclear whether the ‘taboo’ was already in existence, or (as he says on p. 108) was actually established during the conflict.

96 Ibid., 110–11.

97 Prager holds that the government's response was disproportional (Building Democracy, 166); yet in another context he bears out (p. 189) the government's view that IRA intimidation of juries was a deadly menace to ‘the integrity of the public’.

98 Speech notes, President of the Executive Council. NA D/Justice 4/202/1.

99 UCDAD, Hayes MSS P53/344, q.; Garvin, , 1922, 60Google Scholar.